The New Vladimir Guerrero Jr. Is Holding the Old One Back

Nick Turchiaro-USA TODAY Sports

In 2021, Vladimir Guerrero Jr. put on a remarkable show, hitting .311/.401/.601 with 48 home runs. He finished second in MVP voting to Shohei Ohtani — perhaps the only drawback to having Ohtani in the league is he’s going to end up dwarfing about a decade of other great performances on the historical record — with a season that looks even better in context.

In the past 100 years, only 10 AL or NL players have posted full seasons with a .300/.400/.600 slash line at age 22 or younger. And this is not one of those things hitters tend to achieve before flaming out. Of those 10 players, five — Ted Williams, Jimmie Foxx, Mel Ott, Joe DiMaggio, and Eddie Mathews — are not only Hall of Famers but inner-circle Hall of Famers. Albert Pujols will be once he’s eligible. Alex Rodriguez would be if he’d stayed away from Biogenesis and/or not been so weird the entire sport had it out for him. That leaves three active players: Bryce Harper, Juan Soto (in the COVID-shortened 2020 season), and Vladito.

So that’s five Hall of Famers, three future Hall of Famers, plus one guy who would be in the Hall of Fame if performance were the only consideration. But what of the young Guerrero?

I was thinking about this recently, as Guerrero and the Blue Jays traded arbitration numbers. It’s the most expensive arbitration case left on the docket, as Guerrero filed for $19.9 million, with the Blue Jays coming in at a hair over $18 million. The discrepancy between the two is more than twice what Casey Mize — the former no. 1 overall pick whom the Tigers are taking to trial over the cost of a certified pre-owned 2019 Honda CR-V — is even asking for. The Blue Jays are conceding that Guerrero, who is still due another year of arbitration after this one, is worth what would be first-division starter money on the open market.

That’s not really what Guerrero produced last year. In 156 games, he hit only 26 home runs, with a batting line of .264/.345/.444 and a wRC+ of 118. Remember the 2019 Home Run Derby?

That guy had an ISO under .200 last year. TJ Friedl, the buntin’-est cowboy east of the Pecos River, did better. Guerrero’s full-season WAR, 1.0, is derived in part from defensive metrics that are so unkind to the young Guerrero I worry that they violate the terms of this website’s comment policy. But even the bat was underwhelming compared to the admittedly astronomical expectations Guerrero went in with.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage

So here we have — at the risk of startling the ghost of German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hagel back into corporeality — two contradictory versions of Guerrero. On one hand, the supreme hitting talent, the combination of plus-plus hit tool and 80-grade raw power, who has shown that he can hit with Hall of Famers. This player would be two full seasons from reaching free agency in time for his age-27 season and, like Harper and Soto, ringing the bell for many hundreds of millions of dollars.

On the other hand: What if Josh Bell was short? A good player — absolutely a good hitter — but one who’d have trouble in free agency for the same reasons Rhys Hoskins is still without a home. A great designated hitter has huge value. A good DH? Eh, you can go without.

So what’s the problem? How is Guerrero suddenly merely a good hitter rather than a transcendent one?

The first thing to point out is obvious: For a guy who hits the ball as hard as he does, Guerrero is pretty earthbound. That means fewer hard-hit balls in the air, and by extension, fewer extra-base hits and home runs. We’ve known this about him forever, and while it’s a weakness, it isn’t a fatal one. If you can read this, you’re old enough to remember a time when Christian Yelich was hitting 40 home runs a year with a GB/FB ratio that made Tim Anderson look like Phil Plantier. For all the hype about launch angle over the past decade, there’s a point where you can hit the ball so hard the trajectory doesn’t matter very much.

Which brings up problem no. 1: Guerrero didn’t hit the ball quite as hard in 2023 as he did in 2021.

See how far the right tail of this histogram goes, and compare it to 2023, which is still good but not top-five-in-baseball good.

It takes an outlier to buck a trend, and when Vladito was no longer regularly producing outlier exit velos, he was no longer able to buck the trend that groundball hitters put up less impressive power numbers.

