Top 21 Prospects: Washington Nationals
Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the world champion Washington Nationals. Scouting reports are compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as from our own (both Eric Longenhagen’s and Kiley McDaniel’s) observations. For more information on the 20-80 scouting scale by which all of our prospect content is governed you can click here. For further explanation of the merits and drawbacks of Future Value, read this.
All of the numbered prospects here also appear on The Board, a new feature at the site that offers sortable scouting information for every organization. That can be found here.
| Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carter Kieboom | 22.3 | MLB | SS | 2020 | 60 |
| 2 | Luis Garcia | 19.6 | AA | 2B | 2021 | 50 |
| 3 | Jackson Rutledge | 20.7 | A | RHP | 2022 | 45 |
| 4 | Wil Crowe | 25.3 | AAA | RHP | 2020 | 45 |
| 5 | Mason Denaburg | 20.4 | R | RHP | 2023 | 45 |
| 6 | Andry Lara | 17.0 | R | RHP | 2025 | 40+ |
| 7 | Eddy Yean | 18.5 | A- | RHP | 2022 | 40+ |
| 8 | Matt Cronin | 22.2 | A | LHP | 2022 | 40+ |
| 9 | Tim Cate | 22.2 | A+ | LHP | 2021 | 40 |
| 10 | Seth Romero | 23.7 | A | LHP | 2021 | 40 |
| 11 | Drew Mendoza | 22.2 | A | 1B | 2023 | 40 |
| 12 | Yasel Antuna | 20.1 | A | 3B | 2021 | 40 |
| 13 | Jeremy De La Rosa | 17.9 | R | RF | 2024 | 40 |
| 14 | Israel Pineda | 19.7 | A | C | 2022 | 40 |
| 15 | Joan Adon | 21.4 | A | RHP | 2022 | 40 |
| 16 | Roismar Quintana | 16.9 | R | RF | 2023 | 35+ |
| 17 | Jackson Cluff | 23.0 | A | SS | 2022 | 35+ |
| 18 | Raudy Read | 26.1 | MLB | C | 2020 | 35+ |
| 19 | James Bourque | 26.4 | MLB | RHP | 2020 | 35+ |
| 20 | Tyler Dyson | 22.0 | A- | RHP | 2023 | 35+ |
| 21 | Reid Schaller | 22.7 | A | RHP | 2021 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
Younger Potential Helium Types
Pablo Aldonis, LHP
Viandel Pena, 2B
Junior Martina, SS
Yoander Rivero, SS
Daniel Marte, CF
Todd Peterson, RHP
Justin Connell, RF
Leandro Miliani, RF
Mirton Blanco, RHP
We’ll try to plow through these pretty quickly as this system has more of this tier of prospect than most clubs. Aldonis turns 18 in March. He’s a medium-framed, 6-foot-1, 55 athlete with a smooth delivery and advanced feel for three pitches. He’s a long-term physical projection sleeper. Pena is a stocky switch-hitter with bat-to-ball skills and he hit .360 in the GCL last year. He’s a 50 runner and infield defender who’s about 5-foot-7. It’s softer contact right now, but the barrel feel is there. Martina is a native of Curaçao and a 19th rounder out of Western Oklahoma St who crushed the GCL after the draft. He takes big hacks and could be a power-over-hit middle infield utility type. Rivero is an 18-year-old, glove-first shortstop. Peterson pitched in relief at LSU and would sit 92-94 with a 55 cutter/slider and curveball at times. Washington tried him in a rotation last summer. Connell and Miliani are bat-to-ball 1B/LF sorts; they have promising contact skills but probably need to end up with premium hit tools to profile. Blanco is a 17-year-old who has been up to 98 but he’s very wild.
Major League Ready Depth
Kyle Finnegan, RHP
Ben Braymer, LHP
Yadiel Hernandez, 1B/OF
Jordan Mills, LHP
Steven Fuentes, RHP
Andrew Lee, RHP
Nick Raquet, LHP
Tres Barrera, C
Nick Banks, OF
Jacob Condra-Bogan, RHP
Finnegan was a high-priority minor league free agent whose stuff was up late in the year, and has been strong in the Dominican Winter League. He’s in the mid-90s with an average slider and split. Braymer is also on the 40-man and looks like a lefty pitchability swingman with a 55 breaking ball. Hernandez is a weird one. He signed out of Mexico at age 29 and is now 32, but he rakes (it’s hit over power due to lack of launch, but the contact is very hard) and because of when he signed, he acts as upper-level depth without occupying a 40-man spot this year, so he has sneaky trade value. Jordan Mills sits upper-80s with sink, his changeup is plus, and his slider above average. Fuentes has reached Double-A and has a tailing low-90s fastball and above average changeup. Lee and Raquet are overhand four-seam, curveball relief types. Barrera is on the 40-man right now and is a well-rounded third catcher. Banks has several above average tools (speed underway, raw power, arm strength) but the bat is below. Condra-Bogan is significant because he’s the only player on this whole list who arrived by trade (he came back from Kansas City in the Brian Goodwin deal), as everyone else was drafted or signed by Washington. JCB touches 100; he’s still working on a breaking ball.
