Tim Anderson Has Found a New Home

Reggie Hildred-USA TODAY Sports

With spring training games in full swing, the pressure is mounting for baseball’s remaining free agents to find homes. After all, nobody wants to miss out on the weather in Florida or Arizona this time of year, and Opening Day is just a few weeks away. Now Tim Anderson won’t have to fret. Anderson is heading to the Miami Marlins on a one-year, $5 million deal. With a clear path to the starting shortstop role, the 30-year-old will no doubt hope to re-enter free agency this winter having bounced back from his disappointing final season in Chicago.

Anderson’s fit in Miami is an interesting one. If he can stay healthy and return to his prior form, he could help to stabilize the shortstop position in Miami. But he also constitutes a risky addition to an already uncertain Marlins lineup. It’s not hard to imagine a scenario where neither Anderson nor Jazz Chisholm Jr. has an offensive bounce-back, Luis Arraez regresses, and Jake Burger’s contact overhaul proves to be just a flash in the pan; it could all go sideways pretty quickly. But if it goes right, this could be an exciting lineup. If nothing else, the top three of Arraez, Anderson, and Chisholm make for a very fun group. Still, in order for things to go right for Anderson, he needs to recover some of the BABIP skills that were a key reason for his success. Let’s focus on how exactly that might happen.

From 2019-2022, Anderson led the majors in batting average with a .318 mark. On a hit per plate appearance basis, nobody was more productive. Then in 2023, he cratered. Knee, shoulder, forearm, and neck injuries all contributed to the contact hitter dropping to a 60 wRC+ and -0.5 WAR in 123 games. Add to that concerns about his ability to stick at shortstop, and you have yourself a player who fell $3 million short of his median crowdsourced contract prediction. The shape of Anderson’s production through his successful four-year run was inherently volatile. He definitely possessed skills that propelled him to run above-average BABIPs, but the margin for error for that hitting style is razor thin; a handful of injuries and some loss of strength can make an otherwise productive profile almost unplayable.

Last week, I wrote about Anderson as part of my analysis of the variance among hitters with steep swings. The piece compared how hitters with steep Vertical Bat Angles (VBA), the angle of the barrel at contact relative to the ground, can have extremely different offensive profiles because of the other factors at play when it comes to measuring bat path. Despite an extremely steep VBA that is on par with some fly ball heavy hitters, Anderson had a league-leading groundball rate due to other limiting aspects of his swing. From 2021-2023, Anderson’s VBA was between the 96th and 97th percentile. It’s a trait he has had for a while, including in his successful offensive seasons. But as his VBA remained consistent, other factors changed.

Last season, Anderson made contact very deep in the zone, much more so than in the previous three years. With his inside-out swing, he has typically been able to consistently hit line drives even with deep contact points. That is a common skill among contact hitters because they tend to create a ton of depth in their bat path, which gets them on plane with the ball deep in the hitting zone. But like I said before, this style of hitting has razor thin margins. If a hitter starts making even deeper contact than usual, they can find themselves running a 60% groundball rate when they had typically hovered in the mid-50s.

In addition to contact point, you can look at other bat tracking components such as Attack Angle (AA) to understand what may have changed for Anderson. But before doing that, I want to note how AA and VBA differ from one another so that we might better understand their relationship. VBA is the angle of the barrel relative to the ground at the point of contact. AA is the angle of the path the barrel is on at contact. AA is an expression of the vertical direction the bat is moving in, while VBA is merely a snapshot at contact. Ideally, a player wants their barrel to be on an upward trajectory through contact because it directly affects launch angle. A player’s range of AA will depend on how much strength they have; the stronger they are, the higher their range of AA can be. However, it should always be positive.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

In the past, AA data hasn’t been publicly accessible, but luckily SwingGraphs just made some data available last week, so we don’t have to do as much guess work. It’s not raw AA data, but they did give percentile rankings from 2019-2023, which is just as useful. Here is a quick snapshot of how Anderson’s VBA and AA have trended:

Tim Anderson Attack Angle Percentile Rankings
Year VBA Rank AA Rank
2019 83.15 43.59
2021 96.35 16.11
2022 96.10 7.81
2023 97.39 1.16
SOURCE: SwingGraphs

Even as Anderson’s VBA has remained consistent in the last few seasons, his AA has continued to fall. As his AA has fallen, so has his xwOBACON. Last season, he posted his lowest xwOBACON since before his offensive breakout. Getting back to his best swing will require him reversing some concerning trends in his AA. Perhaps improved health might aid in him in that, but it’s not a given. To provide an example of another contact hitter with a similar swing style that has been consistent for multiple seasons in a row, look no further than Arraez, Anderson’s new middle infield mate. Last season, he ran a 95th percentile VBA with a 23rd percentile AA. In 2022, he ran an 82nd percentile VBA with a 41st percentile AA. The gap between Arraez’s AA and VBA in 2023 was significant, but not nearly as big as Anderson’s. In fact, no hitter with at least 225 batted balls in 2023 had a larger gap between their AA and VBA than Anderson. If he wants to make the most of his skills, he’ll have to get his swing working in a more positive direction through contact by increasing his AA back to his 2019-2021 levels. On top of seeing how Arraez has balanced these two measures, he already has his own blueprint for success.

