The Rangers as an Inning

The Rangers are sliding again. Perhaps you’ve noticed. The last time they won was September 8, and even that was just their second win in seven games. Since then they have zero wins in seven games, losing on Monday to the Rays, who are direct wild-card competition. To make matters worse, the Rangers haven’t even had a single lead in this seven-game cold streak. Or maybe that doesn’t make matters worse. Maybe it’d be worse to have blown leads. Maybe the sequences don’t matter, provided the end result is still a loss. Who cares how you get there? Losing is losing, and mid-September is the wrong time to be losing.

Used to be, the Rangers felt like postseason shoo-ins. Now they’re clinging to a half-game lead for a wild-card slot, their division hopes entirely dashed. There are four teams on the Rangers’ heels, the Indians tied in the win column. Our playoff odds report puts the Rangers’ chances of getting beyond the regular season at 47%. It is now, basically, a coin flip, where it used to be a flip of a very biased coin. Though hope is far from lost, the Rangers need to get to work, because now they can’t back into the playoffs — they’ve already done the backing up. The Rangers need to score and not let the other guys score.

For purposes of this post, I want to try something. It’s pretty easy to understand a seven-game losing streak, and it’s pretty easy to understand a narrow lead in the standings. But I want to look at the Rangers’ losing streak in another way. A way that might help capture how this week has felt. I want to look at the Rangers’ playoff odds as win expectancies, and convert the streak to a made-up partial inning. This is just for fun, but it’s almost always just for fun. We’ll begin when the Rangers won on September 8, to improve to 81-61. Though they’d already started losing, that’s still their most recent victory. If this isn’t clear yet, hopefully it becomes clear in short order. It’s a weird thing to describe and an easier thing to just show.

Win expectancies are approximations, and for simplicity’s sake, we’re dealing with general playoff odds, combining division chances and wild-card chances. Obviously, those are very different things, but, put a sock in it.

SEPTEMBER 8

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
  • Rangers win, 4-3
  • Playoff odds/win expectancy around 92%

I told you we’re converting to a made-up partial inning. We’re joining in progress, and here, the Rangers are winning a home game 3-0 in the top of the ninth, with none out and a runner on second. Maybe it was a leadoff double. Maybe it was a leadoff single and stolen base. I don’t know, but this is how we’re starting. Ignore player identities and various other details. This game, at this point, isn’t an automatic win, but it’s a game you feel comfortable about, if you’re rooting for Texas. That runner on second doesn’t matter. It’s just a matter of getting outs, and batters are always making outs.

SEPTEMBER 9

  • Rangers lose, 1-0
  • Playoff odds/win expectancy around 89%

Not much has changed in our made-up partial inning, as it’s still 3-0 in the ninth with none out and a runner on second. But now there’s a new batter at the plate, and the pitcher on the mound has fallen behind in the count. The batter hasn’t reached, and he could still make an out, but now the odds are turning in his favor, because the pitcher needs to think about throwing a strike.

SEPTEMBER 10

  • Rangers lose, 5-4
  • Playoff odds/win expectancy around 86%

And now the batter’s been walked. The pitcher couldn’t come back from falling behind in the count, and the tying run is coming to the plate, with none out and runners on first and second. You still figure the other team won’t hit a home run, and the odds are still lopsided, but this is when one begins to feel real nervousness. Fans are always hasty in feeling their nervousness.

SEPTEMBER 11

  • Rangers lose, 7-5
  • Playoff odds/win expectancy around 79%

Once again, not much has changed, but once again, the pitcher has fallen behind in the count to the third batter of the inning. Now there’s a real threat of a homer, and a greater threat of a hit. Simply, there’s a greater threat of the batter not making an out, and the pitcher hasn’t looked sharp.

SEPTEMBER 13

  • Rangers lose, 9-8
  • Playoff odds/win expectancy around 72%

Danger zone. After falling behind, the pitcher came over the plate and the batter ripped a run-scoring single. Now there are runners on first and second, and none out, and the score is 3-1. The run you care about still isn’t in scoring position, but he’s drawing uncomfortably close.

