These Bullpen Games Are Tearing Me Apart

Rob Schumacher/Arizona Republic/USA TODAY NETWORK

In Game 4 of the NLCS, Torey Lovullo ran out of starting pitchers, so he sent Joe Mantiply out there, and decided to mix and match with the rest of his relievers until the game was either won or lost. And it worked. Phillies manager Rob Thomson also went to his bullpen early, and before too long we had a close matchup of dueling bullpens. The hope in such a strategy is merely to survive to see the endgame, and pit one’s high-leverage relievers against the opponent’s offense, just as would be the case with a conventional starter.

Both teams got that far. Andrew Saalfrank had a little bit of a meltdown, but Orion Kerkering and Craig Kimbrel had a big meltdown, so the Diamondbacks won. Faced with an identical conundrum in Game 4 of the World Series, Lovullo played “Freebird” again and called on Mantiply once more.

How did it go? Not too badly for Mantiply, who was a bit unlucky to take the loss after striking out three batters and allowing two hits in an inning and a third. But after that, the Arizona bullpen imploded like an overripe tomato under the wheel of a dump truck.

In a flash, the Rangers scored 10 runs, and the game was basically over. We did see some drama near the end, but only because the Rangers’ bullpen isn’t exactly trustworthy either, and manager Bruce Bochy had too much Diet Mountain Dew before the ninth inning.

I’ll just come out and say it: That stinks! We only get seven World Series games a year, tops, and when one of them has you thinking “maybe I should go to bed” in the top of the fourth, that’s a real drag.

The whole affair was like taking a gamble on a skunked can of beer; it brought on feelings of discomfort and queasiness, which Tyler Kepner of The Athletic captured well in his postgame column: “On the World Series stage, a bullpen game just feels wrong.”

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

The following evening, we got a classic pitchers’ duel. Zac Gallen and Nathan Eovaldi traded zeroes through six innings; Gallen took a perfect game in to the fifth and a no-hitter into the seventh. It was like something out of the 1960s, when men were men and relief pitchers were merely a necessary evil.

The long and short of it, for people who remember Randy Johnson and Curt Schilling the last time the Diamondbacks made the World Series, or read about Bob Gibson vs. Mickey Lolich in 1968, is that the World Series ought to be a platform for exceptional performances by exceptional pitchers.

We’re seeing fewer of those. Starting pitcher workloads have gone down in general as the job has become more physically intense and strikeout-focused. Jay Jaffe wrote extensively last week about the decline in starting pitcher workload volume, both in the regular season and in the playoffs. This isn’t one of those boiling-the-frog-type slow descents into the dictatorship of Johnny Wholestaff, it’s happening more or less overnight:

These workload trends have really only gotten noticeable in the past five years, 10 at most. Which sounds like a long time, but if you’re a 50-year-old general sports columnist who only periodically dips into baseball, or a one-team fan whose ballclub hasn’t made the playoffs in a while, what you’re seeing now is quite jarring.

I want to highlight two points about the increase in postseason bullpen games. First, the problem with Game 4 is not that too many pitchers were used, it’s that the game was out of hand two innings in. In his column, in addition to mentioning the Curly Ogden Maneuver in Game 7 of the 1924 World Series, Tyler quotes Lovullo as saying that the game has changed since the days of the Big Red Machine. He then follows up by pointing out that in Game 6 of the 1975 World Series, Sparky Anderson pulled his starter after two innings and used seven relievers. If the game is close, nobody is going to give a damn how many pitchers are involved.

I’ll go one step further into the annals of history. Go back up a couple paragraphs and look at that chart again. See that blue dot in the middle, way below the others? That’s the postseason with the record lowest percentage of starters who made it through five innings: 1947.

That year, the postseason comprised only the World Series, and in seven games not a single Dodgers starter lasted long enough to qualify for the win. Only four of seven Yankees starts lasted that long, one of those being Bill Bevens’ famous no-hit bid.

