The Walker Buehler Gambit
Heading into the final weekend of the regular season, the Dodgers originally had Walker Buehler scheduled to start Sunday. Manager Dave Roberts opted to push Buehler back, however, letting Rich Hill take the mound against the Giants in San Francisco.
The team indicated the move was based partially on the Nationals’ decision not to pitch Max Scherzer against the Rockies on Sunday. Regardless of whether Scherzer was starting, however, the choice made a lot of sense. The Dodgers did not control their own destiny in yesterday’s matchups. Even if they won (which is what happened), they would inevitably have to play another game to reach the divisional series (which is what they’re doing this afternoon). Letting Buehler start a less important game would have left the team worse off in a more consequential one, like today’s.
The decision is predicated on the belief that Buehler is one of the best, if not the best, Dodger pitcher at the moment. It’s not particularly difficult to make that case. For the season, Buehler’s 2.99 FIP leads the Dodgers; his 2.76 ERA is virtually even with Clayton Kershaw’s 2.73 mark. Hyun-Jin Ryu has a 1.97 ERA in just under 100 innings with a FIP right at 3.00, so he’s certainly part of the conversation, as well. Buehler has been roughly as good (if not better) in the second half as the first, recording a 2.96 FIP and 2.20 ERA since the All-Star break. Kershaw and Hill have been close — as has Ryu in nine starts. In September, though, nobody can touch Buehler’s 2.30 FIP. Kershaw has slowed some (4.32 FIP), while Hill (3.36) and Ryu (2.76) have pitched well, just not as well as Buehler.
With Ryu and Kershaw having started Friday and Saturday, they weren’t going to be available Sunday, Monday, or Tuesday, so flipping Buehler and Hill meant the 24-year-old rookie would be pitching in a game which, with a Dodger victory, would advance them directly to the division series.
That raises a question, however: by the logic employed above, wouldn’t it make sense to save Buehler for a hypothetical Wild Card game, with a view to saving the team from possible elimination? The short answer is, “No.” The longer answer is below.
There is less to be gained from holding back Buehler for another day. For one, there is no Rich Hill-level pitcher the team can use in Buehler’s place. Kershaw and Ryu wouldn’t be available because they made starts over the weekend. Alex Wood and Kenta Maeda have been transitioned to the bullpen, while Ross Stripling has, over the last month, pitched bullpen-level innings out of the rotation without bullpen-level quality. Holding Buehler for a potential game tomorrow means employing a bullpen game today. While bullpenning an important game might seem like a really good idea, it poses challenges in this particular scenario: if the Dodgers lost today, then their best relievers would likely be unavailable — or, at the very least, tired — for a potential do-or-die game tomorrow. If the team were choosing a game to bullpen, tomorrow’s game with a potential day off on Wednesday makes a lot more sense.
Plus, holding Buehler back doesn’t present that much of an advantage even if the club wins. The Dodgers already have Kershaw and Ryu ready for Thursday and Friday. Using Buehler today actually gives him an extra day of rest both today and in a potential Game Three on Sunday, though calling it extra rest might be a bit disingenuous, given Buehler has made twice as many starts with five days rest (13) as he has on the more traditional four days of rest (four). While potentially not meaningful, Buehler has also pitched better at home this season (2.63 FIP) than on the road (3.37). Throw in a 12-strikeout, one-walk start against the Rockies at home on September 19, and having Buehler make another start in similar circumstances makes a lot of sense.
As for what to expect from Buehler, the data suggest he’ll throw lots of high heat with a diverse arsenal to complement it. The right-hander employs a mid- to high-90s four-seam fastball 40% of the time, mixes in a hard sinker around 20% of the time, and also uses a slider, curve, and cutter about 10% each. Buehler is not a pitcher of extremes. He doesn’t have a single offering that gets a whiff rate above 13%, but he has four pitches with swinging strikes above 10%. At 8%, the sinker is above average, as well. Overall, his whiff rate of roughly 11% makes him good, but not great. Despite heavy four-seam fastball usage, Buehler still induces ground balls at a 50% rate, around the top 10% of pitchers. Buehler gets a first strike 63% of the time — another good, but not great, figure. The same is true for inducing swings out of the zone and takes for strikes.
