The Red Sox Are Once Again Disappointing

© Gregory Fisher-USA TODAY Sports

The Red Sox may not be as catastrophically awful as the Reds, but at 10-19 they’re running last in the AL East and own the league’s second-worst record ahead of only the Tigers (8-20). Cripes, they’re looking up at the 12-17 Orioles, losers of at least 108 games in each of the last three full seasons. But while Baltimore is in the midst of a seemingly interminable rebuilding effort, Boston is coming off a season in which it won 92 games and fell just two wins short of a World Series berth, and its payroll — $236.6 million for Competitive Balance Tax purposes — is over the tax threshold. At the moment, the Red Sox look like the worst team that money can buy.

You’re forgiven if this feels somewhat familiar, because the Red Sox have made precipitous falls something of a specialty. In 2011, they won 90 games, then crashed to 69 wins the following year while carrying a $175 million payroll, second only to the Yankees. They followed that with a 97-win rebound and their third championship in a decade in 2013… only to plummet to 71 wins a year later. They fell even further from 2018 (108 wins) to ’19 (84) than from ’11 to ’12, but they at least finished above .500 in the latter campaign before plummeting to 24-36 — and last place in the division — during the pandemic-shortened 2020 season.

Here’s a quick look at where this start fits in among expansion-era Red Sox teams:

Red Sox Teams With Worst Records Through 29 Games
Year W L Win% W L Win%
1966 8 21 .276 72 90 .444
2020 9 20 .310 24 36 .400
1996 10 19 .345 85 77 .525
2022 10 19 .345 NA
1972 11 18 .379 85 70 .548
1961 12 17 .414 76 86 .469
1964 12 17 .414 72 90 .444
1984 12 17 .414 86 76 .531
2012 12 17 .414 69 93 .426
2019 12 17 .414 84 78 .519
SOURCE: Baseball-Reference
Since 1961.

This current team is tied with the 1996 edition for the third-worst record to this point. While some of the above squads were able to scramble back above .500, none of them made the playoffs; the slow start cost the 1972 team a spot in the strike-shortened season. No team that has started 10-19 since the playoffs last expanded in 2012 has even claimed a Wild Card spot, though an 11-18 Pirates team did in ’14, and five other 11-18 teams did so from 1995-2011, when each league only awarded one Wild Card spot.

In other words, this is generally not a good place to be, though with the newly-expanded playoff structure and the talent on hand, our Playoff Odds system still gives the Red Sox a 19.8% chance of rallying, though only a 1.1% chance of taking the AL East, where they’re already 10.5 games behind the hot-starting Yankees (20-8).

The chief culprit for the Red Sox’s slow start is their offense, which is scoring just 3.28 runs per game, the third-lowest total in the AL and a rate that most of us wouldn’t have thought physically possible for a team that calls Fenway Park home. The full-season low for an expansion-era Red Sox team is 3.70 runs per game by the 1992 Red Sox, who were 0.62 runs per game below the league average; this one is similarly 0.59 below.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

As a team, the Red Sox’s 80 wRC+ ranks 12th in the AL, their 16 homers 13th, their .279 on-base percentage 14th, and their 6.1% walk rate dead last; they’re a slightly more respectable 10th in slugging percentage (.342) and eighth in batting average (.228). Normally, this is the part where I tell you something like, “The team has just three regulars with a wRC+ of 100 or better.” While that’s true in this case, it’s more descriptive to note that those three — namely Xander Bogaerts (156), J.D. Martinez (148), and Rafael Devers (135) — are the only ones with a wRC+ over 65. No big deal, just a lineup with six regulars not just below average, but at or below replacement level.

