The Rockies Went Backwards by Doing Nothing

At 4 PM EST last Friday, the trade deadline closing bell rang, and when it did, those of us on the outside looking in were glued to Twitter to learn about the trades that had been completed right before the countdown clock hit zero. It usually takes a little while to learn about all the transactions that get completed in those final minutes. Plenty of players found new homes, but the surprise of the afternoon was that when the dust settled, Trevor Story was still a member of the Colorado Rockies.

The Rockies are 21 games out of first place in their division. Per our Playoff Odds (and good sense), their chances of reaching the postseason this year are a big fat zero, and have been for some time. They also play in the toughest division in baseball, with the Dodgers and Padres looking like teams that will sit at the top of the National League West standings for years to come. The Rockies need to make drastic changes in order to take on those two powerhouses (and the Giants aren’t exactly slouches), and those changes should have begun on Friday. Instead, they sat on their hands, losing a golden opportunity to kick-start a return to competitiveness for a franchise that has reached the playoffs just five times in 28 seasons and has still never won a division title.

Colorado did make one trade during deadline week, sending reliever Mychal Givens and his expiring contract to the Reds for a pair of fringe pitching prospects. But that’s not starting a re-build or, if that term strikes you as too strong, re-tooling the roster so much as it is taking care of some necessary chores. And while Givens departed, there were other players rumored to be on the move who ended up staying put. Holding on to Jon Gray is a curious decision. The team hasn’t earned the benefit of anybody’s doubt, but let’s give it to them in the case of Gray, who has publicly stated his desire to stay in Colorado. Player comfort leads to better player performance, and if they can sign him to an extension, this makes sense. The jury can still be out on that one. But Daniel Bard still being the teams’ closer on August 1 is significantly more difficult to explain. Again, there is surely some loyalty here, and the Rockies deserve some credit for getting Bard back on the mound and finding a decent late-inning option in the process, but as a free agent following the 2022 season (a season in which Colorado will almost certainly not contend), the club just squandered Bard’s peak trade value, and yet another chance to boost a farm system that is among the worst in baseball.

Rockies leadership tries to say the right things (we’ll ignore the club’s strange insistence that this is a very talented team that has simply underperformed), like that they are excited about the young core in their starting rotation, and that they want to spend this winter trying to improve the offense. You know, the offense that could use a guy like Nolan Arenado, who was jettisoned in a move that seemed to be at least somewhat driven by a clash with management just two years after signing a Rockie-for-life extension. Or the offense that would benefit from a contact-driven machine like DJ LeMahieu. At least there, owner Dick Monfort admitted the team erred by allowing LeMahieu to sign elsewhere when he inked a two-year deal with the Yankees prior to the 2019 season that was below industry expectations. But trying to say the right thing hasn’t translated to good process or results, and now we can add Trevor Story to the list of playoff-caliber players looking forward to getting out of Denver.

Maybe they really do believe that the compensatory draft pick they’ll receive when Story departs in free agency after being tagged with a qualifying offer is better than the deadline offers they had in hand. Story’s 2021 performance certainly led to a depressed market for the shortstop. But it’s nearly impossible to believe that no team was willing to offer a prospect, or a package of prospects, with greater value than a pick in the 30s. Not to mention that that player (or players) would immediately become a Rockie and hopefully begin his path to the big leagues, while the player Colorado gets with a 2022 compensation pick won’t even begin his pro career until a year from now, thus further delaying any hope for a return to competitiveness.

Despite their struggles as a franchise, the Rockies have never had a full front office turnover. The people in charge can be traced, family-tree style, to the team’s origins. In terms of their strategy, behavior and responsiveness, other clubs have found them somewhere between confusing and frustrating to work with for years. There is nothing wrong with zigging when other teams zag, but at times the Rockies operate with seemingly no understanding of the Major League Baseball rule set, or what must be done within it to build a good roster.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

And to be clear, I feel bad for Bill Schmidt, the team’s vice president of scouting who currently serves as the interim general manager. With front office personnel departing the organization left and right over the last 12 months, he was put in an exceptionally difficult spot. He’s a well-respected talent evaluator and a well-liked person who was placed in an absolutely untenable situation; it’s like being made captain of the Titanic, but only after it hits the iceberg. I can’t help but think that his activity (or more accurately, unforgivable inactivity) during deadline week rests on the shoulders of Monfort, who at times seems to care more about optics than winning. Those optics took a severe hit when a visibly upset Story expressed his frustration and confusion with the situation, talked about the toll it has taken on his on-field performance, and pulled himself from Friday’s lineup.

