The Red Sox Have to Bench Somebody

After the first two games of the World Series, the Red Sox are probably feeling pretty good. With two victories already to their credit, they need to win just two of their next five contests to win this year’s title. The odds are in their favor.

As they begin the the first of three games in Los Angeles, however, they have a decision to make regarding their lineup, owing to the absence of the designated hitter in a National League park. The issue comes up every year, but rarely does it present much difficulty to decision-makers. Most American League champions feature either feature a DH who isn’t worth playing elsewhere or an obvious weakness somewhere in the lineup.

That isn’t so much the case for J.D. Martinez and the Boston Red Sox, however.

Consider some examples from recent World Series. In 2014, Billy Butler DH’d for the Royals in Kansas City but only pinch-hit in San Francisco. Kendrys Morales played the same role for the 2015 edition of the Royals. Last year, it was the Astros’ Evan Gattis. Only Cleveland, during their series against the Cubs, was forced to take some unusual measures to include their usual DH in the lineup, placing Carlos Santana in the outfield. That said, Cleveland also lacked a surplus of great outfield options at the time.

The last legitimately good AL player forced from a lineup when the World Series headed to an NL park was probably Kevin Youkilis in 2007, when the presence of David Ortiz sent him to the bench. But the current version of the Red Sox will be forced to take similar steps in Los Angeles. Martinez was a six-win player this season, with a 170 wRC+ as Boston’s designated hitter, marking the best season by a DH since Ortiz’s 2007 campaign for the world champions. Martinez needs to go to an outfield corner, and even if he we assume that he had just bested (worsted?) the single-season low for UZR (-36 runs, set by Brad Hawpe in 2008), he still would have recorded nearly four wins this season. He needs to be in the lineup, right?

It would seem so, yes, but once Martinez goes into the outfield, one of the following scenarios needs to occur:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
  1. The Red Sox bench Jackie Bradley Jr.; or
  2. they bench Andrew Benintendi; or
  3. they play Mookie Betts at second base.

Mike Petriello made the case for the third option over at MLB.com. In that piece, he notes that the decision is easier in games Four and Five with a lefty on the mound, mentions the lack of potential opportunities for Betts at second base based on Red Sox pitching and Dodgers hitters, says the offensive numbers are a wash, and concludes thusly:

So if the lineup choices are a wash, this comes down to defense. Martinez is a sizable step down from Betts in right, but he’s got to be there if we want his bat in the lineup. Betts is likely a small step down from Bradley in center, probably a barely perceptible one, but that matters with Martinez in right. And at second, Holt is worse than Kinsler, but better than Betts. You could argue in either direction. Either way, Betts and Martinez must both play, and Bradley’s defense is more valuable than Holt’s.

Maybe putting Betts at second base is too radical for the World Series. Perhaps Cora will just keep it simple and bench Bradley, starting Holt or Kinsler at second base. It’s the easy way to go, and Red Sox fans know better than most how hard one poorly-timed defensive miscue can sting. But October is when the tough choices mean the most. Putting Betts at second is far from traditional. It just might be the right thing to do.

Petriello presents an interesting argument, but I’m not sure it is the correct one. Instead of separating offense and defense, let’s try to combine them. First, here are the player projections with a slight platoon adjustment for the lefties against a potential righty in Walker Buehler.

Red Sox Lineup Options
Name WAR/600 Projections
Mookie Betts 6.8
J.D. Martinez 4.2
Andrew Benintendi 3.7
Jackie Bradley Jr. 3.5
Ian Kinsler 2.8
Brock Holt 2.1
Bradley Jr., Benintendi, and Holt bumped up 0.5 WAR for platoon advantage

That’s what things look like when the players are all playing their normal positions. I’m leaving Martinez where he is, since the DH penalty is roughly equivalent to a -10 outfielder, a figure that seems about right. In the scenario where Betts goes to second base, we have to remove about a win off his value because of the change in defensive position. He’s a great outfielder, yes, but given his lack of recent play at second base, it’s probably not reasonable to expect even average defense from him, regardless of how many grounders he’s taken over the last few years. Putting that into the calculation, we see these numbers for the four outfield slots plus second base.

