Thoughts on Last Night’s Draft Proceedings

I already chatted for nearly six hours during last night’s picks, wrote a bunch of mock drafts and, with the help of David Appelman, made a Sortable Draft Board full of the top players with tools, reports, video and where they were taken last night, but I thought I should drop in and give some thoughts on last night’s first two rounds of the draft.

The top-11 picks went pretty much as expected, with those players all projected there in some order. Husky Canadian prep 1B Josh Naylor crashed the party, jumping from late first-round expectations to 12th overall, which was the first big surprise of the night, similar to what Kodi Medeiros did last year with the Brewers. Often, what fans will term a “reach” or “overdraft” is a team deciding they want a player and realizing he won’t be at the next pick. I support this idea from the team’s side, especially if you can save some money, because when we look back at the draft in 10 years, we won’t say “this guy wasn’t a good value here,” we’ll either say he was good or he wasn’t. Don’t forget that rankings and mock drafts are a guide, not the correct answer. When you can’t trade picks, you take the guy you want and sometimes it’ll look like this.

The rest of the first round was composed of names I had projected in that range or ranked within my top 50-60 players, except for the Orioles at pick 36 with Ryan Mountcastle, whom I heard last week had some people looking at him in the second round. Mountcastle is a unique player with above-average bat speed, bat control, raw power and speed to go with a projectable frame and a long track record of hitting, so he clearly checks a lot of boxes. His swing is a little awkward, he didn’t hit for power in games this spring and scouts think he might be a left fielder, but you can clearly see why teams would be on him with a high pick and I’m betting the Orioles wouldn’t have gotten him with their next pick.

I will never be able to call the 37th overall pick before the draft again in my whole life, but I got it this time and the Astros effectively used their bonus-pool muscle to get three of my top-dozen players with their top-three picks. Among the best values on the first day were the Jays taking RHP Jon Harris (my 14th prospect) at pick 29 after some so-so starts down the stretch, the Rays taking C Chris Betts (my 17th prospect) at pick 52 due to defensive questions (I think), the Dodgers taking RHP Kyle Funkhouser (my 19th prospect) due to a late-season velo dip and the Cardinals taking RF Bryce Denton (my 27th prospect) at pick 66 due to being a medium-sized high-school corner outfielder.

Only two players went last night who weren’t in my top 202: Tigers second-rounder LHP Tyler Alexander from TCU and Braves comp second-rounder LHP A.J. Minter from Texas A&M. Alexander was in the mix for the list, but has fringy stuff in most outings, although I recently heard his stuff ticked up very late. Of the four teams I asked about the pick to see if I missed something, one liked him as a fifth starter with some feel, for a pick a round or two lower than Detroit took him; another had him on the board for rounds 6-10; a third team was a little lower than that; and a fourth team didn’t turn him in, meaning they weren’t going to draft him.  I saw Minter on Team USA last summer and didn’t think he belonged on the list, as a power reliever without a knockout second pitch and below average command. That said, he should come as a discount, as the sub-6 foot lefty reliever is recovering from Tommy John surgery.

Thoughts on Specific Teams

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Among teams, most of them made a couple picks of solid value, but 11 teams stood out for various reasons. The Indians took a risk with Brady Aiken at 17, but that’s also where I ranked him and it feels like a solid decision with the top players off the board. I also liked the value picks in the second round of two more prep pitchers, Juan Hillman and Triston McKenzie. The Rockies took four prep prospects (Rodgers, Nikorak, Nevin, and Lambert) who were all solid values at each pick, infusing some upside into the lower rungs of their farm.  The Astros mixed college high floors (Bregman, Eshelman) with prep upside (Tucker, Cameron) in their four picks that, as I mentioned above, represents a very good use of their resources while also potentially quickly helping a surging big-league team.

The Royals went straight upside with three raw arms (Russell, Watson, Staumont), but I’d bet one of them works out in a big way. I liked the Dodgers taking what the board gave them with the college pitching slipping (Funkhouser and Buehler) and Mitchell Hansen should be a nice second-round pick if they get him signed as expected. The Brewers also caught my eye, getting the best value in the top-15 picks, by snagging an inexplicably falling Trenton Clark at 15, then grabbing two nice values with college pitching in Nate Kirby and Cody Ponce. The A’s steered into the strength of this draft, taking two college shortstops (Martin and White) from the southeast, which also happens to be the type of player they target often.

