There’s Nothing At All Like the Dodgers’ Offense
It’s funny now to reflect on some of the things that were said over the offseason, when the Dodgers went through an almost complete roster overhaul. Granted, people have to say something, because that’s how this business works, but think of the concern expressed in some corners regarding the immediate future of the Dodgers’ offense. How were they going to make up for losing Matt Kemp? How were they going to make up for losing Hanley Ramirez? How were they going to make up for losing Dee Gordon? Two of those players, as it happens, have hit quite well this year. Hasn’t mattered to the Dodgers. After swapping so many different pieces around, the Dodgers became an early-season offensive juggernaut.
It is, of course, a big reason why the Dodgers have the second-best record in baseball, and the highest run differential. They’ve dealt with significant injuries on the pitching side, that have left them weakened, but the lineup has picked up the slack, despite some injuries of its own. The point isn’t just to say, hey, the Dodgers have hit pretty well. No, that wouldn’t be worthy of a post. The point of this is to explain to you the magnitude by which the Dodgers have out-performed everybody else. The state of things is ridiculous.
It’s hard not to make this just a whole post of fun facts. Fun facts are fun, as the name suggests, but no one wants to read a hundred of them in a row. The Dodgers have played 32 games, about a fifth of their season. Allow me to try to curate the fun facts. I think this can be done in a readable way that isn’t overwhelming.
Start with regular old wRC+. It’s my preferred adjusted measure of team offense. The Dodgers, as a team, stand at 131, meaning they’ve been 31% better than average, adjusted for park. In second place, we find the Royals, at 116. That’s a big gap! The gap between first and second place is the same as the gap between second and tenth.
But, wait a second, the Royals play in the American League! That’s hardly fair. The Dodgers, pitchers and all, have that 131 wRC+. The second-highest National League mark belongs to the Cardinals, at 104. Enormous gap, almost twice the size of the first. Here, the difference between first and second place is the same as the difference between second and 14th.
Why not bring everything together and just look at overall MLB performance, excluding pitchers? That should level the playing field, more or less, and this is where we arrive at my favorite facts. The Dodgers, without their pitchers, stand with a wRC+ of 142. The Royals are still in second, at 116. A few things about this. First, the highest team wRC+ marks since 1950, leaving pitchers out:
| Rank | Team | Season | wRC+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dodgers | 2015 | 142 |
| 2 | Reds | 1976 | 130 |
| 3 | Dodgers | 1953 | 126 |
| 4 | Yankees | 1953 | 123 |
| 5(t) | Reds | 1965 | 122 |
| 5(t) | Orioles | 1971 | 122 |
It’s the Dodgers, and it’s the Dodgers by a landslide. The Dodgers, obviously, have played only a partial season. The Dodgers, probably obviously, won’t finish this season as high as 142. They’ll come back to the pack, and I have to imagine the probability is they won’t be No. 1 on this list come season’s end. But, who’s to say? What’s happened is what’s happened, and it hasn’t all been a fluke. And besides, this isn’t a projection post. This is a post intended to review what has taken place. The Dodgers have basically hit like a lineup full of All-Stars. Not uncommon to see for a few games in a row. Far less common to see for several weeks.
And there’s this part. This is my favorite part. The difference between the Dodgers and the Royals, in non-pitcher wRC+, is 26 points. Here are the season-to-season gaps between first and second place, from 1950 on:
It’s the biggest gap, by a lot. The average gap is about three points. In 1975, the Reds were better than second place by 10. The next season, the Reds were better than second place by 18. Since then, no one’s cleared second place by more than eight. What the Dodgers have done is genuinely exceptional. It’s not that they’ve hit the ball well. It’s that they’ve hit the ball so much better than anybody else. The fun facts could continue almost endlessly.
