The Padres Descend Into Danger
A month ago, things were fine. After the games of July 17, the Padres were 55-40, hanging on to the periphery of the NL West chase. Five games back of the Giants, they didn’t have a ton of hope — our odds gave them a 10.4% chance of winning the division — but they were close enough to dream, and a 5.5-game edge in the Wild Card race meant they had a 92.3% overall chance of reaching the playoffs. Today, that number is down to 46.3%. Yikes!
It didn’t happen overnight. By looking at the slow decline of their chances, I think we might learn a thing or two about what went wrong, and maybe get a sense of what they’ll need to do the rest of the year to avoid plummeting all the way out of the postseason, an outcome that felt downright inconceivable before their recent swoon.
July 24
Record since July 17: 3-3
FG Playoff Odds: 92.3%
Wild Card Lead: 5.5 games
Things were looking up! A huge group of reinforcements had just come off the injured list, as Drew Pomeranz, Blake Snell, Yu Darvish, Ryan Weathers, and Austin Nola all returned to action. On the field, the team fended off some NL East opposition — Nationals, Braves, and Marlins — and kept pace in the standings. Even better news: the trade deadline was approaching fast, and there’s no one better to add to a team than AJ Preller. The Padres were linked to everyone, and after their offseason frenzy, every rumor seemed credible. The playoffs seemed all but a certainty; the real question was whether they could catch the teams ahead of them in the West.
July 31
Record since July 24: 2-4
FG Playoff Odds: 76.7%
Wild Card Lead: 4 games
The deadline went poorly for the Padres. Adam Frazier is a nice piece, but only that; he was hardly a lineup-altering force. In theory, Frazier gave the team the flexibility to avoid playing Eric Hosmer, but Hosmer played in every game the week after Frazier joined the club. Every contender seemingly got a piece of the Cubs and Nationals, but the Padres’ take — Jake Marisnick and Daniel Hudson — was worse than either the Dodgers’ or Giants’.
Meanwhile, the team languished through an easy slate. Despite playing four of their six games against the Rockies and Marlins, they only managed a 2-4 mark. That ate into their Wild Card lead, because the Reds were hot, but four games is still a healthy buffer. But this day was tremendously impactful to the Padres’ chances, and it wasn’t just because they failed to improve at the deadline. Injuries went from a nebulous concern to truly worrisome, as Jay Jaffe detailed at the time (https://blogs.fangraphs.com/injuries-and-an-underwhelming-deadline-have-dealt-the-padres-significant-blows/).
The lesser of two blows came in the form of Chris Paddack, who strained his oblique in a bullpen session that took place just after the deadline. That of course meant the Padres couldn’t trade for a replacement, but he wasn’t close to the biggest injury of the day. That came when Fernando Tatis Jr. re-injured his shoulder sliding into third base, his fifth subluxation of the year. That earned him an immediate spot on the IL, and missing a few weeks of Tatis did serious damage to the team’s playoff odds. Yet again, the timing of the injury stung; the trade market had several shortstops, but the Padres had passed on them.
August 7
Record since July 31: 3-2
FG Playoff Odds: 66.9%
Wild Card Lead: 2.5 games
You’d think that going 3-2 would give you some breathing room, but those pesky Reds just kept coming, going 5-1 over the week. Meanwhile, San Diego’s divisional hopes were now more or less gone — the Giants held a 7.5-game lead — which made missing out on Scherzer all the more painful. Ryan Weathers got shelled by the woeful Diamondbacks, Mark Melancon blew a save — the action on the field was maddening.
A team can stomach several of this sort of week, though. With their best player out, passing time above .500 is a fine place to end up. Managing that record despite a blown save and two starts from rookie pitchers? It’s as good as they could have hoped for. Weeks like this are why leads tend to hold up. The Padres are a good team even with Tatis sidelined. They’re a good team even with the last two spots in their rotation held by rookies. If they played .600 baseball for the remainder of the year, they’d easily make the playoffs. This is why dopey internet pundits like me trust the odds; more often than not, talent and games in hand win out.
August 14
Record since August 7: 3-4
FG Playoff Odds: 56.9%
Wild Card Lead: 2.5 games
Wait, huh? The Padres were awful over this stretch. Their slate was as easy as it comes, with three against the Marlins and four against the Diamondbacks, and they were lucky to finish 3-4 — those motley outfits outscored them by 16 runs. It was the kind of week that can weigh a team down. You win more against the bad teams than the good ones, and winning five of seven in these soft patches of schedule is how good teams get to their gaudy records.
