Thinking About Sinking

Last week, Justin Choi wrote a fascinating article about sinkers. You should read it, because Justin’s stuff is great, but I’m going to summarize it here because I want to riff on it a little bit. In essence, Justin pointed out what we all kind of knew but didn’t talk about much: sinkers are much better against same-handed batters. Teams have caught on, and they’re changing usage accordingly.
Here’s a great chart from that article: the percentage of all right-handed sinkers that are thrown to right-handed batters:

That’s pretty straightforward: pitchers are increasingly using sinkers only when they have the platoon advantage. Here’s another way of looking at it: the percentage of sinkers among all pitches thrown by righties to lefties, league-wide:

In plain English, pitchers have stopped throwing sinkers when they’re faced with opposite-handed batters. Meanwhile, they’re throwing right/right sinkers as frequently as ever:

Those two charts hardly look like the same pitch, and in fact they aren’t really. Righty pitchers are actually playing two slightly different games: they’re pitching to same-handed batters and separately pitching to opposite-handed hitters. The object of both games is to get the batter out, so it’s not like the games are that different, but it’s inconceivable that the same pitches would be best against both sides.
Let’s delve a little deeper into why sinkers merit this huge split usage. At a basic level, the argument is pretty simple. Take a look at groundball rate, wOBA on contact, chase rate, and whiff rate for sinkers thrown by right-handed pitchers in 2023, split by handedness of opposing batters:
| Batter | GB% | wOBACON | Chase% | Whiff% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left | 47.6% | .378 | 18.4% | 15.4% |
| Right | 57.2% | .344 | 28.8% | 13.6% |
More grounders and the resulting lower production on contact are the key differences here. As a point of comparison for how platoon-sensitive a pitch is, here’s the same chart for four-seam fastballs:
| Batter | GB% | wOBACON | Chase% | Whiff% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left | 33.2% | .398 | 23.1% | 21.0% |
| Right | 32.7% | .399 | 25.8% | 24.2% |
Four-seamers allow louder contact than sinkers and make up for it by missing more bats. But they allow similar production on contact regardless of the handedness of the batter.
To be fair, there are some selection effects here. Some of the sinkers thrown by righties against lefties are from pitchers who simply have nothing better to throw, and those guys tend to be bad. Both effects shrink if we look at individual pitchers and compare their results against lefties and righties. But the overall shape of the effect is clear. Unless you’re throwing a particular subset of sinker, as Cam Levy wrote about earlier this year, the platoon effect is hugely important.
The general idea here is simple: throw your best pitches often. What’s changed is how teams and pitchers are deciding what’s best. To get an example of this, I decided to use two teams as a case study. First, we’ve got the 2014 Pirates, the foremost example of the mid-2010s sinker trend. Their starters threw sinkers a whopping 43.4% of the time. We’ll also look at the 2022 Phillies, whose starters threw the most sinkers in baseball last year (28.5%). The way these two teams use their pitches is emblematic of the era each is from.
First, take a look at Pittsburgh’s starters from that year:
| Pitcher | Handedness | Sinker% | Sinker% R | Sinker% L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edinson Volquez | Right | 35.8% | 35.5% | 36.2% |
| Francisco Liriano | Left | 37.9% | 37.2% | 41.1% |
| Charlie Morton | Right | 59.3% | 68.1% | 51.1% |
| Gerrit Cole | Right | 14.9% | 17.1% | 12.7% |
| Jeff Locke | Left | 61.5% | 57.6% | 74.8% |
| Vance Worley | Right | 45.6% | 42.8% | 48.4% |
| Brandon Cumpton | Right | 72.5% | 73.0% | 71.9% |
| Wandy Rodriguez | Left | 31.7% | 31.4% | 33.3% |
This group is all over the place when it comes to pitch usage, but broadly speaking, they were equal opportunity sinker throwers. Morton and Locke threw theirs much more frequently with the platoon advantage, but the rest of the crew didn’t really. In aggregate, Pirates hurlers decreased their sinker usage by only five percentage points when they didn’t have the platoon advantage.
How’d that work for them? Not particularly well:
| Pitcher | Handedness | GB% R | GB% L | wOBACON R | wOBACON L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edinson Volquez | Right | 62.9% | 40.4% | .321 | .438 |
| Francisco Liriano | Left | 58.5% | 57.1% | .363 | .488 |
| Charlie Morton | Right | 68.7% | 51.8% | .343 | .320 |
| Gerrit Cole | Right | 72.0% | 48.5% | .323 | .483 |
| Jeff Locke | Left | 50.0% | 63.3% | .376 | .181 |
| Vance Worley | Right | 53.5% | 59.6% | .294 | .346 |
| Brandon Cumpton | Right | 55.4% | 33.3% | .333 | .375 |
| Wandy Rodriguez | Left | 25.0% | 60.0% | .602 | .535 |
When thrown to same-handed batters, Pirates sinkers were phenomenally effective, allowing a wOBA around .330 when the opposition put the ball in play. When thrown to opposite-handed pitchers, those sinkers were stinkers, allowing a wOBA of .379. Single-pitch platoon splits are tremendously noisy, so don’t read too much into any single pitcher’s line, but the broad point remains: these sinkers got creamed when hitters had the handedness edge. And this wasn’t a bad pitching staff; they were second in the majors in WAR.