The most conspicuous player in his underperformance is Trevor Story, whom the Red Sox signed to a six-year, $140 million deal on March 20. The 29-year-old ex-Rockies star was tasked not only with joining a new team late in an abbreviated spring training but with learning a new position, second base. It’s too early to judge his defense, but on the offensive side, nothing has gone right for him, as he’s hit .194/.276/.269 (62 wRC+) without a homer in 105 plate appearances, that while striking out one-third of the time. The big concern is that he’s hitting just .171 and slugging .220 against fastballs, compared to .269/.495 last year, and his average exit velocity when making contact with those pitches has dropped from 92.9 mph to 90.3, that while his whiff rate has increased from 23.3% to 31.3%. What’s more, he’s 1-for-19 against fastballs 95 mph or higher. Maybe he’s still rusty after reporting late, maybe he left his bat speed in Colorado, or maybe the concerns about his past right elbow injuries are valid.

The story beyond Story gets worse, as holdovers Enrique Hernández, Alex Verdugo, and Bobby Dalbec, all of whom turned in a wRC+ in the 107-110 range last year, haven’t even lived up to the newcomer’s offensive standard. Hernández, who enjoyed a breakout as an everyday player last year and ranked behind only Bogaerts and Devers with his 4.1 WAR, is hitting .176/.252/.284 (57 wRC+) with one homer in 115 PA; worse, he’s hitting .143/.200/.208 in 85 PA against righties, undercutting his claim on everyday play. He leads the majors in popups with 12, four more than any other player, and his 27.3% hard-hit rate places him in the ninth percentile, though his 7.4% barrel rate is in the 48th, a more typical placement for him. Like Story, he’s crashed against fastballs, from .282/.492 last year to .161/.226 this year (and .125/.167 against righties), with a drop from 92.4 mph to 89.4 mph in terms of average exit velocity. He’s struggled against breaking pitches as well (.143/.214).

Driven by a .207 BABIP, Verdugo is hitting just .212/.246/.327 (56 wRC+), but he’s making much better contact than that line suggests. His 8.4% barrel rate, while middling, is actually a career high, and while neither his average exit velocity nor his hard-hit rate are impressive, his .285 xBA and .534 xSLG are quite similar to Martinez’s .290 and .558. Dalbec’s BABIP is even lower (.196), and he’s “hitting” .139/.225/.215 (31 wRC+) with one homer in 89 PA. His 31.5% strikeout rate actually represents a three-point drop from last year, but his barrel rate has fallen from 20.2% to 7.4%. He’s just 1-for-29 when putting breaking or offspeed pitches into play, and his .104 xBA and .145 xSLG on those balls isn’t much better.

Jackie Bradley Jr., while neither a newcomer nor a holdover — he’s back via trade after a very rough season in Milwaukee — has added to the offensive woes by hitting .202/.264/.298. If the small-sample metrics are to be believed (and I would generally caution against that), he’s offset that misery with excellent defense (6 DRS, 3 OAA, 1.7 UZR) so far.

Speaking of which, without getting too wrapped up in any single player’s defense — particularly that of Story, given his quick conversion to the keystone — it’s noteworthy that as a team, the Red Sox have improved markedly in turning batted balls into outs relative to last year. The team’s .659 defensive efficiency was the AL’s worst in 2021, 21 points below that of any other team and 35 points below league average. They’re at .714 this year, ninth in the league but four points above average. As their problems go, this is not one of them. The better defense has helped the Red Sox’s pitching, but it’s worth noting that in the current environment, its 4.07 runs allowed per game — which is tied for seventh in the league — is still 0.15 runs above average. Given the park adjustments, their overall 99 ERA- and 105 FIP- put them more or less in the middle of the AL pack.

Despite the losses of Eduardo Rodriguez to free agency and Chris Sale to a stress fracture in his ribcage, the rotation has collectively performed respectably, pitching to a 3.28 ERA (fourth in the AL) and 3.88 FIP (eighth). Both their 8.2% walk rate and 1.12 homers per nine are on the high side, but their 23.6% strikeout rate and 15.4% strikeout-to-walk differential are among the AL’s top half-dozen. If you needed a reminder that we’re in small-sample theater, here’s one: of the six starters they’ve used, four have BABIPs of .256 or lower while the other two are at .319 or higher, and all but swingman Garrett Whitlock have an ERA-FIP differential of at least 0.94 runs in one direction or the other.