But wait! The gap in the race didn’t tighten. That’s because the Reds played a significantly tougher schedule and also only managed a 3-4 record. You can’t give away too many easy weeks like this, but you can give away some, especially if there’s only one team chasing you. Leads are valuable things.
But wait again! We knocked 10 percentage points off of San Diego’s playoff odds, despite no change in the standings. That’s partially because of the schedules — the Padres got through the soft underbelly of their schedule without banking any extra wins. We simulate the season 20,000 times to come up with our odds, and in many of those scenarios, this week catapulted the Padres up in the standings — it’s a lot easier to pick up games when you play a bunch of scrubs.
Even worse, injuries continued to mount. Drew Pomeranz had missed a ton of time in the 2021 season, but he’d been excellent when healthy, to the tune of a 1.75 ERA (and 3.03 FIP). In his nine appearances since returning from the IL (up at the start of this article), he’d been on form (2.08 ERA, 3.18 FIP). Then he felt something in his arm, and that was that — a torn flexor tendon is going to keep him out for the rest of the year. The bullpen has been a strength this season, but it’s had to be, with all the injuries to starting pitching.
Speaking of injuries to starting pitching: the Padres have been downright cursed. Darvish and Joe Musgrove had been the team’s only reliable starters all year — Snell has been a mess and Paddack has been hurt. In Darvish’s August 12 start, his lower back tightened up in the third inning — and potentially before that, as he looked off all night. The team evaluated him over the next few days, then placed him on the IL Sunday.
It would be hard to overstate how much this injury hurts. The Padres came into the season with a strong but shallow rotation. Darvish, Snell, Musgrove, Paddack, and Dinelson Lamet were one of the best top fives in baseball, but depth was always a question. That question has been answered, and not in a good way: Weathers doesn’t look ready for prime time. Adrian Morejon lasted two starts before needing Tommy John surgery. Reiss Knehr was rushed to the majors, but he’s no one’s idea of a sure thing.
Things were so bad that the Padres had to bring in Jake Arrieta. That’s… suboptimal. Arrieta was so bad this year that the Cubs cut him loose unconditionally rather than let him play out the string. That might be partially due to his, uh, divisive locker room presence, but it’s also because he’s been awful. His 6.88 ERA hardly looks like a fluke — he’s walking 9.5% of the batters he faces while striking out only 18.1%, below average on both counts.
Everywhere you look, the signs are grim. Fastball velocity? It’s the lowest of his career. Swinging strike rate? A woeful 7.2%. Opponents are smashing line drives, getting the ball in the air, and knocking the stuffing out of it when they do. ZiPS and Steamer both think he’ll be replacement level the rest of the season, but I think they’re too kind; he simply looks cooked. The -0.7 WAR he’s totaled so far this year feels more like a guide to his form than the Arrieta of old at this point.
And that’s only San Diego’s fourth starter! Matt Strahm, who last started in 2019, was pressed into service to round out the rotation, likely as part of a bullpen game. With Snell still scuffling, that leaves Musgrove as the lone dependable starter. Despite the injuries, the Padres have a great offense and a great bullpen — and they’ll have to given the pitching they’re counting on.
August 18
Record since August 14: 1-2
FG Playoff Odds: 46.3%
Wild Card Lead: 1.5 games
That brings us to today. The Strahm bullpen game resulted in yet another loss to the Rockies, the team’s second straight. The Reds are still gaining, and the Padres are running out of easy games. The projected strength of their remaining schedule is the hardest in the majors — we project their opponents to play .539 baseball the rest of the way.
There’s still plenty of baseball to play, and the Padres still have the lead. Tatis is back, albeit in right field. The offense has scuffled over the past month, and deadline acquisitions Frazier and Marisnick have combined for -0.4 WAR, but the team still looks like a top 10 offense in baseball, particularly with Tatis back in the fold. Figuring out where to play everyone will of course be complicated, but it’s a good problem to have — lots of teams would love to find a way to plug Tatis into their outfield.
Still, their path to the playoffs has narrowed considerably. A month ago, the Padres merely had to hold serve to reach the postseason, and they had a stretch of games against the Rockies and Diamondbacks to help pad their lead. Those games are gone. The lead might be next. If they can’t fix their pitching — either by getting Darvish, Lament and Paddack back or by coaxing something out of Arrieta — they won’t make the playoffs.
Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.