That was the sinker-iest team of 2014, perhaps the sinker-iest year in baseball history. How does the 2022 version compare? Things have changed, and yet some practices remain the same. Here are the Phillies starters who threw sinkers last year (excluding opener Cristopher Sánchez):
| Pitcher | Handedness | Sinker% | Sinker% R | Sinker% L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron Nola | Right | 18.9% | 20.8% | 16.9% |
| Kyle Gibson | Right | 28.1% | 35.7% | 18.6% |
| Ranger Suárez | Left | 40.2% | 34.3% | 65.3% |
| Zack Wheeler | Right | 17.2% | 32.2% | 1.9% |
| Bailey Falter | Left | 32.3% | 33.9% | 25.8% |
| Zach Eflin | Right | 38.6% | 48.7% | 29.7% |
| Noah Syndergaard | Right | 40.5% | 50.6% | 28.4% |
Right away, you can see that usage patterns have changed. Did you see those graphs up at the top of the article? The Phillies had a lot to do with those. How’d they fare with their approach? Fairly well:
| Pitcher | Handedness | GB% R | GB% L | wOBACON R | wOBACON L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron Nola | Right | 65.1% | 28.3% | .266 | .307 |
| Kyle Gibson | Right | 60.7% | 62.0% | .386 | .427 |
| Ranger Suárez | Left | 57.8% | 81.1% | .344 | .200 |
| Zack Wheeler | Right | 67.7% | 66.7% | .269 | .295 |
| Bailey Falter | Left | 37.3% | 18.2% | .375 | .727 |
| Zach Eflin | Right | 62.7% | 48.6% | .347 | .488 |
| Noah Syndergaard | Right | 38.5% | 58.1% | .366 | .263 |
Bailey Falter is weird. Even accounting for that, though, the change in pattern is clear. Most Phillies starters threw far more sinkers when facing same-handed batters than they did when opposite-handed batters were up. Like their time-shifted Pirates counterparts, they ran a higher groundball rate and allowed a lower wOBA on contact against same-handed hitters. Weighted by number of sinkers thrown, Phillies pitchers had a 9.5% groundball edge and 27-point wOBACON edge when they had the platoon advantage. They leaned into that gap by ditching sinkers when they weren’t set up to succeed.
I’m not sure you’d think of the Phillies as a sinker-first pitching staff. I think of them more as a top-heavy pitching staff than anything else; Nola, Wheeler, and Suárez are excellent, and the rest of the rotation is sketchy. But they threw more sinkers than four-seamers, and got better results with them. In fact, they got the best production on their sinkers out of any team in baseball. It might not lead to a bestselling book anytime soon, but just because sinkers are out of fashion doesn’t mean teams aren’t using them well.
As Justin mentioned in his article, this kind of handedness optimization is sweeping across baseball, and with good reason. You have to fill that gap in usage somehow — changeups, four-seamers, cutters, whatever your favorite neutral option is — but it’s a switch worth making. Sinkers are excellent pitches, particularly if you use them right, and the league seems to be getting better at just that. It feels weird to treat a fastball like a slider and put it in your back pocket against opposite-handed hitters, but you can’t fight the math, so you might as well join it.
Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.
Thinking about thanking Ben, very cool!
Too soon…
Good stuff. This is a universal trend across the game, but one the Rockies (of course) don’t really follow. Nevermind that it burns them over and over again!
Cool article, and thanks for the link to Justin’s cool article as well. I’m wondering what proportion of the wOBACON effect is due to out of zone contact, since RH batters chase more often but swing and miss at a similar rate to LH batters when facing sinkers from RHPs. My guess would be that the results on in zone contact against RHP sinkers would be more similar between RH and LH batters. If that’s the case, it would be interesting (to me at least).
After spending 30, or so, years watching nothing but sinkers and sliders when the strike zone dropped to the belt to mid calf I actually see a smaller percentage of sinkers than ever. Today’s pitchers have a tool kit that is filled with more options than Baskin-Robbins and each of these pitches have a subset of variations within each of them. That hellacious sinker diving down to the glove side from a pitcher with the ability to pronate his forearm is as effective a pitch as there is. Jeurys Familia, in his 2014-2015 seasons, has been the measure by which I judge the pitch. It was so hard to hit that he could have told the hitter what he going to throw and where and still be untouchable. Zach Britton was another who only needed the power sinker to dominate.
The modern strike zone isn’t that small. It goes from the middle of the torso (which is above the belt) to the bottom of the kneecap.
The zone has returned to something closer to what it was before 1980. From out of nowhere around that time, probably as a show of power by the umpire’s union, the top of the strike zone dropped from the letters to the belt and from the top of the knee to the bottom of the knee. This dramatic change forced pitchers to stop throwing high heat and the game became a steady diet of sinker, slider pitchers. Slowly, as hitters became more adept at lifting the thigh high sinker, the zone has gradually come back up to where the high fastball is again called a strike.
