The Rays’ Modified Four-Man Rotation

(Photo: Keith Allison)
The prospect of a six-man rotation has either been discussed or confirmed by a number of clubs this offseason. The Angels will use one to help ease along Shohei Ohtani’s development as a pitcher. The Rangers also have plans to experiment with one (although Cole Hamels isn’t an advocate). Mickey Callaway mentioned at the beginning of February that the Mets might utilize six starters at points of the season.
The Rays, as they often do, are trying something different. In this case, they’ve announced plans to use just a four-man rotation in 2018.
#Rays Cash just said they could go with 4-man rotation all season, filling in with bullpen guys when needed to start
— Marc Topkin (@TBTimes_Rays) March 7, 2018
Given trends going in the opposite direction, this plan could lead to disaster, although it isn’t clear that the five-man rotation is obviously superior. Tampa Bay is in a fairly unique personnel situation, so there’s some logic behind the decision. The move isn’t likely to work, but it might be worth a shot.
When discussing the possibility of the Los Angeles Angels’ use of a six-man rotation, I noted the importance of having starting pitching depth and no ace. To effectively deploy a four-man rotation, the opposite is true; indeed, it’s the presence of an ace and little rotation depth behind him that give rise to the unique possibility. A team also requires a deep bullpen and multiple players with minor-league options, so that, whatever starting depth the club does possess, can be easily moved back and forth between the majors and minors.
The Rays fit those criteria nicely. They have an ace in Chris Archer. After the trade of Jake Odorizzi and injuries to Brent Honeywell and Jose De Leon, the team has also taken a hit to its starting-pitching depth. The team does have a lot of bullpen pieces and features some starting depth, as well, as seen by our Depth Chart projections below.
| Name | IP | K/9 | BB/9 | HR/9 | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Archer | 198 | 10.4 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 3.37 | 3.30 | 4.8 |
| Blake Snell | 167 | 9.5 | 4.1 | 1.0 | 3.75 | 3.88 | 2.9 |
| Jake Faria | 142 | 9.4 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 4.09 | 4.27 | 1.8 |
| Nathan Eovaldi | 121 | 7.2 | 2.9 | 1.1 | 4.17 | 4.15 | 1.7 |
| Matt Andriese | 103 | 7.9 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 4.14 | 4.13 | 1.5 |
| Yonny Chirinos | 94 | 6.5 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 4.34 | 4.43 | 1.0 |
| Anthony Banda | 56 | 8.4 | 3.8 | 1.3 | 4.43 | 4.51 | 0.6 |
| Ryan Yarbrough | 37 | 7.3 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 4.34 | 4.49 | 0.4 |
| Jaime Schultz | 19 | 9.9 | 5.5 | 1.4 | 4.82 | 4.97 | 0.1 |
| Hunter Wood | 9 | 7.1 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 5.13 | 5.26 | 0.0 |
| Total | 947 | 8.7 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 3.97 | 4.03 | 14.7 |
The depth here doesn’t actually look too bad. Matt Andriese appears to be a capable fifth starter, while Yonny Chirinos and Ryan Yarbrough both experienced some success in Triple-A last season. Newcomer Anthony Banda, meanwhile, produced strong fielding-independent numbers in a brief MLB debut last season.
With eight pitchers capable of providing innings, doing away with the conventional five-man rotation doesn’t seem incredibly necessary. There is, however, a pretty distinct drop from the first five pitchers here to the next three. That drop-off, plus extra off-days built into the schedule, does make the four-man rotation possible.
The extra days built into the schedule by the most recent CBA are actually important here. In 1968, teams played 162 games in 172 days. A decade later, five more days were added. By the late-80s, the number of days in the season was up to around 180, increasing to the 183 of the last few years. This year, as part of the new CBA, the players sought and received a few more days, with Tampa’s season now scheduled to be played over the course of 186 days. Those 24 off-days decrease the number of bullpen games needed.
