Three Keys to Understanding Aaron Hicks
You’re forgiven if you don’t much care about Wednesday’s swap of Aaron Hicks for JR Murphy. Maybe you’re not a fan of the Twins or the Yankees. Maybe you’re not a fan of baseball at all, and you somehow wound up here by accident. Or maybe you are a fan of the Twins or the Yankees, but you recognize this as a trade featuring two players with less than 2 combined WAR over more than 1,200 plate appearances. Hicks has been probably the more hyped of the two, but Murphy is the younger of the two, and he seems like a backup. This isn’t on the level of Brad Miller and Nate Karns, and even that wasn’t on the level of something truly big.
These are the moves we have available to discuss, though, and if you want to speak generally, every professional baseball player has a compelling story. They’re all tremendously talented, and they’ve all dreamed of big-league success. If you want to speak specifically, Hicks is interesting, and I’d rate his level of interest above-average. He’s a former top prospect who’s trying to recover from initial struggles, and the most recent year saw him take a step forward. As far as this trade is concerned, it’s important to understand 2015 Aaron Hicks, and what follows are three keys to fully grasping the Hicks campaign. What he was in 2014, he wasn’t this summer.
1. More aggressive
The Twins didn’t want Hicks to be so passive. There’s nothing wrong with drawing walks, but Hicks didn’t seem to get himself ready to hit. This touches on the difference between passivity and discipline, and you can either go up looking for walks, or you can earn them. In this most recent year, Hicks did more to earn the walks he drew, by swinging more often and showing pitchers he wanted to put the ball in play. Hicks swung more often at the first pitch. He went out of the zone a little bit more, but the bigger change was he attempted many more swings at would-be strikes. And Hicks made himself a far better two-strike hitter, understanding how to protect. He lifted his two-strike slugging percentage by more than 100 points. This, I think, is also pretty striking:
- 2013: 10% called strikeouts (out of all plate appearances)
- 2014: 12%
- 2015: 3%
Compared to 2014, Hicks just batted 166 more times, but he struck out looking less than half as much. Meanwhile, his swinging strikeouts barely moved. Hicks was more ready to attack, and so Hicks more resembled an actual big-league hitter.
2. Swing adjustments
To be honest, point no. 1 ties into this. Hicks is a switch-hitter, and he made some changes that then had various effects. The changes made him feel more ready to hit, so that’s where the increased aggressiveness came from, and you also see differences in trajectory. Brandon Warne has your backstory. For images, here’s Hicks batting righty in 2014:
Hicks batting righty in 2015:
Hicks batting lefty in 2014:
Hicks batting lefty in 2015:
There are some little differences in the hands, but the biggest and most obvious thing is the new, aggressive leg kick, replacing a toe-tap, or a heel-lift, whatever you want to call it. Hicks more or less stumbled upon the leg kick last offseason, and he kept it in spring training with the coaching staff’s approval. It’s a timing mechanism, and a lot of players go through a leg-kick phase, but with Hicks there’s at least evidence it did something for him. He’s always had a better right-handed swing; he struggled from the left side, which is unfortunately the more common side. Hicks wasn’t great from the left side in 2015, but he was a good deal better, swinging more readily and not so often cutting himself off with a slap attempt. While Hicks didn’t meaningfully improve his rates of making contact, I think it says something that the contact didn’t suffer while the aggressiveness went up.
Let’s establish some context for Hicks’ statistical changes. Between the last two years, Hicks came to strike out less often, and put the ball on the ground less often. Between those years, 272 players batted at least 200 times in each season. Hicks had the second-biggest decrease in groundball rate. He also had the fifth-biggest decrease in strikeout rate. These are big moves, and good ones for a fast hitter who also has a decent amount of power.
Hicks wasn’t as much of a groundball hitter in 2013. That was more of a 2014 development. In 2015, he un-did the grounders, but he also chopped what had twice been an elevated rate of strikeouts. So he improved on a 2014 problem and on a 2013 + 2014 problem. Not coincidentally, Hicks’ wRC+ while batting left-handed went 54 – 54 – 80. 80 is barely playable as a regular, Hicks making it okay with his speed and defense. But what this suggests is there’s still more room to grow. And now Hicks is going to Yankee Stadium.
3. Increased quality of competition
This isn’t really about Hicks’ skillset — we already know what that is. This is more to underscore the magnitude of his development between the last two years. Look at Hicks’ player page, and you might notice something: the average fastball he saw last year was 92.4 miles per hour. The year before, 90.7.
