The Opposite Trends of Starlin Castro and Allen Craig
Not too long ago, I observed that Allen Craig was getting pitched differently. He was getting pitched differently because he was hitting differently, in that he hasn’t been hitting for pull power. So pitchers have fed him more fastballs, and more fastballs inside, daring him to turn on something. Before that, I observed that Robinson Cano was also missing his pull power, although he compensated better than Craig has. And somewhere along the line, I wrote something similar about Evan Longoria, so I guess I realize I’m interested in certain batted-ball tendencies. And that realization made me want to look at the bigger picture.
Some hitters are lethal when they’re able to pull the ball. Other guys are quite good at going the other way. Brian Dozier is a total pull hitter, who can’t do crap the other way. Ryan Howard, meanwhile, can’t do crap to his pull side, preferring the opposite field. Individual tendencies are individual tendencies, but things get interesting when you see those tendencies change. Changes can be indicative of changes to swing or ability.
I’m interested in batted balls to the pull side and batted balls to the opposite field. But for these purposes I’m not interested in groundballs, because I’m thinking about balls in play that could go for power. Using the FanGraphs leaderboards, I recovered fly balls and line drives that were pulled, hit to center, and hit the other way. I combined the two stats into one — air balls — and then I calculated the rates to each field. For example, this year, Yoenis Cespedes has pulled 34% of his air balls. Kyle Seager has hit 28% of his air balls the other way.
Then, for each hitter, I simply calculated Pull Air% – Opposite Air%, which you can accept if you can accept K% – BB%. Then I went through all the same process for 2013, then I compared the data for batters with at least 100 air balls in each of the last two seasons. There are 164 such batters, and the stat appears to be reasonably sustainable:
There’s a good relationship there, which isn’t surprising, because batted-ball distributions are a part of a hitter’s identity. If you have a guy who pulls a good amount of his air balls, he’s probably going to keep on pulling a good amount of his air balls, unless something changes. And it’s those changes in which I’m most interested.
In case you’re curious, that isolated dot toward the bottom left: Joe Mauer. A year ago, he pulled 11% of his air balls, and he hit 52% of his air balls the other way, for a difference of -41%. This year, he’s pulled 8% of his air balls, and he’s hit 65% of his air balls the other way, for a difference of -57%. He had the league’s lowest difference in 2013, and he has the league’s lowest difference in 2014, and look no further for an explanation of why Joe Mauer isn’t hitting for power. He’s hitting the ball in the air the other way even more often, and he’s not doing so with the authority he did in 2009. Something with Joe Mauer is clearly awry.
Now, the ultimate point of this is the comparison between 2013 and 2014. For each year, I already had the difference between pulled air balls and air balls the other way. Then, between years, I calculated the difference between those differences. A positive result would belong to a hitter who’s pulled the ball in the air more often in 2014. A negative result would belong to a hitter who’s pulled the ball in the air less often.
Here now are the ten biggest positive differences:
- Starlin Castro, +27%
- Michael Brantley, +25%
- Brandon Moss, +22%
- Anthony Rizzo, +22%
- Jay Bruce, +20%
- Jose Altuve, +19%
- Troy Tulowitzki, +17%
- Alexei Ramirez, +17%
- Devin Mesoraco, +17%
- Salvador Perez, +17%
Castro, a year ago, pulled 15% of his air balls, and hit 51% the other way, for a (rounded) difference of -35%. Castro, this year, has pulled 26% of his air balls, and hit 35% the other way, for a difference of -9%. So the (rounded) difference between those differences is +27%, yielding the number above. Castro has drastically reduced his air balls to the opposite field, and he’s turned many of those into pulled flies and liners.
It reads like a list of high achievers. There’s an MVP candidate in there, and some guys having breakthrough campaigns. In all, a year ago, these guys hit .269/.323/.420, with a .151 ISO and a 102 wRC+. This year, they’ve hit .292/.357/.481, with a .189 ISO and a 131 wRC+. The only player who hasn’t gotten better is Bruce, and he’s had some injury issues. All these guys have been able to pull the ball in the air more often, and that’s closely related to performing better at the plate.
Now the other side. Here are the ten biggest negative differences:
- Allen Craig, -35%
- Domonic Brown, -32%
- Mark Reynolds, -27%
- Dioner Navarro, -26%
- Angel Pagan, -25%
- Andrelton Simmons, -25%
- Marcell Ozuna, -24%
- Justin Smoak, -23%
- Andre Ethier, -20%
- Robinson Cano, -19%
Right away, you can see it’s not a killer. And I should mention that right behind Cano is Andrew McCutchen, at -18%. But the list is topped by a couple crushing disappointments, and, a year ago, these guys hit .272/.339/.441, with a .169 ISO and a 116 wRC+. This year, they’ve hit .260/.316/.388, with a .128 ISO and a 96 wRC+. By and large, it’s a worse unit, because it’s a hell of a lot more difficult to sting the ball with authority the other way.
Pagan has been fine, even though his ISO has dropped. Cano has thus far traded extra-base hits for extra singles. Ozuna’s annihilated the pulled balls he has hit. McCutchen’s running a career-best opposite-field wRC+. It’s possible to survive this trade-off, especially if you have MVP-level natural ability, but most things in baseball should be considered on a case-by-case basis, and in most cases, a trade-off like this is a bad thing. With Craig, this seems indicative of something wrong with his swing. Same goes for Brown. A guy like Smoak doesn’t have the power to succeed by pulling the ball less often. You can never be sure what’s a slowing bat and what’s just poor timing or a mechanical hitch, but if a player is hitting the ball in the air the other way more often, at the expense of pulled balls, it seems like it should be worrisome unless it’s part of an intentional plan.