Bud Black spoke after the deadline about how the team needed to score more runs. He’s certainly not wrong, as the Rockies entered the week 10th in the National League in on-base percentage and ninth in slugging despite playing half of their games at Coors Field. No position player has accumulated as much as 2 WAR on the season; their best qualified hitter has been Brendan Rodgers, who has a wRC+ of 103. The third overall pick in the 2015 draft, at age 24 Rodgers feels like he’s begun to turn a corner. His wild approach is now merely aggressive, and the power potential is starting to show up in games. He’s beginning to look very much like a building block kind of player and he doesn’t reach free agency until after the 2025 season. But based on what we’ve seen from the Rockies over the past five years, and their inability to project anything close to a competent organization, chances are much better than he’ll just become the next disillusioned, talented infielder looking for a way out of the Mile High City.





Kevin Goldstein is a National Writer at FanGraphs.

42 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
OddBall Herrera
4 years ago

Not trading Story at the deadline because you liked the comp pick value better than any offers you got is defensible, with the caveat that we don’t actually know what those offers were.

What is indefensible is that the offers were so low because the Rockies chose not to trade Story when it made the most sense to, which was last offseason. Going into the season it was obvious that the Rockies were entering a long window where they are going to play third or fourth fiddle in the division. Now they are in that window and don’t look like they have much in the way of assets to claim that they can be ready to be good when the Dodgers and Padres get old and expensive.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

I’d say this analysis is mostly correct. I’d say about 90% of moves we really hate are actually no-win situations because of indefensible moves they made in the last 12 months.

In this case, it was holding Story until his market completely collapsed. You’re a rebuilding team and you have a 5+ win shortstop who insists he won’t sign an extension with you? This is the situation they were in this offseason.

It’s worth noting that this is actually the same thing that happened with Arenado, too. He had been pissed about the direction of the team for a year IIRC (maybe more?) but then they waited until he had his worst season ever to trade him.

mikejuntMember
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I mean I definitely agree with you here. It reminds me of something I saw recently about how Americans often insist about discussing and analyzing things tactically instead of strategically.

A number of recent team blowups that we would generally pan in a strategic sense (Cubs this week, Red Sox trading Betts) can be logical if you break them down to the in-the-moment situation. If re-signing the players was, at that point, not possible or realistic (because the well had already been poisoned), trading Betts, Bryant, etc so you get something instead of nothing made sense.

Strategically, however, allowing the situation to reach that point didn’t make any sense. Now, in the Red Sox case, the trading GM (Bloom) and the person responsible (Dombrowski) weren’t the same. In the Cubs instance, though, Hoyer was a big part of the Epstein front office – responsible for the bad strategic approach in the first place!

Who knows who’s even in charge in Colorado. I think it’s pretty sketch to think that they couldn’t do better than the comp pick with Story, even if he’s struggling a bit, there’s a bunch of teams out there who could use the help. And indeed I think there’s evidence that this is an excuse: there was a “Rockies lowering asking price for Story” report about 3 hours before the deadline. I would guess they did not have a realistic asking price until it was too late to get a deal done.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  mikejunt

The Cubs fire sale and the Red Sox trading Betts are also excellent examples of when you shouldn’t blame them today you should blame them for the foolishness that happened a long time earlier.

It’s probably a bit too soon to declare this one as well, but I would put the Willy Adames trade in that bucket too. It was pretty clear he had a major problem with hitting at the Trop and that his 2020 line was never going to repeat itself. But the Rays have a formula where they always trade guys just before arbitration and don’t really bother beforehand. It took his value totally bottoming it out before they finally sold him off. Future baseball fans who look at the stat lines are going to talk about how the Rays made a huge mistake trading him so soon, when the problem was they traded him too late.

newsenseMember since 2020
4 years ago

Eric Longenhagen rated the comp pick as comparable to what the Nats got for Schwarber. Schwarber is having a great season, Story isn’t. While Schwarber isn’t a lock to be the more valuable player over the next 2-3 months, I think he’s the better bet.

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
4 years ago
Reply to  newsense

There’s also the non-zero (but impossible to quantify) value of having Story in town for 2-3 months and have an exclusive right to negotiate an extension with him. Schwarber may hit more for the remainder of the year, but there’s a 0% chance he gets a bigger FA deal in 6 months

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

EDIT: Comment deleted. I thought HappyFunBall was talking about Story signing with the Rockies, but I misread it.

PhilMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

There is a non-zero chance that Story blows out his arm or some other injury that would keep him out of a substantial amount of 2022 – so Schwarber would get the bigger deal by default.

(Would it be the most Rockies thing for Story to get injured, and the Rockies don’t give him a QO, so not even a comp pick for him, and, lets say, the Giants give him a cheap 2 year deal to cover the injury year)

Richard Bergstrom
4 years ago
Reply to  Phil

Injuries have impacted the Rockies ability to trade, such as CarGo before hot streaks.. but overall the Rockies don’t sell high and rarely sell at all.

rhswanzey
4 years ago
Reply to  newsense

(Defensive spectrum argument here)

PC1970Member since 2024
4 years ago
Reply to  newsense

Even though he’s currently injured? It’s 8/4 & Schearber isn’t even running bases yet, much less started a rehab assignment.

Good chance that it’s 2 months of Story vs 5-6 weeks of Schwarber in any value calculation..& if Schwarber has a setback (hamstrings are notoriously fickle), it could be 2 months of Story for 3-4 weeks of Schwarber.

tung_twista
4 years ago

Generally speaking, if you are a non-contender with a good player in the last year of his contract,
you should trade the position player but feel free to keep the pitchers.
Around the trade deadline, there are always multiple contenders who are willing to pay for a 3 WAR starting pitcher or a 1~2 WAR reliever.
Cannot say the same for a 3 WAR position player.

Ashburn Alley
4 years ago

It is not defensible for the reasons Kevin explained, namely delaying by years the time until the person received is productive at MLB level.

PC1970Member since 2024
4 years ago
Reply to  Ashburn Alley

& let’s add in the new CBA, which could totally change the FA comp model. No guarantee there will even still be FA comp by the time Story signs a new deal.

WARonEverything
4 years ago

It would be great if Story accepts the qualifying offer.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

Based on this writeup, you kind of have to believe he’s out of there on the first train. There’s still a chance a team overlooks this year and gives him $100M+ contract, but he probably knows that some shortstop-needy team (the Reds?) will give him a pillow deal if that’s not on the table.

Rex Manning DayMember since 2022
4 years ago

It’d be better if he rejected it but then took a 1-year prove-it contract elsewhere that bumped Colorado’s compensation pick back a round.

Tristan
4 years ago

Imagine if the Jays go back to the Semien playbook and sign him to that pillow deal, while re-couping a comp pick for signing Marcus.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

In the end, I have to believe being staffed at 25-40% capacity or whatever they are at played a big role in the inaction. They laid off a bunch of scouts that they didn’t re-hire (I think?), they lost their GM, two assistant GMs, and probably a ton of other people too. KG is one of many people who reported other front offices didn’t even know who to contact for trades. You can go after the Rockies for not paying down salary like the Cubs did for Baez to get a legitimate prospect, but I bet if they had more front-office staff talking to other teams / thinking out loud they would have considered it.

I also didn’t realize Bard’s contract was up so soon. That’s kind of horrifying that trade him considering that. The Brewers traded an FV45 for Daniel Norris, and Bard is having a way better year than him with similar team control (although Norris is also a lefty). That extra year really plays a lot into how much you get. But if you don’t have enough people to work the phones you probably can’t drive as much interest.

dozingoffdadMember since 2021
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

And on top of that with how busy this year was it probably wouldn’t have hurt to actually have a couple extra people on hand in the room rather than practically no one. They may have almost pulled it off in a slow year, but that’s not what this was.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  dozingoffdad

Yeah, and the draft being so close to the deadline really threw a lot of teams for a loop as well. A lot of front offices were exhausted already. I bet no one in that office has slept in weeks.

Richard Bergstrom
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The Rockies are always inactive. Sure being understaffed didn’t help, but it’s a cultural thing with them. They’re historically quiet at the trade deadline and don’t do many trades.

RatkoVarda
4 years ago

Unlikely, but possible, that under the new CBA there will be no comp picks given, so further risk is that Rockies get literally nothing.

natedub
4 years ago
Reply to  RatkoVarda

Such a change in qualifying offer/compensation picks would likely begin in the 2023 season. I’d even wager that MLB front offices knew that such a change wouldn’t occur in 2022, otherwise, we’d have seen a few more players moved at the deadline, and possibly even big names (Freddie Freeman?).

