The Yankee Stadium Effect

Many are skeptical that Yankee Stadium II’s dimensions represent an exact replica of the original stadium’s — or, at least, a replica of the post-1976 version of old Yankee Stadium. The club contends on its official site that the distances from home plate to the outfields walls are identical to the previous park’s.

Because of the volume of home runs hit there since it opened, however, and because the outfield depths sure seem different, many have wondered if the club’s claims are true. The New York Times, for example, was compelled to explore the issue back in 2009.

When I asked if he still believed the dimensions were the same as before, as some folks have disputed with visual evidence, [Yankees general Brian] Cashman said, “I’ve been told they’re the same. I know they’re supposed to be the same.”

Still, without access or permission to survey the field, it’s never been possible to know exactly how honest any team is being with regard to its outfield dimensions depths. There are many who believed Fenway’s left-field wall was closer than the listed dimensions, and to anyone who has hit, pitched, or watched a game in New Yankee, the right-field wall seems awfully close. I would suggest that it’s unreasonably close to home plate.

We’ve never known which dimensions we could trust, though. Until now. It’s my understanding that the Doppler radar of Statcast is quite accurate. With that as backdrop, it’s my goal in this post to employ that radar technology to measure home runs that have passed just over the wall of Yankee Stadium to get a better sense of the park’s dimensions — especially those areas of the field that are left unmarked. Only five outfield depths are listed on the Yankee’s official website and posted on the outfield-wall locations. I was especially curious with regard to the unmarked territory in right.

Let’s begin. First in left field.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

The stadium’s dimensions are listed at distances between 399 feet and 408 feet from left to left-center at Yankee Stadium. According to Statcast, however, this was a 397-foot homer to center-left-center via Tyler White.

Interesting!

Rule 1.04 states that each major-league stadium must have a minimum center-field depth of 400 feet and field of play stretching to at least 325 feet down the lines. Exceptions by the commissioner’s office are often granted, of course, including the the dimensions of 318 and 314 feet down New Yankees’ left- and right-field lines, respectively. But I am not aware of any regulations governing the distance of dimensions between center and the foul lines, and it’s here where the Yankees and/or stadium designers were most aggressive in pushing an acceptable distance.

According to Statcast, here is a 339-foot fly ball via Dustin Pedroia to right field at Fenway, just left of the Pesky Pole.

Here is a 339-foot Pedroia fly ball at Yankee Stadium …

An Adrian Beltre 331-foot fly ball at Wrigley Field …

A Beltre 336-foot fly ball at Yankee Stadium …

Those fly balls, above, are batted to an area that we’d would probably classify as “right field.” What about the right-center gap and nearer the alleged 385-foot marker? This is an Aaron Judge 362-foot home run. Think Judge loves hitting at Yankee Stadium?

Since 2006, no right-handed hitter has hit more home runs to right center and right field at New Yankee than Starlin Castro (6). Here’s a 374-foot Castro homer that lands in the third row — again, the third row — in right-center field.

There’s a reason New Yankee ranked first in MLB in home-run park factors in 2014, 2016, and is leading again this season.

Andrew Clem’s ball-park web site is becoming quite the resource for this author. I employed it last week to detail how ballparks are pushing us a way. But we’ll use it briefly today to show how Yankee Stadium II is quite different, dimensionally, from Yankee Stadium I. From the bird’s eye view, these stadiums sure seem, well, different. In old Yankee Stadium, the 385-foot sign was located nearer the right-center midpoint, in New Yankee it is pushed more nearer center field.

Clem estimates that right-center gap at Yankee Stadium is 360 feet from home plate. The Judge homer verifies that distance. And between that point and the foul pole the majority of 350-foot fly balls will go for home runs. This was one heck of a way to entice Bryce Harper to join the Yankees in 2019.

Harper is going to be a superstar wherever he plays. But the thing is, New Yankee Stadium might actually benefit right-handed power more than left-handed power.