SEPTEMBER 14

  • Rangers lose, 1-0
  • Playoff odds/win expectancy around 62%

Pickoff throws are usually unsuccessful, but pickoff throws, at least, are also usually caught. This one wasn’t. Now the runners have moved up to second and third on the error, meaning the tying run has advanced to scoring position, and there still aren’t any batters out. At this point, emotionally, it’s hard to believe the win expectancy is still strong in the Rangers’ favor.

SEPTEMBER 15

  • Rangers lose, 5-1
  • Playoff odds/win expectancy around 57%

A weird play, but still a bad play. The batter smashed a low liner to third, and the third baseman couldn’t catch it cleanly. The upside is that the runner on second didn’t advance. The downside is that the batter reached, and the runner on third scored. So the score’s now 3-2, and still there aren’t any out, and there are runners on first and second again. This feels like it’s spiraling out of control.

SEPTEMBER 16

  • Rangers lose, 6-2
  • Playoff odds/win expectancy around 47%

The pitcher had been paying attention to the runners on first. The pitcher forgot about the runner on second, allowing him to get a big lead, and that runner just aggressively and successfully stole third base. The Rangers are still ahead 3-2, but now there are men on the corners with nobody out, and for the first time the odds swing against the Rangers and in favor of the opponent. It’s a rare situation in which the winning team is the mathematical underdog. There’s no more coasting to this win. There’s no more letting the opponent get itself out. Now the Rangers need to make big pitches, and odds are they’ll shortly need to take great at-bats.

—–

That is, basically, where the Rangers stand. It feels like a ninth-inning meltdown, and though the Rangers are still clinging to a tiny lead, it feels like they’re behind. The others are making up ground in a hurry, and as much as one knows objectively not to believe in the significance of momentum, momentum shapes emotions and emotions shape perceptions. The Rangers effectively have a 50-50 chance of emerging triumphant, but it used to be a lot higher, and now even if they win, it will not have been comfortable.

I’ll say this for the Rangers — seven straight losses are seven straight losses, but four have been by a run and one has been by two. They’ve been games against Pittsburgh, Oakland, and Tampa Bay, playoff-caliber teams, all. Also, the Rangers’ recent history is of some interest. In June, they had a 2-9 slump, which was followed by a 9-2 run. After going 3-12 for a stretch in July, they subsequently went 19-4. Now they’ve lost 12 of 14 in September, and the situation feels dire, but they’ve bounced back before and it wasn’t even all that long ago. Momentum is a talking point. Actual decisions pay it little mind.

The Rangers are in an anxious situation. It’s all still perfectly salvageable, even if they’ve allowed Oakland to run away. This has been the rough equivalent of a ninth-inning meltdown in progress. With a little clutch performance, the game can still be saved. With a mistake here and there, it’ll slip out of the Rangers’ hands. Either way, people are going to be talking about this one. This is one that lodges itself in the memory.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

26 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
jon
12 years ago

This was a pretty creative way at looking at things. I really enjoyed it and it should be interesting to see how the 9th inning unfolds.

bdhudson
12 years ago
Reply to  jon

As a Rangers fan who has watched every minute of this (and who can’t shake the ’11 WS and ’12 collapse, even though they aren’t relevant), the 9th inning ends in apocalyptic hellfire. Unless we win tonight, then maybe it doesn’t. But it probably does. Because we are not very good, currently.

tz
12 years ago

As a Braves fan, this reads like the first twenty minutes of a horror film.

CleverName
12 years ago

They basically have 4 3-game series left. Rays, Royals, Astros, Angels

In the ‘inning is a season analogy’, at least they know if they can steal an out from the 6 or 7 hitters, they have the 8 & 9 spot coming up for easy outs

wally
12 years ago
Reply to  CleverName

Neither the Royals or the Angels are push overs. Don’t get fooled by the Angels record, they are a good team.

rusty
12 years ago

Great use of the win-expectancy / RE24 matrix!

chief00
12 years ago

If this article had its own “like” button, I’d press it. 🙂

SKob
12 years ago

Very entertaining piece! I like the visual of the downward progression of playoff odds!

Is anybody else looking at this as a reinforcement of the absolute idiocy of not cashing in the Profar chip when they could have? It’s like waiting to cash a paycheck, but then the bank closes and you have no money to go out. Or in this case, you don’t make the playoffs! In a world of perfect irony, the Royals and Indians beat out both the Rays and the Rangers! Royals and Indians both critized for sacrificing prospects/draft picks for win now players/signings. While the Rays have no choice but to invest in the future, the Rangers look pathetic for doing absolutely nothing at the deadline! Seeing a Rays – Royals wild card showdown would actually be pretty awesome too!

