The White Sox Position-Player Catastrophe

Over the weekend, the White Sox scored 16 runs against the Reds in three games, and just Sunday they got the best of the impossible Aroldis Chapman, walking off after three consecutive hits. With that in mind, this would seem a funny time to be critical of the White Sox position players, but then, for one thing, the season’s been a lot longer than a couple days. And, you know what? So much content is published with timing in mind. People write about a player after he has a big game. It’s natural, but you can think of it as a form of bias. In this post, let’s not be swayed by recency. Most recently, White Sox position players have been good. Let’s knock ’em down a few pegs!

You already know it’s been a struggle for the Sox, and after spending the offseason trying to build a contender, already they’ve approached a decision point. It’s not time yet for the Sox to pull the plug, but it’s an increasingly likely outcome. At this moment, the White Sox sit dead last in the majors in team WAR, which means they rank even behind the Phillies. People have their differences with WAR, but history shows that WAR and team performance are very closely connected. Good teams don’t rank last. (Good teams don’t rank close to last.)

On the pitching side, things could be better and they could be worse. The team sits in the middle of the pack, which seems appropriate for such a top-heavy roster. There are clearly good pitchers, and there are clearly replaceable pitchers. But as for the position players, collectively it’s been a nightmare. By WAR, the Sox are in last place, and they’re in last by more than a full win. By WAR, the Sox have performed below replacement-level. This is a disaster, so let’s break it down.

I’ll employ the help of some images. Each will display the Sox MLB rank in some statistical category. For example, where do the Sox position players rank in WAR? We’ve been over this.

Wins Above Replacement

30th

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

OK, great. We’ve established that no one’s position players have been worse than Chicago’s, at least by this measure. Yet this measure considers a variety of different things. You’re familiar with how WAR is complicated. Time to look at the inputs. Why not start with offense?

wRC+

25th

Sitting at 85, the Sox are sandwiched between the Mets and the Angels. The team walk rate is bad, a hair below 7%. The strikeout rate is fine, but the problem is contact quality more than it’s contact. By hard-hit rate, the Sox rank 28th, and by isolated power, the Sox rank 29th, and last in the American League. The problem hasn’t been Jose Abreu, although he is probably a little below expectations. Nor has the problem been Avisail Garcia, or Adam LaRoche. The rest of the lot have struggled, none more than Adam Eaton, who we get to talk about again later. Eaton, for what it’s worth, has seemingly been ill for a stretch, so maybe that’s caused him to under-perform, but performances are performances once they’re in the books. What’s in the books is that Eaton is currently slugging .268. Melky Cabrera has looked more like his 2013 self than his 2014 self. Which is weird, because his 2013 self played through a tumor in his back, but, here we are.

Moving on, we can look at how these players have run the bases. They have, after all, reached base, sometimes.

Baserunning

30th

Well that’s not good. By our measure, the Sox are already a dozen runs below average. Think about that: they’re a sixth of the way through the season. Last year, the worst baserunning team in baseball finished about 15 runs below average. The Sox could exceed that by Memorial Day. The Sox, last year, were also a bad baserunning team, so this was probably anticipated, but just not to such an extreme degree. Where has this been coming from? Just as we can break WAR down into components, we can break baserunning down into components.

UBR

30th

UBR, basically, is baserunning without the stolen-base part. It’s supposed to measure the rest of the stuff, as best as it can. Where is this coming from? The Sox rank dead last in team rate of taking extra bases. The Sox do rank first in outs at home! But in that category, first place is last place. Sad. 🙁

Double-Play Runs

28th

It’s minor, but it’s something. The White Sox have hit into double plays in 14% of their opportunities. That’s second-worst in the league, where the average is roughly 11%. Abreu has hit into seven double plays. Cabrera, five.

Stolen-Base Runs

30th

Again, it’s minor, but everything adds up. It’s not just that the Sox have an AL-low six stolen bases. Good teams don’t have to steal. It would be fine if the Sox were six out of six. Instead, though, they’re 6-for-16, which means they have more unsuccessful steals than they have successful steals, by four. That ranks the Sox second-worst in stolen-base percentage, even though they barely ever run so you’d figure they were seizing the prime opportunities. The Sox are two off the MLB low in steals, and they’re one off the MLB high in caught steals. Garcia himself is 1-for-4.

