The Nationals Are in Trouble
The Washington Nationals have a problem. The Braves and Phillies have arrived ahead of schedule, as we know. The Nationals enter play Thursday in third place behind those two clubs, seven games behind the Braves and five-and-a-half games behind the Phillies.
While the Nationals have trailed in the NL East for much of the season, their FanGraphs playoff odds have dipped below 60% (59.4% as of Thursday afternoon) for the first time this season.
While the Super Teams are taking care of business in the American League, the NL field remains more open. And at the moment, the Nationals are the only preseason division favorite, the only so-called preseason Super Team, with playoff odds below 89.9% and division odds less than 50% (43.5%). With their loss to Red Sox on Wednesday, the Nationals fell below .500 (42-43).
While teams often go through struggles and sluggish periods in the marathon that is a 162-game season, we’re now more than halfway into this season and the Nationals have never gotten on track. It appeared that Washington might be getting right about a month ago as they moved back into first place and held a half-game lead in the division on June 10. But they fell out of first place on June 12 and haven’t been back, losing 16 of their last 21 games.
As you can observe in the following playoff-odds chart, no team’s playoff stock has dropped like the Nats’:

A large part of this is tied to injury with stars like Stephen Strasburg and Daniel Murphy having been on the disabled list. According to Roster Resources’ “roster effect” rating, the Nationals have lost more value to the disabled list than any other team this season.
Through June 29, the Nationals led the NL in games lost to the DL (772), and they were second in the majors to the Rangers (832), according to Man Games Lost.
Part of it has been inconsistent performances like that of star Bryce Harper. Still, the Nationals haven’t dealt with adversity and injury — or enjoyed the same level of quality depth — as well as, say, the Dodgers. The Nationals entered the season with voids, some they have addressed by jumping out in front of the trade market to acquire Kelvin Herrera. But at catcher, they’ve done nothing and rank 29th in positional WAR there. (J.T. Realmuto would help.)
The Nationals seem to be aware of their predicament and aware of the urgency of the moment: they held a players-only meeting detailed by the Washington Post’s Chelsea Janes after their shutout loss Wednesday to the Red Sox, their fifth loss in a row.
Wrote Janes:
Not a single player hovered at a locker. Not a single cough echoed from the showers. When reporters entered the Washington Nationals’ clubhouse Wednesday after a 3-0 loss to the Boston Red Sox — their fifth straight defeat, the seventh time they have been shut out in their past 22 games, the one that sent them under .500 in July for the first time in years — it was barren.
One by one, players in half-buttoned jerseys, hair matted with sweat, ambled into the clubhouse from somewhere in the back near the training room. Their manager had not been in there with them. The players called the meeting. The veterans rounded everyone up. No one was willing to say exactly what happened or who said what, but the overarching message was clear.
A handful of veterans corralled their teammates, who assembled in the back. ….
The keynote address came from Max Scherzer, which should be no surprise. In a clubhouse full of quiet veterans with a propensity to stay levelheaded, Scherzer is the one man who often channels competitiveness into emotion.
What’s failing the Nationals? Just about everything, but particularly pitching recently.
Over the past 30 days, they rank last in the majors in pitching WAR (-0.5), ERA (5.02), and FIP (4.95).
Of the 18 pitchers to appear over the past month for the club, nine have turned in below-average performances, according to ERA-.
But run production has also been stagnant.
Over the past month, the Nationals rank 13th in the NL in runs (103) and 11th in wRC+ (91). And that’s with Juan Soto and Anthony Rendon raking. Harper has posted a 93 wRC+ and Murphy a 36 wRC+ since returning.
The good news is Strasburg is expected to return around the All-Star break. The Nationals need him to pitch like an impact, top-of-the-rotation starter in the second half. Joaquin Benoit and Koda Glover could perhaps return in the second half. Ryan Zimmerman might begin a rehab assignment this weekend. The club hopes Murphy continues to gain strength and timing after missing much of the first half.
The glass-half-full position is that just getting healthy could solve many of the club’s production issues. Just getting Harper and Murphy to perform more like their usual selves could supply major second-half boosts. FanGraphs predicts the Nationals to go 43-34 the rest of the season and for the Braves and Phillies to regress, forecasting the Braves to win the division by a game over the Nationals and two over the Phillies. FanGraphs predicts the NL East to be the closest division race in the game.
While the Nationals figure to be better in the second half, they might have already dug themselves into too great of a hole. Washington is no longer just competing for a division title; they must mostly be concerned with grabbing at least a Wild Card spot. They are by far the Super Team most in danger of missing the playoff cut.
A Cleveland native, FanGraphs writer Travis Sawchik is the author of the New York Times bestselling book, Big Data Baseball. He also contributes to The Athletic Cleveland, and has written for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, among other outlets. Follow him on Twitter @Travis_Sawchik.
