The NL East Race Might Be Down to Two

Our Playoff Odds page has a nice little feature that lets you display, for any two dates, the difference between a team’s playoff odds on Date A and its odds on Date B. Around the end of each calendar month, I like to use that feature to check in on which teams most improved their odds over the month that was and which lost ground. It’s a long season, and it’s easy to miss things. Here are the largest changes in playoff odds from June 1 to June 30:

June Shook Up the NL East
Team % Change
Braves 37.9%
Phillies -28.8%
Nationals 25.8%
Mets -16.8%
Cardinals -13.0%

There’s a story there. Let me start it by saying that 17 of 30 big-league teams saw no change at all to their playoff odds in June, or saw a change of less than 2%. Another five saw a change greater than 2%, but less than 10%. Of the eight teams whose playoff odds swung by more than 10% in June, fully half — the four teams at the top of the table — came from the same division: the National League East. To some extent, that kind of clustering is to be expected — when one team rises, another in its division must fall — but the relative quiet of every other division gives us an opportunity to reflect for a moment on what happened in the NL East in June, and what lies ahead in July.

And the story in the East in June — if you look past the off-field madness in New York  — was primarily the story of a young Braves team coming into their own at the plate at just the right time. After posting a middle-of-the-pack 96 wRC+ through May 31, Braves hitters came alive in June, posting an NL-best 123 wRC+ and 56 home runs on the month. Freddie Freeman, Ozzie Albies, and Ronald Acuña, Jr. led the charge, but the Braves didn’t really have a single hitter struggle over that span. Nick Markakis and Austin Riley, who put up nearly identical 96 and 97 wRC+’s, were the worst regulars. That’ll play. And it did, against exactly the teams Atlanta needed to beat: After playing just 15 games in-division in March, April, and May combined, the Braves played 15 games against division rivals in June and won 11.

Pre-season, most projection systems — ours included — saw a very tough division race, forecasting four teams (those listed in the table above) at around 85 wins, with the Nationals a touch ahead of the other three. Those four teams were among the top seven most likely to make the playoffs, with the Nationals, who had a 7.2% pre-season shot at the title, the second-most likely to challenge for a World Series championship behind the Dodgers. Well, the Braves’ offensive success in June — and the wins against division rivals that came from it — have put them on track for 91 wins according to our Expected Wins, which would be the second-best in the NL behind the Dodgers. They’re not the best team in the NL, and they are slightly over-performing their Pythagorean and BaseRuns records, but they are a heckuva lot better than we thought a month ago.

That leap has coincided with a June that has been a catalog of horrors for Philadelphia and New York. The Mets salvaged a win against Braves last night, but prior to that, were in the middle of a seven-game losing streak that had come, inconveniently enough, against the Phillies and Braves. The Phillies, for their part, lost seven straight from June 16 to June 23, also against two division rivals. Only the four-game sweep of the Mets that followed, and a drumming of the lowly Marlins yesterday, has kept them from putting up zero wins in the second half of June. This was meant to be the year that Philadelphia took its seat with the big kids of the National League, but their poor starting pitching — a 5.08 FIP in June — and an under-performing offense wasted what was a pretty good month by a Philly bullpen led by Juan Nicasio and Vince Velasquez.

Let’s not overstate the case: The Mets (and, to a lesser extent, the Nationals and Phillies) lost a lot of games in June in part because they played a lot of games against the Braves, who won most of the games they played against those teams. Baseball, a game with a thousand inputs, resolves into only two outputs: wins and losses. One team cannot win without the team other losing, and so it’s perfectly plausible to see a month in which the four teams of the National League East played at roughly the same level but saw one team come out firmly ahead. Maybe that’s what happened this month. Maybe not — the Braves’ offensive success relative to the rest of the league makes me think maybe they’ve figured something out. But the fact is that the wins and losses that pile up in June count just the same as they do in any other month, and the Mets, in particular, have just seven games left against the Braves to make up a 12.0 game deficit in the division directly, though of course the Braves could cool.