Teams not knowing what consequence exists for signing or offering a QO would put several players in limbo next year, and I can’t imagine the MLBPA would want that.

Moral of the story: making such changes for 2022 would be bad for both sides.

Richie
4 years ago

I think a deeper dive on “other clubs have found them somewhere between confusing and frustrating to work with for years” would be fascinating. Time consuming, granted. But fascinating, in small part simply via giving us a case study showing how teams interact.

And you know the local media can’t do it for political reasons.

averagejoe15Member since 2024
4 years ago
Reply to  Richie

If you have a subscription to the Athletic they did a piece that covered stuff related to the Rockies culture from an internal perspective. It was by Rosenthal and former Denver Post, turned Athletic writer Nick Groke.
https://theathletic.com/2467223/2021/03/22/communication-failures-poor-decisions-and-messy-breakups-how-it-all-went-wrong-for-the-colorado-rockies/

I think the external perspective is less interesting because there is so much anecdotal info out there already.
“They value their own guys more than other team’s players.”
“Worried about optics.”
“Loyal to a fault.”
“The owner doesn’t have any friends in the game.”

The Rockies seem to act like a self-contained entity within the broader confines of the MLB. They promote from within as opposed to seeking talent outside the organization both in the front office and on the field it’s just wild.

mariodegenzgz
4 years ago
Reply to  averagejoe15

The Rockies are what you’d call an incest baby. They’ve kept it within the family for so long that everything is now defective. They’re like a lone island in the middle of a big ocean, totally isolated from their reality, and happy to fill up the ballpark, run a basic operation, and call it a day.

Jason BMember since 2017
4 years ago
Reply to  averagejoe15

Hey they sometimes look for talent outside the organization! Let’s not forget Ian Desmond, Mike Hampton, Darryl Kile, Denny Neagle, Wade Davis, Daniel Murphy…

Richard Bergstrom
4 years ago
Reply to  averagejoe15

The Rockies are great at building a brand.. having a team with at least one franchise player and a lot of likable guys for fans to root for, at a beautiful ballpark with one of the more inexpensive ticket prices in the league. But they don’t know how to build a talented team and would rather let a veteran play out their free agency in September then give those at bats to rookies to evaluate.

TheGarrettCooperFanClub
4 years ago

Where the comp pick lands depends on the total value of the contract signed, doesn’t it? So if Story gets a pillow deal or a one-year deal, that comp might not even be at the end of the first round, which at that point, seems like it would definitely be worse than whatever they could have gotten in a trade.

Of course, there’s no way to know what Story will sign for in the offseason right now, but it’s at least more plausible now that the deal isn’t significant enough to land them a prime comp pick, which probably should have given them more incentive to trade him, no?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

Yep. He signs a pillow deal, that pick is at the end of the 2nd round instead of the end of the 1st. Which is roughly the difference between a guy on the FV45/40+ line and one on the FV40+/40 line.

This is probably the biggest flaw in the front office’s logic. There’s still a chance he signs a big contract but there’s probably an even better chance he signs a pillow deal. I’m pretty sure he can talk himself into proving he can hit outside of Coors, that he’ll have a better year somewhere else, and that he’ll do better without the QO.

MRDXolMember since 2021
4 years ago

Reportedly the Colorado FO demanded Kopech from CHW for two months of Story. A touch detached from reality.

natedub
4 years ago
Reply to  MRDXol

That “report” came from a shock jock radio host. The guy doesn’t have a history of announcing these kind of moves.

In fact, I’d rank his reliability right up there with the MarketWatch guy who said the Giants traded Bart and Wade for Kris Bryant.

rhswanzey
4 years ago

The positional talent they are giving full time PT to seems to be clustered in the age 26-29 range, even though most of it is performing well below average. It’s not even like they are breaking in a bunch of prospects, or taking fliers on post hype prospects.

AnonMember since 2025
4 years ago

It really is stunning to look at the Rockies’ roster and realize how bad it is. Of the 13 players with at least 50 PA this year, only one of them is under 26 (Rodgers) and 10 of the 13 are completely home-grown. Only 3 guys have an OPS+ over 100 and only 2 of those are home-grown meaning the Rox are running out there on a regular basis 8 guys they drafted and developed who are A) in their prime and B) not good.

The pitching side is pretty close to the same thing, maybe a smidge less home-grown (forgot that Marquez was originally a Ray) but it’s the same kind of thing – a lot of very average guys that they drafted and are not terribly likely to ever be any good.