One area where Buehler has been elite this season, however, is against left-handers. The table below shows the best right-handed starting pitchers against lefties this season with a minimum of 50 innings against lefties.
| Name | IP v LH | Team | TBF | K% | BB% | HR/9 | BABIP | FIP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gerrit Cole | 99.2 | HOU | 389 | 41.1% | 9.8% | 0.6 | .271 | 2.10 |
| Jacob deGrom | 107.2 | NYM | 424 | 29.5% | 5.4% | 0.5 | .303 | 2.29 |
| Trevor Bauer | 87.2 | CLE | 359 | 29.5% | 7.8% | 0.5 | .280 | 2.65 |
| Luis Severino | 83.2 | NYY | 351 | 29.1% | 7.7% | 0.6 | .349 | 2.66 |
| Justin Verlander | 99.1 | HOU | 381 | 38.9% | 5.5% | 1.3 | .249 | 2.80 |
| Noah Syndergaard | 81.1 | NYM | 346 | 21.1% | 6.9% | 0.3 | .325 | 2.84 |
| Walker Buehler | 64.1 | LAD | 250 | 30.4% | 6.8% | 0.8 | .260 | 2.85 |
| Max Scherzer | 112.1 | WSN | 452 | 31.2% | 7.1% | 1.0 | .263 | 3.03 |
| Lance McCullers Jr. | 63.0 | HOU | 255 | 31.4% | 10.6% | 0.7 | .248 | 3.04 |
| Ross Stripling | 62.0 | LAD | 255 | 29.4% | 5.1% | 1.2 | .315 | 3.05 |
That’s pretty good company to keep — and it might be relevant this afternoon. Colorado leads off with lefty Charlie Blackmon, while fellow left-handers David Dahl, Carlos Gonzalez, and Tony Wolters are all likely to start. Neutralizing that side of the plate will be important for Buehler.
Against lefties, Buehler minimizes his use of the slider and ups the use of the curve and cutter. In a lot of years, Buehler might be a leading rookie of the year candidate. With another good game, he’s going to end up within half a win of Ronald Acuna. When I wrote about Buehler early in the season, I guessed he might be able to survive on his fastball and slider; the curve, at that point, hadn’t proved yet to be a swing-and-miss pitch. He’s exhibited a much broader repertoire than I anticipated, using five different offerings total: the two fastballs, a slider, a curve, and a cutter. He’s parlayed that into one of the better pitching seasons of the year.
Buehler’s counterpart in today’s game isn’t merely younger than Buehler but has actually been better in the second half of the season, as well. That’s not to short-change Buehler, either: German Marquez has outperformed every pitcher in the second half except for Jacob deGrom. Were this an actual postseason game (instead of just feeling like one), it would feature the two youngest starters since 2007, when Franklin Morales of the Rockies faced Kyle Kendrick and the Phillies in Game Two of the NLDS. There have only been 13 playoff matchups in history featuring two players as young as Buehler and Marquez, and this is probably the best one we’ve seen (even though, again, this isn’t technically a playoff game) since Carlos Zambrano and Josh Beckett faced off in the 2003 NLCS. Other matchups of note include Steve Avery versus Scott Erickson in the 1991 World Series and Dwight Gooden against Roger Clemens in the 1986 World Series. Walker Buehler and German Marquez is one of the greatest young matchups in a game of this magnitude that we’ve ever seen. Here’s hoping it delivers.
Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.
I was hoping there’d be an article about this! Very interesting decision. Not pitching him yesterday and immediately scoring 9 runs was definitely the right call.
Not that Marquez hasn’t been great, cause he has, but the second half numbers (13 starts) are somewhat boosted by the last 6 being against the terrible Phillies, Giants, tanking Diamondbacks, and the Padres. His ERA in those 6 starts is 2.18. The previous 7 starts is a 2.92 ERA in 47.2 innings with 37 hits and 12 walks and 54 K’s.
That’s obviously still excellent, but he’s just completely destroyed those terrible teams – 41.2 innings against the Phillies, Padres, Giants, Diamondbacks: 34 hits, 6 walks, 61 K’s. Pretty incredible.
And again, not to say he hasn’t been excellent, but in those 6 starts he has a 39% K rate (!!!!) and a 4% walk rate, compared to 29% and 6% in the other 7 starts. These are still extremely good numbers, my point is just that he’s just destroyed bad lineups the past month+.
but you have to be really good to strike out 40% of any Major league lineup
Not disagreeing that holding Buehler was the correct move, but shouldn’t the counter-argument be that, heading into Sunday, they could have (with a win and Rockies loss) avoided any sort of play-in or WC game?, The risk there is that the Rockies win (which they did, but the decision to hold Buehler was made before that), and then the Dodgers would have to play at least 1 extra game (with Buehler presumably unavailable) regardless of if they won/lost Sunday. But the chance to use your best guy and potentially clinch a playoff spot outright seems like it would have at least merited some thought.