The table below shows just how a four-man rotation would work over the course of the season.
| Day | March | April | May | June | July | August | September |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | Bullpen | 2 | 1 | |
| 2 | Bullpen | Bullpen | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | |||
| 4 | 1 | 2 | 4 | Bullpen | Bullpen | ||
| 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||
| 6 | 4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| 7 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1 | 2 | Bullpen | 4 | 4 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2 | 2 | Bullpen | 1 | 4 | ||
| 11 | Bullpen | 3 | 3 | 1 | Bullpen | Bullpen | |
| 12 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||
| 13 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||
| 14 | 4 | 2 | Bullpen | 4 | 3 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1 | Bullpen | 2 | Bullpen | 4 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | ||
| 17 | Bullpen | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | ||
| 18 | 3 | 1 | 1 | Bullpen | Bullpen | ||
| 19 | 2 | Bullpen | 3 | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4 | Bullpen | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | |
| 21 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |||
| 22 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |
| 23 | 4 | 4 | 4 | Bullpen | Bullpen | ||
| 24 | 3 | 1 | 1 | Bullpen | 3 | 2 | |
| 25 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | |
| 26 | 1 | Bullpen | Bullpen | 2 | 1 | 4 | |
| 27 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | |||
| 28 | Bullpen | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | Bullpen | |
| 29 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | Bullpen | 3 | 2 |
| 30 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | ||
| 31 | 3 | Bullpen | 1 | 4 |
That’s a total of 27 bullpen games, which amounts to exactly one-sixth of the season. Chris Archer, meanwhile, would take the ball 34 times as part of this strategy. Over the last four years, Archer has taken the ball 133 times, including 34 last season, so the 34 starts he would get in this scenario shouldn’t be overly burdensome given the ace’s track record
If the team wanted to get a bit more radical, they could simply start Archer every fifth day, like we see below.
| Day | March | April | May | June | July | August | September |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 2 | Archer | 4 | 2 | 4 | |
| 2 | Bullpen | Bullpen | 4 | Bullpen | 3 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | Archer | 4 | 3 | |||
| 4 | Archer | 3 | 2 | Bullpen | Bullpen | ||
| 5 | 2 | Archer | 3 | Archer | Archer | ||
| 6 | 4 | Archer | 3 | ||||
| 7 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Archer | 3 | 3 | |
| 9 | Archer | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2 | Bullpen | Bullpen | Archer | Archer | ||
| 11 | Bullpen | Archer | Archer | 3 | Bullpen | Bullpen | |
| 12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 13 | 3 | 2 | 2 | Archer | |||
| 14 | Archer | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2 | Bullpen | Bullpen | Bullpen | Archer | Archer | |
| 16 | 4 | Archer | Archer | 4 | 4 | ||
| 17 | Bullpen | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 18 | 3 | 2 | 2 | Bullpen | Bullpen | ||
| 19 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |||
| 20 | Archer | Bullpen | Bullpen | Archer | Archer | Archer | |
| 21 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | |||
| 22 | 4 | Archer | Archer | 3 | 2 | 2 | |
| 23 | 4 | 4 | 4 | Bullpen | Bullpen | ||
| 24 | 3 | 2 | 2 | Bullpen | 3 | 3 | |
| 25 | Archer | 3 | 3 | Archer | Archer | Archer | |
| 26 | 2 | Bullpen | Bullpen | 2 | 4 | 4 | |
| 27 | 4 | Archer | 3 | 2 | |||
| 28 | Bullpen | 4 | Archer | 4 | 2 | Bullpen | |
| 29 | Archer | 3 | 2 | 2 | Bullpen | 3 | 3 |
| 30 | 2 | Archer | 3 | 3 | Archer | ||
| 31 | 3 | Bullpen | Archer | Archer |
In this scenario, the bullpen would still be responsible for 27 games, but Chris Archer would receive 36 starts with the No. 4 spot in the rotation appearing on just 31 occasions. This implementation might be worth an extra half-win over the course of the season, but the throwing schedules for starters No. 2 through 4 would be disrupted quite a bit and might not end up providing the gains.