Back then, relief pitching as an art was only about a generation old, and pitcher usage was a bit haphazard. High-leverage relief opportunities went to starters on rest days, as well as high-workload multi-inning relievers. The 1947 Yankees had one of the best closers in baseball, Joe Page, who went 14-8 with 17 saves in 44 appearances (leading the league) totaling 141 1/3 innings. In the World Series, he closed out Game 7 with a five-inning relief stint. (“Closed out” might not be the right term, since Page was credited with the win.)

And this despite the Yankees having a good rotation, with four above-average starters, three of whom went by Spud, Spec, and Bobo. God bless America.

The other point has to do with seeing what Andrew Heaney and Ryne Nelson did amidst the chaos on Tuesday night. Here, while both bullpens imploded, two pitchers each threw at least five innings of one-run ball, Heaney in a starting role. Had Nelson started the game as well, this might not have turned into a classic, but at least it would’ve been sequenced in a way that was more watchable.

Here’s what Nelson had to say on the issue: “I can’t expect them to put me into the game like that when I haven’t had the results to earn it. It’s frustration toward myself because I know what I can do, and I haven’t shown it to earn that trust.”

Between this answer, and Gallen and Merrill Kelly’s forthrightness about their own ups and downs this postseason, the Diamondbacks seem to have assembled one of the most candid, plainspoken pitching staffs in the league. It’s pretty great.

But the point is this: Nelson was only in this game because it was a mopup opportunity. In the regular season, he made 29 appearances, 27 of them starts, and over 144 innings he had a K-BB% of 8.1 and an ERA- of 121. In his previous playoff appearance, he allowed three earned runs in 2/3 of an inning. You’d have to be out of your mind to start a guy with that track record in a World Series game, and Nelson knows it.

The same is true of Heaney, who was good during the regular season but had never before faced more than 14 batters in a playoff appearance. This year, he was solid one-and-a-half times through the order in his first postseason start against Baltimore, got wrecked in less than an inning in his second, and has been a mopup guy ever since. Bochy, a manager who was a couple hours from inserting his hideously overworked closer in a six-run game, would never have let Heaney throw five innings if the game was close.

One reason I keep coming back to Tyler’s piece is because of what he doesn’t say. The bullpen game is time-consuming, it flies in the face of tradition, and it sets up a house of cards that can often result in the disaster we saw in Game 4. It’s ugly. If I’m being completely candid, it is not baseball as I would like it to be played.

But he never said it was the wrong move on Lovullo’s part.

To paraphrase MLB’s Mike Petriello, this is how teams have to make do when there are not enough good pitchers to go around.

It wasn’t too long ago that teams would just throw their no. 4 starter out there like normal for a critical playoff game. The star-studded mid-2000s St. Louis Cardinals threw Jeff Suppan in Game 7 of the NLCS twice in a three-year span. The second time his opponent was a young Oliver Pérez, who’d posted an ERA of 6.55 that year.

Both Suppan and Pérez pitched well that night, but it’s wild that we ever lived like this, going into the most important games of the year and handing over more than half of it to pitchers who had trouble getting anyone out.

The state of the art seems to be that using more pitchers in shorter stints is the way to go, even if you get the occasional stinker from your fourth-best reliever. And it’s amazing how extreme that trend has gotten in the past 10 years. Even in 2016, when Terry Francona went bullpen-mad in order to white-knuckle an injury-riddled Cleveland team to the playoffs, things weren’t this extreme. Except for cases of injury or extreme ineffectiveness, every Cleveland starter that postseason either went through the lineup at least twice or pitched into the fifth inning. Francona used Corey Kluber on three days’ rest and let Josh Tomlin work into the late innings. He even called on a babyfaced rookie named Ryan Merritt, with all of one big league start under his belt at the time, to pitch into the fifth inning in the ALCS clincher. He never came close to doing what Lovullo did twice this postseason.

There are, at minimum, 150 rotation spots available in the majors at a time: five per team, 30 teams. That’s not accounting for six-man rotations, injuries, or other contingencies. With 12 playoff teams running four-man rotations in October, that leaves 48 starting rotation spots up for grabs in the playoffs.