Do the Red Sox now (I know FG thinks they’re elite, but…)
I am a Padre fan and I was very optimistic until recent days. Two straight bullpen days and Jake Arrieta starting today made me realize how dire the pitching situation is.
I wonder how much the pitching coach is to blame? It seems so strange that so many pitchers are getting injured or underperforming. And Mackenzie Gore has been unimpressive in AAA this year.
As a Dodger fan who was pretty sure the Pads and Giants would be in opposite positions, it’s bizarre, too. It’s hard to know what coaching is and causes on a team/individual basis from the outside, but I think Ben’s right that the Pads simply didn’t have pitching depth. It took the Dodgers a long time to build up a pen that could withstand the loss of 4 starters and multiple relievers, which is probably the only reason they’re not in the Pads’ position.
This is only year 1 of SD’s rise, and like LA, they’ve had a bad injury luck season after a fairly fortunate one. Once they start piling on depth, I think we’ll see things even out. Still have no idea if the Giants regress or not next year (they have to, right?), but I’d bet on SD to beat their ’21 win total in ’22 right now.
The Giants have to regress next year. They simply don’t lose. This is the year the baseball gods are just smiling on them.
78-42 is staggering. On pace for 105 wins. They have multiple guys in their mid 30s having career years. Somehow they are getting it done in 2021, but I have to think the Padres have the brighter future after this season.
Wouldn’t you call this year 2 of the Padres’ rise? The Dodgers beat the Padres in the second round of last year’s playoffs.
Last year was the Pads’ soft opening–they were legitimately great, but ahead of schedule 🙂 I’m a little worried now that Lamet, Gore, and Weathers might not pan out, but it’s hard to imagine next year not being better because unless Clevinger gets lost in the Springfield Mystery Spot or something, it just *has* to.
I’m convinced the Giants’ run is the baseball gods’ retribution for signing Bauer.
The Giants also have a number of pitchers who are going to be free agents and/or likely regression candidates.
this is baseball, nothing is inevitable.
Soft tissue injuries have been up across all of baseball this year, likely due to the shortened season last year. It’s no one team’s or coach’s fault.
The lack of a minor league season at all last year has obviously affected prospect development, as well.
I don’t think games against the Rockies at Coors count as “easy games”. The Rox have what, the second best home record in the Majors?
Good call. Rockies:
Home: 40-21
Away: 14-45
That is staggering.
It’s definitely the story of the season, at least for non-competitive teams. I’ve never seen a team put in a season like that, in any sport.
Not as extreme, but I feel like the Memphis Grizzlies were crazy good at home for a few seasons while being “just good” away.
Great stat, got me to thinking about the current state of home field advantage.
If anyone cares: Home teams leaguewide are winning at a .550 clip this season. Take out the Rockies and that number falls to .546. Both numbers are above historic averages (by decade), though perhaps not by a large enough margin to be particularly noteworthy.
Noise or a COVID bounce back? Interesting!
Runner on 2nd in extras. Look at the record of home teams in extra inning games this year.
AZ also has a 14-45 away record
Wow. That needs an article by itself
Getting Lament back sounds like a perfectly Emil Cioran thing to do.
^
I’m shocked that 16 people (or more!?) know who Emil Cioran is.
Arrieta is “divisive” because he asked a reporter, sitting by himself, conducting a video interview, if he could take off his mask during the interview????
Absolutely nothing in that linked Athletic article is divisive or controversial. It’s about how he is not good at baseball anymore.
That was a weird, untrue and unnecessary shot to take at Arrieta.
Jed Hoyer publicly refuted Arrieta’s statement about how reaching the 85% team vaccination threshold was not a competitive advantage. Arrieta has also been very vocal about his stance on vaccination.
It’s only “controversial” if you disagree with said stance.
I just read the article too. Nothing there that’s “controversial” other than that. Supposedly, he’s against the vaccine, but I wouldn’t have gotten that from the post on The Athletic that’s linked. It’s also oddly thrown in there in The Athletic post. Nothing about how the reporter responded, how it was said, etc.
I think it’s fair to note that he wouldn’t have been cut if it wasn’t for the PR problems. The Cubs still have to pay him.
But also, Arrieta’s ERA, FIP, and xERA are all over 6.
No, it’s not fair to say that at all. He was cut for being terrible. Stop this you guys, you have no reason to spread false narratives like this.
Yea “divisive” in this case seems like an overexaggeration and reeks of bias from the writer, which unfortunately has become too frequent in Fangraphs the last few years.