Consider that, in the Statcast era, the average home run pulled to left of center field by a right-handed hitter has traveled 405 feet. The average home run hit right of center by a right-handed hitter has traveled 387 feet. Of the 544 home runs hit right of center by right-handed hitters since 2016 that have been tracked by Statcast, 47 have been hit in Yankee Stadium, which leads baseball and outpaces runner-up Coors Field (39). And, folks, we’re just entering the Judge era.

Here is a 344-foot Manny Machado fly ball in Toronto. Jose Bautista catches it at the edge of the warning track, a rather routine putout.

Here is a 348-foot Machado fly ball at Yankee Stadium:

Machado has not homered on a fly ball under 391 feet to center or right at Camden Yards since 2016. He’s done it twice at Yankee Stadium. And he could do it quite often should he consider signing there after the 2018 season.

The right-field to right-center-field dimensions at New Yankee Stadium push boundaries and the spirit of rule 1.04. It warps the offensive environment. Most pitchers are not fans of the dimensions. Have you noticed Ivan Nova’s willingness to pitch in the zone since leaving Yankee Stadium? Harper and Machado would perhaps look upon it more favorably. Yankee Stadium has done some false advertising; there are perhaps more regulations needed to govern outfield dimensions. But it is the right-field wall that could also be a drawing card in creating a powerful lineup to fuel the next Yankee dynasty.





A Cleveland native, FanGraphs writer Travis Sawchik is the author of the New York Times bestselling book, Big Data Baseball. He also contributes to The Athletic Cleveland, and has written for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, among other outlets. Follow him on Twitter @Travis_Sawchik.

57 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Llewdor
9 years ago

You can measure these distances pretty well from satellite pictures, can’t you? There shouldn’t be any need to rely on batted ball data.

noseeumMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Travis Sawchik
karcotteMember since 2026
9 years ago
Reply to  Travis Sawchik

That seems particularly naive of you. Maybe it’s a good business decision tho.

Lou BrownMember since 2017
9 years ago
Reply to  Llewdor

True, but I think this is also an exercise in using the new technology to prove a theory.

RotoholicMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  Llewdor

Yeah get an aerial photo of the field with the bases in place and you have precise measurements for the entire field, since you know it’s exactly 90′ between bases and 60.6′ from the mound to home plate. This isn’t rocket surgery.

southie
9 years ago
Reply to  Rotoholic

Ouch. Rocket surgery could be quite invasive.

The Ghost of Stephen Drews BatMember since 2026
9 years ago
Reply to  southie

*jamming rocket into patient’s mouth*
“Can you please say “ahhhh” louder?”

rounders
9 years ago
Reply to  Rotoholic

That is how the left field line at at Fenway was measured at 295′. There are real estate surveyors who do all their work from an airplane. For some reason these things must be kept as mysterious as the true heights of short baseball players.

FrancoLuvHateMets
9 years ago
Reply to  Llewdor

But, then we don’t get a bunch of dinger videos.

johnsnot20
9 years ago

Judge’s first homer last night is an out in 29 ball parks, and also in old yankee stadium

MB923
9 years ago
Reply to  johnsnot20

Most likely. I don’t know how accurate ESPN’s Park Factors is, but it shows his first HR last night is out in 2 ballparks. I’m guessing either Camden or Fenway being the other (if accurate)

computersBaseball
9 years ago
Reply to  johnsnot20

It’s probably a double everywhere else except maybe a HR at Fenway. Hit hard and somewhat on a line into the corner – the right fielder had slowed down, but I doubt even full speed he gets there, and most guys dont run full speed into walls.

exxroxMember since 2026
9 years ago

I would think that with satellite technology these days, it would be fairly easy to get an independent measurement of the field. Or using some measurement devices after a flyover from a blimp or something.

It’s sounds crazy that they would outright lie with their posted dimensions, but I’m really not too surprised. Maybe a bit that they seem to be getting away with it, and people are seemingly oblivious to it.