Of those six starters, only Nick Pivetta has been significantly worse than league average in both FIP (4.42) and ERA (6.08); he’s been hit hard, as his 93.2 mph average exit velocity and 11.7% barrel rate attest. Nathan Eovaldi’s barrel rate matches that of Pivetta, but his average exit velocity is over two clicks lower. He’s outpitched his 2.14 homers per nine to put up a 2.65 ERA. Tanner Houck, who has made four starts and three relief appearances, has been lit for a 5.70 ERA despite just a 3.46 FIP. He’s been victimized by a .333 BABIP (a 91.0 mph average exit velocity hasn’t helped) but he’s also walking 10.9% of all hitters while striking out just 22.8%.

Houck’s move between the rotation and bullpen owed something to his unvaccinated status. In mid-January, the Canadian government ended its special exemption for professional and amateur athletes traveling to the country, meaning that they now have to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 in order to play. Houck, who otherwise would have started during the team’s April 25-28 trip, was moved to the bullpen just before that series and spent those four days on the restricted list. Whitlock joined the rotation as Houck left; the team lost his start in Toronto, 1-0. With Rich Hill now on the COVID-19 IL and Michael Wacha landing on the IL due to a strained intercostal, there’s not only room for both Houck and Whitlock for the moment, but they’ll need further reinforcement until Hill returns, and as the season progresses, they’ll have to mind Whitlock’s innings total as they ramp him up from last year’s 73.1. The cavalry is not coming anytime soon, as Sale, whose rehab was recently stalled by “a non-baseball medical setback” that was not COVID-related, isn’t likely to return before late June. Free agent addition James Paxton, who’s rehabbing from April 2021 Tommy John surgery, was targeting a return around the All-Star break, but a recent bout of posterior elbow soreness will push that timeline back.

While the rotation has been good, Boston’s bullpen has not; its 4.19 ERA is second-to-last in the AL, and its 3.95 FIP just 12th. The team’s nine blown saves are three more than any other AL club, and its 22 inherited runners scored tops as well. And while the format may be to blame more than the individual pitchers, the Sox are 0-6 in extra-inning games, including four lost on walk-off hits. On a related note, they’re 3-7 in one-run games, tied with the A’s for the second-most losses by that margin.

Matt Barnes, who landed a two-year, $18.75 million extension in the middle of last season, saved a team-high 24 games but struggled so mightily in the second half of last year (6.48 ERA, 5.75 FIP) that he lost the closer’s job. Manager Alex Cora declined to anoint a new one this spring, a choice that chief baseball officer Chaim Bloom recently defended, but it’s tempting to wonder about the road not taken. As The Athletic’s Ken Rosenthal noted, Bloom could have chosen to spend on available closers Kenley Jansen or Kendall Graveman; for that matter, old friend Craig Kimbrel was available. The current configuration hasn’t worked out; five relievers each have one save (including Whitlock), but five of the blown save chances have come in the ninth inning or later. Barnes has been hit for a 7.84 ERA and 4.82 FIP as batters have used his fastball — which is averaging just 94.1 mph, 1.7 mph below last season — as a piñata (.385 AVG/.692 SLG). With his whiff rate on his curve dropping significantly, his strikeout rate has crashed through the floor, from last season’s stellar 37.8% to a paltry 16.3%, while his walk rate has risen from 9.0% to 12.2%.