Red Sox Lineup with Betts at Second Base
Name WAR/600 Projections
Mookie Betts 5.8
J.D. Martinez 4.2
Andrew Benintendi 3.7
Jackie Bradley Jr. 3.5
TOTAL 17.2
Bradley. Jr. and Benintendi bumped up 0.5 WAR for platoon advantage. Betts loses a win for defensive change to second base.

Maybe Betts is better at second base than we think. Maybe Martinez is worse in the outfield. What happens if we replace Bradley with Betts in center field and put Kinsler at second base.

Red Sox Lineup with Bradley Jr. out
Name WAR/600 Projections
Mookie Betts 6.8
J.D. Martinez 4.2
Andrew Benintendi 3.7
Ian Kinsler 2.8
TOTAL 17.5
Bradley. Jr. and Benintendi bumped up 0.5 WAR for platoon advantage. Betts loses a win for defensive change to second base.

Betts isn’t likely to lose any value in center field given his range and arm are just as good as Bradley Jr.’s, even by Statcast metrics. Whatever he would theoretically lose in terms of fielding runs from the move, he would gain back by means of the center-field positional adjustment.

Whatever the case, it appears as though the difference between the two alignments — if one exists — is just a few runs. And while that’s minuscule over the course of one game, logic dictates that, when the radical solution doesn’t come out any better in the numbers, it probably isn’t worth the downside risk. The argument holds whether Benintendi or Bradley Jr. is benched. Given that Bradley Jr. seems more likely to hit the bench against a lefty on Saturday and Sunday (if necessary), I think it raises the argument that it is Benintendi who should sit against Walker Buehler.

Given Benintendi’s spot in the batting order, it is fairly clear that Alex Cora feels it is his left fielder who hits lefties (and righties) better than Bradley Jr. The projections (with defense) put the two players as near equals. Against Buehler, that means Cora is simply choosing offense or defense in Los Angeles with the other a potential pinch hitter. Neither option is a bad choice, but since Bradley Jr. still projects competently on offense against a righty, choosing defense over offense — in light of Martinez’s presence in the field — it makes sense to go with Bradley Jr. over Benintendi. The Red Sox center fielder has been unlucky with the bat this season by xwOBA, and it is possible projections are underrating his ability.

The graph below shows all players with 500 plate appearances with their xwOBA and wOBA, per Baseball Savant. Those players above the line are underperforming their xwOBA, while those players below the line are overperforming it.

Most of the players who undershoot their wOBA based on their xWOBA are slow as seen by the table below.

Biggest xwOBA Underachievers
Player wOBA xwOBA wOBA-xwOBA Sprint Speed
Kole Calhoun .283 .335 -.052 26.1 ft/sec
Victor Martinez .281 .324 -.043 23.2 ft/sec
Joe Mauer .319 .355 -.036 26.0 ft/sec
Chris Davis .239 .274 -.035 25.5 ft/sec
Nelson Cruz .361 .394 -.033 24.9 ft/sec
Salvador Perez .304 .337 -.033 25.1 ft/sec
Alex Gordon .305 .336 -.031 25.5 ft/sec
Jackie Bradley Jr. .311 .340 -.029 27.8 ft/sec
Joey Votto .370 .396 -.026 25.4 ft/sec
Ryon Healy .296 .322 -.026 26.0 ft/sec
Marcell Ozuna .327 .352 -.025 27.8 ft/sec
Yangervis Solarte .285 .309 -.024 24.7 ft/sec
Joey Gallo .343 .366 -.023 27.7 ft/sec
Jose Martinez .356 .378 -.022 26.5 ft/sec
Kyle Seager .288 .309 -.021 25.9 ft/sec
Jose Abreu .337 .358 -.021 26.7 ft/sec
SOURCE: Baseball Savant

It’s a bunch of really slow guys, a player who gets massively shifted in Joey Gallo, and then Marcell Ozuna and Bradley Jr. The Red Sox center fielder has hit a lot better than his batting line indicates. At least against a righty starter, he deserves to play. With the pitcher’s spot inithe lineup, Benintendi will still have an opportunity to impact the game off the bench. It certainly feels odd to advocate benching one of Boston’s best players in Andrew Benintendi, but I suppose that is one of those good problems to have.





Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.

60 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
nktokyo
7 years ago

Bench Jackie, Benintendi’s bat is too good and JD gets subbed for a runner at some point anyways.

stever20Member since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  nktokyo

Either for a runner or maybe more likely defensively.

scotman144Member since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  nktokyo

While JBJ is of course an all-world defender it seems funny to bench Benintendi for defensive reasons after the whole “Air Benny” experience in game 2.

Cory Settoon
7 years ago
Reply to  nktokyo

Second half numbers vs RHP. Tell me again who’s bat is benchable?

JBJ – .301/.369/.531
Benny – .273/.350/.385

You could argue how well Benny has played thus far (against LHP too), but most of those hits just sneaked through or barely dropped in.

WellIDoubtThat
7 years ago
Reply to  Cory Settoon

A partial season split of a platoon split? Am I still on fangraphs? That’s ~200 PA worth of data.

Across ~1100 PA, Benintendi is a career 125 wRC+ hitter vs. RHP.

Across ~1600 PA, JBJ is a career 95 wRC+ hitter vs. RHP

If you want to *weight* those for recency, use the whole of 2018. Jackie was a 103 wRC+ to Benintendi’s 135.

Anonymous
7 years ago
Reply to  nktokyo

OOF. Gotta hate it when your reasonable process leads to the wrong results like that.

mph
7 years ago

Okay, I know I’m confessing to an level of ignorance about my own favorite team here, but whatever happened to the “stick your DH at 1B in the NL park” option? If the assumption is that Martinez is a shaky defender, wouldn’t you rather have that shaky defense at 1B, where mostly you just have to catch a ball thrown directly at you, than in the outfield? I mean, keeping Moreland’s bat in the lineup can’t be *that* crucial. And if the answer is “because Martinez has never played 1B,” isn’t this really more of a “why haven’t they better prepared for this” issue?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  mph

Tell him, Wash.

dl80Member since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

It’s incredibly hard.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  dl80

I’m never, ever going to get tired of that scene.

Tim L.Member since 2025
7 years ago
Reply to  dl80

Hey, anything worth doing is.

Six Ten
7 years ago
Reply to  mph

Plus, the Dodgers don’t hit many ground balls, so the outfield/first base defensive importance gap is even bigger than usual.

Plus, the Dodgers will react to the Red Sox starting lefties by playing right-handers, who will overwhelmingly hit their grounders to the third base side, so Martinez will have … roughly two? … fielding opportunities in the first 4-5 innings of the next two games combined. He just has to be able to catch some throws, which seems like the easiest part of the job.

If you want to react to lefties pinch hitting against your right-handed relievers by changing your defensive alignment, you can do it then.

stever20Member since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  Six Ten

Aren’t the Red Sox starting Porcello tonight and then presumably Eovaldi tomorrow night? Aren’t both of them righties?

tice03
7 years ago
Reply to  mph

Would say it wasn’t the easiest issue to address during the season as the Red Sox pretty much already had a platoon at 1B for most of the year between Moreland/Hanley and Moreland/Pearce. Always seemed like they signed him to be there DH/4th OF.

GreggMember since 2016
7 years ago

Mookie played second for years in the minors. And he is such an instinctive, athletic ballplayer that I’m not sure knocking off one WAR if they stick him at second is the right adjustment. When they moved him to center and right, there was no noticeable adjustment. I don’t think we would see any if he returned to second.

JoserMember since 2021
7 years ago
Reply to  Gregg

I’m pretty sure the Red Sox radio announcers* during game 2 said he’s been taking reps at 2nd and practicing the turn for the double-play in anticipation of playing there in LA.