That doesn’t confirm anything, but it hints at something, something the rest of the numbers bear out. Two years ago, Hicks’ average opponent had a 114 ERA-. Last year, his average opponent had a 97 ERA-. The difference gets slimmer if you look instead at FIP-, but you’re still looking at a drop from 104 to 98. If you like OPS+, from Baseball-Reference, then two years ago his opponents averaged 104, and this year they averaged 95. However you look at it, there’s the same message: in 2015, Hicks faced stronger opponents than he did in 2014. They were quite a big stronger, and still Hicks developed as he did. I don’t know what this says about him going forward; maybe it just makes 2014 look all the worse. But it effectively makes his improvement bigger. Which means there could be still more improvement.
The biggest thing about Aaron Hicks is that, today, literally today, he was available for a player like JR Murphy. That tells you something about his market appeal, and odds are probably better that next year Hicks is below-average instead of above-average. Even if that’s unfair, Hicks doesn’t appear to be a blossoming star. What he did just do, though, is improve, and seemingly by quite a bit. A capable center fielder got better at the plate, and he’s somewhat newly 26 years old. You can’t blame the Yankees front office if it’s congratulating itself. You don’t have to dig deep to find stuff to like.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.
Does the addition of Hicks seem to foreshadow a trade of Brett Gardner? Or is it more likely that they keep their starting OF intact and Hicks assumes the role of Chris Young from last year as the OF who plays against almost all of the LHPs and only a few RHPs?
I think the second one is more likely. If they had traded Brett Gardner instead, that would have opened up enough money and playing time for one of the top right-handed hitting outfielders in free agency-Cespedes and Upton. Then the fourth outfielder role would logically go to someone like Mason Williams or Slade Heathcott, and they could save Murphy for a different trade. Or it could turn out that the organizational philosophy had shifted against huge contacts, in which case I would have no idea what I’m talking about.
My first thought is he fills Young’s role, and maybe also spelling Beltran on occasion. He’s struggled as a switch-hitter, so unless he’d actually found his groove from the left side he’s not a great every day option (unless he simply becomes a full-time RHB like Victorino did). But from the right side, he’s a legitimate offensive threat.
Except to trade Gardner they’re going to have to eat a bunch of his contract or take back dead money, so the savings won’t be that great. But I do think Gardner is going so that the Yankee begin to have an actually functioning outfield rather than an ambulance brigade whose stats never get the walking boots off. Dreadful crew of mostly has-beens + Hicks, but that’s baked into The Yankee Way.
Why would they have to eat money? Gardner’s contract is a bargain, that’s why there’s any thought of trading him in the first place.
Not a happy Twins fan right now;( Hoping that this back up catcher becomes more than what it sounds like he is, but Hicks has excellent CF defense, a great arm, and a much higher ceiling at the plate. I was excited for an elite OF defense of Buxton, Hicks, and Rosario. And of those names, Rosario is the one I would have looked to trade, if it was necessary.
Now, I am a little worried of what our OF will look like if Buxton starts the season in the minors, which many Twins fans seem to believe will be the plan to begin the season.
I agree – they can’t be planning on bringing Kepler up to start the season, and some of the team’s shenanigans with Buxton mid-season indicate they may be playing a service time game with him (and he may actually not even be ready). Arcia may not even be a regular OFer.
I think they traded out of an OF logjam they didn’t really have.
What shenanigans? You mean calling him up in June only to have him go on the DL? Such shenanigans
You conveniently left out his midseason demotion to triple AA, cut short only when Hicks got hurt.
It’s hard to call it “shenanigans” when you demote a guy who clearly can’t hit a lick.
OK, so shenanigans may have been too strong a word. The hasty promotion of a top prospect, followed by an equally hasty demotion, was at best odd. If he was so obviously not ready,and you weren’t prepared to hand a starting job on a contender to him, don’t bring him up in the first place. If you thought he was ready, or you were committed to letting your prospects learn on the job and let the playoff chips fall where they may, then give him a realistic number of plate appearances to assess.
I think Twins management wasn’t 100% sure what to do about their surprising relevance this year and they got caught in the middle on some of these things.
That’s true, but also they were pretty much out of healthy outfielders at that point IIRC.
As a season ticket holder and watcher of games I do not attend I’ve long thought Hicks had overrated defense. His routes are horrible though he made up for some of that with good speed and arm. The return for me is fine because A) Suzuki sucks and B) It most certainly assures that Buxton breaks camp on the ML roster.
Shouldn’t UZR / DRS pick that up? Both thought he was an above-average CF (which is a well-above average RF) in 2015 and has been basically just shy of average for his career…
Wouldn’t you *rather* have an OF with poor routes (you can teach) and great speed / arm (you can’t teach)?
You can’t teach routes man. There wouldn’t be any bad outfielders.
Routes are based on your immediate pick up of the ball leaving the bat. It’s as unteachable a skill as speed and arm are. And in fact arm you can teach a bit because throwing mechanics are what makes an arm
Bpdelia,
You can teach better routes. Not everyone will learn at the same level, but it is a skill you can improve on with work.
Routes are also more than just first step.
