Top 15 Team Prospects & Positional Power Rankings

March 11, 2012

Positional Power Rankings
Intro – C – 1B – 2B – SS – 3B – CF – RF – LF – DH – SP(16-30) – SP(1-15) – RP
Top 100 Prospects \| Minor League Rankings
Top 100 Prospects – Minor League System Rankings
2012 Top 15 Prospects
AL East
Blue Jays	Top 15 Prospects
Orioles	Top 15 Prospects
Rays	Top 15 Prospects
Red Sox	Top 15 Prospects
Yankees	Top 15 Prospects
AL Central
Indians	Top 15 Prospects
Royals	Top 15 Prospects
Tigers	Top 15 Prospects
Twins	Top 15 Prospects
White Sox	Top 15 Prospects
AL West
Angels	Top 15 Prospects
Athletics	Top 15 Prospects
Mariners	Top 15 Prospects
Rangers	Top 15 Prospects
NL East
Braves	Top 15 Prospects
Marlins	Top 15 Prospects
Mets	Top 15 Prospects
Nationals	Top 15 Prospects
Phillies	Top 15 Prospects
NL Central
Astros	Top 15 Prospects
Brewers	Top 15 Prospects
Cardinals	Top 15 Prospects
Cubs	Top 15 Prospects
Pirates	Top 15 Prospects
Reds	Top 15 Prospects
NL West
Diamondbacks	Top 15 Prospects
Dodgers	Top 15 Prospects
Giants	Top 15 Prospects
Padres	Top 15 Prospects
Rockies	Top 15 Prospects

15 Comments

Oldest

Newest Most Voted

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

jon

10 years ago

The positional power rankings is missing catcher

also it would be pretty cool to average out all the positions and rank them from high to low, im just too lazy to do that

Bipmember

Reply to jon

As in “overall position player power rankings?” I think that would be a good idea. Someone else please go through the enormous effort so I can read that.

schmenkman

Reply to Bip

I did that here last weeK:

http://mobile.thegoodphight.com/2012/3/7/2851686/positional-power-rankings

Alex

I did that, though haven’t posted it online. Here are the total rankings:
1. Texas
2. NYY
(gap)
3. Boston
(big gap)
4. Philly
5. Tampa Bay
6. St. Louis
7. LAA
(gap)
8. Detroit
(gap)
9. Miami
10. Arizona
(gap)
11. Cincy
12. San Fran
13. Milwaukee
14. Atlanta
15. Cleveland
16. Minnesota
17. Toronto
18. ChiSox
19. Washington
(gap)
20. KC
21. Colorado
22. ChiCubs
(gap)
23. LAD
24. Baltimore
25. Mets
(big gap)
26. Pittsburgh
27. San Diego
28. Seattle
29. Oakland
(gap)
30. Houston

If you do this, you need to adjust DH because it is AL-only and starting pitcher because it is much more important than individual offensive positions.

Os Fan

Actually, what it’s really missing is relievers. But hopefully that will be here on Monday.

198d

Reply to Os Fan

How about a re-sort of the positional power rankings by team in addition to by position? It’d allow one to quickly see teams’ strengths and weaknesses and the like.

Dash

Here’s AL East. Ran out of time to do the others:

Blue Jays
C – 21
1B – 20
2B – 16
SS – 3
3B – 8
CF – 28
RF – 1
LF – 27
DH – 6
SP – 19

Orioles
C – 8
1B – 23
2B – 28
SS – 5
3B – 24
CF – 16
RF – 16
LF – 24
DH – 14
SP – 25

Rays
C – 27
1B – 13
2B – 3
SS – 25
3B – 1
CF – 5
RF – 12
LF – 9
DH – 7
SP – 3

Red Sox
C – 18
1B – 3
2B – 1
SS – 16
3B – 6
CF – 1
RF – 17
LF – 8
DH – 1
SP – 12

Yankees
C – 16
1B – 4
2B – 4
SS – 13
3B – 10
CF – 2
RF – 9
LF – 3
DH – 8
SP – 7

that’s great; thanks!