Lets Play TwoMember since 2020
9 years ago

Google earth will let you measure distance that is within a foot or two

bunslow
9 years ago
Reply to  Travis Sawchik

Just go to google maps, switch to satellite imagery, then right click on home plate, “measure distance”, and right click on any desired part of the wall.

kmeeks
9 years ago
Reply to  Travis Sawchik

I was inspired to do this after re-reading this article today. I used Google Earth Pro, and the timeline to find an image that had measureable distances. The 8/2012 image on Google Earth had the pins for the bases in it. I outlined a box around the base paths to get pixels measurement, and then used the known distances between home and second, and home to first/third as outlined here to verify my math. http://www.turface.com/resources/article/how-layout-baseball-field

In the image here http://imgur.com/a/uFl0k you can see I’ve drawn lines from the apex of home plate to the various distances referenced in the “official” measurements. The distance from home to first was 638 pixels, the distance from home to second 902. My napkin math says that’s a consistent enough ratio of relation as to verify that 638 pixels = 90 feet.

I then measured from the apex of home plate to the various distance markers as referenced officially (LF, LF Bullpen, Center, RF Bullpen and RF). Given the shadows, and detail of the image it’s impossible to directly get the base of the wall, but this gives us a decent enough idea if the measurements are close to the official (as of 2012).

Pixels Feet Claimed Feet
638 90
2275 320.92 318 LF Foul Line
2805 395.68 399 LF Bullpen
2892 407.96 408 Center
2758 389.05 385 RF Bullpen
2241 316.12 314 RF Foul Line

So basically, at least as far as I can tell, the Yankees aren’t fudging the distance numbers (or weren’t on August 2012 when this image was taken).

Sultan of Say
9 years ago
Reply to  Lets Play Two

I was going to look into this, but the field currently shown in Google Maps doesn’t have the bases or home plate shown.

OTMHeartBBCMember since 2025
9 years ago

The wall in OYS was rounded out

the wall in NYS is a straight line from point to point, which makes it alot closer

Thomas
9 years ago

Damn Yankees.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago

This is some excellent sleuthing! But I’ll also say that I kind of like all the weird outfield shapes. That, coupled with other quirks of geography (e.g., Denver, Seattle) makes building a team to play in different home stadiums a challenge. So while they might have violated the rule here, I don’t mind so much.

lesmashMember since 2017
9 years ago

Didn’t Baltimore falsely advertise the distance to the wall in the LF alley until someone took a real measurement and showed that it was, like, 15 or 20 feet closer than what was claimed?

BryzMember since 2019
9 years ago
Reply to  lesmash

I feel that it was RFK Stadium for the Nationals.

AC_Butcha_AC
9 years ago

Daftlogic has a Google maps distance calculator that is very accurate. I use it a lot and the dimensions at yankee stadium are actually correct. 385 right Center to the bullpen, 314 down the line in RF, 399 to the other bullpen and 408 to dead Center. The 339 pedroia HR was indeed a wallscraper where it is 339 according to Daftlogic.
It seems statcast got it wrong on the 397 HR. Daftlogic has it as more like 410-ish.

AC_Butcha_AC
9 years ago
Reply to  AC_Butcha_AC

FWIW the LF line at Fenway is 310 according to Daftlogic. 310 is also painted on the wall… so no conspiracy there

baseball bettorMember since 2017
9 years ago

Reason #235 to hate Yankee Stadium……that park is a total joke.

MB923
9 years ago

Because only the Yankees bat in that park, not the opposing team.

Matt1685
9 years ago

The method of trying to judge the outfield distance of Yankee Stadium in this article stretches the accuracy of the measurement tool to the extreme. You picked one data point that shows a short distance of a ball clearing the fence. You could be picking a few minimally under-estimated distances from Yankee stadium and then finding the maximum over-estimations that more or less match up visually; or some sort of optimization between the two. Are Statcast stats really believed to be so accurate as to allow for such cherry picking?