I am not sure there are 48 starters in the entire league who could hold up for a full season and turn over a lineup more than twice against playoff lineups. Starting pitching is so demanding now, the margins so small, the risk of injury so high, that almost nobody in the league has that combination of stuff, nerve and stamina.

Only 44 starters qualified for the ERA title this year, and of those, 33 had an ERA- under 100. Two of those pitchers, Dean Kremer and Bryce Elder, actually made exactly one postseason start this year and ended up with an ERA over 20.00. Sometimes a rookie with great stuff puts up horrible numbers early in his career before figuring things out in time for the playoffs. That worked out great for Brandon Pfaadt, not so much for Grayson Rodriguez. Then there’s Jacob deGrom, Walker Buehler, Sandy Alcantara, and a number of other top-end starters who were excluded from this postseason by injury.

It’s difficult to even identify the trustworthy playoff starters from season to season or even game to game. Framber Valdez, who was lights-out last postseason, allowed 13 runs in 12 innings over three starts this year. Cristian Javier, who threw the pointy end of a no-hitter in last year’s World Series, got knocked out after a third of an inning in Game 7 of the ALCS. Managers just don’t know whom they can count on anymore.

Regular-season starter and postseason starter are almost different jobs at this point. The Rangers signed Heaney this past offseason, paid him $12.5 million, and didn’t use him much more liberally than the Diamondbacks did Nelson. The Phillies signed Taijuan Walker to a four-year, $72 million contract last winter and got a solid regular season out of him. He didn’t throw a single pitch in the playoffs.

With eight- or even nine-man bullpens, that leaves what we saw on Tuesday as the best option when teams run out of quality arms. It’s not traditional or pretty, but it gives them the best chance of winning.

And I wish it weren’t the case. I don’t know how to change this, short of hopping in a time machine and preventing Candy Cummings’ parents from ever meeting. Maybe there’s a roster rule change that would prevent the cavalcade of relievers without causing further harm to pitchers’ health, but I don’t have an easy answer.

Until then, it is how it is. Bemoaning the bullpen game is in the same bucket of grievances as complaining about teams’ reliance on home runs in the face of overwhelming evidence that the best path to victory goes over the fence. It’s something that’s going to happen if the teams that play under current conditions are playing to win.





Michael is a writer at FanGraphs. Previously, he was a staff writer at The Ringer and D1Baseball, and his work has appeared at Grantland, Baseball Prospectus, The Atlantic, ESPN.com, and various ill-remembered Phillies blogs. Follow him on Twitter, if you must, @MichaelBaumann.

37 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
mariodegenzgz
2 years ago

Great piece. As you said, getting mad at the teams over this is ridiculous. Their job is not to worry about aesthetics, it’s to win as many games as possible, as efficiently as possible. They’re going to push the limits of the rulebook with no regard for anything else. The avalanche of position players pitching in recent years should be a clear indicator of that.

If people want to get mad, get mad at MLB for being so slow to react over a decade ago and allowing teams to distort their product. Its possible the cat’s out the bag now, though I still hold hope that it isn’t. The fact that both Manfred and the MLBPA seem to agree on the idea of reducing the size of the pitching staff is a good early sign, but I’m not holding my breath here.

68FCMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  mariodegenzgz

How sure are we that bullpen games are actually more efficient? I get it for the D-backs when their 4th starter is Ryne Nelson who has been significantly worse than any of the pitchers who would be expected to make up the bullpen game.

But for the Rangers or Phillies, Heaney, Dunning, Gray, and Walker were all around average starters. Is an average starter really all that worse than a bunch of good to average relievers, the best of whom have been worked hard and all of them have faced the opponent multiple times in the series?

Those kind of pitchers should generally be expected to be able to give you 5-6 innings allowing 3ish runs. They were all better than that in the regular season. Is that really worse than you expect to get out of the underbelly of the bullpen game? Plus it saves the relievers that would been pitching both the fatigue and the exposure if they are needed later.

hglmanMember since 2021
2 years ago
Reply to  68FC

Were they better than that vs the best teams in the League? There is a huge difference in terms of bat quality, game stress, etc., in a playoff game. Relievers are generally much better; if you have to win a single game, you should do a bullpen game. Maybe you can make a strategic argument for trying to get 5 out of the 4th guy if you’re up, but that seems likely to be over-optimization.

descender
2 years ago

Go cry to Smoltz about it!