I know this can be hard to conceptualize without actually seeing a highlight of Anderson’s swing path, but I like to simplify it like this: No matter how steep or flat your VBA is, it is ideal for any hitter to have their bat working up through contact. Flatter can be good depending on the height of the pitch or the hitter, but the level Anderson was at in 2023 is a launch angle distribution killer. Maybe Arraez’s approach can help Anderson. It’s always good to have a like-minded hitter in the same clubhouse. However, it’s been a multi-year trend of moving in the wrong direction for Anderson. It’ll take a significant physical adjustment for him to reverse it.

It’ll be exciting to see if Anderson can bounce back. If all goes well, he’ll play closer to his offensive ceiling and enter free agency with an opportunity to secure a multi-year deals, perhaps having contributed to unexpected playoff pushes in Miami.





Esteban is a contributing writer at FanGraphs. One of his main hobbies is taking dry hacks every time he sees a bat.

17 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Bernie Sanders
2 years ago

Thanks, Esteban. Very cool!

NATS FanMember since 2018
2 years ago

Miami is looking a little sneaky good.

MikeSMember since 2020
2 years ago

Everyone harps on Anderson’s BABIP, but the big problem last year was an utter lack of power. He had a career ISO of .162 his fi0.93rst 6 years, then 0.93 in 351 PA in 2022 and an abysmal .051 in 524 PA last year. Ninth worst in all MLB, minimum 100 PA and among regulars with 500 PA or more, only he and Myles Straw were under .086.

JimmyMember since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  MikeS

For a fun and not totally fair comparison, Jon Lester managed a .060 career ISO over 423 PAs.

Last edited 2 years ago by Jimmy
deerhavenMember since 2024
2 years ago

Is there any chance of investigating whether pitchers have adjusted to Anderson in a way that forces him into inferior contact angles? If so, does that suggest a way to compensate?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

This article makes me realize how aggressively mediocre this Marlins team is going to be. Luis Arraez, Jake Burger, Josh Bell, and Jazz Chisholm are the only position players who even look like they have a chance to be average regulars. Gonna have to get good health from the pitching staff (Perez, Luxardo, Garrett) to be any good.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Anderson’s body was wrecked, last year – he played over 100 games at SS on a sprained MCL.

IF he’s gotten himself right during the off-season, this could add a ton of mustard to their lineup.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

If he can hit even a little and play shortstop even a bit he’ll be better than the alternatives. That’s all the Marlins can realistically hope for…a nice 1 to 1.5 WAR guy. I suppose it’s possible he is better than that, but if so it’s more of a bonus than anything else.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

For sure…but I honestly can’t imagine trying to hit on a bad left knee, as a righty.

It makes complete intuitive sense that his LA and barrels plummeted this year.

EonADSMember since 2024
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Said this exact thing in the Marlins projections. This Marlins team has to be lucky and healthy to even approach a league-average offense. They were worse offensively than the Guardians last season, despite the Guardians dealing with injury and inconsistency for most of the year.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  EonADS

Depth Charts 6 of their top 9 players by playing time projected at 100 wRC+ or more, in fairness.

But yeah, their current status definitely makes Anderson a worthwhile gamble.

EonADSMember since 2024
2 years ago

Anderson’s upside value here is valuable, but the players projected for a 100 wRC+ or more all have at least some warts aside from Arraez. Some definitely more than others.

Burger has no OBP upside to speak of and is bad enough defensively that I’d be leery of him being a positive value at all this season (dead serious; his power is his only carrying tool). Bell is a mystery box. He could be anything (he could even be Josh Bell). Chisolm has yet to pair health and effectiveness and has a massive strikeout rate relative to his walk rate. Arraez is good, but isn’t likely to repeat his line from last year. Sanchez is likely a platoon-only bat. Jake Thompson is still in AA.

Also, it’s only five of them. Soler is with the Giants now. Gurriel is also gone, as the only other player projected for a wRC+ of 100 or more.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  EonADS

FGDC has De La Cruz at 100 on the dot.

EonADSMember since 2024
2 years ago

Apparently that changed since the team projections. Alright then.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  EonADS

Yeah, Steamer or BAT must be higher on him than ZiPS.

TheGarrettCooperFanClub
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I like how this comment juxtaposes with the first comment on this post.

RobWHartMember since 2022
2 years ago

TA allegedly went to Driveline in the 22-23 offseason and ruined his swing. Plus TA is an athlete more than a baseball player so I think he’s relied on his physical ability to overcome fundamental mistakes. As he ages this might not work so well. He was an exciting player for the Sox and I wish him the very best in Miami.