A Complete Mess of Other Guys
Jake Irvin, RHP
Fausto Segura, RHP
Jakson Reetz, C
Orlando Ribalta, RHP
J.T. Arruda, SS
Jhonatan German, LHP
Gage Canning, CF
Alex Troop, LHP
Felix Taveras, RHP
Several of these guys signed late out of Latin America, around age 21. Segura (23, NYPL) has a chuck-it-past-you fastball up to 98, German (24, Double-A) has a mid-90s sinker, and Taveras (24, GCL) has been hurt for most of the past three years but was up to 97 with 2500 rpm on the heater. Irvin was up last spring, down last summer, then up again during instructs, where he pitched in relief. He’s 6-foot-6 and sits 93-96 when things are right with an average curveball. Reetz is another athletic, late-bloomer type who makes consistent hard contact; he’s probably a depth catcher. Ribalta is a big-bodied fastball/curveball relief prospect who was up to at least 96 at Miami Dade College the summer after the draft. Arruda was a sophomore-eligible 11th rounder. He’s a lefty-bat infielder with good feel to hit. Troop is a lanky, over-the-top lefty whose fastball has carry.
System Overview
This system is not very good for very good reasons. Prospects have either been traded away (Elvis Alvarado, Jesus Luzardo, Yohanse Morel, Kelvin Gutierrez, Daniel Johnson, Taylor Hearn, Sheldon Neuse, Dane Dunning) or they’ve graduated (Juan Soto, Victor Robles), and several draft picks have been lost as compensation for free agents because the Nats have been busy winning. And so the list above includes just one player who wasn’t originally signed or drafted by Washington; they haven’t been in prospect acquisition mode for a long time.
Once Carter Kieboom graduates off the list, would you rather have this entire system or the Vanderbilt Commodores? It’s probably pretty close.
To answer your question, I would rather have era-defining generational prospect Wander Javier than this entire system (with or without Kieboom) AND the Vanderbilt Commodores. It’s not close.
Okay man your thing with Wander Javier is almost worrying
You don’t even know the half of it. He’s pasted the exact same lines all over the internet.
Oh trust me I know
ha ha +1. You feel about Javier, how I feel about Cesar Puello.
Are you Wander Javier’s publicist or relative?
Or he’s somebody with Wander Javier’s shirtless poster up on his apartment’s bedroom wall.
Where can I buy that? Asking for a “friend”
I really want Wander Javier to succeed for no reason other than DC’s persistence.
I’m just going to say what everyone is afraid to tell you….Isaac Paredes >>>>> Wander Javier
Running Value Total:
ARI $279.5M
MIN $251.0
SFG $207.0
COL $142.5
WSN $118.0
BOS $82.0
A $1M increase from 2019’s report, due to the aforementioned winning/not accumulating prospects.
Boston has 12 additional prospects and is $36M behind the Nats. I don’t know what to do with this information, just thought it should be known.
I would take the Red Sox’s system over the Nationals’ system as currently constituted. The difference is likely because FV60’s are worth way, way more than depth in Craig’s valuations.
That’s completely what the difference is. I guess it just depends on your style; I would personally rather have a 60 than a bunch of lottery tickets, depending on the profile of that 60. I love Kieboom’s profile, so I’d gladly take him over the handful of 35+ prospects.
Yeah, gonna have to disagree. I’d take Kieboom and some filler over a bunch of middle tier looking guys and some filler.
1/10 of the time you hit he jackpot with someone like Kieboom and the other 9 times you lose.
I would take this system over BOS. I think that BOS system is particularly bad in terms of floors.
Answer to your question: I’ll take the rings, thanks.
Also, while I love the writeups here and think they’re awesome, I do have some slight concerns about two of the comps mentioned here.
First, comparing anyone’s “feel for contact” to Juan Soto is probably either dramatically overselling the person you’re comparing to Juan Soto or underselling Soto’s ability in that area. I realize that’s not all Soto brings to the plate, but it is probably his most freakish attribute.
Second, I don’t see how Jay Groome and Seth Romero are comparable at all. They both have concerns about makeup and injuries but with Groome it’s almost all the injuries and with Romero it’s almost all the makeup. Romero might have the worst makeup of any prospect I can remember, ever. Worse than Jesus Montero. Worse than Lastings Milledge. Maybe Ruben Rivera was this bad?
