The Rays Got Amed Rosario for a Song. What Does It All Mean?

This winter has been one of the weakest markets for middle infielders in recent memory. You remember the shortstop glut of recent years? Carlos Correa, Corey Seager, Francisco Lindor, Trevor Story, Xander Bogaerts… the list of players who either reached free agency or signed extensions to take them off the market went on and on. But this year, the pickings were slim. Depending on personal preference, the best second baseman or shortstop available was… Whit Merrifield? Isiah Kiner-Falefa? I would have said Amed Rosario, only the market clearly disagrees:
Infielder Amed Rosario and the Tampa Bay Rays are in agreement on a one-year, $1.5 million contract, sources tell ESPN. Rosario, 28, will bring a strong bat against left-handed pitching and should get at-bats at shortstop, second base and potentially corner-outfield spots.
— Jeff Passan (@JeffPassan) February 20, 2024
That’s a shockingly light deal for Rosario, at least in my head. I had him at the tail end of my Top 50 free agent rankings, and the crowd and I both penciled him in for a two-year deal worth $8 million per year. Instead, he’s getting less than a fifth of that AAV, and for only a year at that. This merits some investigation, both into why his market didn’t develop and why the Rays came calling in the end.
If you’re looking for a reason not to sign Rosario, it’s pretty easy to come up with a handful. The first one is fairly obvious. He just put up a season worth 0.2 WAR, which is about as disastrous as it sounds. The reason? His defense at shortstop was downright abysmal. DRS and OAA agree that he was one of the worst regular shortstops in baseball, 10 runs or so below average in an abbreviated run as Cleveland’s everyday option.
That’s putrid stuff, plain and simple. If you play shortstop that poorly, you probably shouldn’t play shortstop at all. The Dodgers clearly concurred; even with a clear need at the position, they relegated Rosario to second base duty after trading for him. But good news! He handled second base fairly well, so he can still play an up-the-middle defensive position, which gives his value a nice floor.
Back to the bad news: If you’re going to play acceptable second base defense, you can probably get away with being a league average bat. But Rosario wasn’t average — his 88 wRC+ wasn’t quite disastrous, but it’s the kind of line you can accept from a slick-fielding guy, not a defender who is average at best. An average hitter who plays average second base defense is a nice major leaguer. Downgrade either side to below average, though, and we’re talking about replacement level or thereabouts.
A little bit of everything went wrong for Rosario at the plate last year. He has never hit for a ton of power, but he hit for less than ever in 2023. His underlying numbers back that up; every permutation of his batted ball data says the same thing, that he was making impactful contact less frequently than before. In the past, he’d been able to offset that lack of pop by slashing and sprinting his way to a high BABIP. He didn’t do abysmally on that front in 2023, but even a .310 BABIP wasn’t enough to rescue his overall offensive value. The combination of a low walk rate, low power, and a merely acceptable batting average turned him into an offensive liability.
That’s always been the downside risk with Rosario, and that’s why he ended up with such a modest contract. If things don’t pan out, he’s not much better than someone you could pull up from Triple-A. But that’s now baked into the contract; even for the penny-pinching Rays, $1.5 million will hardly break the bank. That means that Tampa Bay can focus on the upside he might bring to the table, and that’s considerable.
Let’s start with one obvious limitation of Rosario’s that might work out in the team’s favor: He’s probably not an everyday player unless his offense improves significantly. Rosario has been an awful hitter against righties in his career, posting a .262/.296/.374 line, but he checks in at .298/.339/.467 against lefties, a huge improvement. Even if you regress that a long way back towards the mean, as befits someone who has faced lefties 948 times in his career, we’re looking at someone with somewhere between double and triple a league average platoon split. If you think Rosario is a 95 wRC+ hitter overall, that works out to something like a 91 wRC+ hitter against righties and 104 against lefties.
That’s a middling case, but you can imagine better scenarios than that. However good of a hitter you think Rosario is, the Rays could make him significantly better simply by putting him in more advantageous situations. And wouldn’t you know, that’s kind of their specialty. A quick look at their roster shows two easy places Rosario could work into the mix without eating at-bats against righties. He could form a pure platoon with Brandon Lowe, the incumbent second baseman and a lefty who has at times struggled against southpaws. He could also platoon with Jonathan Aranda, who we currently project as the DH.
