The Royals’ Last Ride

Not long ago, I was thinking about the teams that might elect to rebuild next. The only really obvious candidate was and is the White Sox, who could begin the process at any moment. After them, I thought about the Diamondbacks, who might be a half-year away. The Orioles might be approaching their own cliff. The Tigers have already expressed a desire to get younger and cheaper. And so on. A team I didn’t think about enough was the Royals. In my head, I still associate the Royals with having so recently won a championship, but now that’s behind them. What’s ahead of them is a future that seems like it’s going to be very tricky to navigate.

Now isn’t the time for the Royals to start blowing it up. The Royals shouldn’t dismantle, not this week, not this winter. I don’t think that would really help them avoid the coming reality. But from the looks of things, 2017 is going to be it. Already, the Royals achieved the greatest success. The cost of that pursuit will begin to take its toll.

This is not, of course, a criticism. The Royals won a World Series, and for a lot of people, that justifies a painful cost. The Royals became relevant and popular in the market again, and that has immeasurable value to a franchise. This is more like looking to the last few years of a major long-term contract. All the good stuff comes near the start. Most big contracts look bad at the end. The Royals might enter a team equivalent of the albatross period.

What the Royals don’t lack is pretty good players. I don’t need to list them out for you. It’s true that, at present, they project to be something like .500. Four years ago, they projected to be about .500, and they won 86 games. Three years ago, they projected to be about .500, and they won 89 games. Two years ago, they projected to be about .500, and they won 95 games. Last year, they projected to be about .500, and they won…81 games, but they were also hurt a lot. We’ve been over this. Similar Royals teams have won.

It’s just, there’s a thing about many of those players. The Royals don’t and can’t run very big payrolls. The following players are due to be free agents after this season:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Right there, you’re looking at 54% of the Royals’ projected 2017 team WAR. They already have about $70 million in 2018 commitments. The Royals could struggle to re-sign any of those guys, and even with extensions, they’d be paying something like free-market value. And when a team is losing a lot of big-league talent, you want reinforcements from the farm system. The Royals’ system is in relatively bad shape, after a number of subtractions and underwhelming performances.

Top to bottom, there’s an argument to be made that the Royals have the least-valuable collection of assets in the game. It’s not that they don’t have assets, but every team has assets, and the Royals might have the worst blend of big-league surplus value and minor-league blue-chippers. It’s been somewhat quiet, because the Royals still get to sell themselves as champions. Yet some kind of cliff is coming up. It could be almost impossible to avoid.

That might make you think they should start re-loading now. I don’t think that would be wise, for two reasons. One, there’s still a major-league opportunity in 2017, especially with the division being somewhat weak. The Royals shouldn’t give up on success. And two, there’s only so much the Royals could get. They don’t even really have the values present to turn into a restocked farm system.

Nobody is trading a great prospect or two for a contract-year player. Not, at least, for the players the Royals have, not at this time. Moustakas is too much of a risk, after his injury. Hosmer’s most recent numbers were not good. Cain was down from where he had been, and Dyson isn’t perceived as a starter. Escobar is just a glove. On the pitching side, Duffy has value, but he’s still something of an unknown as an impact starter. And while Davis is great, he just had arm problems, which can never be dismissed.

The thing to do here seems pretty obvious. The Royals should probably mostly keep things intact. They project to be about as mediocre as, say, the A’s, but you figure the Tigers will get worse. The Twins aren’t good, and they won’t be good, and the White Sox appear increasingly prepared to get bad in a hurry. The AL Central is likely to have just one good team, and the Royals might as well spend a few months trying to keep up. There wouldn’t be much for them to lose, and if things didn’t work out, there’s still the midseason market.

If Duffy stays good, the Royals could move him for a haul in July. At that point he would’ve been a quality power starter for more than a year. Hosmer or Moustakas could make a difference in a lineup, and of course Davis could become greatly sought after if his arm were to stay intact.

On Davis — he might be the one guy to sell today. The Royals would have an in-house replacement in Kelvin Herrera, and closers are obviously in demand. According to various reports, the Royals want to trim some payroll, and Davis would make the most sense, given his $10-million price tag. He’s someone the Royals could move while staying reasonably competitive, and you wonder about the Dodgers and the Cubs. The Dodgers could give the Royals someone like Brock Stewart, and interesting young long-term starter who’s ready for the majors. The Cubs could give the Royals someone like Jorge Soler, an affordable long-term outfielder. Soler might then set in motion another move, maybe a Cain deal, but now I’m just speculating away.

The bigger point is that 2018 stands to be rough, almost no matter what. The Royals do not have a good overall collection of values, and the farm is short on promising reinforcements. There’s not a lot that could be done about that today, by trading contract-year players, so the Royals should just try for one more run. They’ve already accomplished what they wanted. They bought themselves some time, some forgiveness, and this would all be so much worse if the title pursuit hadn’t worked. There’s no giving back all those rings. But that group’s window is just about closed. You can’t say it hasn’t been an enjoyable era.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

17 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RMD4
9 years ago

Agreed. The Royals have the easiest plan of any major league team this offseason. Stand PAT. Listen in on deals for Wade Davis and add a low cost bullpen and starting pitcher. If it goes well great, otherwise sell off some contract-year guys at the deadline.

