The ZiPS Midseason Update for the American League

As we reach the mathematical halfway point of the season and approach the trade deadline, this is an opportune moment to run an update of the ZiPS projected standings. The standings are based on projections from the most robust version of ZiPS rather than the simpler one, which is more practical to run daily during the regular season, implementing things like the Statcast-aided zStats and up-to-date minor league translations.
The process that ZiPS uses is the typical one, but I’ll run it down quickly for those who may be new to how these projections work. ZiPS starts with a modified version of our depth chart and applies a generalized probabilistic model of available playing time for the players listed. So instead of a team’s roster strength being a simple sum of everyone’s projected WAR pro-rated to a fixed expected number of plate appearances, we end up with a whole distribution of possible roster strength. As an example: While Jacob deGrom still has a median of 55 innings in the roster sims I run for each team, sometimes he’ll be at 65 or 70 innings, sometimes he’ll be at 30 or 45 innings, and occasionally, it’ll be much worse than that. ZiPS will then “fill in” playing time based on the next players available on the depth chart and their probabilistic measure of availability. Just to stay with the Mets: When the outfield is healthy, the depth chart is mostly Mark Canha, Brandon Nimmo, and Starling Marte. But on the particularly bad rolls, the team’s estimated roster strength will have a lot more Ender Inciarte, Nick Plummer, Mark Vientos, and even players like Daniel Palka and Terrance Gore.
After ZiPS gets a distribution of each team’s roster strength, it “draws” one each year and sims out the rest of the season, team versus team, a million times and sees what happens. Is this a perfect methodology? Absolutely not! But I think we get closer to our goal of trying to evaluate team uncertainty and team depth, something which is harder to do using a less time-consuming scheme.
For today, let’s check in on the American League.
| Team | W | L | GB | Pct | Div% | WC% | Playoff% | WS Win% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York Yankees | 103 | 59 | — | .636 | 97.6% | 2.4% | 100.0% | 13.8% |
| Toronto Blue Jays | 88 | 74 | 15 | .543 | 1.0% | 73.5% | 74.5% | 4.8% |
| Boston Red Sox | 88 | 74 | 15 | .543 | 0.9% | 71.9% | 72.8% | 3.3% |
| Tampa Bay Rays | 87 | 75 | 16 | .537 | 0.5% | 63.9% | 64.4% | 2.9% |
| Baltimore Orioles | 71 | 91 | 32 | .438 | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% |
Can the Yankees win 116 games? If the projections are to be believed, it’s unlikely, but it’s at least plausible, with the team reaching that mark in 2.9% of the simulations. The Yanks are currently on a 116-win pace, but even if not everything has gone right — hello, Joey Gallo and Aroldis Chapman — quite a lot has to for them to win games at such a torrid pace. The rest of the division is tough, and even the Orioles are showing a pulse, which is something that works against them. What trades might be made is beyond the jurisdiction of ZiPS, but I don’t expect the Yankees to be aggressive at the deadline, considering that the division and the bye are likely going to be locked up in four weeks. Winning 117 games would be cool, but I’m not sure it’s sufficient incentive to go for broke. If anything, the Yankees might go lighter on the innings than ZiPS expects, given the injury history of much of the rotation.
The Red Sox have recovered enough from their poor start that ZiPS now sees them finishing right where it projected them coming into the season, at 88 wins. The Rays have essentially played up to their prediction as well. Toronto is the team other than the Yankees that has seen the biggest boost in expectations, as the increase in the computer’s confidence in Alejandro Kirk and Santiago Espinal is larger than the disappointment in Matt Chapman and the injury to Hyun Jin Ryu. Kevin Gausman’s status is a bit uncertain right now; he has avoided a severe ankle injury, but just how quickly he’ll return and how effective he’ll be are very much up in the air. The Jays also project with the easiest schedule remaining of any team in the division.