Vladito’s Leaguewide Ground-and-Pound Ranks
Year GB/FB ISO HardHit%
2021 157th 9th 6th
2023 212th 125th 30th
Minium 300 PA (262 players in 2021, 293 players in 2023)

“Hit the ball in the air more!” I can hear you screaming, and that’s easier said than done. More than that, I wonder if Guerrero’s struggles (“struggles,” really; it bears repeating that in 2023 he was comparable offensively to Pete Alonso and Christian Walker) are the result of following what you might call the conventional wisdom when it comes to hitting.

Hear me out.

Vladito’s great strength is his ability to combine contact and power. In 2021, 20 qualified hitters had an ISO of .250 or better; of those, the young Guerrero had the second-lowest strikeout rate, just 15.8%. The only player from that group who struck out less was José Ramírez, and I just read somewhere on the internet that Ramírez is “a marvel.” “Contact” is probably not the right way to put it; in 2021, Guerrero had the 28th-lowest strikeout rate among qualified hitters but the 94th-lowest contact rate.

Bringing this back up is making my eye twitch, but down here in the Delaware Valley, we had some Discourse last fall. The Phillies, led by Harper and Kyle Schwarber, spent the first two and a half rounds of the playoffs ambushing opposing pitchers back to the stone age. When the bats went quiet in the second half of the NLCS, that same approach — which had looked unstoppable earlier in the week — got blamed for the collapse.

I bring this up because Guerrero is doing exactly the kind of evolved hitter stuff these critics want all modern sluggers to do. He doesn’t strike out much. He doesn’t uppercut to get the ball in the air. He hits the ball hard to all fields.

And he’s worse off for it.

In 2023, Vladito had the highest contact rate of his career. In 2021, he had a huge hole in his swing at the bottom third of the strike zone, and in the past two years, he’s closed it; 2021 is on the left, 2023 on the right, from Baseball Savant.

So he’s making more contact, which is great in theory. But getting the bat on the ball isn’t the object of the game.

Guerrero is making more contact in parts of the zone where he doesn’t do as much damage. He’s also making more contact on pitches that are outside the zone altogether. His O-Contact% in 2021 was the lowest of his career, and the best part of nine percentage points lower than it was in 2023. Contact on these pitches turn into outs, or worse, double plays.

Nobody needs to be reminded of the perils of the hard grounder less than Vladimir Guerrero Jr. As a right-handed batter who hits the ball extremely hard on the ground and runs the bases at a spirited andante, he was built in a lab to hit into double plays: 92 of them since his debut, the second-highest total in the majors in the past five seasons.

In 2021, Guerrero was making the most contact in the upper two-thirds of the strike zone, which also happened to be the area in which he did the most damage. Now, he’s covering more of the zone but at the cost of making much less effective contact everywhere.

Here’s his wOBACON by region of the strike zone, again with 2021 on the left and 2023 on the right.

The 2023 heat map is just depressing to look at. It displeases me. Let’s move on.

What happened over the past two years, at the risk of oversimplifying things, is that Guerrero traded quality of contact in his kill zone for quantity of contact everywhere. You want to know why his HR/FB rate dropped from 26.5% in 2021 to 14.5% in 2023? Because his home runs come on hard contact up in the zone, and this happened.

And Guerrero’s groundball rate is only one of two directional concerns to his offensive game that required an outlier performance to overcome. As you’re no doubt aware, baseball stadia tend to have deeper outfields in center than down the lines. Vladito hits a lot of fly balls to center. When the ball is coming off the bat at 110 mph, it gets out. When it’s hit at 100 mph, it gets caught. And that spray tendency absolutely killed him in 2023, as Ben Clemens wrote in September.

A true dialectical examination of Vladimir Guerrero Jr. would attempt to resolve the contradiction between the harder-hitting 2021 version and the better zone coverage we saw in 2023. To hell with that — I say throw the measured 2023 approach in the oubliette altogether. If anything, 2021 wasn’t extreme enough.

The most remarkable thing about Guerrero, as I’ve said, is his minuscule strikeout rate for how hard he hits the ball. But a low strikeout rate is not an end in and of itself. It’s a gift. It means he has room to play with, to come out of his shoes swinging at pitches up in the zone, to swing and miss more, to cheat and clear his hips early — if it means restoring that exit velocity in the 110s. Aaron Judge and Shohei Ohtani are the two highest-paid batters in baseball, and two of the hardest-hitting. Both of them strike out almost twice as often as Guerrero does.

