The Pirates Have Some Hope
At 10-1, the Mets own the National League’s best record, but the bigger surprise relative to preseason expectations may be the Pirates, who after Thursday’s 6-1 victory over the Cubs are 9-3, are tied with the Diamondbacks for the league’s second-best record. After a 75-win 2017 campaign and then an offseason during which they dealt away Gerrit Cole and Andrew McCutchen and pared their payroll to the majors’ fourth-smallest, the Bucs appeared destined to spend 2018 languishing with the other rebuilding teams. They may do so yet, but for the moment, their hot start is worth a closer look.
The 2017 Pirates were not much fun. They had just one month with a record above .500 (a 14-11 July), never got further than a game above .500, and finished 13th in the NL in scoring, with a lineup featuring just four players to produce a 100 wRC+ or better (McCutchen, Josh Bell, David Freese, and Josh Harrison) — and just two with a WAR of at least 2.0 (McCutchen and Harrison). Starling Marte drew an 80-game PED suspension, Jung Ho Kang missed the entire season after failing to secure a work visa in the wake of his third DUI conviction in South Korea, Francisco Cervelli was limited to 81 games by a variety of injuries, and Gregory Polanco regressed significantly (more on him momentarily).
On the other side of the ball, they were seventh in run prevention, but Cole looked more plow horse than thoroughbred, and while Jameson Taillon made an inspiring in-season return from testicular cancer, top pitching prospect Tyler Glasnow was pummeled for a 7.69 ERA and 6.30 FIP. Travis Sawchik has the gory details of the big picture.
In the wake of what appeared to be a pair of era-ending trades — McCutchen to the Giants, Cole to the Astros — that failed to bring back anybody who could assume the mantel of franchise player, the Pirates were projected for a 76-86 record and an 8.8% chance at the playoffs, lower than all but four other NL teams.
Already, their playoff odds are up to 19.7%. While battling bad weather that caused two postponements in the season’s first three days, the Pirates opened with a three-game sweep of the Tigers in Detroit, split a two-game series with the Twins, took three of four from the Reds, and most recently took two of three from the Cubs at Wrigley Field. Their 9-3 start is their best since 1992, the year they began 10-2 en route to their third straight NL East title, the last one before Barry Bonds skipped town. In each of the three seasons since in which they’ve made the playoffs (2013-15), they started 6-6, a split they apparently liked so much that they did it again in 2016 and -17, minus the Wild Card berths.
Historically speaking, a 9-3 start isn’t an automatic ticket to the playoffs, but it does bode very well. Of the 32 teams to get out to such a start 1995-2017, 22 reached the playoffs, 19 by winning their respective divisions. Fourteen of the last 15 such teams reached the postseason, 12 by winning their respective divisions:
| Team | Year | Record | Postseason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rays | 2010 | 96-66 | Won Division |
| Yankees | 2010 | 95-67 | Won Wild Card + LDS |
| Twins | 2010 | 94-68 | Won Division |
| Phillies | 2011 | 102-60 | Won Division |
| Rangers | 2011 | 96-66 | Won Pennant |
| Nationals | 2012 | 98-64 | Won Division |
| Tigers | 2012 | 88-74 | Won Pennant |
| Cardinals | 2012 | 88-74 | Won Wild Card + LDS |
| Dodgers | 2012 | 86-76 | Missed Playoffs |
| A’s | 2013 | 96-66 | Won Division |
| Royals | 2015 | 95-67 | Won World Series |
| Dodgers | 2015 | 92-70 | Won Division |
| Mets | 2015 | 90-72 | Won Pennant |
| Cubs | 2016 | 103-58 | Won World Series |
| Nationals | 2016 | 95-67 | Won Division |
From the larger set of 32, the 2000 Yankees were the only other team to win the World Series, while the 2002 Giants were the only other pennant winner. The 32 9-3 teams combined for a .567 winning percentage over the course of their full seasons, roughly the equivalent of a 92-win season.
(If you’re wondering about the fates of teams that started the year 9-3 or better, the count is 31 out of 49 for the playoffs, 26 of those by winning the division. Nine won pennants, with the 1998 Padres and 2003 Yankees, both of whom started 10-2, the ones not mentioned thus far.)