Either of these roles will be inherently limited by the number of lefties the Rays face. Randy Arozarena got all the lefty looks he could handle last year, which came out to 138 plate appearances. Yandy Díaz got to 139. There are only so many plate appearances to go around against lefties because there are only so many lefty pitchers. Even the most platoon-happy righties end up facing mostly same-handed pitching because of the way that handedness works.
That’s the bad news. The good news is that 150 or so plate appearances against lefties goes a long way towards juicing up Rosario’s value. He’ll play plenty of games with righties starting thanks to Tampa Bay’s whirling configuration of bodies. Maybe Lowe will get a rest day at DH and let Rosario handle second. Maybe he’ll spell Jose Caballero at short, or cover a corner outfield in some weird flex operation. With his speed and ability to hit lefties, he’ll also provide late inning utility.
In some ways, the Rays seem like an obvious fit for Rosario’s talents. No one shuffles and reshuffles quite like they do, and no one else finds little edges for just the right players the same way. That extra juice matters a lot for players like Rosario, who projects as a below-average player if used in a “standard” way. By excising the spots where he’d be at a disadvantage, the Rays will likely get more per plate appearance out of Rosario than any other team in baseball might.
On the other hand, Rosario will probably get fewer total plate appearances with the Rays than he would anywhere else interested in signing him. That’s just part of how they operate, with few players on the 40-man roster getting anything approaching full playing time. The Rays don’t sign a lot of average regulars, because the value that those kinds of players provide is blunted by the lack of available playing time.
If Rosario signed for anything approaching what I was projecting, he never would have ended up on the Gulf Coast. The Rays simply don’t operate that way. But when his price tag dropped, he became far more attractive. When the league values a player this close to the minimum, using them as a part-time player makes good baseball and economic sense. It’s a reasonable deal for Rosario, too; if he wasn’t getting much money in 2024 regardless, there’s no better place to play than somewhere that will flatter his rate statistics in advance of a dip back into free agency next year.
There’s something else at play here, at least potentially. I can’t take much credit for this insight, but I also can’t pin down who said it first, because I picked it up over the course of reading a lot of our comment sections. Basically, teams are getting so good at developing Rosario-esque players internally that they’re being devalued in free agency. If you can generate an average-glove, slightly-below-average-bat second baseman from your farm system at will, there’s no reason to offer someone like Rosario a market rate in free agency. The more teams churn out 1-2 WAR middle infielders, the less that group of players will be in demand.
It doesn’t pass cleanly up the line to more accomplished hitters, or at least it hasn’t yet. You might be able to generate 95% of Amed Rosario for a bargain rate, but the same can’t be said for Jose Altuve. But the middle class of up-the-middle defenders – yes, I said that on purpose – is feeling it in their wallets at the moment. There are knock-on effects worth considering, too. The old argument in favor of defensively versatile prospects who might struggle to hit at the major league level is that they could still become average middle infielders. Just look at literally Amed Rosario for an example of that. But if that kind of player isn’t worth so much on the open market anymore, if you can get those types of hitters more or less freely, then the calculus changes.
It’s funny to me that the Rays are the ones signing Rosario. For years, they’ve been the ones generating middle infield prospects to avoid hitting the free agent market for those players. But now the tables have turned, and they’re wisely changing with the times. Right now, there are enough so-so (relative to the best major leaguers) middle infielders that you can sign them for cheap. So naturally, the Rays are doing just that, and picking the ones who most fit their roster construction style to do so. Good work, Rays; the rest of baseball surely won’t be far behind on the same plan.
Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.
Calling it now. A Rays team, well in contention throughout the season and having pumped up Rosario’s value with judiciously chosen spots, will flip him at the deadline for someone else’s middling RP who will magically earn 6-10 saves down the stretch as well as an anonymous 40-man crunch casualty who turns into Amed Rosario in 2026.
