The Rockies Could Really Use Joe Blanton
Two weeks have elapsed since I last wrote about the Rockies, so I hope enough time has passed to allow me to return to the subject matter.
As we know, Colorado has experimented with a number of approaches to pitching at Coors Field, from sinker-heavy staffs to expensive free agents to four-man rotations. Nothing, it seems, has worked. Back in January, I wrote about how the Rockies ought to be a center of pitching innovation when I advocated for the club to break away from the traditional five-man rotation.
While battling fatigue is one significant issue tied to pitching at altitude, another is, of course, the movement of pitches in the thin air. One kind FanGraphs reader directed my attention to a Dan Rozenson study on pitch effectiveness at Coors Field.
Wrote Rozenson:
There is strong evidence that the slider performs in absolute and comparative terms better than the curveball in Coors Field. Part of this can probably be attributed to the fact that sliders deviate from the “gyroball” trajectory of a pitch thrown in a vacuum the least of the major pitch types. Sinking fastballs also have a sharp drop-off in performance at Coors, and there is some evidence that using a cut fastball would be a good alternative.
Rockies management would be wise to learn from failed pitching experiments past. Their system ought to emphasize pitchers developing an arsenal of pitches that could be used effectively at home. This most obviously means encouraging their pitchers to throw sliders instead of curveballs as their main breaking ball, although further study might be able to illuminate what other pitches offer a comparative advantage in Denver.
While every type of pitch is less effective at higher altitude, the slider loses the least of its effectiveness among all pitch types. I went back and looked at the last five years of data and, curiously, I found only one season during which the Rockies had really committed to slider usage.
| Year | Slider % | MLB Rank | ERA- | MLB Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 15.6% | 16 | 100 | 17 |
| 2015 | 13.8% | 20 | 110 | 25 |
| 2014 | 22.5% | 1 | 113 | 29 |
| 2013 | 19.1% | 7 | 101 | 16 |
| 2012 | 18.2% | 9 | 113 | 26 |
Rozenson’s research, and the last five years of pitching linear weights data, suggest the Rockies should be committing to the slider and to pitchers that throw sliders.
In looking at the most common non-fastballs – sliders, curveballs, and changeups – only three times in the last five seasons has one of those pitch types produced a positive linear weight for the Rockies in a season. Each time it was the slider.
| Year | wSL | MLB Rank | wCU | MLB Rank | wCH | MLB Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 27.7 | 12 | -15 | 29 | -5.8 | 22 |
| 2015 | -15.6 | 30 | -15.2 | 28 | -28.3 | 30 |
| 2014 | 7.7 | 21 | -14.9 | 28 | -2.1 | 20 |
| 2013 | 28 | 8 | -2.9 | 17 | -36 | 30 |
| 2012 | -10.5 | 30 | -22.4 | 29 | -34.5 | 30 |
It’s more evidence in support of the case for a slider-first approach. The Rockies as a staff should perhaps become the Rich Hills of sliders.
The good news for the Rockies is Jon Gray throws a heckuva slider. And it’s the slider that might allow Gray to become one of the few Rockies starting pitchers to enjoy success at Coors Field. It’s Gray’s slider that, in 2017, could help the Rockies become a dark-horse candidate for an NL Wild Card spot.
Gray threw his slider at a 26.9% rate last season, and it generated a positive linear weight of 13.9 runs above average. His fastball, which averaged 95 mph, produced a -9.6 linear weight. Among pitchers who threw at least 200 sliders last season, Gray’s slider produced the 11th-best whiff rate per swing (43.1%) and a 3.1 GB/FB ratio, according to Baseball Prospectus’ PITCHf/x leaderboards.
It’s a good pitch, maybe a great pitch. For reference, see the final strikeout of his 16-K, shutout effort at Coors last season:
But if the Rockies wanted to implement more of a slider-based approach in 2017, one issue is that, other than Gray, the only pitcher returning from last season with a plus slider (according to linear weights, which isn’t a perfect tool) is potential closer Adam Ottavino.
The Rockies have added slider-heavy bullpen arms in Mike Dunn and Greg Holland, though Holland is coming off Tommy John surgery. While the Rockies’ overall slider usage has declined the last two seasons, the Holland and Dunn signings follow a slider-fastball bullpen template that MLB.com’s Mike Petriello noted the Rockies have focused on in recent years.
And one of the better slider-heavy relievers remains available.
For a club like the Rockies that’s always in need of pitching — and which, in particular, might benefit from a plus slider — the availability of Joe Blanton oughtn’t be ignored. Despite having been no average Joe as a reliever, Blanton still has yet to sign with a club — even as of pitchers and catchers report and Valentine’s Day passes.
Here’s some of what I wrote last month regarding Blanton:
Since 2015, Blanton has appeared in 107 games, all as a reliever. In that time he ranks 11th in ERA (2.29) among all relievers, 24th in FIP (3.02) and 26th in K-BB% (19.1 points).