And I have an extra comment about the comparison of Rogers Centre and Yankee Stadium. Here’s a view of Rogers Center: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/54f9f8eee4b0cfcc918a27eb/t/5692164b69a91a3789880856/1452414541569/?format=750w . From your video, Bautista catches the ball presumably on the edge of the warning track at about the right edge of the 2nd pane of transparent plastic from the left.
Here’s a couple of picture of Yankee Stadium: http://yankees.io-media.com/web/images/VV_fbshareicon_Retina.jpgcomment image . From your video it looks like the ball goes just over the wall around where the ‘S’ or ‘O’ in ‘SONY’ is in that picture. So the Yankee Stadium hit is much closer to the line than the Rogers Centre hit. The Yankee Stadium hit is also estimated by Statcast to be 4 feet further. The 385 sign in Yankee Stadium is around the middle of the right-center field bullpen. That’s much more towards center field than the 375 sign in Rogers Centre, which is just to the left of that DQ sign and not too far from where Bautista caught the fly ball. Compare the distance between the ‘S’ in ‘SONY’ to the middle of the right-center field bullpen in the first Yankee Stadium picture I pasted to the distance between the middle of the right field bullpen (where Bautista caught the ball) to the 375 sign in the picture of Rogers Center I pasted.

It’s not impossible, but I’d be surprised if the stated distances on the walls are not right. I’ll buy that the right field wall is flatter than it was in Yankee Stadium II. Beyond that, insistence that the new Yankee Stadium is significantly smaller than the old one sounds like conspiracy talk to me, and the methods of this article don’t convince me otherwise.

DeanAnna
9 years ago
Reply to  Matt1685

This comment deserves to be on top.

The Ghost of Stephen Drews BatMember since 2026
9 years ago

The comments are giving Travis some heat for not using satellite technology but Statcast batted ball data to judge the outfield dimensions. I do not mind this approach at all. We’re here for baseball content and measuring baseball fields with batted ball data is tight af.

I hope Travis goes even deeper and tell me how many Ronald Torreyess’ are each of these dingers. That’s next level.

(Also I hope Harper and Machado read this piece – let’s go Yanks!)

millsy
9 years ago

What is the purpose of this article? Correct me if I’m wrong, but don’t both teams play on the same field?

MB923
9 years ago
Reply to  millsy

No. The fences are moved in when the Yankees bat, and moved out when the opposing team bats.

millsy
9 years ago
Reply to  MB923

Eye roll…

SoxWatcher
9 years ago
Reply to  MB923

I won’t be TRULY impressed until the Yankees manage to do the same with the mound and bases — during the commercial break, sloooowly move the mound back a foot or two for the opposing pitcher, and move first base a little closer to the plate for the Yankees batters.

That would have the added bonus of making it harder to use the 90′ to first, to measure how big the outfield actually is. Downright devious I say!

Sultan of Say
9 years ago
Reply to  millsy

While I agree that both teams play on the same field and I would even like to see home fields that are even more extreme and unique (e.g., 450ft fences, more Green Monster-like features, etc., although I still can’t believe they allowed a freaking hill on the field in Minute Maid).

That being said, there are currently rules in place that Yankee Stadium might be breaking. I imagine the rules are in place to prevent teams from extremely tailoring fields to their strengths or building teams to be better suited for an extreme field. In the Yankee’s case, they might have the shortest CF distance in MLB and could build their team to take advantage.

millsy
9 years ago
Reply to  Sultan of Say

The Mets tried the really far fences thing. It took one season to spook all their players and force them to start moving them in.

Sultan of Say
9 years ago
Reply to  millsy

It takes more than 1 year to build a team, but I’ve always wanted to see a team with a huge outfield build their team around speed. You’d have lots of exciting triples and inside-the-parkers. Your opponents would come in with their lumbering sluggers that they normally hide in a corner outfield spot. Their normal HR’s turn into outs, singles, and doubles and their defense just got a lot worse.

London Yank
9 years ago

Using batted ball data to measure outfield dimensions is pretty egregiously the wrong way around. Its a fun idea, but this should not be taken in any way seriously.

London Yank
9 years ago
Reply to  London Yank

That said, it would be a useful exercise to measure the error in Statcast batted ball distances by doing this study the right way around.

Mario MendozaMember since 2017
9 years ago
Reply to  London Yank

Yeah. Why AREN’T we doing that?

Joey Butts
9 years ago

I believe I saw on Wikipedia that right field is actually five feet closer in the new park because of the scoreboard. I can believe it.
But the most common explanation for all the homers to that direction is that the new shape of the ballpark lets the wind effect fly balls more.