Let’s assume the team goes with the first schedule above, then, giving the top-four pitchers essentially one extra start. In order for the strategy to pay off, the bullpen games would need to outperform an expected fifth starter without negatively impacting the bullpen in the rest of the games. This will be tough to pull off.
Let’s start by assuming that starters average six innings per start, so that, in a typical five-man rotation, starters pitch 972 innings and relievers pitch 486 innings. In the Rays’ scenario, we will have starters go six innings 135 times, or 810 innings. Relievers, meanwhile, will go nine innings 27 times and three innings 135 times, or 648 innings. That’s a a lot of innings for a bullpen to cover. Let’s take a look at the Rays’ bullpen Depth Chart under a normal innings scenario.
| Name | IP | K/9 | BB/9 | HR/9 | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Colome | 65 | 8.6 | 2.9 | 1.0 | 3.62 | 3.79 | 0.8 |
| Dan Jennings | 65 | 7.5 | 4.0 | 0.7 | 3.62 | 3.88 | 0.7 |
| Andrew Kittredge | 55 | 8.7 | 3.0 | 1.1 | 3.78 | 3.95 | 0.4 |
| Sergio Romo | 55 | 9.2 | 2.7 | 1.4 | 4.04 | 4.18 | 0.2 |
| Daniel Hudson | 45 | 9.0 | 3.9 | 1.1 | 4.13 | 4.14 | 0.1 |
| Chaz Roe | 40 | 9.9 | 3.8 | 0.9 | 3.60 | 3.67 | 0.3 |
| Ryne Stanek | 35 | 10.2 | 4.5 | 1.2 | 4.02 | 4.23 | 0 |
| Jose Alvarado | 30 | 10.2 | 6.1 | 0.7 | 3.85 | 4.11 | 0.1 |
| Matt Andriese | 25 | 7.9 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 4.14 | 4.13 | 0 |
| Austin Pruitt | 20 | 7.7 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 4.12 | 4.11 | 0 |
| Chih-Wei Hu | 15 | 7.4 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 4.26 | 4.43 | 0 |
| Diego Castillo | 10 | 8.8 | 3.3 | 1.0 | 3.80 | 3.93 | 0 |
| Yonny Chirinos | 10 | 6.5 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 4.34 | 4.43 | 0 |
| Jose Mujica | 10 | 5.2 | 3.1 | 1.7 | 5.43 | 5.65 | 0 |
| The Others | 31 | 8.4 | 4.2 | 1.6 | 5.55 | 5.12 | -0.1 |
| Total | 511 | 8.6 | 3.5 | 1.1 | 4.00 | 4.11 | 2.5 |
The Rays have five pitchers who can’t be sent to the minor leagues. In a presumtive eight-man bullpen, that leaves three open spots with which the team can move pitchers between the minors and majors to ensure sufficient rest. To start the season, Matt Andriese seems assured of a spot, so we are talking about two spots with flexibility. With Andrew Kittredge representing one of the teams better pieces here, that flexibility might be even further challenged. The team might need to carry nine relievers to make this work.
One potential workaround comes from the bumped starters. While the team might not want to commit to Banda, Chirinos, or Yarbrough as a full-time fifth starter, they could choose to alternate the bullpen starts among those players and let each pitcher go three innings before sending him back down to the minors.
American League starting pitchers put up a 4.56 FIP last season. The first time through the order, AL starters produced a 4.23 FIP, though, with a sharp increase to 4.76 the second time through and then 4.79 the third time. (The last figure also benefits from some selection bias: ineffective starters tend not to go through the lineup a third time, resulting in one-third fewer innings). Banda, Chirinos, and Yarbrough are all projected as average pitchers, but the first time through a lineup, they would presumably be slightly above average. By letting those three pitchers go three innings in their bullpen starts, we’ve added 81 innings for which the bullpen isn’t responsible, and they’ve been covered at a decent level of quality.