Then there’s the money. They are paying almost as much to guys who don’t play for them any longer (Arenado, Murphy, McGee, Shaw, Davis total $46M) as their top 3 existing salaries (Blackmon, Marquez and Story total $47.8M) and a little over 50% more than they pay the rest of the roster combined (approx $30.2M). A full 37% of their payroll this year is dead money.

Richard Bergstrom
4 years ago
Reply to  Anon

The Rockies are historically slow at giving their rookies playing time, sometimes promoting people just to sit on the bench for weeks. McMahon kept sitting for Murphy/Desmond, etc. Tapia would sit for what was left of Matt Holliday. Trevor Story, as you might recall, was supposed to debut later because the Rockies liked Jose Reyes more…

catmanwayne
4 years ago

The risk of handing Story a QO is that if he accepts, the Rockies are stuck paying him $18-20ish million (or whatever the amount will be) to play on a non-competitive team and then they don’t get that comp pick. Which delays the much-needed rebuild even further, and keeps them stuck in the mud while everyone else around them gets better. The likelihood he accepts is low (why wouldn’t he want to sign a megadeal to a contender?), but not zero. He has taken a big step back from his career norms on a statistical level, so perhaps he might take the QO and hope to rebuild his value for 2023, which does give the Rockies yet another chance to trade him in mid-2022.

ajb3313
4 years ago

This organization sucks. All the teams that have comparably bad farm systems (A’s, White Sox, Phillies, Astros, Braves) also have far superior talent in the majors. In the case of a few of those teams, that talent is also young, inexpensive, and on the upswing. The Rockies seemingly have Zac Veen and Benny Montgomery, both years away, and then a small group of 45’s and little else. Brendan Rodgers is nice, I guess. It’s just bleak. This felt like a spot where, short of getting a 50-55 headliner, a package of potentially useful 45’s would have done a heck of a lot more to move the needle long-term than a single comp pick (that is likely to be a 45 anyway).

AnonMember since 2025
4 years ago

Just going to throw this out there but what if Story starts letting it leak that he might accept the QO just to bluff the Rockies. He has had a poor enough season that it’s at least believable that he might accept the QO in an effort to get a better deal next offseason. I mean I don’t think he would given how bad the relationship is at this point but it’s at least believable.

It would be the most Rockies thing ever to keep Story and then chicken out and not even make the QO. . . . .

natedub
4 years ago
Reply to  Anon

I don’t think Story has that much leverage, to be honest. Let’s say he does leak this info, the Rockies could simply call his bluff. He’s made it obvious he’s not happy with Rockies leadership, so it wouldn’t make sense for Story to waste a year of his baseball career in Colorado. That front office would know this.

So let’s say the Rockies call his bluff, and Story accepts the QO. Unless he willingly sabotages his 2022 season (which would be massively, massively stupid on his part), the Rockies could possibly get a return that is better than a compensation pick.

I don’t think the Rockies are going to hear Story leak such information and go, “well, shit, he’s gonna accept the qualifying offer. Guess we can’t offer one now!”

Trevor Story has very little leverage here.

Richard Bergstrom
4 years ago

The Givens trade was somewhat atypical for the Rockies so I had some faith the Rockies might operate like sellers… but they didn’t. What the Rockies don’t understand is that draft and develop can’t compete with other organizations who draft and develop and have the resources to acquire another team’s best players at the trade deadline for a playoff push…. and as an aside, the Rockies need a better scouting and analytics org to properly draft and develop anyway.

I also think the compensation picks get valued a bit too highly. I’d think a “proven minor league prospect” who has spent some time and put up some numbers is at least a little more valuable than the compensation pick unless the draft pool is extremely deep. I also have to think there was a strong market for Story given the return that was given for Baez and Turner.

natedub
4 years ago

So, let’s say the Rockies were offered a 40+ prospect in return for Trevor Story. They feel that they could get a 40+ prospect in the compensation round next summer.

Do you pick the proven guy or the draft pick?

I’m certainly open to differing opinions, but I feel like the draft pick is better, as it gives you significantly more options to choose from. Think of it this way: if you were given the option of a DVD valued at $10 or a $10 Wal-Mart gift card, which do you pick?

You pick the gift card, every time. Unless it’s a can’t-miss prospect (which if that’s the case, you’re trading for him, and not worrying about the draft pick), you see what you find with more options.