If the Nats keep tumbling (which I don’t think they will) and find themselves, say, 10 games out towards the end of July, do they move Bryce?*
*Operating under the assumption that the rumors are true and the Nats know he’s a goner a la Machado.
I’d be a big fan of such a move, but I feel like it would have to be a trade for a current above average major leaguer, if such a trade could ever make sense. Theoretically that major leaguer is under team control through 2019 or later and could help the Nats make another run very soon.
If the trade is for a bunch of prospects, the front office gets lambasted for throwing in the towel, no question.
I think there’s no way they move him unless they don’t think they can re-sign him. I hadn’t heard the rumor that he was a goner. Where did you see that?
I’m more interested in what the heck happens to Harper if he continues scuffling. I thought it was a foregone conclusion that he was going to get a half-billion dollars (with half of that deferred) from Ted Lerner, but not only is he no longer running the team but Harper hasn’t even come close to deserving a mega-deal based on his performance this year. Does he try for a pillow deal? A less lucrative deal with a couple of opt-outs? With the Nationals somewhere else.
I was thinking the same thing. How much could he get for a 1 year deal? $35M? $40M?
There have been rumors for the last 2 years that he won’t resign. No idea on the validity, obviously, but it has definitely been out there.
What flavor of the Kool-Aid was served with the “foregone conclusion” that all-world overrated player B. Harper was going to get half a billion dollars after having one superstar season out of six in the bigs?
Harper is getting $20 million in salary this year. They have $15 million in deferred commitments expiring at the end of this year. They can offer $35 million per season with no increase in payroll.
To me, he’s likely to stay.
He won’t stay. He will go to the highest bidder.
maybe it’s a new strategy to be the WC team so they can try their luck with Max in a one-game series and technically – finally – win one. but i think they’re cooked; losing is a disease and they’re afflicted.
re: the graph – LAD, ATL and CHC all look like the same blue and the two reds are kinda close. suggest a rainbow selection as it’s hard to parse now.
I’m not seeing how a team that Fangraphs says is the favorite to win their division is just hoping for a Wild Card. Yes they’ve been terrible, but so were the Dodgers for 25 games last year, and so have a bunch of teams that then righted the ship. Last year’s Cubs didn’t take over 1st place till midseason. They may need a jolt of some kind but they’re still better than the Phillies and Braves.
Even if they are better, unless the Braves AND the Phillies success this year is a mirage, they are in trouble. FG still doesn’t really believe in the Braves at all and still really believes in the Nats, and they see it as a toss up. If there is more to the Braves start, more to the Phillies start or more to the Nats start than what the projections see, they are likely toast.
Well sure if the projections are wrong in the direction that favors the Phillies or Braves that team becomes a favorite. OTOH if the projections are wrong in the direction that favors the Nationals they remain the favorite. It’s a tautology.
There really isn’t a lot of room for the Nats to be better than projections. That’s the point. FG projections tend to be slower than other projections to adjust in season. This might be based on empirical data, but there is a better chance that the Nats are worse than their rosier projection than somehow being better than that. There is just more room to be wrong in that direction.
Starting players wRC+, Depth Charts Projection, 2017 Actual
Turner — 103, 105
Harper — 138, 156
Rendon — 120, 142
Murphy — 109, 136
Eaton — 105, 126
Taylor — 79, 105
Zimmerman — 102, 138
They need a real catcher but I’d say just there they’ve taken the first half into account, and there’s room to be too low, no?
On July 5th of last year, the Cubs were in second place, 3.5 games back of ONE team. On July 5th of this year, the Nationals are in third place, at least 5.5 games back of TWO teams. I’d call that a difference, wouldn’t you?
Nice moustache!
Thanks good sir!
It takes a LOT of problems to convince the projections that the pre-season front runner is in any sort of trouble. The projections are designed not to overreact to little blips, so they kept projecting the Dodgers to win the division even when they were something like 9 games back and had lost Corey Seager for the year. I know there were good reasons to continue to have optimism in the Dodgers then and they’ve since made up much of the difference so that’s not a criticism of the projection. Rather, either the Nationals have fallen so far behind that they don’t project the Nationals to make up enough games over the course of the season, or the injuries and underperformance has convinced Steamer and ZiPS that there are problems here and they don’t get convinced easily.
Are they really that much better? Albies and Acuna look to be for real and they have a bunch of #2/3 type starters that are young. Plus they have such a hoard of prospects that they could add a SP, RP, and 3B (assuming they don’t trust Camargo). Gohara is coming back and more highly regarded prospects (Riley, Allard, Toussaint) will likely join them in September.
