The Padres’ Biggest Problem

Even after a win Tuesday, the Padres stand at a flat 20-20, and there’s talk that manager Bud Black might be on the hot seat given ownership expectations. Curiously, the Padres aren’t letting minor-league coach Pat Murphy talk to the Brewers, and while there’s any number of potential explanations, one could be that the team sees Murphy as a Black replacement. Managers get fired by disappointing baseball teams. The Padres haven’t quite lived up to their preseason hype.

When you get to thinking about why, it’s only natural to consider the team defense. It always looked like it was going to be a potential issue, and the numbers indicate the defense has indeed been a weakness, mostly in the outfield. By Defensive Runs Saved, the Padres have been the fourth-worst defensive team in the league. By UZR, they’re second-worst. Right there, it seems like you can explain the team’s bottom-six ERA. But as it turns out, there’s something else going on. Something that’s hurt the Padres even more than their defense.

Here’s a good representative quote, from Tuesday starter James Shields:

“He came after the seventh and said, ‘If I quit giving up home runs, I’d be pretty good,'” Black said after the Padres rallied to top the Cubs, 4-3, at Petco Park on Tuesday.

If you can believe it, the Padres have allowed more home runs than any other team in baseball. They’ve allowed two more than the Brewers, who play their home games in a hitter-friendly environment. They’ve allowed five more than the Blue Jays, who play their home games in a hitter-friendly environment. They’ve allowed a dozen more than the Reds, who, you get it. The Padres have featured a dinger-happy pitching staff. Dingers are automatic runs. They’re the worst possible outcome.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

What does this look like? Below, let’s track the Padres’ team home runs per fly ball allowed, season to season, for as long as we’ve got data:

padres-hr-fb

There’s a spike this year, to 17.2%. Previously, the highest mark we see is right around 14%. The overall average is just barely north of 10%. Think about that average, and think about where the Padres stand today. What’s the cost of all those extra home runs? We’re looking at 23 dingers, north of what you’d expect based on the team average. Now it’s time for some linear-weight approximations. If you, say, turned those extra homers into doubles, that’d be a difference of about 15 runs. If you turned them into outs, it’d be a difference of about 38 runs. If you turned half of them into doubles and half of them into outs, it’s a difference of 26 runs. The defense? The defense has been an issue. The home runs have been a bigger issue. You’re looking at something like two or three or four wins, or thereabouts.

This won’t surprise you: the Padres own the highest team HR/FB% allowed in baseball.

2015-hr-fb

Just in case you’re curious, they also have the highest rate of home runs per ball hit fair:

2015-hr-bip

James Shields has been abused, in between strikeouts. Ian Kennedy’s given up a bunch of homers. Ditto Andrew Cashner. Even Craig Kimbrel has proved unusually hittable. This year, he’s allowed three home runs; last year, he allowed two home runs.

Home runs aren’t fun to allow. They’re the thing you want to protect against the most. It’s difficult to conclusively explain why the Padres are where they are. Maybe they’ve gotten unlucky. Maybe their pitching staff has gotten worse. Maybe there’s something about Derek Norris, even though he didn’t have a homer problem before. Maybe they’re getting into predictable situations, throwing predictable pitches, and batters are doing damage in turn. Generally, you don’t allow a home run when you properly execute.

But, you probably know the bright side. If you’ve been reading FanGraphs for long, you’re familiar with the vagaries of HR/FB%. I noted before the Padres, at the moment, are at 17.2% as a team. The highest team mark posted between 2002 – 2014 was 14.1%, by the 2012 Blue Jays. Right here is a plot of split-season HR/FB% allowed, comparing first and second halves from the past five years.

hr-fb-half-splits

There isn’t a particularly strong relationship, and the equation calls for heavy regression. If we plugged the Padres into the best-fit formula, we’d get an “expected” second-half HR/FB% around 12%. And remember, we aren’t at the All-Star break, nor are we close. We’re a quarter of the way into the season. What’s the right thing to expect from the Padres? Something like an average rate of home runs. Even if it is their fault that what’s happened has happened, history indicates this isn’t keeping up.

About that. The Padres’ adjusted team FIP is second-worst in baseball, and worst in the National League. But this is exactly why we have xFIP. That’s too easy a number, and it makes too simple an assumption, but it works as an indicator when you’re dealing with extreme home-run rates. The Padres are tied for the No. 10 adjusted team xFIP, and they’re even with the Nationals. The difference between the Padres’ FIP- and xFIP- is 22 points. The next-biggest is 15; the next-biggest is 9.

The Padres are going to stop giving up so many homers. These pitches? These were homers, Tuesday night. Wasn’t even necessarily a case of terrible location.

shields1

shields2

kimbrel1

This, meanwhile, didn’t go for a homer.

shields_out

Damn sure could’ve. Would’ve changed the whole game. But, there’s very little difference between a home run and a fly ball to the warning track, a lot of the time. The Padres have had too many balls go a few feet too far. Maybe this .gif is evidence their luck’s about to turn.