| Team | W | L | GB | Pct | Div% | WC% | Playoff% | WS Win% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minnesota Twins | 85 | 77 | — | .525 | 45.9% | 13.5% | 59.5% | 1.5% |
| Chicago White Sox | 85 | 77 | — | .525 | 39.7% | 14.2% | 53.8% | 4.1% |
| Cleveland Guardians | 81 | 81 | 4 | .500 | 14.3% | 9.5% | 23.9% | 0.6% |
| Detroit Tigers | 69 | 93 | 16 | .426 | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Kansas City Royals | 63 | 99 | 22 | .389 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Despite the trials and tribulations, ZiPS still sees the White Sox as the most dangerous team in the AL Central and a potential postseason headache in the playoffs thanks to a rotation with a high front end. Also working in the team’s favor is that ZiPS projects the Sox to have the easiest schedule of any AL team remaining. These are significant advantages, but the Twins get a very slight edge in the overall divisional probability because of their big advantage: a 6.5-game lead that’s currently in the books. With the Pale Hose currently 0–5 against the Twins, Minnesota also gets the tiebreaker in the vast majority of tie situations. Contrast that with a game 163 — the superior tiebreak format for anyone who was raised with a modicum of taste and moral character — in which the White Sox project with a 64/36 edge in a Lucas Giolito/Dylan Cease versus Sonny Gray matchup.
Cleveland is also currently ahead of the White Sox, but ZiPS sees the odds of the Guardians holding them off as much longer than that of the Twins. One thing worth noting is that Andrés Giménez has now cracked the top 50 in baseball for ZiPS WAR over the next five years. José Ramírez projects to finish the 2022 season with the most WAR of any AL position player who isn’t also a dynamite pitcher (he loses to Shohei Ohtani, 6.2 to 5.9).
Detroit’s offense still figures to be better than the embarrassing showing so far this year, but it’s a case of too little, too late. Complicating things is that some of the players who would be most likely to be traded this month, such as Jonathan Schoop and Robbie Grossman, have played so poorly that I’m not sure there will be much of a market for either. As for the Royals, they were projected to play like the Royals, they’ve played like the Royals, and they’re run, both on the field and in the front office, like the Royals, so I doubt you need ZiPS to run those numbers.
| Team | W | L | GB | Pct | Div% | WC% | Playoff% | WS Win% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Houston Astros | 102 | 60 | — | .630 | 99.7% | 0.3% | 100.0% | 21.0% |
| Seattle Mariners | 84 | 78 | 18 | .519 | 0.3% | 40.0% | 40.3% | 2.3% |
| Texas Rangers | 77 | 85 | 25 | .475 | 0.0% | 5.0% | 5.0% | 0.1% |
| Los Angeles Angels | 77 | 85 | 25 | .475 | 0.0% | 5.6% | 5.6% | 0.2% |
| Oakland A’s | 60 | 102 | 42 | .370 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ZiPS projects the Astros to have the strongest current roster in baseball. They’re a bit behind the Yankees but have the second-weakest projected schedule in the AL and, at 1.2%, have their own shot at winning 116 games. Their stranglehold on the divisional crown is also likely stronger than New York’s; if the wheels came off this particular apple cart, the AL West does not have another team projected to be as strong as the Red Sox, Rays, or Blue Jays.
The Mariners are demonstrating the cruelty of run differential. While it certainly feels like a significantly worse season — standings are tallied by actual wins, not a reasoned evaluation of a team’s strength — the team has made some progress and is arguably stronger than last year’s overachieving unit. Our confidence in the quality of Logan Gilbert should be stronger than at the start of the year, and Robbie Ray has turned things around quickly over the last six weeks or so. This team still has a realistic shot at the last wild card spot or two.
Imagine having Shohei Ohtani and Mike Trout healthy and having fewer wins than the Orioles in the toughest division in baseball. Los Angeles’ early-season surprise standouts like Brandon Marsh and Michael Lorenzen have collapsed over the last month, and the roster has 16 players below replacement level over the last 30 days. Contrast that with the Yankees, who have only two, with one of them, Miguel Andújar, playing in just two games.
At the bottom of the division, Texas has shown progress this season but is probably too weak for a serious playoff run. The A’s, meanwhile, are ZiPS’ favorite to have the fewest wins in baseball at the end of the season (47.2%). They could at least bust out the sweet gold jerseys!