Why would a team selling at the deadline want half a season of Rosario?
It wouldn’t be “selling,” per se – it would be “I need a reliever, you need a UTIL” situation.
Bold of you to assume there won’t be other pieces involved.
More likely Rosario is batting cleanup against an LHP in the World Series.
I don’t know why anyone thought he was going to get a multi year deal. He was so bad that the Guardians had to trade him for a pitcher that got DFA’d. He was basically sunk cost at that point.
He’s a 28-year-old up-the-middle player with a history of at least decent production. I would have thought someone would place a cheapish two-year bet on that.
Aside from that, his ability to mash lefties shouldn’t be understated (career 121 wRC+), nor should his speed. I wasn’t expecting a multi-year contract, but like 4-ish million wasn’t unwarranted in my opinion.
Also, while the Guardians did trade him for Syndergaard, that probably wasn’t the best deal they could have gotten, just the cheapest. Always apply a skepticism penalty when the Dolans trade anyone. Some of the cheapest and most backhanded owners across all sports. Only Fischer is worse imo.
This, basically.
I figured Rosario was going to get a 1 year deal with a swellopt, basically.
Something like 1/8 with incentives plus a player option for 1/2 and a team option for 1/18? Those figures are just spitballing and subject to change, but you get the idea?
Typically teams don’t want to give out any real money to players who look cooked. Maybe this is teams displaying recency bias, and Steamer seems to think he will bounce back, but he looked cooked.
At the same time, few players of any acclaim at all are cooked at 28 unless injuries are involved, which doesn’t appear to be the case.
It’s not that long ago that a lot of people considered him the number 1 prospect in all of baseball (Fangraphs had him at #3). There are still people out there interested in Jurickson Profar because they hope he might become the player his prospect status promised he’d be; Rosario is a lot younger than that and still has time to turn into… well, something better than he is now.
I have a working theory that people cling to the perception of Profar as interesting because he missed so much time. If he simply struggled or even played average ball during that timeframe, I think teams would be more likely to value him closer to Rosario.
I loved him with the Dodgers although he was another guy that forgot how to hit in the post season. He seemed to get hits in critical situations during the time he was with the team until he didn’t anymore.
He wasn’t on the postseason roster for the Dodgers last year, he did have a good playoff series against the Yankees in 2022.
It’s wild that the Rays got Rosario for only 1 year, 1.5M with 500k in incentives. Most of FG’s projections still pro-rate out to 2ish+ WAR over 650 PA/150 G… and that’s pretty reasonable! Just a year ago, Rosario got 7.8M for his final year in arb and was considered a candidate for a multiyear extension in Cleveland.
Rosario was worth 2 or more WAR, both b + f, in all 3 full seasons between 2019-22 (his 2020 was dismal, similar to his 2023.) His offense was league average or better in all of those years, whether by OPS+, RBat+, wRC+, etc. His 105ish bat in 2022 is outright pretty good for a shortstop, though obviously it’s contact driven.
DRS (and DRP, which had him at +1.6 in 2022) likes his defense better than FRV and it’s reflected in his bWAR — he was worth 3 bWAR in 2019, 4.2 in 2022. Also in 2022, fWAR had him at 2.7 fWAR. His overall production was dragged down by a disastrous OF experiment in early 2022 and he still graded out at 2+ WAR. Obviously, his defense at SS took a huge step backwards in 2023. He seemed to take well to 2B with the dodgers in a very SSS, but his up/down defense (and everything else) makes that extra unreliable.
As well-noted above, Rosario’s problem is that his floor totally sucks — it’s RLish — and as a high variance player who hasn’t really improved all that much, that’s probably going to stay the case. I’d add that he remains the same high risk, high reward, guy who is tantalizing with all his athletic potential and just a bit of better luck (or an improved swing.)
But it’s still wild that *basically* a flawed but high upside, very high variance 2ish WAR /650 player with premium athleticism only got 1 year, 1.5M for his age-28 season. My guess is that it means either (or both) that teams just don’t want to play for what they internally view as very low floor players (and this is my guess) or maybe there’s some off-field stuff we don’t know (prior to going to Cleveland and rehabbing his rep, Rosario didn’t have the best rep in NYM and the lack of maturation or evolution in his skills this many years into his career is at least a yellow flag.)
tl;dr: Amed Rosario remains interesting, if nothing else.