The Pirates have rolled to their hot start thanks in large part to an offense that has bashed out an NL-high 6.42 runs per game. Let’s see if we can figure out why:
| Name | PA | HR | AVG | OBP | SLG | wRC+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gregory Polanco | 53 | 5 | .262 | .385 | .714 | 189 |
| Corey Dickerson | 44 | 1 | .341 | .386 | .610 | 171 |
| Colin Moran | 40 | 1 | .343 | .425 | .486 | 153 |
| Francisco Cervelli | 46 | 2 | .250 | .348 | .500 | 135 |
| Josh Bell | 54 | 1 | .304 | .389 | .435 | 132 |
| Starling Marte | 54 | 2 | .234 | .333 | .489 | 128 |
| Josh Harrison | 54 | 1 | .313 | .370 | .417 | 121 |
| Jordy Mercer | 46 | 0 | .256 | .348 | .359 | 90 |
As a team, the Pirates lead the NL in all three slash stats (.278/.353/.479) and wRC+ (129), the last two figures by 44 and 17 points, respectively. Nobody is suggesting that’s sustainable, but if you’re getting average-or-better production from every position but one, yeah, you’ll put up runs galore. Note the hot starts of Moran, the new third baseman acquired in the Cole trade, and Dickerson, added in a February deal that was primarily a salary dump for the Rays, as Daniel Hudson, who was sent to Tampa Bay, didn’t even make the team. Marte and Cervelli have bounced back from subpar 2017 seasons (91 wRC+ for the former and 93 from the latter).
On the other side of the ball, the Pirates haven’t done a great job of keeping opponents off the board (4.83 runs per game, 13th in the NL), but Jameson Taillon is showing signs of emerging as the staff ace, and the rotation as a whole ranks a respectable fifth in ERA (3.36) and seventh in FIP (3.82). The less said about the bullpen’s 6.97 ERA and 4.43 FIP, both the league’s second worst, the better.
Turning attention back to the offense, of the most interest, at least to these eyes, is the performance of Polanco, who homered twice against the Cubs on Thursday. The 26-year-old right fielder now has five dingers in 11 games, a particularly notable showing for a player who managed just 11 homers in 108 games last year while serving three separate disabled list stints for a strained left hamstring.
The 6-foot-5, 235-pound Polanco has had a hard time living up to the expectations that come with his size. As a prospect, he was viewed as having plus power potential, albeit with some concerns given his long swing. Yet from the time he debuted in June 2014 through the end of the 2017 season, he’d hit just .252/.315/.401 with 49 homers in 1,920 plate appearances, which prorates to 15 homers per 600 PA. Only in 2016 did he homer more than 11 times or slug above .400; that year, by far the best of his big-league career, he hit .258/.323/.463 with 22 homers for a 106 wRC+, still just three points ahead of all corner outfielders as a group.
As a starting point for a 24-year-old player, that’s okay, but last year’s .251/.305/.391 (81 wRC+) was a setback. Among players with at least 400 PA, Polanco was in the bottom quartile in O-Swing% (34.4%), BB% (6.6%), BABIP (.272), OBP (.305), SLG (.391), and ISO (.140). One thing that particularly stands out is his lack of success when pulling the ball, which he did with some frequency (44.1%, just within the top quartile). One of these things is not like the others:
| Season | Pull% | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wRC+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 39.2% | 87 | .314 | .310 | .605 | 157 |
| 2015 | 39.4% | 187 | .332 | .332 | .545 | 140 |
| 2016 | 49.2% | 204 | .322 | .320 | .634 | 150 |
| 2017 | 44.1% | 141 | .277 | .277 | .454 | 88 |
Woof. Only six out of 161 qualified players had a lower wRC+ when pulling the ball last year, and only nine had a lower SLG. Don’t blame the shift, as Polanco had better numbers against it (.426 SLG, 95 wRC+) than overall. It’s quite possible the issue was injury related, and what we’re seeing now is simply the healthy version. A return even to his typical career performance would probably make him an average player again, but he’s exceeded those thus far. In the teensy sample of 15 PA in which he’s pulled the ball this year, he’s slugging 1.200 with a 363 wRC+. Through Thursday, he’s hitting .262/.385/.714 overall and has walked in 17% of his plate appearances, roughly double his career rate. He’s hitting more flies than grounders for the first time (0.69 GB/FB this year vs 1.20 for his career), and his average exit velocity of 91.6 mph is a 5.1-mph increase over last year, and a 2.0 mph increase over 2016.