All that’s left is defense. WAR, of course, includes UZR, but there are other things you can look at. Consider, say:

BABIP Allowed

28th

UZR

26th

DRS

29th

If the White Sox have actually had a good defense, it’s impossible to see. We just about know they’ve been bad, and the disagreement is simply over just how bad. The Sox have a position-player WAR of -1.3, and yet the team DRS is 14 runs worse than the team UZR, so maybe that actual WAR should be more like -2 or -3 or thereabouts. The funny thing: the Sox pitching staff ranks third-best in hard-hit rate. According to the StatCast data we have, Sox pitchers lead baseball in lowest average exit velocity allowed. Relatively speaking, the opportunities have been easier, and yet the Sox haven’t made enough plays.

The problem has been mostly in the outfield. You wouldn’t expect Cabrera to be good. You wouldn’t expect Garcia to be good. Eaton’s been more polarizing in the past, with one metric liking him more than the other, but this year everyone’s down on Eaton’s first month. Again, this could be a consequence of Eaton trying to play below 100% health. Maybe the numbers are just insane and incorrect. But, they’re pretty strong about it. Data says the Sox have had a lousy defense to this point. Assign responsibility however you like.

Put it all together, and, yeah. The team hasn’t hit nearly well enough to make up for its bad baserunning and its bad defense. Put it all together and you get a below-replacement performance, and though on talent the White Sox position players are not collectively worse than replacement-level, this is the biggest reason why the Sox have started slowly, and this is the biggest reason why a gap has developed between the Sox and the Tigers and Royals. From this point forward, how do the Sox position players project?

26th

Well, it would be a step up. We figured the strength would be the rotation. It is, for the most part, an intriguing rotation.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

73 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Phillies Fans
11 years ago

“Good teams don’t rank last.”
Woohoo!

“Good teams don’t rank close to last.”
Aw man

Harry Peter Sushi
11 years ago
Reply to  Phillies Fans

I really appreciate your self-defication.

BipMember since 2016
11 years ago

did you mean self-deprecation, or is that supposed to be as bad as it sounds?

UnreasonableDoubt
11 years ago
Reply to  Bip

Must be a big George Brett fan

Danny Thomas' Coffee Table
11 years ago
Reply to  Bip

You have no idea.

Scotty
11 years ago

And yet here they are, hovering near .500 about 30 games into the season. I don’t think anyone would argue that they’ve struggled mightily on offense, but what your article doesn’t reflect is the fact that the big, consistent hitters in this lineup who have started out the season terribly are unlikely to maintain that pace. Abreu, Cabrera and Eaton are likely to start hitting. Garcia has been a pleasant surprise based on your projections. The top of the pitching staff has largely looked kind of awful. And yet, 12-16. It’s far too early to give up on this team.

Pirates Hurdles
11 years ago
Reply to  Scotty

12-16 isn’t really hovering near .500. It is a .429 win percentage on pace for 69 wins.

Scotty
11 years ago

They started out 0-4 and have stayed largely within four games of .500 since the start of the season. Based on projections their 0-4 start would have suggested a worse record at this point in the season. I do think that four games under this early in the season .500 would certainly qualify as “hovering” near the break even mark, mainly because of the struggles I mentioned and the fact that they’re road record is unsustainably terrible. But glass half full and all that.

ralph
11 years ago
Reply to  Scotty

Yep, a poster would be ridiculed if they said that the Cardinals 22-9 start meant there was a very good chance to be a 110-win team. Just don’t use on-pace number for serious purposes this early in the season.

To that point, if just two White Sox losses had instead been two wins, they’d be right at .500. So I don’t think it’s ridiculous to say that’s “hovering near .500.”

Pirates Hurdles
11 years ago
Reply to  Scotty

Not trying to take a sss projection too far, just saying that 4 games below .500 is not as close to .500 as it seems. The Sox can’t go back and unlose games so the need a 7-3 stretch to get to .500.

BTW, the projections here say 77 wins, not anywhere close to a contender.

ralph
11 years ago
Reply to  Scotty

I said more below, and appreciate the dialogue, Pirates Hurdler.

Just out of curiosity, would you also say a 68-72 record is not as close to .500 as it seems? I feel like 68-72 is the epitome of a team hovering around .500, but it sounds you think 68-72 wouldn’t qualify as hovering around .500, either?

Timbooya
11 years ago
Reply to  Scotty

It’s all relative. Would you say an 0-4 team is hovering near .500? NOPE. What about a 75-79 team? Yea. The percentage is MUCH more important than the number of games right now, so earlly in the season.

Hyatt
11 years ago

NICE win total

ralph
11 years ago

Would 13-15 be hovering around .500? If so, then calling attention to 12-16 as if it couldn’t possibly be considered “hovering” seems wrong.

