The Pirates Sail Forward With Andrew McCutchen
The Pirates almost traded Andrew McCutchen. That’s all anyone could really think about when McCutchen was present at the Pirates’ annual PirateFest, the Saturday after the end of the winter meetings. Maybe the public never should’ve had any idea in the first place, but teams leak information, and the McCutchen rumors ran rampant. It made the occasion a little awkward, an occasion where fans would prefer to simply embrace the homegrown superstar, free of complicating thoughts. It’s anyone’s guess how much longer McCutchen might last where he is.
The reality of the Pirates’ situation is that the commitment to McCutchen probably isn’t forever. He’s under contract one more year, with a club option after that, and it’s hard to see the two parties together in 2019. It would’ve made plenty of sense for the Pirates to make a deal last week. It also made plenty of sense for the Pirates to hold off. It would now appear McCutchen will at least open the next season in Pittsburgh. Beyond that, it’s murky, but no one yet has to say their goodbyes.
There was an argument for the Pirates to take the best offer they could get in Washington DC. McCutchen would’ve wound up with, say, the Nationals, or the Rangers, or the Mariners, or the Dodgers. The argument hinged upon two things. For one, the Pirates are a lower-budget operation, and they always need to balance the short-term against the long-term. McCutchen has become a shorter-term asset, right when it looks like the Cubs could run away with the division anyhow.
And for two, it would’ve been possible to trade McCutchen and remain fringe wild-card contenders. Though it always sucks to deal away a star player, the Pirates without McCutchen wouldn’t have been toast. They’d probably have a brand-new good prospect, and they’d have either a major-league piece, or financial flexibility. The McCutchen money could’ve been directed elsewhere, to make the roster better right away. The Pirates would’ve looked something like a .500 team. A team like that only needs a few breaks to play an extra game.
The Pirates understand their situation, better than anyone. They weren’t afraid of the McCutchen decision. I think what happened is they essentially left the decision up to the bidders. McCutchen was made available, but for only a very high price. Had the price been met, this article would read differently. No bidder got there, so McCutchen remains. The Pirates will move forward as is, and this really isn’t so bad. It’s probably even a little bit better.
The first reason is obvious. Without McCutchen, the Pirates could still be fringe contenders. With McCutchen – well, he’s arguably their best player. The Pirates are stronger with him, so these Pirates are contenders. They’re definitely not Cubs-level contenders. No one in their right mind would pick the Pirates to win next year’s NL Central. But they have most of what’s been before a pretty strong club.
This is going to sound elementary, but five teams in each league make the playoffs. You don’t have to be as good as the best team. You can be the fifth-best team, and the door is still open for you. The Pirates don’t have to win as many games as the Cubs, Dodgers, or Nationals. They just have to keep up with the second-best team out of the Cardinals, Giants, Mets, and maybe – maybe – a few others. And, hell, even if the Pirates were to miss the playoffs, just being close has value. Fans love any kind of pennant chase. It’s sort of the whole point.
One reason not to trade McCutchen, then, is that the Pirates aren’t bad. Bad teams are supposed to be the ones trading good players. There’s more. We can talk about McCutchen’s own trade value. This wasn’t the Pirates’ last opportunity to cash him in. There could and should be more chances down the road, and, perhaps you’ve noticed where McCutchen’s numbers have gone lately.
Here’s a peek:
2012: 6.8 WAR
2013: 8.4
2014: 6.8
2015: 5.8
2016: 0.7
Even if you didn’t know much about WAR, the meaning would be apparent. The first four numbers are super good. The last number was really disappointing. McCutchen is coming off his worst season, and now he’s 30 years old. He’s not a good defensive center fielder, and he’s dealt with nagging injuries.
From the Pirates’ perspective, they believe McCutchen can and will bounce back, to some substantial degree. That’s totally reasonable; everyone should be more or less on the same page. There’s no reason why McCutchen should be finished. But if you’re some other team, thinking about making a trade, you just have to wonder. Those questions would eat at you. Even if you firmly believe McCutchen is better than he just showed, you’d want proof. You wouldn’t want to pay a premium price for a potentially non-premium return. It’s just too hard for the Pirates and another front office to align.
All McCutchen needs to do is play well. That’s what he’s done for most of his career. If McCutchen plays well, there are two possibilities. The Pirates could play well around him, and the team would be a contender. Great! Alternatively, the Pirates could sputter. Then McCutchen talks could be re-visited, with him having re-established his on-field credentials.
The fans have already been primed for this. Pirates fans know, more than ever, that the McCutchen clock is ticking. A few years ago, the Rays considered trading David Price in the offseason, when he had two years of control left. They held off and then made a move in July, netting a starter and the organization’s current top prospect.