But Arrieta stinks and has no business on an MLB a roster regardless of how good or bad his locker room presence is
Arrieta is the classic example of “if you have an unpopular opinion, keep it to yourself.” If Arrieta never mentioned the mask thing, would he still be a Cub? Maybe not. But we wouldn’t know this story, either.
For all the praise we give outspoken athletes, we often forget the wisdom of those who keep their mouths shut.
Yes, only talk if we like what you are going to say. But if your opinion differs from mine, then keep it to yourself. That about sums up most people’s thinking.
I think a better way to put it is, if your opinion is unpopular, your xERA sure better be under 5.00*. If it isn’t, shut it.
*if you’re going to repeat 9/11 conspiracy theories or something truly out there, your xERA better be a whole lot lower than 5.00.
You guys are making something out of nothing. There are no conspiracy theories. Read the article. Arrieta did not get cut because he asked a reporter to take a mask off over video. Stop being sheep, people.
Once you read “sheep” you can stop reading, it tells you all you need to know…
I noticed yesterday that the Reds have 4 games against the Cubs (who are playing terribly), 6 against the Pirates, and 7 against the Marlins. The Padres have only 7 games total against teams with losing records going forward, and two of those are against the Angels (who could very well have Trout back by then and are only one game under .500). In addition to 19 games against some combination of the Dodgers, Giants, and Astros. You have to like the Reds’ chances in this scenario.
So what happens, the Reds lose two in a row to the Cubs, losers of 12 straight. As a great sage from the Bronx keeps reminding us, “You can’t predict baseball Suzyn”.
Yeah the Reds strike me as a house of cards. There just isn’t enough pitching to stay hot for long enough. Think they regret trading away the back end of their bullpen for scraps last off-season? But the Padres schedule is scary and they’ve been reduced to bringing guys off the street just to soak up innings. Gonna be a race to the bottom, probably decided by how long Darvish is out. Don’t overlook the Cards (who aren’t very good, but no one else is either), Phillies (ditto), and Mets (I dunno).
Not much of a prize, either, having to go to Dodger Stadium and face Buehler or Scherzer (or both) in a one-game playoff. For you fans of the stupid “reverse order” idea for the draft: Think any of those teams might prefer getting the first pick in next year’s draft over the one game in L.A.?
The pitching is probably fine. Maybe the bullpen has some issues but the rotation is #10 by Depth Charts. Besides, they’ve got something like 13 combined games against the Marlins and the Pirates. And the Padres schedule is brutal. They don’t have to be a better team, they just have to win a few more games, and the schedule helps that.
That said, it would be a pretty cool system if the team that gets bounced in the wild-card gets one of the top two picks in the draft. Getting to the wild card game and losing absolutely stinks. It’s a lousy consolation prize for fans but at least there would be a silver lining (everything else could stay the same, as far as I’m concerned).
Not directly related to their descent, but there’s cause for concern about the team’s development of pitchers. Having to rely on Arrieta and Strahm is mainly due to injuries, obviously, but it’s also because they’ve got no pitching in the upper minors. I would imagine that most teams have a few league average-ish arms they could turn to in lieu of Arrieta, whose only discernible value at this point is “being a veteran,” whatever that’s worth.
I’ve been discussing this with a friend recently. How can we fairly evaluate the Padres’ pitcher development, or lack thereof? Lots of injuries; some ineffectiveness. Gore’s development has been unusual.
OTOH, Musgrove got better.
I want to avoid resulting, aka evaluating the Padres’ abilities on the results, since things can happen and pitchers all break. Does anyone feel they have a well reasoned take on the Padres’ ability recently to develop and keep healthy their pitching?
That is an interesting way to describe Gore’s development or, more correctly, total lack of development. Jesus Luzardo, equally highly touted, isn’t doing much better. TINSTAAPP is the truest acronym in baseball.
Musgove has nothing to do with the Padres pitching development. He came up in the Astros system, then became a good MLB pitcher with the Pirates, two excellent pitching development teams.
There aren’t that many teams that have adequate 6th or 7th starters. Darvish, Paddack, Lamet, and Morejon are all hurt. Snell’s a mess but I think that was a possible outcome when they traded for him; Snell being the Padres’ problem is a different department of mistakes. That’s five starters before you get to Musgrove. Weathers is 21 and probably better than most 7th starters (who look more like Arrieta). Gore is 22.
Snell has had 3 straight good starts. Granted two were versus Arizona, but he seems to be coming around a bit.