The explanations are trickier. Maybe it isn’t luck. Maybe it really is about, say, pitch-sequencing. But, the thing about that is you can learn and make adjustments going forward. If the Padres have been pitching too predictably, they don’t need to keep doing that. What we know is what the numbers say, and the numbers say dinger rates like this don’t sustain. That’s probably true for a variety of reasons, but there’ll be reasons for when the Padres’ numbers settle back to something normal.

And as that happens, the Padres’ pitchers will increasingly hold up their end of the bargain. And the Padres will look like a better baseball team. A team that should win more often than it loses. We’ll just have to see if the numbers figure themselves out in time to save Bud Black’s employment. But no matter who’s in charge, virtually certain regression is coming.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
PR
11 years ago

no mention of this but doesnt Petco make this stat even crazier?

Emcee Peepants
11 years ago
Reply to  PR

Since they moved the fences prior to the 2013 season, Petco has been around 20th in terms of HR Park Factor, at 96 both years. Overall, it’s still a pitcher’s park, but does not suppress HRs like it used to.

D4P
11 years ago

I like how the Padres’ 3 starting outfielders are each in the bottom 8 of outfielder Defensive Value, and in the bottom 12 of overall Defensive Value.

Yirmiyahu
11 years ago
Reply to  D4P

This is not a surprise. They’ve got an averageish RFer playing CF and a DH playing RF. I don’t know what’s happened to Upton when he switched from RF to LF, but he hasn’t been good there.

Rick
11 years ago

This won’t surprise you: the Padres own the highest team HR/FB% allowed in baseball.

Not knowing anything about the Padres’ pitching staff, this does come as a surprise to me. Even with the subtracted fences, I would have suspected the Padres to have a flyball heavy staff that would generate a lot of homers, but a low HR/FB%, infamously like the Giants.

bmasar
11 years ago
Reply to  Rick

I think he means that in the context of having just said how astronomically high the HR/FB% is. As in: they have a crazy high HR/FB%, this won’t surprise you but that crazy high % makes them tops in baseball.

bmasar
11 years ago

Also worth noting is that the previous spike of 14% was the last year in Qualcomm, a fair park IIRC.

LenardMember since 2016
11 years ago

It’s just so odd that the top 4 starters are all suffering career high home run rates while pitching home games at PetCo(Cashner since becoming a full time starter and Ross barely above his previous career high).

Really, I think it’s just BASEBALL! more than anything else.

Feeding the Abscess
11 years ago
Reply to  Lenard

The fences were moved in significantly and lowered in height in 2013. Anecdotally, it seems like most of the HR hit to right field at Petco land in the seating that has been placed behind the new wall and in front of the old wall.

Petco isn’t death to left handed power anymore.

Circlechange11
11 years ago

Looking at the gifts, 2 of the 4 pitches missed their spots: one was intended out and ended up in and the other intended down ended up center. The other 2 hit their spots but not in pitcher friendly locations.

Makes me curious about the locations and intended targets of huge rest of their homers allowed.

CircleChange11
11 years ago
Reply to  Circlechange11

Sorry, autocorrect butchered that post.

As a stat fan or website, we can just show how much outside of the norm this is, assume regression will happen and expect improvement.

As a coach or player, i’ve got to assume that we’re doing something predicatable (maybe repetitive pitch sequences/locations) or we are not executing as we should.

When you’re getting beat by bloopers and ducksnorts, you can chalk that up to luck. But, home runs (or even long flyouts) are the result of good contact, and at the very least it can be said that the Padres pitchers are getting “hit hard” and we would need to find the cause for that effect.

Tommy L
11 years ago

It’s the drought.

Aelfinn
11 years ago

I hope, for Padres’ fans, that the metrics will flatten out as the season progresses. It be nice to see them in the playoffs again. Home runs are killer, but not too bad so long as they’re solos. I’d be interested to see the stats on what kind of counts the pitchers are getting themselves into when giving up these bombs. If they’re happening early or deep into an at-bat, and/or what are the average counts these batters seem to be taking advantage of.

Andrew
11 years ago
Reply to  Aelfinn

Along these same lines, pitch sequences on home runs could be interesting to see. Whether or not a pitcher gets a favorable call on a 1-1 pitch can loom pretty large in an at-bat. There’s probably not a correlation/causation that can be drawn from it, but it’d be neat to see.

jay stokes
11 years ago

I really like the first half and second half, but wonder if some of that is a team getting rid of HR-friendly pitchers in the first half. You would definitely need to control for sufficient sample, but would love to see first vs. second half by starting pitcher.

Grant
11 years ago

How about Preller coming out with a “my bad” comment instead of firing the manager.