So if Guerrero wants to get paid properly, to return to that Hall of Fame path, he needs to stop trying to hit everything and get back to hitting fewer pitches harder.





Michael is a writer at FanGraphs. Previously, he was a staff writer at The Ringer and D1Baseball, and his work has appeared at Grantland, Baseball Prospectus, The Atlantic, ESPN.com, and various ill-remembered Phillies blogs. Follow him on Twitter, if you must, @MichaelBaumann.

52 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
jcduggerMember since 2019
2 years ago

“…TJ Friedl, the buntin’-est cowboy east of the Pecos River…” — Haaaa! I’m going to be using this line all summer! 🙂

Fun-Hating DorkMember since 2019
2 years ago

It’s pretty clear the Toronto org is philosophically inclined to emphasize contact% — they’re fifth in baseball in contact% over the years 2021-2023. Contact for contact’s sake is how you wind up like Cleveland.

I don’t know if that philosophy is “to blame” for Vlad Jr. merely being All-Starish as opposed to Best Hitter In Baseball-ish, but the rest of the AL East is thankful for it.

Rollie's MustacheMember since 2017
2 years ago

Toronto also has the 5th highest Oppo% rate in that timeframe too. That might work for an outlier like Bichette, but a contact-oriented, “spray it to all fields” approach is not befitting of that lineup.

I recall an interview with Danny Jansen last season where he specifically mentioned how that approach doesn’t work for him, and he feels at his best when he’s in “pull” mentality. His elite power numbers for a catcher speak for themselves. Vladdy may want to heed his teammate’s advice.

GoodEnoughForMeMember since 2018
2 years ago

Orgs applying a team wide philosophy instead of catering to player strengths is baffling. We went through this with Pirates pitchers in the 2010s and realized it’s not good. The pre-Harris Tigers were the same way, with a unified pitching philosophy everyone had to follow no matter what. Not good to see this popping up for pitchers or hitters in 2023/2024.

hljwarsen
2 years ago

“So that’s five Hall of Famers, three future Hall of Famers…”

Soto is 25 and has less than 30 WAR. He’s in a great spot but there’s a long way to go – let’s not get ahead of ourselves here, Michael.

LightenUpFGMember since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  hljwarsen

I will agree that ‘future hall of famer’ gets thrown around in a lot of sports writing, kind of like ‘GOAT’. It’s annoying… but Soto is looking like he might get there at his age if he keeps things going. If Michael had wrote in “possible future hall of Famers” he’d probably dodge the ire of the skeptical.

formerly matt wMember since 2025
2 years ago
Reply to  LightenUpFG

FWIW, there are 30 AL/NL players with more than 25 WAR through age 24 (plus Willie Wells, who put up 33.1 WAR through age 24 in the Negro Leagues). The ones not in the HoF are Mike Trout, Alex Rodriguez, Joe Jackson, Andruw Jones, Sherry Magee, Soto, Vada Pinson, Cesar Cedeno, Jimmy Sheckard, and Bryce Harper.

Of this group, Soto has the 11th most PA and the 21st most WAR, though the non-HOFers who are off the ballot and not banned (Magee, Pinson, Cedeno, Sheckard) had either more PA than him or fewer WAR, both for Pinson and Cedeno. And Magee has a decent chance with the Veterans’ Committees or whatever they’re called these days, and maybe Sheckard should.

Soto seems on pace barring an Andruw-like collapse or a scandal. Though I guess the HOFers in this group had considerably fewer PA or more WAR. Magee is the closest as PA/WAR go.

Anon21Member since 2018
2 years ago

He’s certainly on pace, but he has to stay on that pace for a long time to actually be a deserving inductee. If he tears his ACL tomorrow, the whole path is in jeopardy. Less likely, if his performance drops off for inexplicable reasons, he does not yet have enough career value to just coast in.

Shirtless George Brett
2 years ago
Reply to  Anon21

If he tears his ACL tomorrow, the whole path is in jeopardy. 

It would have to be something way more serious than that. An ACL tear is barely even a significant injury anymore. Even less so for someone who doesn’t rely on speed/defense to produce value like Soto.

It would take something much more significant (IE: Prince Fielder’s neck issues) to put Soto or anyone’s career in jeopardy. Ligament tears are pretty mundane injuries this century.

Last edited 2 years ago by Shirtless George Brett
fjtorres
2 years ago

Wright’s back might do it.
But how common is that?