I think the main thing is that no one views him as a high upside guy, anymore.
His “upside” is Alex Verdugo – if he only runs a .320 BABIP, he’s closer to Yuniesky Betancourt.
I think you’re probably right and tbh, I’m not entirely sure as to why.
He just produced a very good 2022 only a year ago (granted, relying in part on luck but with a skillset that can take advantage of luck). His hitting data cries out for a change in his swing. He’s still very athletic.
Again, I think you’re probably right that FO’s have soured on Rosario’s upside (maybe it really just is the platoon split and they don’t view him as a SS anymore) but if that’s the case, I suppose I just don’t agree with them.
My own inclination is that he’s just very high variance and very low floor, and FO’s are typically risk averse. Rosario’s likely production (2ish+ WAR over 650PA/150G) and ceiling (i.e. 2022-ish production, and discounting the chance of a big breakout where he suddenly harnesses his tools) doesn’t really justify taking a risk on a RL-ish floor.
I think he’s just another in a long line of players who had great tools coming up but could never put it all together due to his mental approach to the game. He makes tons of contact, but it’s not all quality contact. He has pop, but doesn’t get to it often because he’s swinging at pitches even Aaron Judge can’t drive. He can run fast, but is roughly average at baserunning. He’s an excellent athlete on defense, but doesn’t make a ton of the plays you’d expect an athlete like him to make.
Yeah, the main thing is that while his career averages make him look like a 1.5 WAR guy, he’s actually been either a 0-0.5 WAR guy or a 2-2.5 WAR guy.
High risk, low/medium reward player.
This is simply not true. In 2022 Rosario ran a .326 BABIP and put up a 105 wRC+ and 2.7 WAR, with an xwOBA that matched his wOBA. Yuniesky Betancourt had a career 77 wRC+ and negative WAR. His best seasons don’t even come close to Amed Rosario with a .320 BABIP
So, this promoted me to look up Yu-Bet’s line and…. he peaked in 06-07 with a pair of fairly similar seasons.
2007 is the better of the two: an aesthetically pleasing .289.308.418 for a 93 OPS+ (89 wRC+) with -5 DRS (-4.4 UZR) for 2.0 bWAR (1.5 fWAR) flat.
That’s worse than (and basically a downmarket version of) Rosario’s 2019, 2021, and 2022 seasons.
I *did* look it up, haha!
Through age-28, Betancourt put up 1.8 fWAR with an 81 wRC+ in 3057 PA…and that does include the crazy nightmare season in ‘09.
That’s pretty damn close to Rosario’s 2023.
So, Rosario through 3367 PA has:
Try re-reading the comment, mate?
When everything goes right, Rosario hits .280 and looks like a 2-2.5 WAR, Alex Verdugo-type.
(Verdugo has 9.2 fWAR and 11.1 rWAR in 2559 career PA, for reference).
That’s happened three times in his 6-plus seasons…accounting for 7.1 of his 7.6 career fWAR.
In the other four seasons in which he’s appeared, he’s totaled 0.5 fWAR across 1454 PA.
I take your point re. Verdugo and we’re largely agreed there, but I’m not sure where you’re going unless it’s “Rosario in his down years is like Yuniesky Betancourt’s average season over the course of his career”?
This still doesn’t make sense re. Yu-Bet, because even that doesn’t really fit. Rosario, bad as he’s been, is still better than Yu-Bet in his bad years.
Betancourt was below RL from 2008-2013, and substantially so (likely out of variance/MOE) in 4 of those 6 seasons by bWAR. Yu-Bet has -2.4 career bWAR, -.3 per season on average. He was sub-RL in 4 of his final 5 years by fWAR, and substantially so/out of variance in 3 out of 4 of those.