Obviously, Polanco won’t slug .714 for the rest of the season, but the Pirates can hope that their young right fielder, who’s under control through at least 2021, is becoming the cornerstone that they envisioned. If he is, then their chances of converting this 9-3 start into a playoff berth and erasing the sour taste of the winter’s trades, will be much greater.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
Led by Gregory Polanco!? Hmph. Team-leader-in-WAR Corey Dickerson takes exception to your single-minded rush to praise Gregory Polanco.
In fact, Dickerson is a full 1-WAR over CJ Cron, his supposed replacement in TB. Who, I should add, when added to Hudson’s retained salary, costs more than Dickerson does this year.
I wouldn’t suggest rigidly looking to WAR this early in the season, mostly due to the noise with defensive stats. So far Dickerson’s DEF rating is +2.0, while he’s been negative in that area every year of his career.
The last two years Dickerson posted a positive rating in left field before positional adjustment. Believe it! He gets a bad reputation because he spent so long trying to track down balls in the massive Colorado outfield (which makes everyone look bad), and then he got moved over to DH in Tampa. He’s still not as good as this year makes him look, but he can contribute there, and he’s also running a 171 wRC+.
I mean, I wouldn’t suggest looking to any stat this early in the season rigidly, but at least this allows us to say fun things about the legendary Corey Dickerson.
I only listen to the games via MLB ATbat but chronic curmudgeon Bob Walk has been raving about Dickerson’s D.
I’m an old guy so I can appreciate Dickerson’s approach to defense. He uses two hands whenever possible to catch the ball. And unlike Polanco, Frazier, Osuna, Rodriquez and others that Hurdle/Huntington have put out there he reads the ball well enough to peel off on hard hit balls he knows he can’t get to and gets in position to try to corral the ball. He’s not an elite outfielder but he’s a pretty damn good professional outfielder!
A lot of what Dickerson does looks really weird to me, and especially how high over his head he catches fly balls makes me nervous, but for all the weirdness of how it looks, Dickerson makes everything he does work somehow.
The Dickerson dump was/is shocking. He would be their 2nd best position player.
They’re also hitting .333 with men on base. Once that drops back down to (at very least) a more sustainable level, their porous pitching staff will drop this team like an anchor.
The sad thing is that they have chosen to go with Bell and ignored Osuna’s great spring. Bell is a butcher on defense and Osuna is the best defensive first baseman in the organization
Osuna will get plenty of Atbats this year. He’s officially a the backup to Freese as the backup corner IF due to the addition of Dickerson , which made Frazier the backup corner OF ….and Sean Rodriguez backs up everything else.
Jerrick Suiter takes exception to your anointing Osuna the best defensive first baseman in the organization. And Bell is a better hitter than Osuna, let’s not try to kid ourselves otherwise.
Osuna’s a fine bench player. Bell is a legitimate starter, despite his defense.
That table might (accidentally) minimize the contribution of Jordy Mercer so far. He’s the 8th in wRC+, but he’s on base at a healthy ~.350 clip.
This being the National League, I’d say he’s out-performing the expectations of his role.
Pitching might be a problem going forward, though.
They’ve even had a little bad luck so far with AJ Schugel being injured and Musgrove’s setback pulling Brault out if the bullpen.
I would love to see those teams above and how they compared to the preseason projections. Might give a better idea of the Pirates odds at finishing above their projections.
so with the 9-3 or better “rule” that would mean these teams are all in good shape- Boston, Angels, Astros, Mets, and D’Backs. Using the 31/49 thing since 1995- that would mean that 4 of the 6 make the playoffs.
Which 2 don’t?
Angels and Mets have fragility concerns on the pitching side.
Congrats to the Pirates on the quick start. Many Bucs fans (and some non Bucs fans…myself) criticized the haul on GC but I hope it works out for them. The franchise is a small market but having a good product on the field, beautiful stadium, affordable (relatively…) tickets and an owner who makes money are all positives.
The Pirates have young players who have yet to establish themselves. This includes Polanco (injuries). It would not surprise me if the team barely made it past the McClatchy Line (.500). They could also win 90 games or more. This also would not surprise me. The Pirates had a top farm system for a number of years. We are now waiting to see if those players are worth the hype they had in the recent past.
Number of impact players produced in 10 years of drafting (usually in the top 10 picks) by Neal Huntington? One: Gerrit Cole, who mysteriously went from being mediocre to a total stud upon leaving the org.
NH is like the middle manager who never quite offends enough to be fired, but continually holds back the division from any meaningful success.