Jason BMember since 2017
2 years ago
Reply to  Anon21

If he tears his ACL tomorrow, the whole path is in jeopardy. 

Well…sure, OK. But you can say that about anybody this side of Mike Trout. Acuna is off to a good start, but a vending machine could fall on him. Mookie Betts is playing well, but he could get caught in the bowling ball return. Ohtani is amazing, but could get buried in a grain silo.

All technically true, but none especially helpful.

Anon21Member since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  Jason B

I think it’s helpful to understanding why they should not be considered future Hall of Famers, but rather on a Hall of Fame trajectory that must be sustained for many years to come.

Anon21Member since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  hljwarsen

I agree–even Harper is just a good candidate, certainly not guaranteed. Pujols, Verlander, and Scherzer have earned that label–they’re already well over the standard. Harper and Soto are just on very good paths, but the road to Cooperstown is strewn with the frozen corpses of Tulowitzskis and Sizemores.

carterMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Anon21

Harper is guaranteed. I realize that guys like Tulo and Sizemore looked like they were headed that route too, but the HOF is more than just career stats, and Harper has the recognition that they do not imo.

tarvisMember since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  carter

Those oversized postseason bombs tend to play well with the collective memories and votes of the HoF voters as well….

jaysfan39Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Anon21

Harper has 47 FWAR thru his age 30 season add that to his 2 MVPs and 7 all star games and short of a career ending injury or completely falling off a cliff like Andruw Jones he is pretty much a guarantee for the HOF already.

Anon21Member since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  jaysfan39

He’s likely to get in! But you can’t just exclude the possibility of career-ending injury or sudden, inexplicable performance collapse. Future HOFer means they’ve already done the work but haven’t yet come up for election–or they’re closing in on the 75% threshold with time on the ballot to spare.

Shirtless George Brett
2 years ago
Reply to  jaysfan39

To be fair, even with falling off a cliff Jones should still be a HoFer.

Oh, Beepy.
2 years ago

Jones is also contending with the character clause in addition to his place within the peak vs. longevity discourse

carterMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  jaysfan39

Right, a career ending injury he gets in because it is an injury and he has 2 mvps and 7 all star games, and is one of the biggest names in baseball. Only way I see him not getting in is a scandal, or maybe negative war rest of career. Voters do not vote based on WAR. We might look at it that way, and they might as well, but one of the couple biggest names in baseball last decade is getting in, regardless. That is just how baseball works. Fangraphs is an analytical website, and we look at numbers, etc, if you have seen how voters are voting this year for HOF you can see that numbers matter very little in terms of voting.

Oh, Beepy.
2 years ago
Reply to  jaysfan39

“Short of two things we have a lot of examples of happening” is not the greatest argument for surety – especially when everyone is in agreement that Harper is well on track for the hall

airforce21oneMember since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  jaysfan39

I don’t think all-star appearances should be a metric for HoF voting

LightenUpFGMember since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  Anon21

Just wanted to point out I liked the dire wording of the end of that last sentence. Soooo many great top 10 players from various years, so many players not being able to maintain it…

Shirtless George Brett
2 years ago
Reply to  Anon21

I get what you are saying but even in their wildest dreams Tulo and Sizemore couldn’t hit like Harper. His career wRC+ is currently higher than either of the best single season marks. He is pretty clearly on a different level than guys like that. Harper has been legitimately one of the 10-15 best hitters of the past 30 years. I think he is as close to a lock to the HoF as anyone not named Trout.

Here is an interesting comp for you. Over his first 6000 PA’s Original Recipe Vlad Guerrero had a 144 wRC+. He retired only 5 years later at 36 and made the HoF pretty easily. Over his first 6000 PA’s Harper has a 142 wRC+ and is the exact same age Guerrero was (31) at the time.

It would take an ungodly collapse for Harper to not make the HoF in my opinion.

Last edited 2 years ago by Shirtless George Brett
soddingjunkmailMember since 2016
2 years ago

Sure, but the game is more than hitting. Those guys played premium defensive positions.

Shirtless George Brett
2 years ago

Yes its more than hitting, but hitting is still the vastly more important thing. Anyone who says otherwise is lying.

