The Rays and Rangers Swap Prospects
We all know factors beyond talent — be it contract length or value, a team’s competitive window, or a player’s social fit within the org, among others — have an impact on how trades balance and are agreed upon. Just being mindful that these factors exist, and that we’re not always privy to them, can help us to square what we perceive to be a context-free gap in the talents exchanged. But can we bridge what is, based on our evaluations, a sizable gap in this weekend’s Rangers and Rays prospect-for-prospect trade?
Rangers get:
2B Nick Solak, 50 FV, No. 93 overall prospect
Rays get:
RHP Peter Fairbanks, 40 FV
This deal looks very good for Texas in a vacuum based on our evaluations. Kiley and I both think Solak, who is a career .290/.382/.453 hitter in the minors and has raked since his freshman year at Louisville, is going to be an average everyday second baseman, while Fairbanks is a 25-year-old reliever who has had two Tommy John surgeries, a demographic we rarely rank at all.
But we think there’s enough room for disagreement on both players that with a reasonably pessimistic view of one player and an optimistic opinion of the other, they’re not that far apart.
For instance, I think it’s defensible to have Solak evaluated as a 2B/OF utility type in the Enrique Hernandez mold, which would make him a 45 FV, someone we’d value on the same level as Cavan Biggio and Luis Rengifo, two other recent 45 FV prospects who we expect to be valuable role players, but not 2-3 annual WAR producers. Despite his track record of hitting, Solak’s three-year ZiPs projections have him performing more like a 40 FV player due to lack of power and his predilection for groundball contact.
Conversely, Fairbanks exhibits some traits consistent with players who often fly under our radar. He missed 2018 recovering from a second TJ, then was moved to the bullpen where his stuff exploded. He now sits 95-98 and touches 99, and he generates nearly seven feet of extension down the mound, which means the fastball plays up almost two ticks. And Fairbanks has a vertical arm slot consistent with other pitchers whose fastballs play above their raw velocity. He could be another fastball-dominant, late-inning reliever if he stays healthy, someone we’d grade out as a 40+ FV.
And Tampa’s logjam of 2B/OF types coupled with the opportunity to add someone who might make a playoff impact in a bullpen role this year makes a 45 FV for 40+ FV swap pretty palatable. Again, I like this deal for Texas because I consider Solak a better player, but I can see an argument for it from Tampa Bay’s perspective.
The Rays also have 40-man considerations to reckon with. Solak would have had to be added to the 40-man this offseason or be vulnerable to the Rule 5 Draft, and he almost certainly would be taken. Travis d’Arnaud and Avisail Garcia will both come off the Rays 40-man and reach free agency this offseason, but Solak, Vidal Brujan, Ronaldo Hernandez, Lucius Fox (all 40-man locks), Resly Linares, Garrett Whitley and Moises Gomez (less so) are all Rule 5 eligible this winter, and Tyler Glasnow, Anthony Banda, and Christian Arroyo are on 60-day DL and will need to be put back on the 40-man at some point.
In essence, the Rays would have had two 40-man spots for nearly 10 players. With several comparable players on the roster (Arroyo, Matt Duffy, Joey Wendle, Brandon Lowe, Daniel Robertson, and soon Brujan), Solak is tougher to squeeze in than Fairbanks, who is simply better than several of the pitchers on Tampa Bay’s 40-man. Expect the bottom of Tampa Bay’s pitching depth to be jettisoned at some point this fall to make room for some of these guys, while others are likely to be traded ahead of this summer’s trade deadline or this fall’s 40-man deadline.
Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.
So Solak has now been traded twice due to 40-man roster crunches? Weird.
Never mind, I’m thinking of Shed Long.
This is kind of a no-brainer trade for the Rangers, but for the Rays I think they may be trying to outsmart themselves. There’s a reason why prospects with two TJ surgeries and not much of a track record of performance aren’t on the radar. Obviously they *could* win this trade, but the chances of success do not seem high.
Given that Solak would have almost certainly been taken in the Rule 5 Draft, and would have had a very good chance of lasting the entire year in the majors (he’s probably better than half the players on Baltimore and KC right now), this was the Rays’ alterative to losing him for nothing
I think trading Solak is fine. I think trading for Fairbanks is a head-scratcher. Solak’s stock clearly wasn’t as high as we thought, but even then, I would have preferred if they traded him for someone who has a better shot than the multiple-TJ-surgery-reliever-only-prospect-who-is struggling.
“Struggling” over just 8 innings in the majors. Not exactly something to worry about a ton. More interesting is that he was dominating in the minors this year and regularly touches 99.
The AAA ball is significantly more juiced than the MLB one this season (thanks, Manfred, for the loss of all integrity), so I imagine that also plays a role in comparing the two players’ stat lines.
The AAA ball isn’t the same?
but Fairbanks has to be on the 40 man also, so they dont really get any benefit in freeing up a spot on the 40. it would’ve been better to try and get another prospect that still has some time before they have to be added. like what the yankees did. they got shed long and flipped him for stowers because stowers didnt need to be on the 40 man
Just because they needed to move him, doesnt mean they needed to move him for such a low return.
It’s hard to say the Rangers didn’t win this trade. Solak could start today for several teams and has power/BB upside (and 60 speed, apparently).
Fairbanks seems like a fringy prospect even without looking at the injury history, the best case scenario for him (moderately usable player) seems like the worst case for Solak.
But I think Solak has both a higher floor and ceiling, based on what I saw at Louisville and when he was with the Yankees, and just the raw numbers. He’s even a full year younger. Odd deal
to be fair, no other outlet has solak anywhere near the top 100. some have him at 40 grade. maybe the rays didnt think too highly of him?
I know it doesn’t really fit the Ray’s MO but they couldn’t put a package together with all that depth for a major leaguer?
they’ve got time. everyone’s talking about big deadline moves, and the Rays could trade, like, their entire team
The Rays will probably try to acquire talent at the deadline for guys who need to be added to the 40man roster this offseason. So Linares, Moises Gomez, Whitley being traded wouldn’t surprise me at all.
RJ Anderson reports that the Rays attempted to trade Solak for Encarnacion, but th M’s balked. Solak’s defense is viewed as atrocious within the industry. Maybe this is the best they could get.
Calling this a prospect for prospect trade is technically true but functionally I doubt TB believes they traded for a prospect. Tampa is trying to win this season and acquired a bullpen arm who can help in their pennant race. Any gap in FV should take 2019 impact into account.