Starting pitchers also give up lots of runs and sometimes World Series games they start are over early. Stop blaming the league just because you want to see “innings pitched”.

Taking one reliever out of the bullpen isn’t going to change much. It isn’t going to make quality starting pitchers suddenly materialize out of thin air. Having 4-5 reliable starting pitchers is unlikely for any team to ever have again.

Last edited 2 years ago by descender
mariodegenzgz
2 years ago
Reply to  descender

You gotta wonder why that is, considering we’ve never had more tools to make pitchers better. Development has never been more advanced, and yet we can’t develop starting pitchers as a league?

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  mariodegenzgz

It’s not some big secret. The quest for velocity (and strikeouts) acts at cross purposes to the desire for injury prevention. The compromise is fewer innings.

mariodegenzgz
2 years ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

Oh, of course. It was a rethorical question. Hence why we need to compromise the viability of everyone throwing max effort all the time if we want more SP innings and less injuries. And MLB can do that with restrictions and rule changes.

sandwiches4everMember since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  mariodegenzgz

I don’t know how you restrict/rule change the third-time-through-the-order penalty out of existence.

mariodegenzgz
2 years ago

You dont have to. Force teams to live with it more often, thats all.

dozingoffdadMember since 2021
2 years ago

Great title.

‘Leave your stupid comments in your pocket!’

Jason BMember since 2017
2 years ago
Reply to  dozingoffdad

“In a few minutes, bitch!”

jrothMember since 2026
2 years ago

All due respect, but that bit at the end really yada-yadas Taijuan Walker. League-average run prevention by ERA- and FIP-, but the Phils just left him on the shelf! Who knows what’s going on behind the scenes, but that doesn’t look to me like “analytics tell us we must do this, aesthetics be damned.”

More broadly, I think it’s a sign of groupthink, the league deciding that a bunch of generic 100 mph RHRPs is always going to be more effective than all but the very best starters. But as we saw just the other day in Lindbergh’s article for The Ringer, RP familiarity is a bigger effect than the TTO penalty. And of course we’ve all known from the beginning of time that RPs are, as a class, inferior to SPs. It doesn’t feel that way because most good RPs will have a bunch of clean outings in a row, but when they blow up, you get… Game 4. Point being, you should expect bullpen games to look like Game 4 as often than not—it wasn’t some unforeseeable fluke. And that’s what the baseline should be, instead of “most starters just aren’t good enough.”

KevinMember since 2017
2 years ago
Reply to  jroth

The detail about Walker not throwing a pitch in the playoffs really broke my brain

tomjefMember since 2014
2 years ago

Also, middle relievers aren’t that good either, in many cases the lower paid players on the roster (excluding newbies). Both WS teams couldn’t wait to get to the other’s middle relief, weaknesses in both teams. MLBTR predicts that Mantiply, World Series starter, will be non-tendered.

chuck e
2 years ago

Lots of people writing about this topic these days.
Pitchers just keep breaking except a collection of old timers like Verlander who just keep on trucking. And maybe pitchers are becoming more and more like clones of each other, which is making the batters job easier. Maybe there is too much emphasis on elite pitches, and not enough on just the business of pitching (sequencing and stuff). But it feels like for quite a while now that teams are acutely short of reliable pitching, especially in the playoffs, and a few relievers and starters seem to be out there way too much.

hglmanMember since 2021
2 years ago
Reply to  chuck e

Rule changes force effort levels to come down while pushing workloads onto more arms. Games need 3 pitchers going 3 innings each with a maximum number of innings in, say, 5 days. Injuries are, in my opinion, worse than low SP innings. Watching ppl get hurt makes me think maybe I shouldn’t be part of something that causes ppl to hurt themselves.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

The distinction between a regular season starter and a playoff worthy starter has been apparent for several years, although I’m not sure people noticed it until Taijuan Walker wound up on the shelf. That’s why the contracts for guys like Taijuan Walker and Jameson Taillon were so egregious. Why would anyone spend that much money for a guy who you wouldn’t trust in the playoffs?