It is incorrect to say that if good routes were learnable, no one would be a bad defender. First, that you can improve at something doesn’t mean everyone will actually improve to the same degree. Throwing a curve or changeup, for example, is learnable… But some Ps are still WAY better at it than others. Additionally, taking a good route is only one component of OF defense. Someone like Carlos Beltran, say, might take good routes but just be physically incapable of being a good OF (age in his case, but some guys are just slow even when they’re young).
I can’t think of any physically mature pro baseball players who improved their arm strength in a meaningful way…
From a Yankees fan, Murphy definitely has the potential to be a solid starting catcher. Maybe not an all-star or anything, but definitely solid. Plus he has a great attitude with media, and pitchers apparently like throwing to him.
One of the things about the Yankees is that we’ve been stacked with very talented Catchers that are at AAA or above, and are kind of blocked by McCann in terms of his skill & contract. Last year we traded Cervelli to make room for Murphy, and the initial Pirates fan reaction was that they gave up too much for a backup catcher. Cervelli had a great year as the starting catcher there (3 bWAR) and I imagine Murphy will be great for you guys as well.
Murphy was a rookie last season on a team with a highly respected veteran C. That has a ton to do with why he was a back-up.
Murphy is not a total stud or a lock to be a good starter (or he wouldn’t be available for Aaron Hicks), but he’s got a solid shot at being a starting C. For some reason, Fangraphs writers are reading a ton into a small sample from a young player.
“Look at Hicks’ player page, and you might notice something: the average fastball he saw last year was 92.4 miles per hour. The year before, 90.7.”
Curious – since average fastball is going up across the board, how does this compare to the rest of the league? I would assume that most players saw general increases.
I am already on record in the other thread that I don’t like this one too much. The Twins were patient enough with Hicks that they didn’t sell at his absolute lowest value, but if he plays another half season like he did the second half of 2015, and you really must trade him, then you have a much more compelling argument that he’s a changed player at the deadline. If he doesn’t, all you missed out on was an opportunity to get a backup catcher.
I doubt the Twins see JRM as a BUC, and there’s plenty of reason to believe they have a good shot at being right.
I think Twins fans will be pleasantly surprised with Murphy. He really seemed to come into his own in the 2nd half last year but was blocked by McCann.
Hicks, not really convinced. Surprising H-A split. Whats that all about? If its SSS, then so isn’t pretty much everything being talked about in this article.
His seasonal numbers seemed skewed by an awesome July where he had a 1001 OPS. Before July he was sub 600 OPS. After July he achieved a 662 OPS, 221 BA, which is right around his career average. This despite the AL having a significant offensive upsurge in the 2nd half (offense boosted from 717 OPS in first half to 746 OPS in 2nd half.
Yeah, I’m seeing the same thing. Not sure why Dave, Eno, and to a smaller extent Jeff are making such a big deal over Hicks. He had a brief hot streak of less than 100 PAs. They should know better than to draw conclusions from a small sample size. Beyond that, he has a large home/road split (can he hit outside of Minnesota?) and doesn’t hit righties.
JR Murphy is a lot more then a backup catcher and I do not know much bout the Twins outfielder the Yanks just got. The only reason why Murphy is available is because Sanchez is tearing up Arizona Fall League after a monster minor league season. It clears up the Yanks catching log jam and either paves the way to trade Gardner or now we have our 4th outfielder late inning defenseive replacement and Young is gone…
I agree. I wouldn’t compare Hick and Murphy, rather I’d compare Suzuki and Murphy (Herrmann now being leaving, and Pinto in the weeds). You need a back-up/replacement for Suzuki, and teams aren’t going to give up catchers that easily. Murphy isn’t a bad choice (he did well in NY, and made contact); the cost (Hicks) was not that painful. I think this trade may be more even then it appears.
“The biggest thing about Aaron Hicks is that, today, literally today, he was available for a player like JR Murphy. That tells you something about his market appeal, and odds are probably better that next year Hicks is below-average instead of above-average.”
Great point. As a team, I wouldn’t want either starting. A 4th outfielder for a backup catcher. Maybe a good 4th outfielder for maybe a good backup catcher, but that is the situation nonetheless. Both teams think they sold high, likely because they did.
I don’t really follow your logic. Both teams also probably believe that they bought relatively low. Why do they both happen to be right in their evaluations of the guy they gave up (or really your guess at what that evaluation was), but both wrong in their evaluations of their new guys? That’s quite a coincidence…
I see two young, cost controlled players who play premium positions fairly well and can handle the hat at least a bit. They’re not studs, but these are decently valuable pieces. I would bet that odds are at least one of these guys is a solid starter going forward. (Based on historical results for similar players, that is to say.)
My take on it is that the Yankees won the trade and that Brett Gardner is now on the Yankee trading block and should start packing his bags.