The Cubs have been pleased with Starlin Castro’s offensive development, and as it happens, this year he’s pulling the ball in the air a lot more often. The Cardinals have been badly hurt by Allen Craig’s offensive decline, and this year he’s pulling the ball in the air a lot less often. Andrew McCutchen is also pulling the ball in the air a lot less often, but he’s still thriving because he’s one of the best players in baseball and, like Robinson Cano, he seems able to make the best of what the pitchers will provide. There aren’t many statistical rules in baseball that apply to everybody the same across the board, but exceptions tend to be few, and limited to the truly exceptional.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

Just looking at McCutchen’s spilts he really didn’t show much power until June. Has flyball profile changed since then?
Very well written article. Thanks Jeff
“The only player who hasn’t gotten better is Bruce, and he’s had some injury issues.” You meant “and,” not “because”? If not “because,” why does Bruce suck ballz this year?
OK, yes, “because.” Sorry, very panicked. Not thinking straight.
Jay Bruce’s injuries have us all in a huff, Burton.
Brandon Moss is an interesting case. He hit 30 HRs and had a .267 ISO last year which he’s roughly on track to duplicate last year. His biggest difference at the plate is cutting down the strikeouts a bit. So unless it’s related to his strikeouts, the big increase in pulled fly balls…hasn’t had much of an effect?
Maybe some of the balls he swung under last year are now turning into lazy fly balls to the pull side. If that’s the case, at least he’s going the right way on the “quality-of-contact” scale.
Had to take a look, and this may be on the right track.
So far in 2014, Moss has more fly outs to deep right field than he did all of last year (the gray dots on the two spray charts)
http://www.fangraphs.com/spraycharts.aspx?playerid=4467&position=1B/OF&type=battedball&pid2=4467&ss1=2014&se1=2014&ss2=2013&se2=2013&cht1=hittype&cht2=hittype&vs1=ALL&vs2=ALL
And Dave has the gall to doubt me.
Is this the kind of thing that could be used fairly predictively? If guys are pulling the ball in the air more often, it could be a power breakout leading indicator.
Yes I am wondering this as well. Would this predict McCutchen to have lower power numbers in the future? Does this mean that Brantley isn’t having a fluky season and that he’s figured things out? Does it confirm that Rizzo and Castro have turned things around and this year isn’t a fluke (and conversely, that last year wasn’t a fluky season and they were struggling for real reasons).
What about the case of Allen Craig? Would be interesting to delve into whether players can lose pull power and then regain it. Or how much pull power is dependent on the aging curve, like velocity for pitchers.
It would also be interesting to look at pull power for a guy like Pujols and how it has changed over the years. This is a neat stat and I hope to read future articles about it. Even though I’m a Cardinals fan and it’s another knock against Craig.
I’m a cynic. There are many ballplayers whose power is gone, especially pull power. I just think that with the Braun and Biogenesis revelations, that steroids are gone in the game, along with pull power. Good riddance, I say. Any evidence of that from the stats, looking more generically?
Castro’s last 84AB don’t reflect a good indication of
this being predictive. No homers..limited power numbers.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/split.cgi?id=castrst01&year=2014&t=b#total
So you might want to dial back your outcome thinking: “It reads like a list of high achievers. There’s an MVP candidate in there, and some guys having breakthrough campaigns. ”
I like the idea – just needs another layer to it. SLG or ISO or wOBA to measure the improvement against an offensive metric tied to RC. I see a linear regression r-2, but a standard error/p-value rate would be nice too.
Castro leading this list hasn’t been as
So this is a slump for Castro? This group of 84 ab’s is a trend?
Sorry, it should read “So, this ISN’T a Slump for Castro?”.
Great article Sully. Or is it Sulli? Back in the day it was said the Cubs told Ryne Sandberg to start turning on the ball a little more. I don’t know the year but do remember the result was more, many more home runs by Rhyno. Aren’t hitters taught to turn on the inside pitch and go up the middle and then the other way the further the ball gets away in the zone? It seems to me this might be the natural progression for a young player (Castro) who is starting to learn more about their craft. Your data seems to prove this somewhat.
Also about Cano. Is it possible he’s going the other way due to his new hitting environment? I could see him trying to pull the ball more in Yankee Stadium and going the other way in Seattle.
More numbers to crunch I’m sure. Great stuff. Thanks.
First of all, great analysis.
I hope Allen Craig and John Mabry both read it. Delving into the splits by location further, Craig is hitting 80% of his pulled batted balls in 2014 as grounders compared to around 58% in 2012 and 2013. Additionally from 2012 to 2014 (thus far) he has increased hitting to the opposite field (including grounders) from 22% to 33% of the time, at the expense of both pulling (down 7%) and hitting to center (down 4%). Finally, from 2012 to 2014, the grounders increased from 44% to 57%.
I think it is about time for Craig to give up the opposite field hitting experiment and focus on hitting the ball hard in the air.
Castro 217 / 295 / 261 in July and hasn’t homered since June 20th