Nombre
12 years ago
Reply to  SKob

So teams that traded future assets to win now are more likely to win now than a team that didn’t- except that’s not true because Texas still has about a 50/50 shot at making the playoffs whereas the Rays almost certainly will?

Doesn’t that say a lot more about the Royals and Indians organization?

bdhudson
12 years ago
Reply to  SKob

What do you suggest they should have tried to get in return for Profar that was both a) available, and b)a solution to the problems the team faces? It’s easy to say ‘don’t hoard the prospects,’ but what, realistically, would they have been able to achieve?

Wobatus
12 years ago

“This is one that lodges itself in the memory.” Or the throat.

Buck
12 years ago

Great work

By the way, that was about 15 ninth innings during Ned Yost’s tenure

RedSoxFan
12 years ago

Can you do one for the ’11 Red Sox?

jon
12 years ago
Reply to  RedSoxFan

Actually this would be really entertaining to read…

Ian
12 years ago

I sure hope Wash has Neal Cotts up and ready in the pen.

Phantom Stranger
12 years ago

As expected, their offense has disappeared down the stretch with the loss of Nelson Cruz and whatever happened to Lance Berkman. You can’t win a game when you don’t score a run. People were quick to praise Jon Daniels when they won back-to-back AL pennants, but some fingers have to be pointed his way when they miss the playoffs this season.

They had more talent than any other team in prior seasons, but Washington’s flaws as a manager are being exposed now when his team isn’t the best one in the field.

Robert
12 years ago

This has way less to do with Washington than Daniels. See Matt Garza

eric
12 years ago
Reply to  Robert

C’mon, that’s ridiculous.

Jon Daniels supplied Ron Washington with the best team in baseball in 2011 & 2012, and Wash did just about everything in his power to assure the Rangers wouldn’t win. The ’11 World Series is on him.

This has not been JD’s finest season, particularly when factoring in the haul he gave up for Garza. But it’s clear he isn’t going to throw away any of his premium prospects (Profar, Perez, etc.) to try winning one particular season. He is playing the long game, and the window is far from closing.

Antonio Bananas
12 years ago

Great article. How would you translate the very real and very significant loss of the division being all but gone? They might be clinging onto a playoff berth, but they will then have a 50/50 shot at even making the real playoffs. As far as the real playoffs are concerned, this feels more like being down by a run in the top half with the based loaded and one out. Even if you get that inning ending double play, you still have to score in the bottom of the 9th to stay alive.

Jason
12 years ago

Masterfully compared. Well done.

JayT
12 years ago

Great article, I too would like to see something like this done for the 2011 Red Sox.

chuckbMember since 2016
12 years ago

Really super article. I’d like to see this updated daily as the Rangers continue this season, at least as long as it’s relevant.

Aussie MarinerMember since 2016
12 years ago

Fantastic, I wish I had a fraction of your creativity.

Nate
12 years ago

Nice Jeff. BTW, I recognize that only a Mariner’s fan could write something like this off the cuff.

Fan 75
12 years ago

The Ranger 2010 and 2011 team were so dominant and strong they would have finished where they did without a manager. 2012 September required some real managing by Washington. Not one (or at least very few) times did he change the lineup to get “hitters” in right spots. 2013 is the same and hopefully not but may be with the same result. Washington’s mentality has been to “save” for tomorrow when today is “the” crucial one. His use of Berkman in these last important games, his not using Nathan in another game resulted in most certainly loss of two games. A real manager has to manage when the going gets tough.

Juan
12 years ago

The reality of all this is that Washington made the Rangers
respectable again. We’re all thankful for that. Twice he
was given the opportunity to take the team to the promised
land, but didn’t. So, he’s been paid in full, and the Rangers
should’ve hired a manager (with the killer instinct) to take
the team to the next step (a WS Championship)for 2013! They
didn’t. Then, we should have expected this collapse again!
We knew Washington was not a WS Championship caliber manager.
Are we now to conclude that we also have a non WS
Championship caliber management team? We’ll know for sure
this next off-season.