Among regular and semi-regular players, the Dodgers have seven of the top 25 wRC+ marks in baseball. They have four of the top 10 isolated-power figures. According to Baseball Savant, the Dodgers have three of the top five players in average exit velocity. (Incidentally, Hanley Ramirez is also one of the five.) A dozen Dodgers have batted at least 50 times. Nine of them have been significantly better than average. The team has thrived despite Jimmy Rollins slugging .298. Juan Uribe has underachieved. Carl Crawford is hurt. Yasiel Puig is hurt. No matter. We figured the Dodgers would have tremendous depth, and at the moment the injuries are almost helpful, because they’re keeping the roster from having too little room for too many talents.
I don’t want to convey the wrong impression — the Dodgers should be outstanding. They have more resources than anyone, so it’s not like they aren’t working with an extraordinary advantage. Consider that gap between the Dodgers and the Royals in wRC+. The Dodgers’ payroll is nearly one and a half times higher than the Royals’. The Dodgers are exceeding the luxury-tax threshold by more than six teams are spending on their whole rosters. Money can’t buy happiness, but it can buy wins, and there’s nothing miraculous going on here. The Dodgers are smart and privileged. They’re positioned better than any other team in their league.
Yet there is a balance between acknowledging the advantages and giving the money credit for everything. The Dodgers did well to identify and acquire Yasmani Grandal. They did well to trust Joc Pederson. Scott Van Slyke isn’t a big-money player. Neither is Justin Turner. Andre Ethier might be in the middle of a resurgence, mashing the ball like it’s 2009. Even Adrian Gonzalez has turned it up. Gonzalez was a quality player before this season, but he’s showing evidence of little tweaks, to go with a career-best performance. More balls in the air. More balls toward right and right-center. Almost everybody’s been dangerous.
The rest of the season should allow the numbers to settle. Where they are now is almost too absurd, so you can’t expect this same performance going forward. Yet it’s clear this isn’t a team with many offensive weaknesses. They have skill, depth, and the money to ensure they always have both. However thin the rotation might be, the lineup is the opposite.
There’s one last asterisk I do want to point out before I close. The Dodgers’ opponents so far:
- Diamondbacks
- Padres
- Giants
- Rockies
- Mariners
- Marlins
- Brewers
Some struggling pitching staffs in there. The pitchers the Dodgers have faced have allowed a weighted .763 OPS. Take out the matchups against the Dodgers, and they’ve allowed a weighted .745 OPS. The average pitcher’s allowed a .712 OPS, so there’s evidence the Dodgers have had it relatively easy. Baseball Prospectus tracks a quality-of-opposition stat, and of the 30 players with at least 50 plate appearances who’ve seen the easiest average pitchers, 12 are Dodgers. That’s all of the Dodgers. One thing you can say about the Dodgers is they never have to go up against Clayton Kershaw or Zack Greinke. The slate to this point has been generous.
So it’s a factor. It’s not the whole explanation. They’re probably going to face some tougher pitchers, but then, they’ll always share a division with Arizona and Colorado. Even San Francisco is kind of thin behind Madison Bumgarner. Divisions are unbalanced, and we know this.
It gives the Dodgers a bit of an edge. Because what the Dodgers really need is another advantage. The Dodgers are on pace to win 111 games, and they’re on pace to have the best team offense of all time. Maybe that’s not the way things are going to turn out, but you can’t argue with the direction of things.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

don mattingly is a genius!
Funny, I’ve been waiting for someone around here to write about how ridiculously good the Dodgers’ offense has been so far…
“probably obviously”
Should be the fangraphs epigraph.
and hopefully epitaph
Also, looked at team BABIP, expecting regression-worthy levels.
Nope: .307
You could have looked towards their 18.4 HR/FB% to see a number due for regression.
Good catch!
Also, don’t forget that Hector Olivera is on his way at some point this season, maybe even later this month (though I have no idea how they’ll fit him in). And if Rollins doesn’t turn it around by July and Seager keeps smashing baseballs in AAA, maybe Seager too.
It’s good to be the Dodgers right now. For competitive balance reasons, maybe they should be forced to replace Friedman and Zaidi with Ned Colletti again.
Please no
We’re blowing up teams so much that we get to see their worst relievers.