While the Yankees could move Gardner, Hicks is actually a really good for as a 4th IF for the Yankees so I don’t think Gardner is necessarily gone.
For the Twins’ point of view, it had to happen. This means that Buxton will be their opening day CF, Rosario will remain in LF, and Arcia will get his final chance in RF with the Twins. Oswaldo is not a good fielder, but his potential offensively is worth the risk. Look for the Twins to move Plouffe, which allows Sano to develop @ 3B. Park then is the FT DH. Rumor has it that the Twins are looking for a hard throwing, young RP, and an additional young asset in A ball for Trevor.
ESPN story….about Hicks. Both stories here, about Hicks……would really like to know something about Murphy…..
He was always a good but not great prospect for the Yankees. Handles the bat pretty well for a C, and he developed a lot defensively coming through the minors to the point where his D / work with staff is considered a plus (late convert from IF to C, so he had some warts at C early on as a pro).
Pretty much a lock to a be at least a quality BUC if healthy, with a real shot to be a decent starter. And decent starters are quite hard to find at C. Especially decent starters with 5 years of cheap control.
In his Summa Theologica, St. Thomas Aquinas put forth, with words if not deeds, he put forth the argument that forgiveness is achieved as an outgrowth of grace, regardless of day or company. Perhaps you are seeking forgiveness on a Wednesday. But his castigation of transactionally-derived forgiveness, perhaps via a Yankee Swap or a trade, is necessarily bereft of grace and is therefore empty and ultimately unsatisfying. It is from this premise, where a Man, that is, a Man who is both of Mankind and singularly, a Man, shall never be happy is he finds forgiveness via accidental happenstance. Neither shall a Miller, nor a Baker – both noble occupations – neither shall be made happy via this salvation from Grace.
Summa Theologica in St. Thomas Aquinas opens its high flyers, if not action, it has expanded to argue that achieving remission sometimes cruel grace, regardless of society. They can not ask for forgiveness on Wednesday. But his gentleness, forgiveness through trade, either through trade or commerce Yankee, there is mercy, and therefore empty and the last part nezadovoljavajuzi. That is the premise of that man, that is, man and mankind and outstanding man, ever be happy found forgiveness through the coincidence of an accident. Baker-Miller not both noble profession, are not happy about what is salvation by grace.
Looking at those videos of Hicks, he also clearly had a hitch in his load from both sides of the plate in 2014. In 2015, it’s completely gone from the left side, and much reduced from the right. It looks like he was using it to get some coil in his swing, but is now using the leg-kick far more productively for the same purpose. Even when he isn’t making good contact, Hicks does walk, but the point is very well taken about earning them.
I’m far from convinced on Murphy, but see Hicks as a highly useful guy who is firming up his skills and so has more ceiling than we’ve seen, his age despite. But Minny had no real use for Hicks, and so sold perhaps low but to fill an area of crying need, so it’s a good deal for the Twins. But leave it to Cashman to come up with a real asset like Hicks for a back-up who was going to spend 2016 in the minors to boot barring an injury to someone who really mattered in NY. If ownership of the Yankers didn’t keep forcing Cashman to sign millstones like the Ellsburys and A-Rods of the world, we’d understand him as the best team builder of his generation.
Murphy would have been the full time back up to McCann, not someone who would have spent time in the minors. If there was an injury to McCann, it’s likely he would have become the regular catcher
Trade value is not about a guy’s role with his current team (though JRM almost definitely would have been at the MLB level for the Yankees). It’s about his market value. There are 29 teams that can trade for any given player, so his trade value is his value to the team that is highest on him… not just his value to his current team.
This is just generally how pricing works in any somewhat competitive market. If your $50k luxury car suddenly becomes worthless to you because you move to a city and have no need to drive… that doesn’t mean you should just take $10k for it if I offer it to you. Someone else will give you more than $10k.
(I’m not saying Cashman got ripped off. I think it was a pretty fair trade for both sides. I am
Just explaining why trade value is distinct from value to a guy’s current team.)
It’s really hard to look at the general scarcity of / value of C’s around MLB and say with a straight face that Murphy profiles as a back-up. He doesn’t have sky high potential, no, but if you can hit about league average with solid D and stay pretty healthy… you’re already a top 10, maybe top 5 C. He’s by no means a lock to do those things, but JRM has a pretty good shot at doing them immediately. He’s a got a good shot at being a solid starter, with a healthy floor of being a quality back-up.
I like Hicks, but I think you’re drawing some sweeping conclusions from some tiny samples. I also wish people would stop pretending all LHH become more valuable in YS… Some will have a better batted ball profile for the park than others, but in general almost any LHH will do better in YS. So the one LHH who goes to YS doesn’t suddenly become more valuable just because he switched parks. They could get just about any LHH and expect him to hit better for them than in a neutral park.