Let the Twins, Phillies, Padres, Reds, Brewers, A’s, Braves, and White Sox compete for those high draft picks… This is a good enough team in a winnable enough division to go ‘one more for the roses.’

John Autin
9 years ago

KC’s situation reminds me somewhat of the 1976 A’s. Everyone knew that team was going to be shattered by free agency. Finley tried to get ahead of the process, but Kuhn blocked him, so there was nothing left but to try going out in a blaze of glory. They came up a couple games short, and then came the dark ages.

It would be fun to see these Royals try something as extreme as the madcap baserunning of those ’76 A’s — 341 stolen bases and six 30-steal men, both more than any other live-ball team.

Jonathan Sher
9 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

I was only 10 in 1976 and not aware the A’s stole so many bases, with Larry Lintz getting 31 with just one at-bat.

That season, the A’s were caught stealing 122 times. To place that in context, in 2016, only 5 MLB teams stole more than 122 bases.

Lanidrac
9 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Wow, that is impressive, although the ’85 Cardinals came close with 314 steals and five 30-steal men.

hahigginsMember since 2018
9 years ago

the orioles have been decent for so long with basically nothing but manny machado and a bullpen that i don’t think of them in the same way. interesting to see if they can go for it in his peak seasons.

jim fetterolf
9 years ago

With good health the team should contend. Do nothing beyond trying to extend Duffy and Dyson, hope Gordon remembers how to play, and hope Strahm or Staumont break out. If they look bad at the break, sell.

SpuriosityMember since 2025
9 years ago

Can someone please explain to me why Dyson “isn’t perceived as a starter?” Over the last 5 years he has accumulated 11.8 WAR despite only averaging 284 PAs a year. Prorate that to 600 PA/year and he is a 5-win player over a five year span. If the Royals don’t see him as a starter then I’m sure that a lot of more savvy teams with OF decifencies would love to have him, the Cardinals, Cubs, and Giants come to mind. The fact that teams are considering doling out cash and draft pick compensation for Fowler based on one year of success (which he is unlikely to repeat) but Dyson is dismissed as not good enough to start just blows my mind. Is there something I’m missing here?

Monsignor Martinez
9 years ago
Reply to  Spuriosity

My guess is that he’s being platooned, and only starting in the most favorable matchups.

Pirates HurdlesMember since 2024
9 years ago
Reply to  Spuriosity

Its probably the assumption (most likely correct) that he would be exposed with more at bats and facing more LHP. You can’t take a largely platoon player who is spotted in favorable matchups and just double his production and call that a fair expectation.

SpuriosityMember since 2025
9 years ago

Yes, he’s worse against lefties, but his defense isn’t worse when he’s facing lefties and he’s still valuable on the bases even if he’s getting on a at a slightly lower clip. The 5-win thing wasn’t an expectation, just a statement.

John Autin
9 years ago
Reply to  Spuriosity

True, Dyson’s defense isn’t worse when he’s facing lefties. But right now, he’s earning some defensive WAR off the bench — an average of 20 games per year as an OF sub, in which he averages less than 1 PA. If he instead starts those games, he gets some more dWAR, but his weak bat kills a lot of that.

Dyson is obviously a better defender than batter. KC leverages that by using him more in the field than at bat. In the last 5 years, he’s logged 46% of a full-timer’s OF innings, but 40% of a full-timer’s PAs.

Likewise, they leverage his baserunning by sometimes using him as a PR, when the value of a run is greatest.

There are other ways to see Dyson’s limitations. He’s hit much worse against good teams, against power pitchers, and in high-leverage spots. He hits worse against SPs in the 3rd and 4th times through the order. All of this suggests that KC has him pegged properly.

John Autin
9 years ago
Reply to  Spuriosity

Dyson’s WAR per 600 PA is misleading, because he’s earned WAR for games in which he never batted — one-sixth of his games in the last 5 years. His WAR per 162 games is 3.7 in that span.

One might think the “truth” lies between those numbers, but I think the latter is much more real. He’s been shielded from batting against LHPs — 82% of career PAs against righties, against whom he is at least passable. He hasn’t hit southpaws at all. Making him an every-day player would lower his batting numbers.

I think the Royals are probably using him just right. By keeping him a half-time starter, they can deploy his defense and baserunning in higher-leverage spots. Note that 16% of his steals came in games where he never batted.

SpuriosityMember since 2025
9 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

You’re probably right that the Royals are using him in a way that provides value for the team. But this is only because they have other solid outfield options. With the state of the Royals rotation and farm system, you would think that they could move him to a team without solid outfield options and get some pitching or prospects in return.

Kyle Sharamitaro
9 years ago

Sad, but true article.
I wonder if Royals’ fans would rather see one more run that falls short, or see the team sputter out of the gates in 2017 and make several moves that bring back some controllable talent for 2018 and beyond?

jim fetterolf
9 years ago

Whatever performance dictates. The standings will make that decision.

Schillings Bloody Sock
9 years ago

Royals -> Cubs -> Astros? ….. the draft is working as designed.

Lanidrac
9 years ago

That trade proposal actually sounds pretty good. They could trade Davis to the Cubs for Soler, and then they could trade Cain to the Cardinals for Luke Weaver.