I tend to agree with you and bosox. They had as much depth as plenty of teams. Injuries happen, particularly in these last two weird seasons, and prospects don’t develop as quickly as we’d like (or at all). The Pads are paying big money or gave up a lot for Darvish, Musgrove and particularly Clevenger, so it’s hard to expect them to find another quality starter. And they were surprised by the Dodgers’ Scherzer acquisition. I wouldn’t blame their coaching staff without firm evidence.
Yeah the Padres have a world class starting rotation on the IL. It would be one of the best in baseball. Sometimes a thing is just a thing, and there’s nothing else going on. You can’t explain luck.
As a Padres fan, Preller was taking big risks. Paddack has been better this year but was not very good last year. Morejon was a giant unknown and was awful as a starter prior to injury. Lamet finished last year with a serious injury. He traded away guys like Quantrill, Lauer, Lucchesi, Patino that would have given us depth. The Snell trade is looking on the order of the Kemp trade or Hosmer signing. Snell was great in 2018, solid in 2019 but at least by fWAR, middling all the other years so trading away a lot of the farm to snag him seems classic Preller. He has pushed in most of the chips and we are struggling to make the WC.
As a Padres fan I completely agree with this, but it’s also worth noting that the trades made over the past 18 months to acquire Snell and Clevinger absolutely gutted that AAAA depth the team had, and Snell has been mostly bad and Clevinger has yet to contribute. The team could mightily use the likes of Luis Patiño, Cal Quantrill, and Logan Allen right now, and they don’t have it, largely because they traded to get the guys who should be contributing right now!
It’s hard to say if it’s bad luck or bad GM’ing by Preller, but as always in life, it’s likely a mix of both.
This is true. I think they overdid it substantially. Just got trigger happy and made gamble after gamble, putting more and more of their future into a few players, who then all got hurt. Also screwed up in overvaluing Gore, who presumably would have been sufficient by himself to make any of these deals.
It only seems like a gamble because they are extremely unlucky with injuries.
Luck or bad training staff? When injuries are this frequent it’s never just luck but some underlying issues in the coaching.
If this author was a member of the Seattle press corps, the narrative would be that the Padres played poorly after the break because the front office did not reinforce the team at the deadline, leading the players to question if the FO was willing to “go for it.” Funny that is not mentioned here.
I wanted to take a moment to explain my downvote. Your comment was about something that bothers you but is not relevant to this article. It doesn’t add anything to the conversation, and for the 95% of readers unfamiliar with the Mariners’ press coverage, it sounds like 100% sour grapes.
I don’t like mayonnaise, but that doesn’t mean I should bring it up in every discussion about food.
Indeed…to say nothing of the fact that SD and SEA are not similar franchises in any way other than time zone
They are designated rivals.
Oh the blood that has been spilled in the stands over the years when these two franchises face off….yeah, neither fan-base cares but MLB had to match them up with someone.
The heat the Mariners got from the media and their own players was also wildly unwarranted. They had 5% playoff odds at the time of the deadline and pulled off an absolute heist getting Toro for Graveman
Perhaps the Seattle press corps was just shocked by the lack of action from the FO? When you are used to covering 20 trades a year, you get a little spoiled
Karma for how unbelievably insufferable and arrogant their fans became after having one good 60-game stretch in a decade.
Raise your hand if your genuinely surprised that Darvish is injured.
I just don’t see them sitting Hosmer. It’s not just the huge contract, it’s the psychological commitment to him. He’s basically a slight better than league average hitter, and a slightly better than replacement value overall player. If he were less important, he’d be platooning–except he doesn’t have much a platoon split. The mistake was being fooled by Boras in the first place, no so much in signing him, as in paying so much for so long.
You can and should platoon him, because RH bats confined to 1B that can kill LHP are in pretty heavy supply
The Padres lost again to a bad team tonight!
Meanwhile, don’t forget that the Reds aren’t their only competition for that last Wild Card spot. The Cardinals and Phillies have also been gaining ground against them, and the Mets aren’t out of it yet, either.
As noted above, the Rockise at home are VERY far from a bad team. In fact they’re one of the best in baseball.
time for Larry Rothschild to move onto some other career or retire. SF and LA have lapped SD on the pitcher development front. Wonder what Sonny Gray has to say….
“The Padres came into the season with a strong but shallow rotation. Darvish, Snell, Musgrove, Paddack, and Dinelson Lamet were one of the best top fives in baseball”
Interesting take. If this is shallow, 25 teams in baseball have a…shallow-er rotation?