An even stronger comparison is Jonathan Lucroy, who the Brewers thought about trading last winter, when he had two more years of control. Instead, they traded him for a big return in the middle of the summer. Like McCutchen, Lucroy was a homegrown star at his position, coming off a down year. In 2016, he found his game again, and the Rangers paid a steep price to get him. It was hard for the Brewers to move their everyday catcher, but their faith in his ability was rewarded.
The Pirates still have Andrew McCutchen, because the ballclub could be pretty good. Beyond that, McCutchen stands to rebuild his own perception and value, and so even if the team goes on to sink, there would be other chances to redeem McCutchen for youth. In the best-case scenario, where the Pirates are really great, it could still be weird a year from now, with McCutchen months away from free agency. There might not be a perfectly graceful way to handle all this. The Pirates just have to worry about 2017 first. For 2017, they know what their opening-day outfield will look like.
I think you can sense some kind of end is coming. McCutchen is getting older, and Austin Meadows is getting better, and the Pirates just don’t spend all that much money. It wouldn’t be like them to pay market price for McCutchen’s decline years, so one way or another, his days in Pittsburgh seem numbered. Realistically, there’s no escaping that.
It’s just not the end of the world. Rays fans got over Price. Brewers fans got over Lucroy. Rockies fans have gotten over Troy Tulowitzki. Players come and players go, and you hope to have positive experiences while certain ones are around. For now, for the Pirates, Andrew McCutchen is still around. And that playoff door is still cracked open.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.
If i was a GM i would trade for him just so i could be in the situation where i was negotiating with him and could then shout;
“No deal, McCutchen! That moon money is mine!”
And then run out of the room.
One of many reasons why I not a GM i suppose.
“the Pirates are a lower-budget operation”
They sure are, but their owner can afford to spend a lot more. Pirates fans have been getting ripped off in a big way with the complete assistance of the MLB media who continue to perpetuate this myth of the small market Pirates to the point that their fans believe that Pittsburgh is a rural suburb of Cincinnati.
Cincinnati is the smallest market in MLB, yet they have the Joey Votto contract, the Homer Bailey contract and the Reds signed the unknown Aroldis Chapman out of Cuba for $30 million.
Look at the competitive balance draft picks. Do you see the St. Louis Cardinals there with Pittsburgh? Do you see the Pirates payroll grouped with the Cardinals?
And since 2014 (which is when Votto would have hit free agency and when Bailey signed his contract), the Reds are 70 games under .500. With the Bailey contract serving as a medium-term anchor and the Votto contract a longer-term risk. Meanwhile, the Cards’ competitive balance status is a joke, because their market extends far beyond their metro area and has since the first half of the twentieth century. These aren’t great examples to show that the Pirates should be spending more.
(I don’t understand the Bailey contract anyway. I guess they thought he had ace potential–but they wound up paying him like he was an actual ace they signed on the free market.)
TINNTAASMT
http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2016/12/13/13904532/small-market-teams-mlb-athletics-economics-the-long-cons-of-lew-wolff-and-many-many-others
how much do LAD, NYY, NYM, CHC, BOS earn annually from local/regional media & TV contracts?
how much do MIL, PGH, KC, CLE, TB earn annually from local/regional media & TV contracts.
The difference in earnings between the first group above & the second group above is hundreds of millions of dollars ANNUALLY.
TINSTAASMT ? Bullshit.
Yes, there are “small market teams”, and yes they suffer a structural (financial) disadvantage that equates to a competitive disadvantage. MLB is the least balanced professional sport in NA by a long shot. It is the one sport in NA where being a small market team virtually guarantees long-term mediocrity or worse, as the bottom 1/3 of the league effectively cannot participate in the Free Agent market w/o mortgaging their franchise. The bottom 1/3 of the league effectively serves as an advanced farm system for the top 1/3 of the league. Forget the names & personalities, and just look at the transactions. 1/3 of the league can simply spend $$ each & every winter to materially improve their roster/post-season chances. But for another 1/3 of the league, the FA market is NOT a practical option.
What’s worse, the new CBA concentrates even more power/$$ among the top-earning (large market) teams, as the international talent pool is effectively just another FA market – a market that has already become unaffordable for the bottom 1/2 of the league.
Local/regional TV & media revenue = degree to which a team can participate in FA & int’l. talent markets.
Large market teams can participate. Small market teams cannot. Inability to utilize FA + int’l markets > rev. sharing + compensatory picks. The gap b/t the Haves & the Have Nots will continue to widen along the small/large market divide…
*whispers*
What does TINNTAASMT mean?