* while watching I switch among the radio feeds on MLB.TV with FOX on mute. Even the Spanish broadcast, which I can barely follow, is better than Buck et al.

Tom Jitterbug
7 years ago
Reply to  Joser

The Spanish booth has been enjoyable, although I too can barely follow. The play by play guy has a great home run call.

Johnnie TMember since 2024
7 years ago

What did the Sox do when they visited NL ballparks during the regular season?

stever20Member since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  Johnnie T

looks like they rotated the odd man out. Martinez sat 3 times. Betts sat 3 times.

Free Clay Zavada
7 years ago
Reply to  stever20

Sometimes injuries dictated their decisions for them

Dominikk85Member since 2020
7 years ago

Also if you win 108 games you can give away 1-2 wins by giving your stars an occasional breather to keep them fresh. In the postseason every win counts.

Doug LampertMember since 2016
7 years ago

Martinez playing hurt on Wednesday. I’d simply take him out and use him as a pinch hitter. Yeah, Martinez hurt is better than most players healthy, but he can use the extra day off and you’re going to need to leave at least one good player on the bench.

kevinthecomic
7 years ago
Reply to  Johnnie T

It’s a bit of a different decision in the regular season. Players need off days to rest and recuperate, so the Sox could have just timed Martinez’s days off to coincide with trips to NL ballparks.

DarthSader9Member since 2025
7 years ago

The MLB article makes the point that the Dodgers hit the fewest ground balls, so his impact at 2B would be minimized.

I see this as taking one of your best players/athletes/defenders and moving him away from the action.

If the Dodgers are that FB/K heavy, shoiuldn’t the chances at 1B be low? I’m with mph, put Martinez at 1B.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago

You would think that with the division largely wrapped up, they would have seen what Betts could do at second with some reps.

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

or JD at 1B. or … something …

zaxellMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Bad play isn’t the only risk of putting a guy out of position. If Betts got hurt trying to turn a double play in a meaningless September game, Cora would have been fired that night.

tung_twista
7 years ago
Reply to  zaxell

If you extend that logic, should they have rested Betts for most of September to minimize the injury risk?
The additional injury risk from playing out of position is probably significantly smaller than the injury risk you already assume by playing a game every day.

The Ghost of Johnny Dickshot
7 years ago

If they bench Benintendi rather than JBJ they deserve to lose. Personally, I love the Betts to 2B option though. Keep all the good bats in the lineup, defense will still be fine.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
7 years ago

For how many years has Jackie’s xwOBA drastically undershot his wOBA?

I feel like this isn’t new, haha.

More importantly – Mookie’s been 15 runs better per 150 in RF than CF, over his career to date.

That’s likely more relevant than a positional adjustment value which consistently underrates the impact of above-average CFs sliding down the defensive scale (see: Gardner, Brett at Mookie’s age).

free-range turducken
7 years ago

If Betts is at second, he’ll basically be playing short right field against the Dodger lefties anyway because of the shift. The Red Sox should start him there and JD in right, and have Holt available to run for JD later in the game.

Rainja182
7 years ago

This also doesn’t include mental factors of forcing Betts to play a position he isn’t comfortable with. While we assume that players can compartmentalize that aspect of things, all it takes is one error while playing a position outside the norm for a player to devolve into a mess at the plate or cause issues for the remainder of the series.

Honestly, the Sox are good enough that it won’t likely matter what they do, so long as it doesn’t cause issues outside the uncontrollable.

kevinthecomic
7 years ago

Martinez rolled his ankle in the last game. It wouldn’t surprise me if Cora benched Martinez tonight, citing the ankle, and punted the ‘hard’ decision to Saturday.

dl80Member since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  kevinthecomic

And if they win today, it takes the pressure off for whatever they end up doing on Saturday. I think that’s actually what might happen.