The Dodgers can put eight men out in the field who each have a wRC+ over 140 after 50+ PAs, without forcing a guy to play out of position. The Yankees are next closest with four players with that high of a wRC+; no other team has more than three. Granted, seriously small sample, I know.
Once Puig and Crawford return from the DL, this team is going to have serious pinch hitting threats too – call that thing the Mariana Bench!
wow
Mariana Bench cuz of serious depth, like the Mariana Trench. I get it.
giggle snort
A+
Who should we blame for all this?
Option A: industrialists (Global Warming has turned Dodger Stadium into the new Coors)
Option B: hippies (Gabe Kapler’s healthy diet plan is the new steroids)
Best team money can buy. How about we adjust that wRC for payroll. Would also be nice if 70% of the Dodgers fans could watch their games while they are on this historical roll. How many MLB teams are not available on TV to 70% of their fans?
Pederson, Van Slyke, Guerrero, Grandal and Turner – the best team money can buy, everyone!
Ethier, Anderson, Rollins, Uribe.
Cherry picked conclusion, everyone !
I find it rather presumptuous of you the believe that everyone has the time to read these comments.
Stop messing up my name, dude.
Oh you.
But I want a list of nothing but fun facts!
With lots of fireworks JPG’s covered in the fancy cursive writing!
He didn’t even mention Howey Kendrick.. He is loving the new scenery. He is gonna have a career yr if he stays healthy.
as good as they’ve been, I’m still waiting for the other shoe to drop…starting pitching. They’re doing this while Kershaw has 1 win and Greinke is their only other reliable starter. Have to think they’ll make a big splash with a Cueto-type stud. Or even two of them. And as a Giants fan, it’s depressing as hell.
Damn you win. I thought I had escaped, but alas you’ve tracked me down again.
3 in 5 years. You’ll be alright.
not sure you comprehend what most long-time Giants fans have traditionally been about. It’s more important for the Dodgers to lose than for the Giants to win. Hard to erase a lifetime of complete contempt, antithapy and hatred over 5 years. Pathetic? I’ll leave that for you. But it’s reality.
“Take out the matchups against the Dodgers”
I’m not just pointing out the error to be a prick. I’m really not sure which team you meant to say there.
I’m pretty sure that’s what he meant to say. If the Dodgers are truly a good hitting team, then removing the matchups against them presents a more true picture of the pitcher’s they’ve faced.
While wRC+ might be a good stat that correlates well with runs scored, I prefer another one to measure how well a team scores runs. It’s called runs scored. The Dodgers are not even 1st in this measure, so I’m not convinced that their offense is as mind blowing as this article suggests.
On the other hand, I think the Dodgers strength is offensive depth. When your biggest problem is figuring how to fit eleven good batters into an 8-man lineup each night, you’re going to be in good shape. So far, holding on to Ethier, Uribe, Van Slyke, and Guerrero are all paying off. I could easily see another GM having traded at least 2 of those guys by now.
“I prefer another one to measure how well a team scores runs. It’s called runs scored.”
Stunningly poor trolling effort. 2/10.
(If not trolling then of course you should adjust for park and league effects.)
And using your “preferred metric” of runs scored they drop all the way to…second! What a crappy team. This offense is terrible.
I didn’t say “terrible”.
My point is that “nothing at all like it” is a bit much. I don’t think park factors are going to adjust their actual runs scored to some unprecedented level, no matter what wRC+ suggests.
An analytical question: what is the impact of taking the worst hitter (the pitcher) out of the Dodgers’ lineup and measuring against AL teams where the worst hitting position player is included? If you assume the DH, whose reason for being is offense, is likely to play somewhere on the field in the Adam Dunn/Michael Morse sense (and therefore would be in the lineup regardless of whether the game is played in the AL or NL park), then it seems to me that measuring the best eight players for the Dodgers vs. the best nine players of an AL lineup would actually lift the Dodgers’ wRC+ a bit in comparison. Not as much as counting the pitcher’s batting would push them down, but some.
Since his first ten games, Trout has a wRC+ of just 132. He would be a below-average hitter on the Dodgers.
sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
That’s the sound of air coming out of this article.