I assume it was supposed to be TINSTAASMT, mirroring:
TINSTAAPP, ‘there is no such thing as a pitching prospect’.
Assuming that the correction I made, this would presumably be ‘there is no such thing as a small market team’
The most tired narrative in Pittsburgh. The deadspin documents proved there was no massive revenue surplus, yet it persists. Bob Nutting didn’t get rich operating businesses at a loss. All Nutting has done is double payroll in the last 6 years. There is no sane reason to think there is some conspiracy when the front office has done exactly what it said it would, retain home grown talent by smart extensions, increase payroll with increased attendance revenue, and spend more on the draft, latin america, and player development. The small TV deal is the big issue here.
BTW, pointing to the Reds as a good example is pretty dubious.
“Bob Nutting didn’t get rich operating businesses at a loss.”
You’re correct. Bob Nutting got rich by being born the son of a rich guy!
Chances the Dodgers,Nats,and Cubs all are div. winners again are slim to none,and slim just walked out the door.Very difficult to do what the Bobby Cox Braves once did.This reminds me of 1986,the Mets were the next dynasty,1987,the Twins won the world series,and the Mets,ouch.
The odds of all 3 of the Big 3 repeating are certainly well below 50% but far above “none”.
Well, what odds would we give each team right now? The projected standings have the Nationals six games ahead of the Mets and 10 games ahead of the Marlins.
They have the Cubs 10 and 13 games ahead of the Cards and Pirates and no one else within 25 wins.
They have the Dodgers 7 ahead of the Giants and almost 20 ahead of the Diamondbacks and Rockies.
I’d have to guess if a play-off odds report existed today, each of those would be at least like 50%, right? all three at 50% would call it 13%, which as you say is not “none”.
Took the projected standings and added a random number [average = 0 wins, stdev = 8 wins] to each to simulate some random variation. I did 16382 of them for each division:
NLC, CHC 75.6%
NLW, LAD 70.2%
ALE, BOS 65.8%
NLE, WSN 61.2%
ALC, CLE 60.8%
ALW, TEX 12.8%
So, 50% was perhaps a bit of a low-ball figure; the figures there put all three NL teams repeating at 32%… 5% for the AL and 1.7% for all six.
Swapping Houston and Texas, IE not a full repeat, but the current projected division winners winning, bumps the AL up to 19% and MLB to 6%.
Granted, some major trades in the next few weeks and the final landing spots of the remaining FAs could make a difference here.
If you want to give me some nice long odds on all 3 repeating as division champs, I’ll take that bet.
I have the roughly opposite expectation, that the failure to trade him now greatly increased the chance that he remains in a Pittsburgh uniform going forward. If he returns to something like his old self, the Pirates will presumably be in contention and the fanbase would riot if he were dealt. If he more closely resembles 2016 than the preceding years, then the offers will only get lower and you lose even more incentive to move him. To me, his availability this off-season primarily stemmed from the uncertainty regarding the trajectory of his immediate future. One way or another, that uncertainty is going to decrease.
Cutch will almost certainly improve from last season. If that improvement is enough to raise his trade value or help the Bucs be in contention by mid-season, the Bucs will benefit, perhaps substantially.
That chance is an excellent gamble,unless some team gives the Bucs a blow-me-down offer before then.
There is just no way in heck that they will be able to pay him $30 million a year that he will get after a good 2017 and 18.
There is just no way in heck that he will receive $30 million a year as a 32 year old free agent outfielder.
A way to think about this is that McCutcheon, on that contract is a reasonable play for a team like the Pirates. If it were, say, the White Sox who had him and were shopping him around, the Pirates might be a reasonable team trying to pick him up in a buy-low scenario. Accordingly, the Pirates have outbid the rest of the league at this point to keep him. And they didn’t need to deal any prospects to do it; they just had to eat his contract. The opportunity cost is the only thing they’re considering at this point.
yes – opportunity cost. this is exactly why McCutchen will be traded in ’17.
trade = getting something in return
no trade = Pgh gets nothing
small mkt. teams can’t afford to let assets ‘walk’ (finish their contracts wearing one uniform)… just one of many habits/realities that SMTs must get comfortable with, while LMTs scoff at such trivialities…
Pittsburgh has a club option on McCutchen in 2018 for $14.5 million with a $1 million buyout.
The Pirates handled the McCutchen thing perfectly. Myself, I’m amazed he showed at PirateFest despite their shopping him. If he gives them a hometown discount, they should sign and keep him forever. Stars who remain with a team all the way through do wonders for building fan loyalty, and so long-term franchise value.