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
The A’s busting out the Gold jerseys would cost too much and cut into their monthly vacations to Vegas
If Cleveland picks up any of the edge they had prior to the past week and a half, they’ll likely beat the ChiSox for the Wild Card. If Chicago stops playing so terribly, I could see the opposite happening. If nothing changes, it’ll be a dogfight and neither of them will perform well. Definitely a season series and storyline to keep an eye on.
Are either of the two teams going to beat the AL East for wild card spots? Seems very likely that both wild cards will be from that division
There are three wild cards, but otherwise this is on target. Right now, the favorites for the wild card are the Blue Jays and Red Sox first, the Rays after that, the Mariners coming in next, and then the two teams of the Twins-White Sox-Guardians group that don’t win the division.
It’s certainly possible a wild card will come out of the AL Central, but they’d have to play well enough to beat out the Mariners (projected for 84 wins–certainly doable), one of the Blue Jays, Red Sox, and Rays (projected for 88 and 87 wins), but not well enough to beat out the Twins (projected for 85 wins). Since most scenarios where they beat out an AL East team involve them also beating out the Twins, you can see how the easier path is just to win the division.
I am not quite sure why the Twins are projected to play sub-.500 baseball the rest of the season, though.
If you think the Twins can play .550 ball the rest of the way (a little worse than they’ve played so far) they finish around 90 wins.
I don’t see any reason to think they’re due to regress. They’ve had neutral luck so far by BaseRuns and Pythagorean, and they don’t really have anyone playing way over their head.
It’s the health for the lineup. Correa and Buxton are really important to them and are really injury-prone.
As for “playing way over their head”, Chris Archer’s ERA is nearly 2 runs below his FIP and xERA, Sonny Gray is pitching very well (it still somewhat lucky) but ZiPS thinks he won’t keep that up to that degree, and the same goes for Joe Ryan. There’s also not much SP depth at all. The Twins could pull it off, but they’re arguably even thinner than the White Sox, just much luckier/not voodoo cursed with injuries this year.
At least some of this is simulating the likelihood that Buxton, Arraez, and/or Correa get hurt. The rotation is also pretty thin too.
But if guys stay healthy and Bailey Ober comes back fine (meaning they don’t have to rely on Devin Smeltzer) then yeah, I think they’ll be fine.
But even so, it is weird that the ZiPs/Steamer blend predicts a neutral run differential going forward. That can’t all be Arraez falling back to earth.
Even the preseason ZiPS had the Twins as a .512 team. You would think their play so far would nudge that up a bit. Strength of schedule must be doing a lot of work?
Chicago SHOULD have the juice to be a WC team/contender, assuming guys get healthy.
No faith in Cleveland. Just not enough hitting, nor a deep enough starting staff & they’re not going to spend $$. They’ll be sitting at .500 within the hour, losing their 4th straight to Detroit. You could kind of tell when Ramirez/Kwan/Giminez were lighting it up & they were still in the .520-.530 range that the margin is just so thin for them.
The White Six should fire the entire training staff and bring in people who can actually get the players in game shape ( players have to commit to it as well) . Too many leg injuries to be acceptable.
Given the injuries, strength of schedule and expected regression, these Mariner projections are pretty solid news. Time now for the wild card tradition of rooting for complex AL East cannibalization situations.
The big issue for projecting the Mariners is likely that of their three good starters, two of them are young and the third has spent his career as a very different pitcher than he was in 2021 and is in 2022. I don’t know how much stock to put in either of those but I do wonder about Gilbert and Kirby and innings restrictions. If they can’t go, I don’t think Matt Brash or Emerson Hancock will be quite ready for this year and Justus Sheffield doesn’t inspire confidence either.
That said, I don’t think I’d really want to go heavy on upgrades at the deadline this year. They’ve got so many more chances to make it in the next few years. Maybe they would trade for Mahle, if they think they want to extend him and the price isn’t prohibitive. But the price will probably be prohibitive. Trading for good starting pitching at the deadline usually is. They’re probably looking more at Zach Davies types right now.
I think we will see part of their plan around the break as I would expect a call up for Sheffield and skipped starts for Gilbert and/or Kirby to give them two weeks off. With the apparent lack of offensive depth, having to back off the young SPs could really torpedo their chances.