Even with those 81 innings from minor-league starters, the bullpen still has to come up with an extra 10% in the innings category compared to what we see above. To make up that gap, we are going to see more innings from the bottom of that reliever table. Jose Alvarado, Chih-Wei Hu, Austin Pruitt, and Ryne Stanek are likely to see more innings than represented above. Jaime Schultz, too. The good thing for Tampa Bay is that most of those relievers are projected to record better numbers than a fifth starter would the second and third times through the order. The bad thing is that injuries are likely, which will mess with the rotation plan and the available bullpen arms. When there are bullpen games followed by or preceding a start where the pitcher didn’t go deep into the game, the pen is going to be strained.
We are left with a lot of questions. Will the team be able to stick with this setup if one of their top-four starters — or top-five including Andriese — goes down with an injury? Would a jump in performance by Banda, Chirinos, or Yarbrough change the dynamic? Will the team be disciplined enough to go through the churn of continuously optioning relievers even when their performance dictates a stay in the majors? Will Kevin Cash be able to exercise similar discipline not to wear down the better relief arms he does have?
These questions will likely be answered as the season goes along, but keeping a rotation healthy and bullpen arms rested is nearly impossible in the best of circumstances. This alignment probably won’t last, but for the Rays, it is probably worth trying, anyways.
Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.
I want to go to those games on April and June 31st
Lousy calendars with uneven days in the month. I blame the Smarch weather. Fixed. Thanks.
Some team should offer a promotional flyer that includes “Unlimited 10-Cent Beer, April 31st Only”. What could possibly go wrong?
They could get away with that on April 1st.
They’ve already said that starters like Pruitt, Chirinos, Banda, and Yarby will ride the AAA train and contribute to these bullpen games, likely piggy backing on each other to go through the lineup once or twice each. If Honeywell can’t be the 5th starter, we might as well see what we have with the other 4.
April 25th last year Tampa experimented with this. Threw a shutout against Baltimore with Pruitt and Whitley eating 6 innings. In my opinion, hold 3 long relievers (Andriese, Pruitt, Random) giving 6 innings to two of them. Letting the other pitch on other days if the tail throws a dud and needs to get pulled. Rays are utilizing their strength of having way too many number 5 pitchers. Would be surprised if they get less production from the 5 hole. It will be interesting, and I’m definitely a big fan of Tampa doing this. Gotta utilize that pitching depth.
I think 4 men is the future. 4 men with 7ip like in the 80s won’t come back but if a starter only goes 4 IP it makes sense that he needs less rest days. You can’t do less ip per star and more rest days because you also need more relievers.
Say it is 4 starters by 162 you get 40.5 starts per starter. Say you get 15 starts by minor leaguers that leaves 38 starts or about 150 ip which I think is doable (after all pitchers threw 250 innings in a 4 men 40 years ago).
That would leave 8 relievers for around 810 ip. Say you get 50 ip from the minors that means every reliever goes 90 ip. I don’t know if that is possible. But if you sacrifice a position player (need a couple versatile guys for that) that would only be 80ip which could be possible.
I don’t see how a 6 men makes sense if everyone still only goes 5-ip, 6 men only makes sense if extra rest means you can go deeper (say 7ip).
You could also do a 4 men tandem going 4 and 3. That would leave 320 ip which is 80 for 4 relievers or 65 for 5.
IMO many clubs will target well over 150 IP from 26-40 spots on 40 man roster.
How many pitches could/should a pitcher throw in order to start again on 3 days rest during a full season? I think around 80 pitches should be doable. It adds to pretty much the same amount of pitches during a full season, no? 4-man rotation, around 80 pitches, a couple of relievers capable of going 2-3 innings. I was always told it was better to throw less pitches with shorter rest than it was to throw many pitches in 1 start and rest for 4 days.
Cash actually hedged a bit by saying they were doing it the first six weeks and would evaluate then. He may be looking to see if one of the minor leaguers steps up.