Since 2015, Blanton ranks 20th among all pitchers (minimum 100 innings) with regard to slider usage (35.4%). He threw sliders on 43% of his pitch offerings last season, roughly three times his career average. Last season, Blanton produced a whiff rate on his slider of 40.5%, ranking 40th among all relief pitchers, superior to that of a similar soft-tossing, slider-heavy contemporary in Sergio Romo (35.9%), and better than A.J. Ramos (36.5%) and Darren O’Day (33.3%).
Consider these three sliders from a September 12 Gary Sanchez at-bat versus Blanton, which offer visual evidence of Blanton’s slider effectiveness. Blanton, as you can see in the following footage and as I discussed last month, is one of the best in the game at locating the slider down and away versus righties.
Strike one…
Strike two…
Strike three…
Blanton, the reliever, appeared in five games at Coors Field last season. He allowed two runs in four innings.
With Blanton’s success as a reliever the last two years, it’s somewhat remarkable – to me, at least – that he remains available in mid-February. Just about any team could carve out a role for Blanton, in a sport that should pitch more and more from its bullpens, but there might not be a better fit for the slider-heavy Blanton than the slider-needy Rockies and their home of slider-favorable Coors Field.
A Cleveland native, FanGraphs writer Travis Sawchik is the author of the New York Times bestselling book, Big Data Baseball. He also contributes to The Athletic Cleveland, and has written for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, among other outlets. Follow him on Twitter @Travis_Sawchik.
Come on already, Rays. Eovaldi isn’t gonna solve your bullpen blues. Bring Blanton in from the cold.
Perhaps my favorite baseball memory was watching Game 4 of the 2008 World Series in my dorm and absolutely going wild when Joe Blanton hit a home run. It didn’t really alter the game or the Series (the Phillies were already up 5-2 in the game and 2-1 in the series), but that moment encapsulated all of the magic of that season for me.
So… yes, I would be in support of Joe Blanton going to a stadium where maybe, just maybe, he could luck into a few PAs and snag a home run of his own… for old times’ sake.
Very nice work here, Travis. Enjoyable read.
Question: If the Rockies did start hammering hitters with the slider (and/or non-fastball pitches), wouldn’t it begin to regress as hitters would be instructed to be more prepared for it? Furthermore, batters going into Coors (for now) understand that the fastball is what they can capitalize on and they aren’t as concerned about off-speed or breaking pitches. However, I guess it would take some time for the analytic departments to catch on to that (slider) trend.
I think you’re right. There isn’t a magic pitch that can work permanently because the only permanent effect of thin air is that it kills ‘stuff’. Altitude doesn’t have any effect at all on deception – but that deception has to occur earlier than the pitch trajectory/movement (thats ‘stuff’). And unfortunately, the more one tweaks for Coors (inevitably a higher contact environment) the more one tends to disadvantage themselves for sea level. The latter is only a Rockies challenge.
It’s why I personally think the home/road rotation in some form is the only solution. The Rockies themselves aren’t ‘Coors’. They are half Coors (unique in MLB) and half road (just like everyone else). This isn’t a general selection/development issue (except that Rockies should draw more from Mexican League pool than anyone else). More a specialization/division of labor one.
The more innings Rockies can get AT Coors from their subset of pitchers who specialize FOR Coors, the more they render other teams analytics/scouting irrelevant. Altitude is unmodelled in all league-wide stats/adjusts and always will be so league-wide data/adjusts will always be bogus for decisions at Coors.
“except that Rockies should draw more from Mexican League pool than anyone else”
Would you mind explaining this thought?
5 of 16 teams in MexLeague play at higher altitude than Coors. 3 more are higher than everyone in MLB except Coors. The others are all sea level – but still have to play a lot of games at altitude so it prob doesn’t scare them off.
Seems like happy hunting grounds for the Rockies to me.
Thanks, Michael … Good question. To a large extent it’s perhaps dependent on the quality of the pitch. Everyone knew Jon Gray’s pitch mix and yet the slider was still very effective last season
Wonder if the Rockies put in any bids for the Great Francisco Liriano Salary Dump last year.
“Sinking fastballs also have a sharp drop-off… in performance.” That’s the only kind of drop-off any pitch gets at Coors.
Blanton is historically a fly ball pitcher. Fly ball pitchers don’t typically have the best success in Coors. Not a good fit imo.
Fly ball pitchers have issues in Coors because fly balls travel farther. Ground ball pitchers have issues in Coors because BABIP gets inflated. Strikeout pitchers have issues in Coors because their pitches don’t move as much. The Rockies have tried every “type” of pitcher there is.
You know which type of pitcher has the best success in Coors? Good potchers. Good pitchers pitch the best in Coors. Their HR park factor is in line with plenty of other parks, it’s not a huge outlier like people think.
Clayton Kershaw and MadBum might disagree there. They pwn Rockies batters – but at Coors they are very meh. And given that those sorts of pitchers cost a bundle for any team – and a ‘Rockies premium’ on top – that sort of pitcher is not a wise cost/benefit move for the Rockies either.