To be fair, you dont know those people, or their makeup. You only really know that they failed as big leaguers. I remember when “makeup concerns” chopped down Nolan Arenado’s prospect rankings for a year.
I’d agree that “makeup” gets used as a stand-in for a guy who doesn’t have the stereotypical gym-rat attitude, and that’s probably not always fair. But also, you don’t know about Ruben Rivera, do you? And Seth Romero has been suspended more times by his college and pro team than the rest of this list combined–probably more than all of the lists we’ve seen so far, put together.
Great point.
I imagine it was Arenado’s hot-dogging that turned people off. I know it rubs me the wrong way. That is quite a different thing than a player who gets suspended. It is unfortunate that it gets lumped together but I get it.
You use the word anyone too rashly. I think Wander Franco is going to show Juan Soto a thing or two about the “feel for contact”. (Soto is pretty K% prone)
Comps suck, but they are never going to go away. I completely agree with your points.
Did letting Sterling Sharp go make any sense to you at all?
What a terrible system. It’s almost like they graduated all their best talent and then won a World Series or something.
it says that in the intro.
At a point like this it is interesting to think how close they came to not winning a WS. The graduated talent did not win them the WS.
Rendon and Stras don’t count as graduated talent? Soto? Robles, Zimmerman, Turner? None of those guys helped win the World Series last year? Huh, alright.
Why does Jackson Cluff only have two grades? And Tyler Dyson has none?
I enjoy reading these. However, they tend to be marred by puzzling mistakes or inconsistencies–and as far as I know, no one has ever responded to the feedback on these, that we have provided in the comments. It makes me wonder how often these are rushed out the door, etc.
You have the option of starting your own website to point out these errors.
Is the comment section not for feedback? You are proposing a website for feedback as opposed to the comment section. This type of comment is regressive and it is unfortunately an overwhelming school of thought in this community. Its funny because this community wants to be about progress, but isn’t terribly interested in accountability or critical analysis. It is not a coincidence that more useful ideas used to come from this community which has become increasingly vested in protecting itself.
(removed due to redundancy)
It’s not just this community, it is an epidemic in online discourse to not actually *have* discourse, but to trash anyone and everyone for anything that questions anything. Allowing the trasher a moment of ill-gotten endorphins, because the trasher is lazy, can’t be bothered to think, or has to prop up their life by putting down others because their own life sucks.
Is making one sarcastic comment really ‘trashing’ someone? No, it isn’t. And maybe the people that respond to you just disagree with you, the same way you disagree with the column. Perhaps you could have listed some of the puzzling mistakes so that somebody could assess your argument? People that disagree with you aren’t necessarily lazy or any of the other insults you threw. Sometimes you just might be wrong!
Perhaps you could have read the comments on other posts in this series, to see examples of what I wrote.
Perhaps you could have read comments *on this very article*, to see examples of what I wrote.
Perhaps you could not nitpick a choice of words.
Perhaps you could realize you’re the only person who replied, and I replied only to you, for that reason.
Perhaps you *are* actually lazy, for the reasons I just wrote.
Actually, scratch the final “perhaps”. You *are* lazy. Congrats on sullying this board with you laziness.
People should feel free to post whatever comments they want (I suppose certain language shouldn’t be permitted). And just as OPs are free to criticize columns, others are free to criticize the OP. The OP stated that because authors here haven’t directly responded to his feedback or incorporated it into future analysis that some articles may be rushed out the door. It is an arrogant comment. He also provided no evidence of the ‘puzzling mistakes’ or ‘inconsistencies’ he claimed these articles tend to have. I don’t agree with all of the assessments – I am not a big fan of Kieboom – but I’m certainly wrong in many cases and just because I don’t understand or agree with the analysis doesn’t mean I interpret that to mean the articles are marred by mistakes.
rhdx–your type of dismissive snark shows your own ignorance, not mine.
Cute. The fact that you think you deserve direct feedback or are surprised that nobody particularly cares about some of your comments shows your extreme sense of entitlement. But, perhaps you are a baseball expert with opinions that have significant market value? If so, you can start your own website or some other entrepreneurial venture. The fact that you do not receive FG feedback on comments provides no evidence at all that the articles are ‘rushed out the door’. In general, I have appreciated how often authors here directly respond to comments and engage in conversation.
Neither Eric nor Kiley, as far as I have seen, have ever replied to any comments in these article. Which is fine, they don’t have to. I’m merely writing that as a presentation of fact in my defense against your lazy conclusionism.