Rosario has only been sub-RL in his abbreviated rookie year of 2017, which is tbh out of step with the rest of his career in a number of ways. Otherwise, his other two really crappy years (2020 + 2023) hung around RL, and in 2018, he was a 1 bWAR, .4 fWAR guy (defense, as ever being the split.)
Re. your other post regarding defense — FRV has come a long way from its earliest iterations, and obviously it’s awesome to have as an alternative, but I’m still not sure reliable enough to use as dispositive when discussing a player’s defense. DRP/DRS don’t really say quite the same thing, but provide the benefit of typically being — very generally speaking — broadly somewhat aligned.
Rosario def did suck defensively in 2023 though. That is 1000% for sure.
It’s worth noting that he’s one of the big losers from Tango figuring out how to eliminate positioning/protection from infield defense.
The fact that he’s a truly terrible defender at SS, rather than an average one, essentially means he has no margin for error when the hits don’t squeak through.
He’s always been a supreme athlete. I don’t think it’s crazy to think he could become a plus OF defender if his efforts are concentrated there. Potentially the platoon is with Siri (.647 OPS vs LHP) instead of Lowe/Aranda.
The Guardians tried that. It did not end well.
Someone please explain the market forces that gave Whit Merrifield $8m (with an option for a second year at the same price) and Rosario only $1.5m; I am clearly too naive or ignorant to understand what happened here in rational terms.
Rosario was bad in 2023, Merrifield was functional. I also suspect they trusted Merrifield to back up the outfield more than Rosario.
I’ll take positional versatility (and, I suppose, SB, which he still manages to do), though the age disparity makes me suspicious about Merrifield holding that value, whereas it’s hard for Rosario to do worse.
Still, the projections are uniformly in Rosario’s favor by a multiple similar to how much better paid Merrifield is than Rosario, which at least makes me wonder whether Amed may want to find a better agent!
I do think it’s important to remember that these signings/valuations aren’t taking place in a vacuum.
Before the signing, Brandon Marsh was the only established two-way OF on Philly’s roster…and Marsh is a platoon guy who’s not all that established.
Meanwhile, Sosa was their only infield depth to speak of.
A team that’s going to be starting one of Johan Rojas and Christian Pache, with the other in line for a key role, is definitely going to place a premium on predictability.
Meanwhile, the Rays are always looking for reclamation projects…and Rosario likely didn’t want to give away his age 29 season.
Tim Anderson just got $5m!!!! Whose puppy did Amed Rosario kill, my goodness?
I don’t think it’s all that much more complicated than the fact that Merrifield was worth over a win more than him last year, has been worth over a win more than him over the last 3 years, and has proven he can field multiple positions.
To the Phillies, he’s just Edmundo Sosa without the defense.
I think the trendline may be a factor as well. Merrifield is a long-established player and teams have a sense of his floor, whereas Rosario greatly underperforming expectations in his age-27 season naturally makes teams wonder whether he may just continue on his way down.
Watch Rosario become an above average hitter and decent enough fielder at 4 spots.
Remember this is The Rays, who are making a habit of picking up Cleveland cast-offs and getting good ML value out of the likes of Harold Ramirez, Yu Chang, Yandy Diaz, Junior Caminero, and now Rosario.
It’s getting embarrasing.
Rosario was the exact same guy for the Mets, in fairness.
“The more teams churn out 1-2 WAR middle infielders, the less that group of players will be in demand.”
If that happens, doesn’t that raise the replacement level and those players become 0 WAR players? The same thing happens to Amed Rosario either way – this is just a technical question about WAR.
“If you can generate an average-glove, slightly-below-average-bat second baseman from your farm system at will, there’s no reason to offer someone like Rosario a market rate in free agency. The more teams churn out 1-2 WAR middle infielders, the less that group of players will be in demand.”
Isn’t it more like these supposed 1-2 WAR MIFs are actually replacement level, and the positional adjustment from this another other public sites that’s tagging them as 1-2 WAR is wrong?
I never understood how this guy was a top 5 prospect in all of baseball. Not sure if he still does it but he used to lift his back foot while he swung. He also used to get picked off and was bad on D. Big miss by the prospect pundits.