Taillon probably belongs on that list, and I think Bell will by the end of this season. And Pedro Alvarez had a couple at least above-average seasons carried by an impact skill before forgetting how to throw, and then catch. I like what I’ve seen from Glasnow enough lately to expect him to step into impact player territory this year or next, whether as a starter or reliever, and if Meadows is healthy this year, he very well might, too, as he looked great in Spring Training and has continued to look good in the season’s early goings. And with Newman’s sudden new focus on driving the ball rather than trying to just place it someone in play, he might surprise some folks in that respect, coming up this year and moving Mercer to the bench.
The problem is…NH has been on the job for 11 years come this fall and you’re still pointing out guys to “wait and see” on. There’s always guys you can wait and see who are in the system and not yet at the big league level. There’s more than enough evidence to see that he’s pretty spotty when drafting/developing.
Here is a list of the Pirates Round 1/CBA draft picks during the Huntington era. I included players the Pirates could have picked who became impact players. The double asterisks that mark two draft years indicate strong draft classes. The single asterisks that mark two draft years indicate weak draft classes.
* 2008: Pedro Alvarez, 2 (alternative: Posey, 5)
* 2009: Tony Sanchez, 4 (alternative: Trout, 25)
** 2010: Jamison Taillon, 2 (alternatives: Machado, 3; Sale, 13; Yelich, 23, Snydergaard, 38; Castellanos, 44)
** 2011: Gerritt Cole, 1 (alternatives: Bundy, 4; Rendon, 6; Lindor, 8; Springer, 11; Fernandez, 14; Gray, 18)
2012: Mark Appel, 8 (DNS) (alternatives: Stroman, 22; McCullers, 41)
2013: Austin Meadows, 9 and Reese McGuire, 14 (alternatives: none)
2014: Cole Tucker, 24 and Conner Joe, 39 (alternatives: none)
2015: Kevin Newman and Ke’Bryan Hayes, 39 (alternatives: none)
2016: Will Craig, 22 and Nick Lodolo, 41 (DNS) (alternatives: none)
2017: Shane Baz, 12 (alternatives: none)
Obviously, recent draft classes cannot be assessed with any clarity as to their outcome. Thus, the lack of alternatives in those years.
Thus, the record shows the Huntington Pirates with six top-ten picks. The record also shows that, apart from the weak 2009 draft class, led by Tony Sanchez, the Pirates did not produce a head scratching blunder in any of their first-round picks. Even the Sanchez pick had a rational defense: The Pirates refused to overpay for overrated players and instead used the money to draft and sign pitchers taken in the later rounds. They adopted a quantity over quality approach. The pitchers they picked did not pan out; Tony Sanchez only achieved a few coffee breaks in his career. It was disastrous draft class, but not a product of an irrational strategy.
Moreover, if the Pirates lacked head scratching blunders in the first-round, their selections also reflected the industry consensus on the value of the players available to them. Alvarez was a top-of-the-class selection. Only Posey became a star. Even Tony Sanchez had Mike Trout as his only alternative (a player who became an impact player). Nearly every team whiffed on Trout. Taillon and Cole had obvious alternatives since they were members of strong draft classes. Yet, neither pick was a head-scratcher; the Pirates took both in talent appropriate slots. The only other questionable top-ten pick made by the Pirates during the Huntington era: Mark Appel. The consensus at that time had Appel going in the first five picks; the geniuses in Huston made Appel the first pick in the 2013. Appel became one the more noteworthy draft busts in history.
It is worth mentioning that no one complains much about the Astros drafting strategy even though the Stros wasted first-over-all picks on Appel and Aiken. Criticism of the strategies and methods the Pirates used this past decade should be evaluated with that fact in mind. If a team wins championships, they are criticized less even when criticism is warranted. Success is also a flame retardant even if that success is partly a product of dumb luck. Championship in Houston. The Stros: Good. They Pirates: Bad. Q.E.D.
Any claim that Huntington failed to draft an impact player save for Cole ignores the context in which the team made their choices. It also ignores the fact that the Pirates have draft classes coming to the majors right now. Such dismissals are also made without evidence showing that the Huntington Pirates are uniquely incompetent and made their picks because of their incompetence. They amount to whining.
My conclusion: Huntington and company made defensible first-round picks in every year but one.
Defensible doesn’t matter after awhile. The ultimate job is to produce an effective major league team, and NH has done a rather spotty job of that. The best way to produce an effective team for a small market team is to draft effectively and sign LA talent.