Totally agree they shouldn’t go after someone like Kershaw in free agency. I wasn’t trying to address the question of which tier of pitcher the Rockies should go after, but which type of pitcher. My opinion is that Coors is just as difficult for ground ball pitchers as fly ball pitchers.
That i agree with. when you said ‘good pitchers’ and denied ‘outlier’, I assumed you were talking tiers (based on presumably league-wide stats and such). And that methodology of evaluating talent is the real ‘Coors’ problem. Because Coors is the sort of outlier that should be excluded from most stats and treated separately – not mushed in and adjusted in order to be compared. The end result is that Rockies should probably develop pitching themselves and not go free agent or trade route for them.
Coors is just awful for nearly all pitchers …. For his career, Blanton has been nearer league-average GB% rates. But that wasn’t the case last season.
Does Dan Haren still wake up screaming in the middle of the night when he dreams about Coors Field?
You always hear about how pitching at Coors is really tough on Rockies pitchers, I really think these good/bad pitching stats at Coors are a null argument. Making adjustments is just like any other ball park. For example, If throwing a slider is an advantage for Rockies pitchers at Coors, then it is also an advantage if the opposing team’s pitchers can throw sliders. Anytime you have to pitch in Coors so does the other team, there is no advantage or disadvantage.
Except for the fact that opposing pitchers have at most 2 starts per season at Coors, whereas a healthy Rockies starter will have 14-15 starts in Coors in a season (and the same amount on the road). For example, in 2016 Mad Bum had 1, Cueto had 1, and Shark had 2 (all healthy seasons for division rival pitchers).
It is nowhere near a “null argument” as you say because the Rockies pitchers are constantly changing from the extreme environment of Coors to the more neutral/homogeneous environments on the road. Opposing pitchers have to make the adjustment once a season, maybe twice. The difficulty is in making the adjustment time after time after time when pitching at the pro level is so dependent on repeating the same mechanics and maintaining command of your pitches.
number of starts does not matter…those 14-15 starts the opposing team has to start a pitcher too, right? I’m not really talking in terms of fantasy numbers (because that is obviously not a question) I’m talking about winning/losing games. Your argument is basically saying that Colorado’s pitchers are throwing a lot more pitches than other team’s pitchers over the course of a season and I haven’t seen any numbers to support that.
My 2 cents…
Looking at the total pitches thrown over some given time won’t help, because a certain team might just have bad pitchers that are forced to throw a lot because they can’t get guys out. But we can look at the number of pitches thrown by a given team at home vs the total numbers of pitchers on the road to get a sense for how many extra pitches they have to throw thanks to their home park.
The splits leaderboards go back to 2002. They don’t give us total pitches, but they do give us total batters faced and innings pitched, which should work fine as a proxy. Over the past 14 years, Rockies pitchers have faced 4.406 batters/inning at home, and 4.376 batters/inning on the road, or a difference of 0.03 (which, when you’re talking about 10,000+ innings, is ~3,000 additional batters…that’s a lot of extra pitches).
Because of home field advantage, all 29 other team have faced more batters on the road than at home.
I have to side with Joe on this one.
When those pitchers go to Boston, Arizona, Minnesota, Cincinnati they’re not making adjustments? and if your home park is Colorado are you constantly making adjustments when you pitch at home? If Coors is your home park then other parks are not homogeneous.
“more neutral/homogeneous environments on the road” If you only pitch there once maybe twice as a road team how is that ball park homogeneous?
I could show you stats of pitchers that have horrible numbers in San Francisco and San Diego. They only had to make the adjustment (to a pitcher’s park) once a season though!
This isn’t really related to the article, but while there is no disadvantage in a single game, there is definitely a disadvantage over the entire season. When I hear people talking about how pitching at Coors is tough on Rockies pitchers, I think this the argument.
The MLB season is often referred to as a marathon. Any runner will agree that it is much more difficult to run a marathon at altitude. And this is only factoring in the physical difficulties – the mental aspect is difficult as well. No matter what your FIP- is, it has to feel pretty bad to end the season with an ERA in the 4’s and 5’s.
interesting… ask David Price how it feels and ask Chris Sale when this season is over.
The opposing runners in the marathon do not have to run in altitude? Take the time to form a valid argument if you’re gonna try to teach me something…
Yes, actually, in this case the opposing runners don’t have to run the marathon at altitude. That’s the whole argument…Rockies players play more games at Coors than non-Rockies players…
Home: 42 – 39 (0.519)
Road: 33 – 48 (0.407)
So they play better when not in altitude? I know they play more games in Coors that’s not new information…what’s your point?
Colorado Pitching: 4.92 Staff ERA (14th in National League)
San Diego Pitching: 4.44 Staff ERA (10th in National League)
Arizona Pitching: 5.09 Staff ERA (15th in National League)
I think the point being made is:
If Rockies pitchers fail at Coors, they lose their jobs.
If other pitchers fail at Coors, they lose one game
That said – I actually agree with what seems to be your underlying point – that the Rockies pitchers are actually failing on the road not at Coors. But that is because there is a tradeoff.