Of their other high-leverage relievers, lefty Matt Strahm (2.70 ERA, 1.88 FIP) and righty Ryan Brasier (2.70 ERA, 2.78 FIP) have pitched well, but lefty Jake Diekman (3.72 ERA, 5.77 FIP) and righty Hansel Robles (2.19 ERA, 4.78 FIP) less so; Diekman has walked an astronomical 17.8% of all hitters. For all of the matchup-based implications that a closer-by-committee situation carries, it’s noteworthy that when facing right-handed hitters, the team’s lefty relief options — Strahm, Diekman, and Austin Davis — have yielded a .354 OBP (third in the majors) and .336 wOBA (fourth). That’s not going to get the job done.

In a division that figured to have four teams contending for the league’s six playoff spots, the Red Sox were estimated to have a 61.3% chance of joining the October fun according to our Playoff Odds. They’re suddenly in an all-too-familiar hole, and with Martinez and Eovaldi among their 10 pending free agents (including Bradley, whose $12 million mutual option is an obvious no from a club standpoint given his 2021-22 performance), and Bogaerts holding an opt-out after the season, it’s likely that Bloom will have to open the storefront if the Sox continue to lag behind, so as to avoid paying the CBT. The good news is that aside from Story and Sale, the team’s high-salaried players are the ones performing well and will have trade value; it’s the mid-priced supporting cast that’s flopped. But for a team that’s just two years removed from trading Mookie Betts to alleviate their tax problems, this routine is wearing pretty thin.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

44 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
JustinPBGMember since 2018
4 years ago

As a Yankee fan, I do wonder if “win title, be terrible” is more or less annoying than “never actually be bad but don’t quite win title for a long time.”

That said, I will never complain, really, considering all the rings from age 10-23 for me.

I just wonder if this cycle of whiplash is more or less annoying.

dl80Member since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  JustinPBG

I much prefer the latter, personally. For example, to use basketball as an example, I prefer the current Celtics (where they are good or very good for the past 7 years but not really true contenders) to the Big 3 years (where they were really good for 5 years and won 1 title, but then were bad or mediocre for another 4 years).

I’m also a White Sox fan (I know, it’s weird), and I would rather them be really solid for a bunch of years even with no title, over the 2005 team that made the playoffs once in 7 years but happened to luck into a championship.

But it may be because I just really prefer watching playoff games, so the more chances to watch my team in the playoffs the better. Even if they never get all the way.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  dl80

As a Twins fan, I no longer enjoy watching playoff games. At least not ones the Twins are involved in.

Last edited 4 years ago by cowdisciple
carterMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

As a Mariners fan I enjoy watching playoff games. Hopefully we can get into our next one before 2044.

JohnThackerMember since 2025
4 years ago
Reply to  dl80

I think that’s the logic for why they expanded the playoffs (in MLB and in other sports.) On average, for good or ill, the belief is that more fans on average are happier about making the playoffs than people who are annoyed because their team that was better didn’t win it all. (And that fans are a lot happier about sneaking into the playoffs than finishing one or two games back in a tight divisional race.)

Somewhere in the limit, though, you make the 162 game season seem pointless; the NBA may have started to reach that point with their regular season.

Last edited 4 years ago by JohnThacker
JustinPBGMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  JohnThacker

Freaking 9 year playoffs!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  JohnThacker

That the NBA “may have” expanded too far is being very charitable. It. Never. Ends.

Mitchell MooreMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Money grabbers gonna grab.

Lanidrac
4 years ago
Reply to  JohnThacker

The NHL is no better.

Tim Mainella
4 years ago
Reply to  JustinPBG

Are you really asking if four rings in the past 20 years is better or worse than one

JoserMember since 2021
4 years ago
Reply to  JustinPBG

It’s personal preference, obviously, but I always said I’d prefer the Atlanta’s decade of 1996-2005 to that same span in Miami, even though the Braves lost 2 World Series in those years and the Marlins won 2 (Atlanta had their victory back in ’95). And that’s because the Braves played in the postseason every year, while Miami played in none except the two where they snuck in as a Wild Card and then went all the way. Postseason baseball is fun baseball, but it’s also a crapshoot: the best teams don’t always win. But watching a postseason run is its own reward, even if it doesn’t end in the ultimate victory.