TL,DR: Im not sold on this obvious gap between the teams. ATL is deep with solid players (few neg WAR), have superstars at the top, and have prospect depth to improve.
I also think that WAS will win the division. I don’t believe in ATL or PHI at all. This is all just part of a larger discussion about how bad the NL East is… which we we all knew coming into the year. The only unexpected thing is WAS playing like garbage, which should be good enough when it is all said and done.
One thing that the Nats have going for them is the schedule- by far the easiest in the NL. In final 75 games the Nats have the Marlins 16 times and Mets 13 times. Starting tonight they have pre-break Marlins for 4, Pirates for 3, and Mets for 4. Could easily see them getting healthy here off of that.
By that same nature though ATL and PHI have equally easy series against the NYM and MIA as well as playing the currently worse then themselves WAS. All three get to beat up on two struggling teams, and also have to play each other. At least when you face the people your competing with enough your fate is in your own hands.
Braves played Mets 12 times already and Marlins 7 times. So only 19 games left vs those 2 teams- compared to the 29 for the Nationals. Phillies may be more of a threat- they’ve played Marlins 6 and Mets only 4 times. So they have 28 games left vs Marlins/Mets.
And the Nats still have 9 games each vs Phillies and Braves the rest of the way.
An interesting item I saw was that the Cubs and Astros have lost the least amount of value to injuries. Does anyone believe in injury regression? Particularly for teams that both made the playoffs?
And on cue the Fan Graphs Jinx strikes again. Nats after falling behind 9-0 answer with 14 runs en route to a 14-12 win tonight. Kind of win that could propel the Nats these next 10 games and allow them to catch up, while the Braves have a pretty difficult segment of their schedule(4 with Brewers, 2 with Toronto and 3 with Arizona).
Maybe the pitchers missed the meeting?
Would have won if Jay wrote the article
I think they’ll recover.
They stuck Murphy and Eaton into the lineup too quickly.
Murphy maybe. Eaton first 20 days back was batting .255. 65 wRC+. Just working his way back. Last week he’s batting .318 with a 113 wRC+. I think kind of a normal recovery type thing. I mean, A.J. Pollock has been back for 4 days with only a 82 wRC+. It’s kind of normal I think.
Also have to remember for Eaton he even right now has only 217 plate appearances in MLB since the start of the 2017 season.
“no team’s playoff stock has dropped like the Nats’”…except the Dodgers, and the Diamondbacks…and if you add them to the odds chart too, the Mets.
This is baseball folks, teams go on hot and cold stretches. The sky was falling when the D-Backs had the worst month in baseball history (https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/the-diamondbacks-were-just-impossibly-bad/), but things have somehow turned around for them. The Nats season is not over because they’ve had a rough month of June and are 6 games back of the division and 5 games out of the wild card.
You sir would not be good at writing headlines!
I’m sure the Nationals will find a way to blame MASN and Peter Angelos for their failures….
I know this article isn’t about Harper, and you don’t usually say a superstar needs to make significant changes, but if I’ve ever seen someone who should make a complete overhaul of their swing in the off-season it’s him. The bat plane is downright dreadful.
He doesn’t care – he is going to get paid and his face is going to be in front of plenty of cameras – that’s his #1 priority.
So the Nats since the article are going to be 3-0 and since trailing 9-0 on Thursday night are just on a 35-9 run. Now back within 5 games of the Braves and Phillies.
Harper’s talent is undeniable, and I’ll freely admit that I may be biased because I don’t like the guy… but am I really the only person who’s felt like his entire career has been inconsistent as hell? Without looking, it’s “felt” like with the exception of his two best seasons, every season has featured really, really long cold snaps followed by really, really long snaps in which no one could get him out, and the end result has been a guy something like 20% above average on the season. Which is good, but hardly matches his potential.
its beyond inconsistent… I am not sure what we should call it. No superstar has ever been as bad as often as Harper. Does that mean he shouldn’t be a superstar? I don’t know these answers. Its the problem with the media putting him on the pedestal that they did I guess. If anything, I think he is a nice example of why WAR and wRC+ are very incomplete measures of a player – he hurts his team probably more than he helps them when its all said and done but many metrics paint him as a top player… which he isn’t on a daily basis. Great players are great every day – not just for a month or two and filling the voids with walks.
Jeez, Ronnie, what did Harper do to your sister? Take a few deep breaths, then give it a rest.
who’s going to give him the blank check he desires? one elite season and a bunch of solid to disappointing seasons (by his talent/standards atleast). There have been injury issues and as you mentioned, extremely long cold streaks.
it’s funny- normally you worry about a guy like Harper being in the HR hitting contest- but given the funk he’s been in last 2 months- it might not be anything but positive for him to be in that.