LHPSU
7 years ago
Reply to  kevinthecomic

He said Martinez should play, but given that Martinez is bad enough in the OF with a healthy ankle, I think we should shudder at the thought.

drewsylvaniaMember since 2019
7 years ago
Reply to  kevinthecomic

I hope Cora does this. Martinez was a butcher in the outfield *before* rolling his ankle.

LightenUpFGMember since 2018
7 years ago
Reply to  kevinthecomic

Can’t believe this wasn’t mentioned in the article. Stats are nice, but if JD still has trouble running then there it is. Play the healthy guys, pinch hit with JD when the bases have runners and, say, Ian Kinsler or Christian Vasquez is up.

sphenreckson
7 years ago

Well, Cora has said that he’s not going to use Mookie at 2b…. Sadly.

Brian
7 years ago

Just put Betts at 2b and stop the dithering.

J
7 years ago

Thanks Craig!

This is *REALLY* interesting.

I wonder how defensive alignments would affect these scenarios and/or how these scenarios would affect Cora’s choices regarding defensive alignments.

For example:
Mookie at 2b in an extreme shift with him in shallow right seems much different from Mookie at 2b in an extreme shift to the 3b side, particularly with JDM playing first or right field.

In actuality for this series though, against a lefty-heavy Dodger lineup shifting away from right isn’t going to happen.

I agree that this all just speaks to the embarrassment of riches that is the Red Sox roster.

I also think Eduardo Rodriguez is unlikely to see a lot of action in LA, no matter who’s on first (or what’s on second).

Cory Settoon
7 years ago

FWIW. In the second half, JBJ has been a good bit better vs RHP.

JBJ – .301/.369/.531
Benny – .273/.350/.385

Benintendi has the better K and BB percents, but the bat on ball damage goes to JBJ.

Add in JBJ’s superior defense and the option to PH or PR with Benny, and the answer seems easier.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
7 years ago

Is Martinez totally unable to play first? I’m only a casual follower of his array of defensive, er, skills but it seems like one more alternative worth at least some quick consideration.

frangipard
7 years ago

Whether or not this is the right thing to do, it appears benching Benintendi or Bradley is what they WILL do.

Boston has had 8 days to get Betts practice time at 2B (or someone a crash course at 1B, a possibility I’m mildly surprised nobody considered), but unless they’ve been very sneaky about it, it hasn’t happened.

Jim Lahey
7 years ago

Call me crazy… but what about starting Martinez at 2nd with no one on base? In the shift, he’s moved into short right, which he should be fairly used to from a positional aspect. With runners on, switch Mookie to 2nd to increase chance of GIDPs and covering 2nd base?

Keeps the best defensive outfield mostly intact so you’re trading maybe giving up a few singles for maybe preventing an XBH or 2? Best offensive lineup is still intact also. Maybe this is more videogame-ish than real life, but the dodgers get away with playing Muncy at 2nd

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
7 years ago
Reply to  Jim Lahey

I doubt that Cora would go through with it on his own, but this kind of batter-by-batter defensive rotation doesn’t get done nearly enough IMO, and really might be the next frontier after shifting for teams that want to experiment to optimize their fielding. At a minimum you can simply swap LF-RF depending on the hitter, to put the better fielder on the pull side, but there are a lot of extra niceties including, as you say, the way the shift makes one “infielder” into a short-outfielder, but with a sharply limited need for range. Never mind the really interesting possibilities you get if you’re willing to play two relievers at once and swap the wrong-handed one to the outfield…

JoserMember since 2021
7 years ago

I agree we may see more of this in the future, but there’s no way a manger starts doing it for the very first time with his team during Game 3 of the World Series (unless forced to by mid-game injuries or something). Even a team that did it periodically during the season — and so had everyone on board with reflexes in place to do the right thing at the right time — probably would hesitate to do it in the playoffs unless absolutely necessary.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
7 years ago
Reply to  Joser