But I’m a Mariners fan, so of course I would say that.

keithk
4 years ago
Reply to  JustinPBG

As a Yankees fan, I’m thrilled that the Yankees have been good every year for a long time and managed to stay in the race, at least marginally, in even their down years last decade. My enjoyment from baseball is driven much more by the day in, day out routine of following the team during the regular season than the crap shoot of October. Sure, I’m a bit jealous of Boston’s recent championships but I wouldn’t trade that consistency for boom and bust.

Lanidrac
4 years ago
Reply to  keithk

I feel the same as a Cardinals fan.

David WiersMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  JustinPBG

A’s fan chiming in uninvited:

The three years contending, three years rebuilding gets old. I’d infinitely prefer to have seen a title — even if it means no playoffs for the seven years before and after the title.

But I’m also a Tottenham fan, so not winning is the norm.

darren
4 years ago
Reply to  JustinPBG

My take as a Sox fan: I think it’s more enjoyable to root for a team that is consistently excellent year to year. Your team is enjoyable for the entire six month season and then occasionally a bit into the playoffs. The championships are tons of fun, but they are short periods of rooting excitement, somewhat flukey, and let’s face, really only good for bragging rights.

LightenUpFGMember since 2018
4 years ago

Glad to hear that the starting pitching staff is doing well so far, but I still can’t trust a group that consists of Wacha, Pivetta and Hill. It just feels like the bottom is going to fall out a la Martin Perez and Garrett Richards last season…

I also wonder if some of the lack of offense has anything to do with not knowing what’s coming from the pitcher with the new electronic device communication this year. I don’t know how many pitchers and catchers use it, but like the lack of video watching ability that JD Martinez complained about last year, one might have to start thinking that some of these guys lost their extra ‘clairvoyant’ edge.

Anyway… go C’s and B’s!

Last edited 4 years ago by JuuuustAnotherBaseballFan
Devern Hansack
4 years ago

Anecdotally, the team chemistry just seems completely off this year. Last year’s group was easygoing, brash, and played the game with a ton of joy. This year’s team looks unexcited to be there.

While I respect that Bloom is making moves to set the team up for longer term success like acquiring a Binelas or two, it can’t be easy for the team to see solid contributors get dealt or three franchise players in three years get publicly lowballed in contract negotiations.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Devern Hansack

Who are the other two aside from Betts?

Also, the Red Sox were right to not trust that Renfroe would repeat last year. The process there was sound.

Devern Hansack
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Bogaerts and Devers.

Agree on the process for trading Renfroe, but I wish they’d have signed a suitable replacement instead of handing the reigns over to JBJ.

carterMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Renfroe has done basically exactly what he did last year, 112wRC+ vs 114wRC+ last year. League offense is down a lot.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  Devern Hansack

Chemistry is always a chicken-or-egg problem, though. They’d probably be relaxed and having a lot of fun if they were 19-10 rather than the reverse.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

So, let me get this straight: They’re over the tax line, they’re 10.5 games back, and three of their top 5 players (Bogaerts, Martinez, and Eovaldi) are free agents after the season ends? And the guy who is (probably) their best player in Devers is a free agent after 2023? Hoo boy.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The good news is that because they have so many one year contracts they can probably get below the tax line if they really wanted to at the deadline. And also they probably will only have something like $65M in guaranteed money next year, so they should have a ton of money to extend Devers if they’re willing to do it (they should).

But it’s going to be impossible to compete unless Sale is healthy and Story and Verdugo are hitting even a little because they’re going to have to fill something like 15 roster spots and Triston Casas can only fill one of them.

Last edited 4 years ago by sadtrombone
Brock244
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Thing is, people always look at whose hitting FA, but forget to mention the money coming off the books too.

While they have a ton of guys hitting FA, all those guys are also expensive. I think they have something like 100mil coming off the books this year.