I’m with you, they have been smart with building up depth, but going for it this year is probably not the best plan, especially if it means paying deadline prices.
This is great as always, thanks Dan. There isn’t a place we can see those ‘next five years’ rankings you mentioned, is there? Sounds super interesting.
I’d assume it’s just the 3 year ones that are available on the site. In a related question, is there a certain MiLB/MLB experience threshold over which players have a ZIPS projection generated?
Nice work! Where can we find the list of ZIPS WAR over the next five years?
Ramirez is “only” projected for 5.9 WAR? He’s already at 3.9.
Seems to be a mistake… ZiPS is showing 7.3 for him and Judge… 2022 Projections » ZiPS (Update) » Batters | FanGraphs Baseball
It seems weird since the ZiPS ROS projection has him accumulating another 3.4 WAR. I can understand some difference between the different versions of ZiPS, but 1.4 WAR over a half season is a pretty big gap.
The explanation is that I’m illiterate. I read the wrong column!
I’m curious – how long does it take for you to run the entire ZiPS simulation? What sort of hardware do you use for it?
The Mariners playoff odds here are double what they are on the playoff odds page (which I assume is calculated with the simplified version of ZiPS) with 3 more projected wins. I’m curious where the difference is coming from. Who does the advanced/more robust version of ZiPS like more than the simplified version?
aren’t those odds half steamer too (un-updated steamer)?
You are correct and that is probably it. It appears Steamer is a little lower on most of the M’s lineup than ZiPS looking at the ROS projections.
The playoff odds are a ZiPs / Steamer mix, but also they are not calculated probabilistically. The simulations Dan mentions in the front half of the article change things quite a bit.
As a Mariners fan, I can’t remember odds higher than 40% ever? (on Fangraphs) Looking back they seemed to peak last year at 29% on 9/30… Is this the best projections for the Mariners in FanGraphs history?!?!
Somebody’s too young to remember #6org
Ha I remember. But it’s not like we were expected to win the division that year. #6 org was about the glorious future of Smoak, Ackley, Zunino, Guti
I’m not sure if I believe in the Rays this year. The division is just too tough and they’ve had too many significant injuries.
So far they’ve been bailed out by Ji-Man Choi, Manny Margot, Yandy Diaz, and Isaac Paredes playing out of their freaking minds. But Margot is hurt, and of those four the only one I think has a shot of continuing to hit like this is Diaz. Losing Brandon Lowe really hurts.
I know the pitching has been hit pretty hard by injuries but I actually like their starters for the first time in a while. Not sure what Baz and McClanahan’s innings limits are but that’s a strong 1-2 punch, Kluber and Springs look competent, and while Rasmussen is probably a reliever long-term he isn’t a disaster out there or anything. And Patino is making rehab starts, too.
Is there a reason Julio Rodriguez is projected to play so few games ROS? He’s only projected to play 54 – is that because ZiPS thinks there’s some chance he’ll get sent down? It can’t possibly be because of injury risk – Ty France, who is currently on the IL, is projected to play 74.
I’m guessing that it is because the model is built on historical data and Julio’s track record suggests that he misses games. He only played in 74 games in 2021 and 84 in 2019. Since there is just so little data available due to his age and he has never played in much more than half the games, it assumes that he will play in a little more than half the games going forward.
ZiPS doesn’t know that the reason he missed time in 2021 was because he was playing in the Olympics, it assumes that it was an injury or other absence that would be representative of his availability going forward.
He played in 0 games in 2020! It’s a low bar, but Julio may have the smallest injury risk of Mariners position players.
I am a little disappointed that the A’s are projected for 60 wins. I was hoping for less. They’re on pace for 54 or 55 wins right now, and hopefully Montas is healthy and they deal him. So there’s a small chance they could go below 50.
Unfortunately, I think that having Laureano and Murphy, assuming they stay, will probably keep them from getting too bad.
Will we ever see Trout and Ohtani together in the playoffs?
Absolutely not
I don’t agree with the Orioles chances. I don’t buy that they make the playoffs only 2 times of 1000. They have a lot of MiLB talent coming to the big leagues shortly, and frankly, quite a bit of MLB talent. After a rough start, they have been a .500 team for 6 weeks.