The reality is that we have known that the true number of playoff worthy starters is about 25-30 at any given time. You can’t really feel comfortable unless you have a league ace, a solid 4 win pitcher, and a solid 3 win starter ready to go at playoff time. And if you don’t have that, you try and get as close to it as possible. But the injuries to starting pitching are so numerous and the cost of signing too starters in free agency is so prohibitive that if you want to win you have to get creative.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Sure, but the relevant comparison once you get to the playoffs and don’t have that staff (as opposed to when you’re trying to put together a playoff-optimal roster), which is the subject here, isn’t actually good starters vs. middling starters, it’s middling starters vs. a composite of middling relievers. Of course it’s a Hobson’s choice for a team like Arizona, which was probably too short on pitching to have a chance either way, but I don’t think the decision to go with the bullpen game there was as clear-cut as people are making out here (or in the case of Taijuan Walker).

Jason BMember since 2017
2 years ago

Agree – OK, so you don’t have Taijuan Walker – who are you giving those 170+ league-average innings to? Build a bridge to the postseason then figure it out from there. Besides, it’s not like every team can just collect 4 reliable postseason starters (a/k/a “aww damn, why didn’t we think of that?!”)

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

In any case, if you really want to kill this trend—and to me this looks like a minor thing—you need to stop having so many days off. It’s counterintuitive because with more days off you get to use your top starters more often. But with fewer days off you can’t do a “bullpen game” and expect to make it through a series.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

One day off between series, plus whatever you earn by winning in fewer than the maximum number of games. No one would even blink at seven games in seven days in the regular season.

Last edited 2 years ago by cowdisciple
jreyn24Member since 2025
2 years ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

How does the travel work? Teams typically travel on an off day or after a day game. Day games seem like a non-starter for the WS and CS.

KennyMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  jreyn24

World Series would be Tu/Wed, travel Thurs, Fri/Sat/Sun with Sun being an afternoon game, then Monday Game 6, Tuesday Game 7. 7 games in 8 days would force teams to use their back-end starters.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  jreyn24

There would be a day game, or maybe two. I don’t really see why that should be a nonstarter. One of them would be on a weekend.

Jason BMember since 2017
2 years ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

BUT OUR PRECIOUS (MOSTLY NONEXISTENT) TV RATINGS!!

jtricheyMember since 2021
2 years ago

The thing that makes predicting it impossible is a case like Brandon Pfaadt. Would you have put him in the good bucket of 48 starters at the start of the playoffs? He was a great minor leaguer and showed some signs at the end of the year, but he ended up being one of the best 3 or 4 starters of the entire playoffs. If that is possible, why wouldn’t you let Taijuan Walker have a start?

I don’t mind a bullpen game, but it seems really weird to not use guys like Walker and Andrew Heaney to hopefully get you through 5 decent innings.

Jason BMember since 2017
2 years ago
Reply to  jtrichey

*nods*

Greg GoldenMember since 2016
2 years ago

It’s ultimately an entertainment product, and I agree that it’s less entertaining to see a parade of relievers than it is to see one guy going deep into the game.

The only solution I can think of is a wildly impractical, two-pronged approach:

  1. Teams get 10 active pitchers at a time, and 15 pitchers for the entire season.
  2. All the fences get moved back or raised up 30 feet.

In a vacuum, this would reduce all three of the true outcomes. Pitchers have to save bullets, and hitters wouldn’t be able to do as much selling out for homers.

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  Greg Golden

Limit pitching changes. Pick a number….4? 5? Maybe allow one additional per inning in extras. Managers are permitted to make additional calls to the bullpen, but doing so advances all base runners, and puts the next batter on first.