It should be fascinating how they retool their roster

Last edited 4 years ago by Brock244
miltonfriedman
4 years ago

Why would you pay a Coors Field product that much money? Trevor Story is as overrated as Cargo

David Klein
4 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

Plenty of so called products of Coors have hit since leaving like Walker, Arenado, DJ among others. I think Story will eventually be fine but that start yikes.

miltonfriedman
4 years ago
Reply to  David Klein

Those other players were good outside of Coors. And Arenado has around an 830 ops in st louis. Story was average at best outside coors

Lanidrac
4 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

What’s wrong with an .830 OPS, especially with the massive start Arenado is now having in Year 2 away from Coors?

Meanwhile, average on the road as a Rockie is just fine due to the Coors Hangover Effect.

FrancoeursteinMember since 2025
4 years ago
Reply to  David Klein

Holliday is my favorite example.

Brock244
4 years ago

I don’t think this team has played as bad as their record. despite its offensive struggles, there was a real avenue for them to be hovering around .500 now

In the last 2-3 weeks, the Redsox have like 4 inexcusably bad blow saves. Moving Whitlock to the rotation had probably cost them a good 3-4 wins.

Had they held onto those games suddenly they are at ~14-15 and things look manageable. The offense will get better. They’ll get Sale, Paxton, and Taylor back eventually. Casas will be called up, too. That’s workable. Could very well see a playoff team in that scenario.

But they did lose those games and have dug themselves a big hole because of it.

Feels like the next few weeks will make or break their season. If they can crawl themselves back to .500ish they’ll be cooking for a wild card slot imo. If things continues to crater, could be a massive fire sale

Last edited 4 years ago by Brock244
sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Brock244

BaseRuns has them at 12-17, which is still bad. But psychologically it’s not anywhere as devastating as 10-19.

Brock244
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Fair. A question I have: how do blown saves factor into baseruns?

For instance let’s saying you blow 5 games where you had a 1 run lead in the ninth. Your run differential in those scenarios goes from +5 to (at least) -5, a 10 run difference.

So had they had a suitable closer (or Whitlock) in those situations, their baseruns record is probably better than 12-17, no?

I’m not sure I understand that correctly, but what I do know is they’ve been brutal in save situations and have 3-4, almost comically bad, late game losses. That type you get once or twice a season. Not 4x in a month!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Brock244

The way I think about BaseRuns is that it’s “expected run differential” based on observable events. Instead of using actual run differential it predicts run differential based on individual events (e.g., singles, doubles, triples, home runs, etc).

So it strips out sequencing from run differential, but keeps the nonlinear aspects of using actual run differential. You can then use it to predict a team’s record and whether it’s been lucky or unlucky, much like you would do with Pythagorean records.

So for example, in the Double-Sox Series, there was a game where the Red Sox got 9 hits, two of which were doubles, where the White Sox got 6 hits, only one of which was a double. Both had the same number of strikeouts and walks. There were no homers. Despite the Red Sox losing by one run, unless I missed something, the Red Sox would actually improve their BaseRuns run differential by a little bit instead of losing it (although the actual amount would be minimal).

FrancoeursteinMember since 2025
4 years ago

This is just part of the Sox usual cycle. They’ll lose 90-100 games and somehow win the World Series next year.

horacefury19
4 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

Well, you’re half right.

Curacao LL
4 years ago

The ’21 season wasn’t consistently good.
We were hotter than Hell in April and May, and the rest of it looked more like between ’19 and (’20 and ’22).
I get that a win in April is as good as a win in September, but those two months really feel like an aberration since ’18.

JimmieFoxxalorianMember since 2020
4 years ago

Thanks Jay Jaffe, I’ve been waiting for fangraphs to address how incredibly bad the Sox season has gone, and you nailed it.

I attend a decent number of games at Fenway each season, and this is the first season I can recall in quite some time that I am not looking forward to the games I have tickets for.