Are you saying that the ZiPS is underestimating their chances? If so, I agree. Some modeling suggests at least 2%, Others suggest higher. However, we are talking about values well into the noise spectrum.
With the balanced schedule coming in 2023, ALE could be a division with no team with a losing record.
They have the most difficult schedule over the rest of the season due to their division and would have to leap at least 4 of the Red Sox, Rays, Blue Jays, Guardians, Mariners, and White Sox who are all currently ahead of them in the standings and project as better teams the rest of the year and have easier schedules.
Even if you believe they are a true talent .500 team, they would need Henderson, Rodriguez, and Hall to all come up and perform well from the jump to have playoff odds much over 1%. I wouldn’t be surprised if none of them see big league action this year given the Orioles handling of Rutschman and rumors that they are looking to trade Mullins.
Lynn is back and Giolito should be lined up for a stronger second half. Add in the return of Eloy, and I’m still on board with the White Sox winning the division.
I don’t think ZIPS has watched a lot of White Sox games and can’t account for things like running into triple plays on fly ball outs, intentionally walking guys in 1 – 2 counts, and stubbornly insisting that Leury Garcia is an every day player.
But I still think they could. The Twins pitching isn’t likely to hold up and the Guardians offense has outperformed by a lot. Not sure what that means though. They have done OK against Toronto, Boston, and Tampa but I don’t like their chances against NY or Houston. Anything can happen in a short series, but you would be asking the starting pitching to carry them unless the offense starts being much less frustrating and that’s a tough order against those two teams in Yankee Stadium, Minute Maid, and Guaranteed Rate Field.
Has anyone ever considered the following proposal for determining wild cards –
Instead of counting records from 162 games, just count the records from games the teams played outside their division.
So the WC standings would reflect around 87 games instead of 162, but the WC-relevant schedules would be much more balanced. Not completely, since teams in easier divisions would be playing slightly tougher schedules (in terms of the schedule counted for the WC standings), but still more balanced. And that slightly tougher schedule would be balanced by the fact that they have an easier path to win their division.
I know this isn’t happening, but it’s not that crazy,
It’s pretty crazy…
In examining the ZiPS based projected records, I would definitely bet the over on NYY and BAL. The ALE is just too strong and BAL is playing well now. And, I might bet the under for LAA and OAK. Bad / dysfunctional teams apparently do underperform their projections.
So here’s my question: Jose Ramirez is projected to lead AL position players in WAR with 5.9. That means that it’s projecting Aaron Judge to have less than 1.7 WAR remaining in the tank over the next half of the season, which would work out to a full-season prorated pace of 3.4 WAR. But 2020 aside, Judge has never put up less than 4.5 WAR in any season, and that was in 2019 when he missed 60 games. What’s up with the projections for him? Even if Judge cools off significanly, barring season-ending injury he seems a pretty safe bet to top 6 WAR.
Higher in the comments, Dan clarified that the Jose Ramirez 5.9 WAR was a mistake, not sure why he hasn’t updated the article though.
So, pre-season, ZIPS had NYY with a .543 win%, and it’s now projecting NY for .556 over the rest of the season, or about a 1-game swing (i.e., +1 win, -1 loss).
Pre-season, ZIPS had HOU with a .556 win%, and it’s now .598 ROS, which is about a 3-game swing.
Both teams have outperformed their preseason projections, though NY has obviously outperformed theirs by more, and thus both teams have been ROS projections now than they did before the season started. But HOU’s ROS projections have improved pretty significantly more than NY’s have.
Is this a schedule thing? I’m not sure if ZIPS actually projects individual games, or if a run of ZIPS gives you the projected standings at different parts of the season. But maybe ZIPS always expected NY to perform better in the first half than the second, and therefore NY’s performance so far doesn’t swing its ROS projections as much because it was somewhat expected? Or does ZIPS just see NY’s improved performance so far as less “sticky” than HOU’s?
ZiPS sees more changed *performances* in Houston than in New York. ZiPS sees New York as being much healthier than history would lead it to expect.
Interesting! Thanks for responding!