Tulo and Sizemore were premium defenders and weren’t terrible hitters. Which is rare. But Harper is one of the 10 best hitters this century, full stop. That’s just a totally different level.

soddingjunkmailMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  Anon21

I like “Future HOFer” for the guys who have exceeded the standard without playing another game, and “HOF trajectory” for the Sotos of the world.

Manco
2 years ago

Blue Jays ain’t cruel enough to hold their changes against him or use them to justify why they can’t hold him in FA, right?

Dmjn53
2 years ago
Reply to  Manco

At the rate he’s going, it’s not going to take too much to keep him around when he hits FA

Richie
2 years ago

Is he perhaps getting, umm … chunkier? There’s a point at which that works against your swing.

carterMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Richie

To be fair he did recently post a best shape of his life photo!

carterMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  carter

Also…did anyone see his brother who just signed? 16 going on 40.

Matt GreeneMember since 2020
2 years ago

*Hegel* eats *bagels*

docgooden85Member since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  Matt Greene

Thank you, fellow pedant! Your correction was wittier than whatever Comic Book Store Guy type thing I would have written.

LTGMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Matt Greene

Marxists don’t actually have to read Hegel to know what he said.

LesVegetables
2 years ago

Vlad Jr. is the rare guy who I almost don’t care what his WAR has been. You are betting on the bat being elite. It might be possible for the Jays to replace him with someone who has a better median projection, but there are not many guys in the world who actually have a chance at being a 70 grade hitter with 70-80 grade power. All of his value is going to be tied to his bat, but that bat has so much potential that I think you just ride-or-die with it. Maybe he doesn’t ever get his wRC+ back above 150 which is where you’ll need him to be a really impactful player. But he has as good a shot at getting there as almost anyone in baseball.

Twitchy
2 years ago

You touched on it but he needs to pull the ball way more. 300+ ISO when pulling the ball vs sub 200 to RF and CF. His pull% should be at minimum 50% and likely higher than that, ideally 52-55%. Right now it’s 42%.

Vlad just needs to pull the ball and you’ll see a huge improvement in his power.

Last edited 2 years ago by Twitchy
DarrenMember since 2016
2 years ago

One might dream of Vladito attending the Isaac Paredes School of Pulled Fly Balls…

Last edited 2 years ago by Darren
jaysfan39Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Darren

That is the dream if Guerrero could find a way to get anywhere near Paredes pulled flyball tendencies he is 50+ if not 60+ homer season waiting to happen

MustBunique
2 years ago

Sorry man, but genetics dictate that he must continue to make contact on all pitches. It’s hard-wired.

Oh, Beepy.
2 years ago
Reply to  MustBunique

Rumor has it that Vlad Sr. called him after every game during his 2021 season to clown him for taking pitches

Michael ConteMember since 2020
2 years ago

I would pay money to hear Keith Hernandez’s reaction to this piece

djanyreasonMember since 2020
2 years ago

So if Guerrero wants to get paid properly, to return to that Hall of Fame path, he needs to stop trying to hit everything and get back to hitting fewer pitches harder.

Okay, Lenin

Last edited 2 years ago by djanyreason
synco
2 years ago

I saw another article about Guerrero Jr recently, and it also didn’t mention the obvious tidbit that in 2021 he played 23 games at Sahlen Field (where he hit .321/.418/.762) and 21 games at TD Ballpark (.410/.521/.897). In his 35 games at Rogers Field he went .294/.368/.566 – still awesome, but way below those other two locations. There were a few other places he crushed in and had significant PAs in (pretty much the rest of the AL East – Fenway, Camden, and Yankee Stadium, all of which are good power locations to various degrees), but losing those two parks definitely hurts. All told he hit 31 HRs at home and 17 on the road.

It’s possible that playing in those locations led to him changing his approach, or affected his ability to pick up the ball. It would be silly to say that the difference is entirely that, but one also has to consider that a huge chunk of his 2021 glory season happened in parks he no longer gets to play in.

Last edited 2 years ago by synco
surfdoc37
2 years ago
Reply to  synco

Those parks were bandboxes and his outsized success continues to bubble through his projections. Just placing a very gross correction on his 2021 season, subbing in prorated Rogers Center numbers for those in the minor league part, and his season looks more like 36 HR, 90 RBI, .295. Fine tallies but not necessarily “HOF trajectory” stuff, and less of an outlier compared with subsequent results.