This is a very difficult team to watch. At least prior bad teams were entertaining! This squad, not so much– there are so many bad swings at bad pitches, and poorly timed swings at good pitches, by most of the lineup. Kike, Dalbec, Bradley, Story, Vazquez, Plawecki, and Arroyo have ALL been terrible. Not just a bad streak, but literally terrible every single game. I’ve lost count of the number of innings I’ve clapped and cheered for batters who have not hit the ball out of the infield. These guys have been really, really inept at the plate. However, Devers and Bogaerts have been solid and always have good at-bats. Martinez has not been terrible, but to my eye he is barely making contact on pitches he used to routinely rake.

The rotation has part been a little better than I expected, but Cora has wildly mismanaged the bullpen and strangely, there remains reliance on obvious poor performers who arguably shouldn’t be regular major leaguers.

This is a very bad, very overpaid roster for whom 90+ losses is a real possibility. As a fan who watches all of the games, postgame pressers, follows the team and players on social, and pays close attention to many details, I still have no clue what the actual direction of the team is beyond 2022, or what Chaim Bloom’s vision is for the Red Sox.

Does Bloom just wait for all costly contracts to run out, and build the team around Marcelo Mayer in 2025? Sign Devers to long-term extension? Trade a Bradley for a Renfroe? No idea what Bloom will do, or what success even looks like to him. Is success a playoff contender with a sub-$200 mil payroll, or World Series appearance with $270 mil payroll, or any finish below luxury tax threshold? Whatever the case, it is a top-revenue-producing organization that can afford to do anything the owners are comfortable with.

Red Sox need to make some moves, and make them fast— anything. Cut players, trade players, whatever. Why not, they’ve got nothing to lose.

johndarc
4 years ago

IIRC, he said he wanted the red Sox to be more like the Yankees and Dodgers, good every year. No more boom or bust. Maybe they’ll get there soon enough, with Bloom’s Rays powers and John Henry’s largesse

Considering the red sox have several titles over the past decade compared to the Yankees and Dodgers combined 1, it sounds silly, but people pay money when the team is at least decent, so it behooves them to be decent or better all the time.

LightenUpFGMember since 2018
4 years ago

Sounds like you just need to go to Fenway purely for the beer. In fact, make a game of it. For every inning that the Sox don’t get a hit or walk, drink a beer. Hopefully as the season goes on and the Sox warm up you’ll get to enjoy the games more, but until then you can let them belligerently have it by the 8th or 9th inning.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  LightenUpFG

That sounds like a very expensive way to get in a fight. If you just want to throw punches and get your head smashed in, you can do that on Lansdowne for free.

LightenUpFGMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

That is true, as the Sox are going to add up JimmieFoxxalorian’s beer tab to an almost ticket price level, but how else will the team hear his candid reviews of each hitter’s talent level? Dalbec may not know that he “really wicked sucks” and Bradley may have not of considered “goin’ back ta Milwaukee”. JimmieFoxxalorian can help with that since he’s going to the game anyway.

JimmieFoxxalorianMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  LightenUpFG

LightenUpFG, you crack me up

deathtothedh
4 years ago

I am a Dodgers fan. We only have one world title in 10 years, but we have had multiple 100 win seasons, 10 straight years of 90 plus wins. Everynight for almost a decade watching the Dodgers has been enjoyable. I would rather only have one world title, and be consistenly good than boom and bust. The regular season counts too.

rounders
4 years ago
Reply to  deathtothedh

Without doubt that is what Bloom is shooting for. Dodger org. When he came on I thought it would be ’23 but unfortunately for Bloom they ourperformed last year and the fans don’t know what to do with that. They will lose Bogie and Eovaldi next year, or before, have five position holes to fill with Bogie gone, plus pitching. But the farm will start producing and an enormous amount of money is coming off the books next year. When Bloom has what he needs he’ll blow through the caps to guarantee outcomes just as the Dogs are doing right now.