Would 79-83 be hovering around .500? Well, that’s the same difference in wins/losses as 12-16. And a 12-16 record this early in the season doesn’t provide us with significant confidence that the White Sox are that far from .500.

Ultimately it doesn’t even matter, but I’m mildly dismayed to see the +13 comment rating that will probably be even higher when I post this. I thought FanGraphs commenters would be above small-sample-size innumeracy.

Pirates Hurdles
11 years ago
Reply to  ralph

See reply above, it isn’t sss inumeracy, it is pointing out that 4 games below .500 isn’t all that great. The current win % is entirely consistent with the focus of Jeff’s article which suggests they have earned that .429 with really bad baserunning and fielding %.

You can’t unlose games so the whole 13-15 logic is faulty.

ralph
11 years ago
Reply to  ralph

I agree that the White Sox aren’t all that great. I thought this before the season started, too. And really, to be honest, current record wouldn’t really have much of an impact on what I thought of the team this early in the season.

I also think that whatever the definition, “hovering around .500” can’t be considered all that great. And that’s all I’m commenting on, because it feels like people are drawing a ridiculously narrow picture of what “hovering around .500” means.

If they were 14-14, they’d be .500.

If they were 13-15 or 15-13, you’d presumably agree that they were hovering around .500.

So while it’s defensible to say that 12-16 is not hovering around .500, I simply can’t fathom a bunch of people ridiculing the fact that someone might consider 12-16 to be hovering around .500.

I doubt I would have even typed anything if not for all the upvoters. But when a bunch of people pile on the upvotes (which in this situation equals riducule to me) about a point that doesn’t seem that ridiculous, it made me decide it was worth saying something.

TKDCMember since 2016
11 years ago
Reply to  ralph

I think the problem is by this reasoning only 4 teams are doing worse than “hovering around .500” so hovering around .500 is not really an accomplishment at this point.

dfives
11 years ago
Reply to  Scotty

luckily an article was recently written just for you!

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/the-remarkably-unclutch-oakland-as/

BipMember since 2016
11 years ago
Reply to  Scotty

It’s too early to give up on them because it’s almost always too early to give up on any team 28 games into the season. You’re right in the sense that they aren’t a 7-21 disaster right now, and they project to get a bit better, but they only project to improve all the way to 26th in position-player WAR. Right now, maintaining a .500 pace looks a bit optimistic, and they’ll have to do a lot better than that to make the playoffs.

Linus
11 years ago
Reply to  Scotty

I don’t think Abreu has hit much differently than should have been expected, really.

J6takish
11 years ago

Classic Sullivan

Well-Beered Englishman
11 years ago
Reply to  J6takish

This post is Peak Sullivan. I don’t know how a post can be Sullivaner.

Eminor3rd
11 years ago

Well I mean it has literally zero animated gifs, so it can definitely get Sullivan-er

joser
11 years ago

It needs an obscure reference to a volcano, or something related to volcanology.

kevin
11 years ago
Reply to  joser

At this point the commentariat talks much more about volcanoes than Sullivan does.

Nigel Tufnel
11 years ago

It’s like, how much more Sullivan could this post be? And the answer is none. None more Sullivan.

Well-Beered Englishman
11 years ago
Reply to  Gregory

Oh my god

T
11 years ago
Reply to  Gregory

Thank you Gregory. Thank you. I really laughed at Matt Tuiasosopo.

T
11 years ago
Reply to  Gregory

Thank you Gregory. Thank you. I really laughed at Matt Tuiasosopo.

tz
11 years ago
Reply to  Gregory

And, he had the right vibe on Fister…

Sandy Kazmir
11 years ago

Not even the best team with Sox in their name. My guess is that it’s just BABIP and both Sox teams will probably be in ALCS because they won the offseason and that’s all that matters.

nerf
11 years ago
Reply to  Sandy Kazmir

This is improving my enjoyment of FanGraphs content substantially. Thank you.

thecodygriffin
11 years ago
Reply to  Sandy Kazmir

Did I miss something? I swear there was a time when you were actually writing insightful comments instead of trolling. I mean, I am pretty sure I even clicked through to your site once or twice because of it.

the real fake everdiso
11 years ago
Reply to  thecodygriffin

he even has that same avatar so i think it has to be the real guy unless he has a secret way of copying avatars.

charles P
11 years ago

I have a big problem with outfield defensive metrics. Garcia in particular is getting a bad rap. His defensive play single-handedly beat the Tigers last week. He has average range with an above average arm and doesn’t make stupid mistakes. So my eyes tell me the metrics aren’t accurate and I have had the misfortune of seeing every game.