Yeah, I don’t really see the argument for “it makes sense” that I expected to see here. There’s a pretty complicated question of strategic resource allocation here — how many chips should you push in on Game 162, and how many should you hold back for Game 163, and how many of those should you also hold back for a potential elimination wild-card game? On the face of it, it feels a little like a toss-up with a rotation like the Dodgers’, where the only really big question is which days you throw Kershaw, but I’m not at all sure that this was the single, obvious, correct choice even though it’s obviously worked out nicely for them.
I agree – I worked it through in my head a few times and couldn’t come to a conclusive answer on optimal strategy.
think of it this way: a game against the Rockies counts double, because what they really want is a win combined with a Rockies loss. any WPA he adds against the Giants counts in one direction. in a potential playoff against them, he is contributing to both at once.
and, worst case scenario, if they lose gm 162 with Hill and rox win, they have him for the wild card game. best case scenario, they have him well rested and able to start twice in NLDS.
um, your best case scenario- no chance Buehler would have started twice in the LDS. Kershaw would have gone in game 1- and with his back issues, they aren’t starting him on short rest in game 4. Best case he would have started in game 2 of the LDS. As good as Buehler is, I don’t think he’d bypass Kershaw.
in that situation, if it was me, I’d do Buehler/Kershaw games 1 and 2, on the basis that Kershaw pitched more recently. but in any case, whoever pitches game 2 can pitch game 5 on regular rest, meaning that even if they went Kershaw/Buehler, both would be available in an emergency for game 5.
On the other hand- Kershaw would be able to start game 1 on regular rest. And as good as Buehler has been he’s not starting over Kershaw.
They won, so I guess it doesn’t matter, but wouldn’t this have left them with nobody to pitch tomorrow? I think bullpenning game 162 and saving Hill as well would have made more sense.
Good catch. Looks like Stripling would have got the ball tomorrow. Or a bullpen start. Ugh. Either way…..not good.
given that winning 163 means skipping the WC game entirely, it is extra beneficial to try to win 163. in terms of pure odds, buehler for 163 + bullpen for WC is the same as the reverse, but when you factor in the benefit of not playing WC game, it makes more sense to go all out for 163.
but as I mentioned above, the same does not apply to 162 since winning against the rox counts double.
I definitely agree that not pitching Buehler in 162 is better. It’s just that I don’t so much like the outcomes of pitching Hill there either, for just the reason you said.
They win 162 and COL loses – they win the division yay.
They lose 162 and COL wins – Buehler pitches the WC game.
They end in a tie – Buehler pitches game 163
Those are all fine, and better outcomes than having Buehler pitch 162. The problem comes in if they pitched Hill in 162 and lose Buehler’s start in 163, in which case they’re up shit creek for the WC game.
If they bullpen 162 – while they still have the extended roster – then they can still have Buehler pitch 163 or the WC game if one of those comes next. But they also have Hill available if both 163 and the WC game happen.
Except you can effectively bullpen the wildcard game even without an extended roster because you don’t need to carry 4 starters and the rosters reset afterward.
but really you can’t bullpen the wild card game like you think. You’re going to have 15 or 16 position players(and I would say the Dodgers in particular). So 9-10 pitchers. Say you have 16 and 9. 1 of the pitchers is the starter. You have a 8 person bullpen. 1 of those probably would be a 2nd starter/long type guy in case the game goes extras. So 7 normal relief pitchers.
Wild Card rosters are pretty much regular March-August season rosters for the bullpen- but with instead of the 4 other starters in the rotation on the roster- at least 3 of those slots would go to position players.
I think that makes sense. I would rank the three relevant games like this, starting with the most important:
163
WC
162
and so I’d pitch them:
Buehler
Hill
BP
obviously the WC game is very important in that if you lose you’re out. but the benefit of avoiding it is such that I would sacrifice some chance of winning it to increase chances in game 163. Game 162 is weird, in that I think it’s actually a *better* outcome to lose the division outright on 162 than to force a game 163 and lose that. Meaning it’s not even guaranteed that winning 162 will improve the overall outcome. (the Rockies are not better off having played game 163). meaning if you have to sacrifice any game to the bullpen, it’s 162, which is what you’re saying.
also, if you bullpen game 162, and happen to win the division that day, you have both Hill and Buehler fresh for the DS.
Also WC game would be on the road and 163 at home so that’s another reason why it’s extra helpful to avoid WC game.
Lots of “todays” and “tomorrows” in here that make it harder to follow for a person not reading in on the day it was published.
The Dodgers took some risks and the risks worked out. Sometimes they do, sometimes they don’t. But the takeaway from me is that they looked at choices from outside the box and made one of them…and then made it work.
How outside the box was it really? They have Hill start on Sunday vs the weaker team, then have maybe their best starter start in 163.