The Phillies did a nice job of taking what the board gave them, pivoting away from their strategy in the past of taking upside at all costs and selecting some of the top remaining players on my board at both picks (Randolph, Kingery). The Cardinals went upside with three prep picks (Plummer, Woodford, Denton) and they’re all guys I like with some track record of standout performance and clean actions. I think the lowest pick of the three, Denton, may be the best of the bunch. Finally, the Rays (Whitley and Betts) and Rangers (Tate, Jenkins) both only had two picks, but both went for upside; in Tampa’s case that helps gives some upside to a system without a ton and the Rangers keep adding to the young stockpile of talent.





Kiley McDaniel has worked as an executive and scout, most recently for the Atlanta Braves, also for the New York Yankees, Baltimore Orioles and Pittsburgh Pirates. He's written for ESPN, Fox Sports and Baseball Prospectus. Follow him on twitter.

35 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Peter
11 years ago

The royals have such a pitiful track record at developing starting pitchers that I don’t really have any faith at all in their ability to turn any of those pitchers into major league starters

TangoAlphaLima
11 years ago
Reply to  Peter

I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t a little bit worried about this myself. However, it seems like Dayton Moore’s strategy to counter this is by sheer volume of pitching prospects. Since 2012, and including 2015, the Royals have had 12 picks in the first two rounds of the amateur draft. 10 of those selections have been pitchers. Time will tell if this strategy, and the ability for the organization to develop starting pitchers, will pan out.

SL
11 years ago
Reply to  Peter

Current Royals roster: Yordano Ventura, Danny Duffy, Luke Hochevar, Kelvin Herrera, Greg Holland.
Other ML roster: Zack Greinke, Jake Odorizzi, Mike Montgomery, Kevin
Chapman, Aaron Crow, Blaine Hardy.
Minor League pipeline: John Lamb, Aaron Brooks, Sam Selman, Louis Coleman, Brandon Finnegan, Scott Blewitt, Foster Griffin, Cody Reed, Daniel Stumpf, Glen Sparkman, Sean Manea, Kyle Zimmer, Jake Junis, Christian Binford, Colin Rodgers, Miguel Almonte, Malcolm Culver.
I think Royals are doing ok. They could always do better but they have quite a bit major leaguers and minor league depth.

Who is Zorbist?
11 years ago
Reply to  SL

I count 1 decent one there, and 2 that the Rays fixed. Not counting Grienke, a guy “deveolped” a decade ago. The rest are relievers.

Cornflake5000
11 years ago

I WANNA HEAR ABOUT THE CUB

Jason B
11 years ago
Reply to  Cornflake5000

He is the son of a bear and will grow big and strong one day. Also has an alleged fondness for pic-a-nic baskets.

SecondHandStore
11 years ago

Any idea if the Brewers will need to give their first three selections overslot bonuses? I ask because their third round pick seemed to come out of nowhere. Only ranking I saw was 322 at BA.

Paul
11 years ago

That money is going to Demi Orimoloye.

Miles
11 years ago

High school players get bigger bonuses in the later rounds, so I think they’d have gone for a low-floor college player if that was their plan.

ShauncoreMember since 2019
11 years ago

What do you think Bregman, Tucker, and Cameron sign for or want? With the 15% overage, does it seem like Houston can afford all three (obviously they think they can).

ShauncoreMember since 2019
11 years ago
Reply to  Shauncore

Not sure why I was thinking 15%. They wouldn’t want to lose those picks. I meant 5%

Feel Plant Ear
11 years ago
Reply to  Shauncore

I thought it over on Monday night as it unfolded… They had to have this strategy going into it and Daz Cameron’s rumored $5MM price tag that caused him to slide may have even been initially communicated with Houston for the 1-5 spot as they had scouted him extensively.

They had to have had a deal in place with Bregman, who quite possibly could have found himself outside of the top 5 without Houston involved. I also think there’s a measure of “good faith” in place with the Tuckers.

$13,277,400 is the total pool for those 3 slots, but with the $17.3MM total pool, they have another $864,460 “5% overage” allowance, so say $14.1MM. (They also drafted college seniors in rounds 7-10 and don’t seem to have any signing issues with the other picks, so there’s loose change to be found.)