Eminor3rd
11 years ago
Reply to  charles P

I’m a die-hard White Sox fan who has watched most of the season, and even I can admit that Garcia is terrible at defense.

Tesseract
11 years ago
Reply to  Eminor3rd

I agree, he is below league average in RF. However, I think defensive metrics put way too much weight. Do you seriously think a guy like Shin-Soo Choo is having a similar year to Avisail Garcia? According to Fangraphs they are pretty close. IMO they are not close.

Hee-Seop Choi
11 years ago
Reply to  Tesseract

And this is why the eye test sucks

Hank
11 years ago
Reply to  charles P

Problem with defensive metrics on this size sample? Surely you jest; take a look at the NY Yankees OF

Brett Gardner -18.6 UZR/150
Carlos Beltran +10.5 UZR/150

Not sure why Girardi is subbing in a defensive replacement for Beltran, when clearly Gardner is the problem!

That said… Garcia is not good (decent arm but not much else).

JLRC
11 years ago
Reply to  charles P

Yeah, I think he’s been worse than the metrics say. He might have the potential but he gets terrible breaks on the ball — something you rarely can see on the live broadcast.

Cornflake5000
11 years ago
Reply to  JLRC

But Hawk says he’s a five tool player.

Tesseract
11 years ago

Meanwhile it’s still 50F in Chicago. These guys will start hitting a lot once it warms up. Defense is near the bottom of the league but the starting pitching should be good. The one area where I agree 100% is the baserunning, it has been bad, and their stolen base rate is a joke. But I am optimistic these number will get better as the season goes on. Avi will regress his hitting but the rest of the lineup should start making more consistent contact. There is still plenty of things to be positive about this team. They might need a better catcher duo if they want to contend.

Jason B
11 years ago
Reply to  Tesseract

The crazy thing to me was that they are 6-for-16 and somehow one team was even worse .

(That would be the Nats at an especially gross 4-for-11.)

MikeS
11 years ago
Reply to  Tesseract

The most unlucky thing is the way it keeps heating up 20 degrees every time the other team comes to the plate.

Cornflake5000
11 years ago
Reply to  Tesseract

But they have a good record at home… so I don’t see how being 50F has factored into them being bad. Please explain… (and use logic, not Sox homerisms)

jazzy jef
11 years ago

Fine, we’ll trade you John Danks for Jose Lopez.

JK
11 years ago

The base running is indeed atrocious. Abreu is bad at 1st, and Micah Johnson is not yet competent at this level. A lot of the other stuff just seems to be breaking the wrong way and will regress, or par for the course with this team for whatever reason. Sale/Quintana/Samardijza most likely will not combine for a 5 ERA as they have, and if Rodon is kept in the rotation, that should be formidable, and a group that can pitch over some of the D with strikeouts. Eaton/Melky most likely did not turn into below replacement level players for no reason.

Even in years where they have been in the hunt/respectable, the offense is bad in April. Good pitching and homers has always been the plan given the park they play in, but April is usually unkind for that strategy. They also have some guys that for whatever reason just don’t hit early. Ramirez for his career is 70 wRC+ in April, and 94 all other months combined. LaRoche is 92 in April, 117 in all other months combined. Who knows why, but it isn’t like we have no sample size with those guys, we’ve seen it repeatedly.

Melky's Tumor
11 years ago

Johnny Danks has TWTW.

ralph
11 years ago

If one of these categories had them ranked in even the teens, would you have used a more spectacular fireworks image for the category?

Mr. Burns
11 years ago
Reply to  ralph

I will present to the White Sox the First Anuual Montgomery Burns Award for Outstanding Achievement in the Field of Mediocrity.

Eminor3rd
11 years ago

They’ve played almost as poorly as we could have imagined, and they’re just 12-16. That’s not good, but it’s not buried, and regression works both ways.

If the worst baseball I’ve seen in years equals 12-16, then I’m hopeful for when Sale/Samardzija/Abreu/Eaton start playing like they normally do. Other than Avisail Garcia and 37 PA of Gordon Beckham, no one on the team is really playing above their heads.

MikeS
11 years ago
Reply to  Eminor3rd

I don;t know if the baserunning or defense will improve with Robin Ventura at the helm. He keeps running them into outs and a lot of the defensive stuff has been really stupid, not physical. If you can blame a manager for anything, you can blame him for that.