As for relying on Statcast, count me a disbeliever. Judge’s first home run (last year) was measured at 446 feet. Machado’s recent blast in YS3 was measured at 470. If you watch the videos, they land in almost the same spot. There was less than a 10 foot difference, but Statcast says it was 24 feet.

Mario MendozaMember since 2017
9 years ago

Whoa. Great article, totally rocking the foundation… that Statcast is at all reliable.

radiokellerMember since 2025
9 years ago

I assume the Castro stat is among active players only? I checked Jeter’s home run log and stopped counting at 25

Paul22
9 years ago

Interesting analysis. Would like to see overlay with best guess of dimensions though.

Also statcast frequently fails to track every fly ball and in cases where it fails to track completely it resorts to an algorithm to estimate distance. Not sure if this issue is more prevalent in some parks or what.

Whatever, balls are flying out of the park like in 2009. Maybe the ball is partly responsible with average distance of HR up about 5 ft over the past 2 years. Seems like I see a lot of HR that really are not being squared up.

Other possibilities are the Yankees have a way of signaling location/signs to their hitters based on what they see from CF cameras. Blue Jays were accused of the same and teams changed signs often

John Autin
9 years ago

To the extent I can trust any measurement based on my eyes alone, I believe that straightaway RF and right-center in the current Yankee Stadium are an easier reach than the prior edition. Been watching games there since ’84, mostly on TV. It’s not just the homers, but also the number of “routine flies” that reach the track.

John Autin
9 years ago

FWIW, Ivan Nova in starts for the Yanks had virtually the same ERA and HR/9 both home and away. His BB/9 was marginally higher at home, 3.06 to 2.92. He may have pitched differently at home, or tried to, but the results were almost indistinguishable.

nailujdiamond
9 years ago

This article is like baseball’s equivalent of the flat earth society

dsc123
9 years ago

No golfers here? A range finder would be another good way to measure. If you can get to lowest level, just shoot home plate, then the wall, and take the difference. Of course, getting inside the moat at Yankee Stadium would cost you. Maybe that’s part of the conspiracy.

Johnston
9 years ago

Using Statcast for this is misusing Statcast and reeks of amateurism. Imagery abounds, get some of it and use it.

karcotteMember since 2026
9 years ago
Reply to  Travis Sawchik

Travis, seriously what are you basing your assumption that Statcast measures balls “quite accurately, though perhaps not perfectly”?

fredsbankMember since 2020
9 years ago

Conspiracy theories about park dimensions? This is Fangraphs in 2017?

Mike NMN
9 years ago

Your last paragraph is unreasonably conclusory in the absence of better data. Inference isn’t enough. And it also assumes a decision-making process in design that ownership would deliberately build a park that disadvantages pitching. Anyone who has watched what’s gone on in Coors would question the logic of that.

stewart715
9 years ago

Wow, what a joke and a complete waste of time for this to be written. Typical stuff to be written when the Yankees are playing well. There must be something going on here other than good baseball!

Sorry, the posted dimensions are 100% correct. Same with Fenway Park’s left field dimension. Guys, this isn’t that hard. Google Earth has allowed you to measure this since like 2006.

And not for nothing, but Yankee Stadium is far from the smallest ballpark. In fact, there are 9 ballparks smaller than Yankee Stadium: http://static4.businessinsider.com/image/5333190aecad04284086ebb3-800-/01-208.png

El Cunado
9 years ago

let’s face it, StatCast is in it’s infancy and isn’t impossible for there to be deficiencies. To the video tape: Matt Holliday’s “459 ft” homerun from 4-17 (http://m.mlb.com/video/topic/73955164/v1296646683/cwsnyy-holliday-belts-threerun-homer-at-1139-mph/?game_pk=448564)

and Aaron Judge’s “448 ft” homerun from 4-19. (http://m.mlb.com/nyy/video/topic/8878548/v1302731183/cwsnyy-judge-crushes-448ft-home-run-in-5th)

There is absolutely nothing you can tell me that will convince me that Holliday’s HR was 11 feet longer than Judge’s.