That makes the Nationals the key team here. As Dan pointed out last week, Washington is near the tail end of a window that they need to have pan out. And unlike New York and Philadelphia, the Nationals have plenty of opportunity left to take on the Braves directly — 14 games from hereon out, including seven in September — and more talent to bring to bear on that opportunity than their competitors to the north. An 8-18 run from mid-April to mid-May is depressing the Nationals’ full-season win totals and obscures the 24-10 run they’ve been on since then. The Braves beating up on the Mets and Phillies in June made it less likely that the Nationals would win the division, yes, but it also made it much more likely that they would win a Wild Card spot (their odds of doing so jumped from 16% on June 1st to upwards of 40% today, driving almost all of the increase in playoff odds) and so made the prospect of a mid-season selloff much less likely.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-members

Add everything up and you get to this simple truth: A month ago, the NL East was a race between four teams, none of which seemed particularly likely to clear 90 wins. Now, the race is mostly down to two teams — the Nationals and the Braves — and it seems more likely than not that the Braves will enter the playoffs with more than 90 wins and perhaps even the second seed in the National League bracket. But if they do, it’ll be after beating off some serious competition from a Nationals team that still has plenty of opportunity to bring them down. That’s what I’ll be watching for the rest of this season, at least where playoff races, and not individual teams or players, are concerned. The Yankees, Twins, and Astros have the AL divisional races mostly wrapped up. So too do the Dodgers in the NL West. The NL East, though, stands together in contention with the Central, and unlike the Central, it saw the ground shift dramatically in the last month. There’s still room for it to swing back, and with the trade deadline looming, perhaps the balance will shift again. I’m looking forward to watching it happen if it does.





Rian Watt is a contributor to FanGraphs based in Seattle. His work has appeared at Vice, Baseball Prospectus, The Athletic, FiveThirtyEight, and some other places too. By day, he works with communities around the world to end homelessness.

31 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
carterMember since 2020
7 years ago

Cardinals aren’t in the NL East

Pokkit
7 years ago
Reply to  Rian Watt

The title of the table is “June Shook Up the NL East”. The sentence prior to the table says the largest changes in playoff odds (regardless of division). The title of the table introduces confusion about what it’s claiming.

As long as we’re talking editing…”That leap has coincided with a June that has been a catalog of horrors for Philadelphia and Atlanta”. I assume Atlanta was supposed to be NYM.

Obviously these are things that don’t obscure the point. But it was brought up.

The Ghost of Johnny Dickshot
7 years ago
Reply to  carter

Reading comprehension is hard isn’t it?

WoundedSprinterMember since 2018
7 years ago

I suspect a limited attention span, rather than RC as such. But, no. I think it’s fairly obvious what Rian’s table was meant to indicate.

I’m guessing that the Braves/Mets thing was indeed a confusion, however. I mean, the table as shown is pretty clear on that point.

insertclevernamehere
7 years ago

Even with the 13% decrease, the Cardinals still have a better chance to win the NL East than the Marlins.

v2miccaMember since 2016
7 years ago

As a Braves fan, June was a fun month to watch. But, there are some serious flaw on this team that could very easily send them into a nasty cold spell. Freeman and Acuña likely will continue to be rock solid. But the rest of the Braves line up is streakier than I would like, with very pronounced hot and cold spells. And if the Braves are serious about making any noise this post season, they are going to have to do something about the bullpen.

teddmorgan
7 years ago
Reply to  v2micca

The bullpen isn’t the problem. Over the last 6 weeks they have had a top 5 bullpen. The starting pitching on the other hand is 22nd

JLanDC
7 years ago

“That leap has coincided with a June that has been a catalog of horrors for Philadelphia and Atlanta.”

You meant New York, right?