I said below the kneecap, and the strike zone still clearly extends above the belt. It hasn’t been at the letters in a long time, but it’s still about halfway between the letters and the belt, and plenty of high strikes are still called above the belt. Any strike zone shown on TV proves this.
Interesting. I guess I’ve always understood at a certain level that even beyond simple direction, running action has a fundamentally different shape than breaking action. But, I had still assumed that, in spite of these differences, the idea of the movement being directed away from the hitter making it more difficult would remain constant. This article clearly lays out in empirical data that I have been mistaken.
So, both breaking action and running action tend towards platoon splits, however they do so inversely. I guess my next question would be, why is that?
What are you talking about? As the article shows, both kinds of movement have the same effect. They’re both harder to hit for same-handed batters and easier to hit for opposite-handed batters. Your initial assumption was correct.
I meant the platoon advantage is inverse based on the direction. Breaking pitches are more effective breaking away from a hitter, while Running pitcher are more effective running in on a hitter.
For example, I had always assumed that a right handed pitcher would be more effective throwing a sinker that ran away from a left-handed hitter as the pitch was moving away from the hitter. After all, that running motion is part of the advantage of a RHP using change-ups against lefties.
No, sinkers still run away from same-handed batters, just not to the same degree as most breaking pitches. That’s why they’re more effective against them as this article shows.
I think he means ‘away’ as to the outside part of the plate. I.e., a righty sinker to a righty runs in off of the inside of the plate/barrel, but it runs ‘away’ from a lefty (and may run into the barrel based on swing plane). His question seems to be how is that righty sinker movement profile so different from a cutter from a lefty pitcher that still moves down and away that it is much more effective.
Righty throws a sinker to a right handed batter. The ball runs in. If the pitcher misses location on the outside, it will run to the barrel of the bat. If the pitcher misses location on the inside, it will run in to jam the batter.
So where are right pitchers going to locate most sinkers? On the inside. So far, in 2023, RHP threw 8930 sinkers to RHB on the inside attack zones (1, 4, 7, etc.). RHP threw 5848 sinkers to RHB on the outside attack zones (3, 6, 9, etc.).
Righty throws a sinker to a left handed batter. The ball runs out. If the pitcher misses location on the outside, it’s a ball and may miss the barrel entirely. If the pitcher misses location on the inside, it runs out to the middle of the plate.
So far, in 2023, RHP threw 4921 sinkers to LHB on the outside attack zones, and 2755 sinkers to LHB on the inside attack zones.
Righty throws a breaking ball that breaks down and away to a RHB. If the pitcher misses location on the outside, it’s just a ball, but on the inside, that moves towards the barrel of the bat.
Right throws a breaking ball to a LHB, it breaks down and in. On the inside, it might hit the LHB, on the outside, a miss in location takes it to the middle of the plate.
It’s more about what happens when you miss location that helps explain the platoon splits.
If it weren’t for the accompanying photo, I would have guessed “Thinking About Sinking” was a follow-up to your May 24 “Nolan Gorman: Balanced Bludgeoner” article.
What if you threw a sinker and a slider with the platoon advantage and a screwball (alongside another kind of fastball) against the platoon advantage? That would be interesting.
Speaking of which, does anyone in MLB actually throw a screwball anymore?
Doing a quick search, it seems Brent Honeywell of the Padres currently throws the only screwball in MLB.
I think there are some pitchers that pronate their changeups quite a bit so that it is very similar to a screwball.
Devin Williams’ “airbender” is a heavily pronated changeup that resembles a screwball.
Hector Santiago threw one; not sure he’s still around though.
its actually surprising to hear that this is something that has only recently become a thing. When I was pitching way back when (god, its been 20 years!) I just sort of inherently knew not to throw two seamers to lefties because if you miss location even a bit the movement is likely to take it right into the barrel. If i did throw one it was almost a waste pitch that started off the outside and tailed even more off the plate.
I’m assuming you’re a righty? I was a lefty (well I guess I still am) and I only threw 2-seamers to righties. I felt uncomfortable as hell throwing them to righties because they would usually tail in and graze the jersey.
I could be wrong, but I think this is the basis of Zack Wheeler’s career turnaround. I remember him exclusively throwing one set of pitches to RHH and one set to LHH in 2020, most notably sinkers to RHH.
Maybe a bit of a tangent but is there anything about the movement on 2-seamers over time?
I swear back in the old days there were more guys (think Brandon Webb, Justin Masterson) who actually threw 2-seamers that sank and nowadays there are hardly any “sinkerballers” to be find who use sinking movement to induce ground balls at an extremely high rate. So these end up being more like “2-seam fastballs” than true sinkers, sometimes by pitchers who actually have decent ride on their 4-seamers.
Logan Webb is the only one I can really think of that throws that true “sinker”. Maybe Stroman as well…