Last edited 2 years ago by HappyFunBall
hglmanMember since 2021
2 years ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

Limit pitchers to 9 innings in 5 days, and make the rule that a relief pitcher has to go 3 innings or the end of the game or 3 runs.

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  hglman

That would annihilate nearly the entire class of relief pitchers. Non-starter.

boomstickMember since 2024
2 years ago

Are there any good thought pieces on the viability of running a 13-man pitching staff as all relief pitchers and skipping the starter role entirely?

An example that could repeat as a 1,2,3,4 cycle. Pitcher inning moves throughout the cycle to reduce repetition exposure with batters in a series.

Game 1
p1 (1st inning)
p2 (2nd inning)
p3 (3rd Inning)
p4 (4th inning)
p5 (5th inning)
p6 (6th inning)
p7 (7th inning)
p8 (8th Inning)
p9 (9th inning)
(p10,11,12 rest)

Game 2
p10 (1st inning)
p11 (2nd inning)
p12 (3rd Inning)
p1 (4th inning)
p2 (5th inning)
p3 (6th inning)
p4 (7th inning)
p5 (8th Inning)
p6 (9th inning)
(p7,8,9 rest)

Game 3
p7 (1st inning)
p8 (2nd inning)
p9 (3rd Inning)
p10 (4th inning)
p11 (5th inning)
p12 (6th inning)
p1 (7th inning)
p2 (8th Inning)
p3 (9th inning)
(p4,5,6 rest)

Game 4
p4 (1st inning)
p5 (2nd inning)
p6 (3rd Inning)
p7 (4th inning)
p8 (5th inning)
p9 (6th inning)
p10 (7th inning)
p11 (8th Inning)
p12 (9th inning)
(p1,2,3 rest)

211 starting pitchers this season, avg $7mil per season
304 relief pitchers this season, avg $2.3 mil per season
On average, swapping avg 5 starter payrolls for 5 relief payrolls cuts salary by $23.5mil. Imagine taking the weakest position player and putting in a high-floor bat/David Ortiz type with that money each year. Opportunity to work the prospective pitchers against big league hitting faster and with shorter leashes. Turn them into valuable trade bits for midseason for bigger bats then backfill with low-cost relief pitching.

Net positive? I don’t know. The game wouldn’t hurt from pitchers changing every three outs so long as those outs line up with the inning change anyway.

hglmanMember since 2021
2 years ago
Reply to  boomstick

The issue is when they don’t get the outs, what do you do when one person blows up? Say they throw 30 pitches, and no one is out? You at a min need some meaningful number of your 13 to be able to go 60 pitches in a game just because they may have to.

68FCMember since 2020
2 years ago

It is wild to me that Taijuan Walker gets grouped in the “absolutely cannot start a playoff game” group. He’s been a roughly average pitcher (maybe a tick above) as a starter the last few years. That means he is probably a solidly above average pitcher overall, but they would rather go with a parade of average to slightly above average relievers who are often failed starters. I feel like most teams’ #4 starters are better pitchers than their #6 reliever. The reliever might be more efficient on a rate basis because they operate in shorter stints and never face the order a second time, but over a series they are facing the same hitters multiple times (often many times because the same relievers are being used against the same part of the lineups).

Why are we so much more worried about Bryce Harper getting a 3rd look at Merrill Kelly in the same game, but have zero concern for him seeing Andrew Saalfrank 5 times over a 6 game span (which he did). Starters have the arsenal to better handle facing hitters multiple times. It is unusual for a reliever to face the same hitter more than twice over a month in the regular season, so they don’t have to develop that skill. But it happens constantly in a playoff series.

mariodegenzgz
2 years ago
Reply to  68FC

I think teams are going to figure this out eventually. Or at least I’d hope they would figure it out. It’s like they haven’t realized that relievers are LIMITED pitchers.

Greg GoldenMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  68FC

He was very bad in the latter stages of the regular season

cregwalkerMember since 2025
2 years ago

Walker not throwing a pitch all postseason feels so strange to me when it feels like not that long ago I watched Jeremy Guthrie start Game 7 of the World Series.