Sure, of course. In fact the last time I can recall a team doing it even in a practically meaningless regular-season game was forced by injury (the Mets bouncing Travis d’Arnaud around the infield to hide his glove when they had run out of other infielders). This is more of a midwinter thought experiment than a genuine middle-of-the-World-Series proposal.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
7 years ago
Reply to  Joser

And in the end, Cora DID send Martinez back and forth between LF/RF to the batter’s opposite field in the 9th and 10th.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Jim Lahey

That is crazy, but I totally love that about your proposal. This should bepart of a column of weird defensive alignments that could maybe, maybe work.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
7 years ago

I don’t understand why boston doesn’t give JDM some reps at first. Any major leaguer can play first at least at some level and boston doesn’t have a great 1b. He doesn’t have to play there a lot but sometimes.

Same applies to the Yankees and judge or stanton. They had no good 1b and at least in the first half an outfield surplus (later dissolved by injury), so why not give judge or stanton 20-30 games at first (for example in IL games)?

Lil NubberMember since 2026
7 years ago

My takeaway from this piece is that Martinez doesn’t need to be all that diminished by the ankle injury — say, 1 WAR/600 — to be a worse option than Benintendi/Bradley.

When you add up all the ways it could affect him — worse defense, reduced chance of doubles, reduced chance of singles (due both to speed and defensive positioning), less likely to advance on the bases, more likely to make an out on the bases, plus any effect it has on him swinging a bat — it make me wonder if he’s the best option. Watching the way he ran in Game 2, it seems very reasonable that those things add up to at least 1 WAR.

Captain Tenneal
7 years ago

“Martinez is a sizable step down from Betts in right”

Talk about an understatement. It seems like every game this year where JD played right there would be a ball that dropped in the first 2 innings that Mookie would have had. The difference between them defensively must be upwards of 30 runs.

ds31Member since 2020
7 years ago

They actually did it too, Alex Cora the absolute madman

texasfury93
7 years ago

Shouldn’t sprint speed be feet per second instead of miles per hour?

Anonymous
7 years ago

RESULTS-BASED ANALYSIS: JBJ was the right call.

johnforthegiants
7 years ago

Just to get in the first word–i thought it was a gutsy and correct call for cora to bring in eovaldi even thought he was supposed to start game 4. Obviously things didn’t work out as planned but eovaldi got them a lot of time to do something offensively and give the red sox a 3-0 lead. If the red sox pitching gets trashed in game 4 and the series turns around, i think a lot of people may trash cora, but he doesn’t deserve it.

danlbyMember since 2020
7 years ago

Yes, I agree. Cora has consistently gone for the kill game after game. The series leverage was high at that point, and Cora gave his team the best chance to win it. Gutsy and commendable call.

LHPSU
7 years ago

It’s not like he had much in the way of choice. It was the 12th and he had practically ran out of pitchers in the bullpen. Unless he wanted to go to Pomeranz, it was Eovaldi or Sale.

johnforthegiants
7 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

Yes, but the reason he was in that situation was that he didn’t use a single reliever for more than one inning (other than Kimbrel for 1.1 to finish the 10th), while Roberts had already used Jansen and Baez for 2 innings each. The normal thing for managers to do in such a situation is to assume that the next day’s starter can’t be used and plan the use of other relievers accordingly, having them pitch more than one inning if necessary. The problem with this approach is that many relievers are less effective if they pitch more than one inning. The plan which Cora adopted maximized the chances of winning game 3 by using all the relievers minimally, even though that left him with no choice but to use Eovaldi to start the 12th. Obviously at some point if the game went on long enough he was going to have to use Eovaldi, but he chose to postpone that as much as possible.

johnforthegiants
7 years ago

That said, it was not at all a good idea for cora to use price to start the 9th. He had had just one days’ rest after pitching 6 innings and was completely ineffective–if not for the pickoff it would have been even worse. Even from the point of view of going for the kill, it was a bad idea. And who knows, it might have an effect on price if the series goes to game 6. Assuming that cora had already decided he would use eovaldi if necessary, he should have bitten the bullet and just used kimbrel and humbree for one inning each.