Mike
11 years ago
Reply to  Eminor3rd

That’s the thing; just about everything that’s gone wrong could have, and now they’re 12-17. A little positive regression, a simple winning streak, and it’s back to .500. But holy cow, they need to start playing smarter.

Howie Porker
11 years ago

It’s interesting how sample size and regression to the mean are completely ignored in this article. Isn’t this Fangraphs? I’m not a Sox fan but that roster is loaded with above average players playing like crap. And it’s almost time to fold up the tents and trade Sale?

L
O
L

Pirates Hurdles
11 years ago
Reply to  Howie Porker

Except the team is not “loaded” with above average players”. This was a .500 team to start the year and the projections hosted here basically say they still are, projecting 77-85.

Jason B
11 years ago

Or, it was loaded with above-average players and equally loaded with below-average to replacement-level players.

Stars n’ scrubs writ large.

MD
11 years ago
Reply to  Jason B

Pretty much nailed it.

Howie Porker
11 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Sullivan

It’s the “approaching a decision point” part that got me Jeff. Under 30 games my man. Looks like Eaton, Cabrera, Laroche, Ramirez, Sale, Samardzija, Quintana & even Abreu are all significantly underperforming to this point. Those are their star players. The sucky guys look to be sucking as expected but I think their plan was to add more good players to compensate for the sucky players. With Rodon seemingly forcing his way in to the rotation, I think this team is a trade or two away from being damn good. I picked these guys to win the central, and you might be right about them ultimately sucking, but let’s check back in another 30 games. They could heat up quickly & rip off a quick 20-10. Or go down the toilet 😉

Peter R
11 years ago
Reply to  Howie Porker

You cant win games you already lost. Sure they may get going but it may be too late when they do. It’s baseball so there is a chance they got hot when someone else is cold but they have to play above average ball the rest of the season now to likely achieve a postseason spot. They are 6.5 games back already and there’s a reason they now have about a 7% chance of making the playoffs according to Fangraphs.

Shingo's Cheeseburgers
11 years ago

I know it means nothing but I want other to share in the joy that as of this moment Gordon Beckham’s WAR is higher than Adam LaRoche, Avi Garcia, Conor Gillaspie, Micah Johnson, Emilio Bonifacio, Geovany Soto, Tyler Flowers, Melky Cabrera, JB Shuck, Alexei Ramirez, and Adam Eaton combined. COMBINED.

steex
11 years ago

If you’re going to include a long list of guys with negative WAR, why not make it more stark and Garcia and LaRoche with Mike Trout?

Adam Eaton has been crappy enough to balance out virtually anyone’s positive WAR. Johnny Giavotella has a higher WAR than Bryce Harper and Adam Eaton combined! Zack Cozart has a higher WAR than Paul Goldschmidt and Adam Eaton combined!

steex
11 years ago
Reply to  steex

*and REPLACE Garvia and Laroche with Mike Trout

Freddie Galvis
11 years ago
Reply to  steex
Ullu Ka Patta
11 years ago

Good thing they traded away Semien, that guy was obviously going nowhere.

steex
11 years ago
Reply to  Ullu Ka Patta

In light of the recent photo of Semien standing beside Billy Burns in the A’s dugout, the real shame is all the fantastic opportunities for hilarity the White Sox roster would’ve presented.

[Insert Player] Eaton Semien
Semien Sale
Semien Flowers

Don’t get me wrong, the A’s still project to have some good options throughout the season as guys like Abad, Cook, Crisp, and Doolittle are given the chance to stand near Marcus.

Rusty Kuntz
11 years ago
Reply to  steex

Could really use Semien right now. Sigh.

Stubby Clapp
11 years ago
Reply to  Rusty Kuntz

Well, you’ll always have me.

Yinka Double Dare
11 years ago
Reply to  Ullu Ka Patta

Eh, he was the only thing in that trade that could have provided any value this year (and one of two along with Ravelo who were worth anything at all), and he’s even worse defensively at 2nd than Micah Johnson, let alone Carlos Sanchez (who will be swapping places with Johnson pretty soon if Johnson doesn’t pick it up). The problem with that trade for the Sox isn’t losing Semien, who is what people thought he was, it’s that Samardzija has been mostly garbage instead of what he was the last two years.

Leslie Leon
11 years ago

Jeff, Don’t allow your critics to influence your integrity. Despite the faint smell of vindication, this reeks of smarm.

Jason B
11 years ago
Reply to  Leslie Leon

wut

The Plug
11 years ago

Has anybody pulled me yet? I thought I was supposed to be pulled over a week ago, 25 games into the season. Somebody just be honest with an old plug like me.