As a system, 4-man seems like it can work. Though when you say “The depth here doesn’t actually look too bad,” you don’t mention that Eovaldi is recovering from TJ and Faria has only 14 MLB starts to his name…
Why not have starters throw every 4 days and just have shorter outings?
Seems reasonable.
The trick is soaking up all the innings that the four starters don’t pitch, with only one extra reliever gained by going from a 5-man to a 4-man rotation. The Point of Pittsburgh recently suggested four starters throwing ~5 IP each and three relievers in a three-day piggy-back rotation, each picking up 2-3 IP. Looks good on paper and great creativity but with as much chaos as you typically see with today’s standard 5-man rotation, it could get pretty ugly in a hurry.
As far as the missing 10% of bullpen innings, wouldn’t we expect Andriese to pitch more than 25 innings because the Depth Chart projections are based on a normal 5-man rotation? If you give him 81, that perfectly fills the gap. Still a tight fit based on ideal health, but it solves that problem.
IMO all we can take away from what Cash said is that the Rays will use 5 SP slots, but the 5th guy will go 3 or 4 IPs instead of the normal 5.
That’s not much of a change. Over 34 ‘5th SP’ starts, you’d expect the Rays to need 34-68 more innings from relievers over the course of the year.
Depending on how they play to utilize their 40 man roster, they be comfortably able to provide those extra innings to players who project to perform well enough to upgrade the overall staff performance.
I doubt this is about shifting more starts to the guys 1-4 as much as it is distributing the innings pitching in the 5th spot to the bevy of young Tampa arms.
Why would you use the bullpen as a fifth starter, and drain the pen, when the point is just to give Chris Archer and the other good starters more starts? Just start those guys more, and skip you fifth starter pretty often.
Looking at the schedule above, numbering the bullpen starts, you can throw one guy on bullpen days 1,3,4,6,8, and 10, where each start there’s at least 10 days between starts, meaning you can call up a starter for those games, send him down, give him one start in the minors, and then bring him back. That means that up until mid-June, you only really have 4 “bullpen” starts, and can effectively carry an 8th reliever for pretty much that whole part of the schedule. With only 4 “missing” starts in that time, it’s not too much to ask one extra reliever to be able to give you the ~24 innings you’re missing during that half season.
Once you hit the stretch in June, I would imagine you would run back to a regular 5-man rotation. The key that the system relies on having a 5th starter with minor league options, who you’re comfortable giving ~15 starts to over the course of the season, along with another 8 or 10 minor league starts to stay fresh, while giving yourself an extra bullpen arm to play with for 2/3 of the season.
Youve got Archer on 3 days of rest at the start of May. No way that happens…
Good catch. Thanks.
its cheaper this way…..more money in the owners pockets having to play a reliever instead of a starter.
I’ve been thinking along these lines for a couple years now but one of the biggest keys, which is mentioned here and doesn’t apply to all teams, is having plenty of guys you can option to the minors (over and over again). If you think about how rosters are constructed (although this has to be taken with a grain of salt after this seismically different off-season), most teams don’t leave a lot of roster spots open for on-again, off-again bullpen arms; they tend to acquire enough big-league starters to fill 5 spots in April, assuming health (and even accounting for a few injuries) and they try to build bullpens with numerous set roles, leaving few spots for piggy-back or otherwise multi-inning RPs. It would be tricky, especially for a contending team, to construct a roster that would assume four starters and a bullpen day. On the other hand, the 2017 Dodgers kind of did this by just throwing a lot of money at way too many starters and then essentially cheating on the new 10-day DL rule to give guys regular starts off.
One point that is underplayed in this scenario, however, is the possibility (even the probability?) that one of the guys in the bullpen mix has a breakout year and forces himself into the regular 5th starter role (and conversely, other bullpen guys under perform and make the pool of guys available for the 5th day smaller, in effect hastening the shift toward rewarding the breakout guy with a full-time spot). If I were a TB fan, this is what I would be hoping for.