CheeseballMember since 2016
2 years ago

This article is a symphony of delights. That said… I’d love to see an analysis of his batting mechanics in 2023 v. 2021. I’m a moron that’s undoubtedly biased by the results, but even when he was hitting bombs, it looked to me as if he was moving his shoulders towards the plate and then away from the plate during his swing (hunching down towards the strike zone at the beginning of his stride, and then yanking back away from the plate to get the barrel to the ball.) I’d think that kind of swing problem would increase contact but decrease power. I’d love to read an analysis by someone with a better eye & understanding.

Angelsjunky
2 years ago

I would think that any player who puts up a 166 wRC+ at age 22 is due to bounce back eventually, even after two declining (healthy) years in a row. Meaning, there probably aren’t many historical precedents for a 160+ wRC+ at such a young age without more seasons of at least, say, 140 wRC+.

That said, it is a bit concerning – but more in the “Maybe he’s just really good but not peak Frank Thomas good.” I mean, we see something similar in Juan Soto: After his ridiculous 47 games in 2020, he was treated like the Second Coming of Ted Williams; while he’s been great since (164, 145, 155 wRC+ seasons), he hasn’t quite followed up with the performance that some expected. Some players just have their best years at a very young age.

But back to Vlad Jr, I might have glazed over it while reading, but one thing I don’t think was mentioned is that with five years in the majors (including one partial season), 2021 is the outlier amidst four seasons that are much closer. We’ve got wRC+ of 106, 110, 166, 133, 116. Which of those is not like the others? Very good players do occasionally have great seasons, and sometimes just pretty good players have MVP-caliber seasons (see “Erstad, Darin: 2000”).

He could also be a bit Harper-esque, in terms of a wide range of variance of what a peak season looks like. For Harper, his best wRC+ was 197, his second 170, his third 155. Compare that to Trout: 188, 180, 177. Now Trout was preternaturally consistent (at least until 2023) and shouldn’t be considered the norm, but in this sense it may be that Vlad is more Harperian than Troutian.

Or to compare Trout and Harper further – wRC+ range in seasons with 400+ PA:

Trout: 167 – 188 (21-point range)
Harper: 111 – 197 (86-point range)

Great hitters come in all shapes and sizes, with different patterns of performance. Trout’s consistency was truly unusual (and it really went through 2022 with the bat); Harper is probably a bit on the other side of the historical norm, but closer to it. Or to return to Frank Thomas, maybe Vlad Jr. is less like the 1990-97 Troutian version and more like the 1998-2008 version.

Meaning, we could simply be facing the fallout of unrealistic expectations, and that Vlad Jr is simply a very good hitter who might occasionally have a great year.

I’m not saying the primary cause of Vlad’s decline over the last two years isn’t as Baumann puts it, just that you don’t have to go that deep to find a reasonable explanation for it: a wide-ish range of variance in performance, and a guy whose overall level is closer to very good than stratospheric. If he bounces back to a 140 or better wRC+ in 2024 while still remaining more of a zone coverage guy than a hard-hitting guy, it would support the point. Time will tell, I guess.

Last edited 2 years ago by Angelsjunky
Curacao LL
2 years ago

Strip out the time in Buffalo as a major league park during 2021 and there’s not that much variance.
He is who he is… 800 OPS, av+ defense at 1B, unplayable at 3B.

Shirtless George Brett
2 years ago
Reply to  Curacao LL

He is actually the worst defensive 1B in MLB the past 2 seasons and its not even particularly close (he has -17 OAA, second worst is -11).

Not that it matters a ton, 1B is 1B, but he is basically as unplayable at 1b as he was at 3rd.

curt schillings ketchup bottle
2 years ago

It turns out being 50 pounds overweight affects your ability to field your position

The Ghost of Johnny Dickshot
2 years ago

So he’s had 4 full-ish seasons of .260ish/.340ish/.440ish production and one insane season. Can we maybe accept the 4 seasons are more indicative of what Vlad is rather than wishing/hoping 2021 is the norm?

Shirtless George Brett
2 years ago

And its probably not a coincidence that in his insane season he played a half of his home games in two very hitter friendly parks where he hit approximately a billion times better than he ever has at Rogers Center (he had a 1.400+ OPS in the 21 games they played in Dunedin lol).