While NH may have made defensible first round picks, other than Cole none were really impact players either. And while the Astros bombed a couple of big ones, they’ve also got Correa, Springer, and Bregman who are high impact players; the first two have been higher impact than Cole, and I suspect Bregman will fulfill that as well. In addition, the Astros have turned some of their first round picks (Appel and Cameron, namely) into fairly significant returns in trades which bolstered their 2017 championship teams as well as future teams. NH hasn’t done that at all.
In short, you win with big stars. NH has shown a pretty big inability to do that, even with “defensible” first round picks. Eventually, you have to look at the results and see where the status of the team is.
“Defensible doesn’t matter after awhile.”
Defensible always matters. A defendable act means an act that has a rational goal and rational means for achieving that goal. Criticizing Huntington for his drafting means criticizing him for acting rationally given his circumstances. Firing Huntington and his staff for their draft results means firing him for making the best use of the cards he was dealt. That’s irrational.
There are sound reasons for criticizing the Pirates. The most important reason: The organization’s failure to pursue top-shelf LA talent. The LA failure was of far greater significance than the alleged draft failures.
Naturally, the current team can expose the nay sayers as just that: Baseball fans who say Nicht. This year’s team is the first that is over burdened with Huntington draft picks. We shall see how they fare as the season goes on.
No one has performed worse than the Pirates overall in the last 10 drafts (measured by WAR above below expected WAR).
It’s not even close.
Ummm, given Taillion and Cole’s injuries and the progress of their recent picks, I’d say your claim amounts to nothing. It certainly fails to rebut my argument.
No defensible doesn’t always matter. If it was always that significant then no one would get fired. If rational picks or moves don’t work out, tough. The nature of the business will always be tied to results and NH doesn’t have enough of them. Frankly, you undercut him by saying this is the first team he has overburdened by his picks…took 11 years for that to take place.
You don’t build an org by merely not making obvious early first round blunders; you build an org by drafting and developing good players taken outside the top 10 overall.
@szielinski You do know that the draft has more than one round, right?
You know that it’s blind luck finding impact players after the first round. It requires luck and hard work to find them in Round .
But, do not let realism undermine your whining.
Other teams like the Cardinals get good regulars fairly often after the first round. The Pirates are mediocre at best at drafting and developing.
A couple notes:
Ignoring the undeniable talent Polanco and Bell have which hasn’t fully manifested yet at the Major League level and very well could this year, there are other positive signs for the offense moving forward.
Marte looks better at the plate than I’ve ever seen him. He still strikes out some, but he’s been way better at laying off bad pitches this season than he has been in his career, and his surprising walk totals reflect that. Harrison, too, but Marte is also hitting the ball very hard with the same regularity as he did in his good seasons. Couple that to taking more consistently competitive at bats, and he could take a step forward this year.
Colin Moran can really hit. He’s not showing the big power from the PCL last year yet, but I also don’t know that I’ve seen him take a truly bad at bat. He hits the ball with purpose to every field, and it comes off his bat hot. When he gets shifted, he just coolly pokes the ball the other way. I don’t know that the power is going to translate, but this kid legitimately has the tools to be a .300 hitter in the Majors *this year.*
Dickerson remains a Big Giant Freak. I am amazed at how consistently he hits the ball well when it’s a foot out of the zone. That’s incredible. I mean, I wouldn’t show his highlights to kids I was teaching how to hit, but he’s definitely fun to watch.
Some good points, for sure. Marte is stinging the ball, and I didn’t have much doubt that he’d bounce back to be at least an above average regular after last year. And Moran, hopefully, taps into his swing change and power. He was a good get, considering he basically had no place to go with Houston.
But the slow development of Polanco has really hindered them and with other young players too. They’ve really been hurt by having almost no one hit the ground running and being a productive regular from Day 1 in the last couple of years. While that’s often asking a lot of young players, teams often need that to be successful and they haven’t had that. If Polanco’s breakout is real (I’m gonna need to see this for a year to believe, considering we have about 2,000 at-bats to say it isn’t) and Bell continues to improve, this offense might have something cooking.
Now they’re up to 11-4. I’ve been a Pirates fan for far too long to get very excited right now, but those wins are in the bank and thanks to Moran and Dickerson, they have a good chance to have 6 or 7 guys post slightly above average (or better) offensive seasons.
I don’t think they make the playoffs, but I am very happy that the team is basically giving Nutting the collective finger.