They could roughly slot Tucker at $3.9MM, which is his best slot if the Astros had passed on him at 1-5. They could probably get Daz Cameron down to $4.5MM, which is still top 4 money. And that leaves $5.7MM for Bregman, but I will not be shocked at all to see him sign for <$5MM. I think there had to be something very club-friendly in place for them to not take Rodgers at 1-2.

TKDC
11 years ago

On Daz Cameron:

There are a lot of things wrong with the draft, but does it bother people that a player from a wealthy family can leverage more money out of a team that will presumably come out of the amount given to a player from a modest background?

ShauncoreMember since 2019
11 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Not really.

Cameron has a unique skill set and wants to be paid adequately for it alongside players with a similar skill set. The amount of money his family has shouldn’t play any importance.

I certainly would do the same thing.

Mainstream Media
11 years ago
Reply to  Shauncore

White privilege!!!! Oh wait . . .

TKDC
11 years ago
Reply to  Shauncore

I’m not trying to be sanctimonious. I’d do the same thing, too. But this has nothing to do with Cameron’s “unique skill set,” which he doesn’t really have (anymore than every snowflake is unique).

That Guy
11 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Get it – a white joke!

Cool Lester Smooth
11 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

The player with a modest background takes less money, but that less money will improve his life by drastically more than the wealthy player’s bonus will.

TKDC
11 years ago

I guess this is the other way of looking at it. Unlike the vast majority of players, Cameron is in the position where he does not feel as though is has to sell his talents for nearly as large a discount, so why should he?

Playing pro ball maybe does help you develop faster, but it sure would be tempting to me to spend three years as a campus celebrity as opposed to the grind of the minor leagues. If money weren’t a factor, of course.

HutchMember since 2022
11 years ago

Talk some trash, Kiley. Did any teams shit the bed?

Well-Beered Englishman
11 years ago
Reply to  Hutch

Notice how carefully he avoided mentioning who overdrafted Josh Naylor.

Paul
11 years ago
Reply to  Hutch

The Mets’ selection of Desmond Lindsay is pretty awful.

senor_mike
11 years ago
Reply to  Paul

I’d actually love to hear Kiley’s take on the Lindsay pick. DePo’s crew appears to be head-over-heels with him, and they have a pretty good track record with their prep picks up to now so I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt.

On the surface it seems to me like they snagged him on a wager that he was both under-hyped due to the hammy injury last year, and that he’d save them considerable slot money in a draft where they have the lowest slot money available of all MLB teams. However, this is all inferred by the Mets PR puff pieces I’ve been reading all morning.

Roger
11 years ago
Reply to  senor_mike

Thinking the same thing. The later picks where teams went far off the predicted consensus board are always going to be the most interesting ones, I guess, because they think they’ve spotted something that others missed, and it’s worth trying to piece together what that is.

Pirates Hurdles
11 years ago

Any chance that the final few hours of last night’s chat still exist is some form? The link cuts off predictably around the end of round 1.

cpjackson
11 years ago

All I want to know is – is amphibiousness something the scouts are looking for now?

Momus
11 years ago
Reply to  cpjackson

No, because submarine-type pitchers usually end up as relievers.

theo epsteins left nut
11 years ago
Reply to  cpjackson

only if they play a lot of rain games

Mario MendozaMember since 2017
11 years ago

So you had Aiken around 17, but in chat you said Yankees had 0% chance of taking him at 16? Why?

Momus
11 years ago
Reply to  Mario Mendoza

Presumably because they didn’t want him?

Voxx
11 years ago
Reply to  Mario Mendoza

It’s more that the Yankees as a team wouldn’t take the gamble from what he was told, rather than that he wasn’t a plausible value there. He talks to a lot of people in the industry that are in tune with what teams are looking at.

baubo
11 years ago
Reply to  Voxx

Yeah, especially when it comes to medicals, there’s a lot of subjectivity involved. I presume the 17th ranking is more due to several teams in the area who take the optimistic side of his medical history. But if every team thought that, his talent warranted top-10 pick easily even with Tommy John given the lack of depth in this draft.

Only Glove, No Love
11 years ago

The Dbacks and TLR/Stewart took Swanson at #1. Is Fangraphs still going with the they are insane and terrible at baseball theme?

nj
11 years ago

they ARE insane and terrible at baseball.

Klimt
11 years ago

do I hate the Naylor pick because I’m biased against huskies or because everyone has told me it was an overdraft? either way I have to stay anonymous, right? someday I’ll know anything about baseball and i’ll decide for myself 🙂