Shalesh
7 years ago

Are the Braves’ over-performing or are the projection systems not properly evaluating how good the Braves are 2 years in a row? Also, Braves’ fans seemed to underestimate the team since they wanted more activity in the FA market over the winter. Maybe that’s justifiable seeing how active the Nats (Corbin), Phillies (Realmuto, McCutchen, Segura, Harper), and Mets (Cano, Diaz, Ramos, Lowrie) were over the winter. Better to have a top-2 prospect pool that keeps pumping out good players than an active winter of veteran player acquisition.

v2miccaMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Shalesh

I would say they are over-performing. Based on run differential alone, they are three games ahead of where you would expect. I’ve watched most Braves games this year, and they definitely have had some luck with sequencing. I’ve seen many games where they were out-hit by the opponent, but still managed to squeak out more runs.

warkol
7 years ago
Reply to  Shalesh

I don’t think the data can predict regulars like Dansby Swanson having a 28 point improvement in wRC+ or Brian McCann’s best offensive season since 2013 (catcher play improved a lot across the league, so wRC+ remains similar to past seasons but numbers dictate personal improvement). It also can’t predict bench bats like Charlie Culberson and Matt Joyce continuing to have very good seasons off the bench in their limited ABs (148 and 126 wRC+ respectively). It also can’t predict Austin Riley tearing the cover off the ball at an unprecedented rate in his first month up.

That level of offense can overcome a mixed bag in pitching that I’d say is probably about as expected (maybe not statistically). Even with Folty’s significant drop and injury, along with some poor reliever play, they’ve done just fine due to the offense being able to prop up just about any pitching staff. Statistic models definitely aren’t going to nail the offensive production the Braves have had thus far, and credit to them to sticking to their guns and own guys in that regard. Though, I bet the fans would probably still prefer Michael Brantley to Nick Markakis at this point.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  warkol

on a similar note to Austin Riley, no one would predict Mike Soroka and Fried would be about all star level pitchers, and that Folty would be terrible. Even in aggregate, would you say that two prospects would turn out so good that it would relegate a solid 3rd starter to AAA? Probably not.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Shalesh

hard to price young pitching finally showing up in a projection system. Either you overweight good early performance, and things get weird, or underweight it and underprice the information you have. Variance of outcome is super high, and you don’t have a ton of data. My take on mispricing the Braves the past two years is that young pitching is really freakin hard to effectively project

FS54
7 years ago

Last Nationals-Braves series was fun. Hated that Nats lost two games but those games were intense.

ScoreboardMember since 2016🏆 MVP
7 years ago

Ryan – I appreciate the work put into this piece but I simply don’t think it meets the bar for Fangraphs. You make a bold claim in the title (and in the last paragraph) that the NL East is down to two teams, but the standings immediately rebuke your statement. If you’re going to tell us that the standings are misleading, that’s fine but you addressed none of what I would anticipate in a detailed analysis:
– Pythag Expectations. The Phillies are better than the they should be, but not by a huge amount.
– Strength of schedule. You allude to head to head matchups, but nothing more. Not even an overall average pythag level.
– Roster changes. Is either team returning injured players? Likely to promote someone? Or make a big trade?
– Regression to mean. Are there player level regressions (either good or bad) that may impact the nationals or the Phillies differently?

In short, I’m looking for Any reason why past performance shouldn’t equal future. If the second half just mimics the first half, then both the Phillies and nationals have a low, but non negligible shot at the division.

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
7 years ago
Reply to  Scoreboard

Actually, he makes the not very bold claim that the FG projections think the race is pretty much down to two teams. The linked projected standings page makes that pretty apparent. If you want to know why the projections are the way they are, look at the expected runs scored for and against. The PHI starting rotation went to crap (mentioned in the article) and the projections don’t trust them going forward.

That being said, While the Nats have been playing much better of late they still don’t really have their bullpen figured out. That’s a recipe for underperforming projections, as evidenced by their April and May results.

insertclevernamehere
7 years ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

It’s also worth mentioning that the team suffered a huge blow with McCutchen’s season-ending injury in the beginning of June, especially with him being one of the more productive players on the team, while Herrera’s suspension further thins out their overall depth, which was a bit iffy to begin with (even with him not really being productive overall).