Forget it. Everything you’re writing in reply indicates just how unwilling to think or research you actually are.
Do the world a favor: Learn how to read what someone’s actually writing, instead of projecting your own conclusions. Or log off and stop wasting smart people’s time.
What are they saying about Yasel Antuna? He has already spent a full season, 2018, playing in the Sally League which is, of course, a full season league so sending him to the NYP League seems like a giant step backwards.
Kieboom seems a lot like a AAAA player. I like the Nats and hope he does well, but I think he is overrated.
AAAA guys are usually fv 40s
The minors are historically thin. Everyone is overrated.
This is that youth revolution that everyone is always carrying on about in MLB. It will be interesting to see if MLB just continues to promote inferior talent and thin the minors even further. NFL went this route quite a ways back if you don’t think it can really happen. At some point wins and loyalty to fans get eclipsed by shareholders wants. At some point enough teams follow suit that truly inferior players (rookies) can now start and have enough success right away. This sounds like a crazy idea but if you think about it from a business perspective fans get excited about young players and we lower the bar accordingly (daily youngest X to Y headlines) and ownership gets to pay minimum salaries. I never thought I would see the minors this thin – a few more years of aggressive promotions would be unreal.
Our system seems thin! I just hope Carter Kieboom turns into the hitter this evaluation says he could become! We may need him for 600 ABs this summer!
With news that Josh Donaldson might sign with the Nationals, I imagine that unless the Nationals move Kieboom to second base he’d be hard pressed to get 600 AB. I, too, would like to see what he can actually do for a full season. Robles got that chance, Kieboom should too.
Maybe not 600, but Kieboom will probably get close if he makes the club and doesn’t stink. It could just be all around the diamond. Even if the Nats sign Donaldson, they almost certainly will also have Zim back, and then you’re looking at a pretty old set of infielders apart from Turner. And it would make sense for him to be Turner’s backup if he earns an opening day job so they can add a LH power bat. There would be no need for a replacement-level guy like Difo or Sanchez.
Good to see the Pearson comp on Rutledge as that is what I immediately thought of. Pearson is a weird one though as he has shown no ability to stay on a mound but aside from that things have gone best-case scenario. Maybe Pearson’s best-case is flashing elite stuff from a distance that will never translate to a meaningful role. Its an interesting type of spec for sure.
The lack of Ks on Crowe are very concerning. It makes me wonder if the stuff isn’t going overrated. Ks are related to walks and when you consider that he walks guys his K rate is absolutely pitiful. I love to see guys succeed without typical stuff and results but he doesn’t look like a big leaguer based on the numbers. Roark seems more like a fictional ceiling than a likely outcome.
Denaburg sounds like close to a non-prospect in my book. How long can one coast on an amateur performance? He is the best example I can think of in why we should move past the HS showings as quickly as possible. He seems like a guy that has shown no indication that he will ever be healthy. Once you move past that you start to get into the horrid command and the reality that he would have to make many changes to stay healthy and throw strikes. I get that he was an exciting kid at one point, but at this point he has done nothing. I get the feeling that some people got looks at him on his best day as a kid and that has carried his entire career up to this point. I get that he could re-emerge at some point but this is a couple years in a row of overvaluing him.
Seth Romero – is there a more interesting prospect? I would argue that he had top of the draft talent, not top 10-ish. It sounds to me like there is TOR potential but of course there a million reasons he won’t get there. I would have him 3rd or 4th in this system despite his volatility. I am very much hoping he actually plays games this year. Sure his career is probably really close to being completely over with but it would be fun to see him have a good year. Of course, even if he ever really breaks out he will likely have tons of assorted issues which would be fun to follow. Interestingly, I also lump him with Groome but not for makeup – more based on multiple lost years and the potential of recovering elite stuff. Another positive is that these guys were not rushed back. I don’t think it is fair to anyone to use them in the same sentence as Romero for makeup issues – the man couldn’t even stay eligible for the powerhouse that is Houston Baseball. Can you imagine how out of control things much have been for a program like that to give a sure-fire first rounder, Friday starter the boot?
Why would Mendoza be a platoon player? I can see him either being a big leaguer or not but I don’t know why he would platoon. I could see him being a masher or just a bust but a part-time role doesn’t look particularly likely to me. I wouldn’t be surprised if his body doesn’t hold up but he at least is an intriguing offensive package.
Are traits typical of top HS pitchers just everything being overrated? Because that is the impression that I am getting. Perhaps we shouldn’t take their stuff so seriously as you know it won’t translate.
I’d like to set the record straight. Jackson has had 1 hip surgery right after his year at Arkansas, not 2. Lot more to the story, I’ll share some day….
Thanks, Dad