CousinNicky
7 years ago

Best bullpen wins the division. The braves went on this run for two reasons, one being the great offense mentioned above (123 wRC+), the other was the great (and very lucky bullpen work). The bullpen had a 1/2 run ERA better than the next closest team. I dont trust this braves bullpen and as it is much better than it was in April/May it is not this good. If the nats can get their bullpen on a run of good work, a big winning streak could be in their future.

dwm8a
7 years ago
Reply to  Scoreboard

Look at BaseRuns, which shows the Phillies’ actual record is 7 games better than their BaseRuns would predict (this is the largest difference in MLB). If past performance does equal future performance, and the Phillies continue to play like a .444 team, then they’ll finish 79-83. Of note: BaseRuns thinks the Phillies have played worse than the Mets.

BaseRuns has the Braves and the Nats in a dead heat, with the Braves at 47-38 and the Nats at 45-38. Of course, the actual records are different, with the Braves’ actual record being 3 wins better and the Nats’ being 3 wins worse. This 6-game swing really affects the Nats’ ability to catch the Braves.

Unless the rosters change, I think the premise of this article is correct: the Braves are in the driver’s seat and only the Nats have a realistic chance to catch them. The Phillies are going to end up closer to .500 than to a playoff spot.

W
7 years ago

In the final sentence of the antepenultimate paragraph, it is claimed that the Phillies have but seven games remaining this season against the Braves. This is in error, as the Phillies have thirteen such games remaining (only one fewer than the Nationals have).

The claim that the Phillies played ‘a lot of games against the Braves’ in June, made in the first sentence of the same paragraph, also seems rather suspect, as the Phillies played only three games against the Braves in June. (The Braves won two of the three games.)

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
7 years ago
Reply to  W

Thumbs up for “antepenultimate”

WoundedSprinterMember since 2018
7 years ago

Wellll … just considering the NL-E, and taking a Jamesian Pythagorean punt at the record (half-way through the season, which is reasonable), you can check out Baseball Prospectus’ “First-Order Win Pct.”

I am not keen on that first, second, and third order thing, btw, because they’re misleading labels as compared to standard error, skew, and kurtosis on a binomial distribution. (I may be wrong. I’m an historian by trade.)

But, as it happens, BP backs up Rian’s thesis. Braves: .552. Nats: ..520. Philllies: .505. Mets: .461. The Braves and Nats have definitely (on this theory) broken into a charge; the other two might need a bit of work.

There’s another team in the division, but I forget who it is.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
7 years ago

they should call ’em moments anyway, it’s probably more accurate because I bet the data is non-normal enough to matter

JCCfromDCMember since 2016
7 years ago

Huh. Weird NL East fact: apparently Washington is where the Marlins’ winning streaks go to die (or at least games against the Nationals). Coming into the series in May the Marlins had won six in a row; the Nationals took the first three of a four game set. In June the Marlins had won four in a row and five of six (against the Cardinals and the Phillies). The Nats swept them in three.

It’s not weird that the Nats won those series. It’s weird that on both occasions a team that is 32-50 was actually on a bit of a roll.

stever20Member since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  JCCfromDC

Darn, the Marlins come into this upcoming series having lost their last game. Watch the Nats get swept here.

JCCfromDCMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  stever20

They did win that series, though, taking 2 of 3 from the Phillies. In games against teams other than the Nationals, the Marlins have won 7 of their last 9 – and one of those losses (to the Cardinals) required 11 innings before they were walked off.

So the Nats have a chance!

JohnThackerMember since 2020
7 years ago

The Cardinals’ decline is interesting, considering that they essentially tread water during June, with the same .500 record as the Cubs and Brewers, but when you’re 3 or 4 games behind, that’s just running out of time. Though I would suppose that losing Jordan Hicks might also be worth an expected W and a lot of that decline too.

NATS FanMember since 2018
7 years ago

Go Nats!!