Top 27 Prospects: Kansas City Royals
Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the Kansas City Royals. Scouting reports are compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as from our own (both Eric Longenhagen’s and Kiley McDaniel’s) observations. For more information on the 20-80 scouting scale by which all of our prospect content is governed you can click here. For further explanation of the merits and drawbacks of Future Value, read this.
All of the numbered prospects here also appear on The Board, a new feature at the site that offers sortable scouting information for every organization. That can be found here.
| Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seuly Matias | 20.6 | A+ | RF | 2022 | 45+ |
| 2 | Brady Singer | 22.7 | A+ | RHP | 2020 | 45+ |
| 3 | Daniel Lynch | 22.4 | A+ | LHP | 2021 | 45+ |
| 4 | MJ Melendez | 20.4 | A+ | C | 2022 | 45 |
| 5 | Nick Pratto | 20.5 | A+ | 1B | 2022 | 45 |
| 6 | Khalil Lee | 20.8 | AA | RF | 2020 | 45 |
| 7 | Nicky Lopez | 24.1 | AAA | SS | 2019 | 45 |
| 8 | Jackson Kowar | 22.5 | A+ | RHP | 2021 | 45 |
| 9 | Kris Bubic | 21.7 | A | LHP | 2021 | 40+ |
| 10 | Kyle Isbel | 22.1 | A+ | RF | 2021 | 40+ |
| 11 | Richard Lovelady | 23.8 | MLB | LHP | 2019 | 40+ |
| 12 | Meibrys Viloria | 22.2 | MLB | C | 2019 | 40 |
| 13 | Daniel Tillo | 22.8 | A+ | LHP | 2021 | 40 |
| 14 | Scott Blewett | 23.0 | AAA | RHP | 2020 | 40 |
| 15 | Yefri Del Rosario | 19.6 | A | RHP | 2021 | 40 |
| 16 | Kelvin Gutierrez | 24.6 | AAA | 3B | 2019 | 40 |
| 17 | Emmanuel Rivera | 22.8 | AA | 3B | 2021 | 40 |
| 18 | Foster Griffin | 23.7 | AAA | LHP | 2019 | 40 |
| 19 | Gerson Garabito | 23.7 | AA | RHP | 2020 | 40 |
| 20 | Carlos Hernandez | 22.1 | A | RHP | 2022 | 40 |
| 21 | Yohanse Morel | 18.6 | R | RHP | 2024 | 35+ |
| 22 | Austin Cox | 22.0 | A | LHP | 2020 | 35+ |
| 23 | Brewer Hicklen | 23.2 | A+ | CF | 2021 | 35+ |
| 24 | Omar Florentino | 17.5 | R | SS | 2024 | 35+ |
| 25 | D.J. Burt | 23.5 | AA | 2B | 2020 | 35+ |
| 26 | Josh Staumont | 25.3 | AAA | RHP | 2019 | 35+ |
| 27 | Janser Lara | 22.7 | A | RHP | 2021 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
Young Guys Who Might Pop
Rylan Kaufman, LHP
Wilmin Candelario, SS
Jeison Guzman, SS
Maikel Garcia, SS
Raymond Lopez, CF
Anderson Paulino, RHP
Rubendy Jaquez, 3B
Kaufman was a $722,000 JuCo 12th rounder who can really spin a curveball (2750 rpm average in pro ball). He’s still just 19, has a lanky frame, and already bumps 92, 93 on occasion. Candelario is a balletic defensive shortstop who adds little flourishes to just about everything he does. The entire offensive package is below-average right now, but we’ll see what happens with the frame. Speaking of waiting on the frame, Guzman is now 20 and has finally started to fill out in a positive way. He’s going to strike out a lot, but has a chance to rise into the main portion of the list this year. Garcia is a smooth, rangy defender and has a good frame but he’s very weak with the bat right now. Lopez looked intriguing (above average runner, gap pop, feel for center field) before he was seriously injured in 2017, and then he had a bad 2018. He’s a bounce back candidate. Paulino is a strong-bodied 20-year-old who sits 93-97. His upper-80s slider has vertical break, but it’s blunt and lacks that bat-missing bite. Realistically, he’s a developmental bullpen piece, but there are some late-inning components in place if that slider gets tighter. Jaquez is 20 and has above-average bat speed.
Potential Role-Playing Arms
Jonathan Bowlan, RHP
Zach Haake, RHP
Arnaldo Hernandez, RHP
Andres Machado, RHP
Bowlan’s stuff has been all over the place, sometimes even during the same start. He was 89-95 during his first outing and could be a sinker/slider reliever, but the Royals have done fairly well with sinkerballers lately. Haake will show plus stuff for an inning or two before his command starts to waivers. He could be a mid-90s, plus slider reliever. Hernandez is 23 and could be a changeup-centric reliever if his fastball ticks up in relief. Machado is a mid-90s/cutter reliever without a pitch that will obviously miss bats.
Bench Types
Michael Gigliotti, OF
Gabriel Cancel, 2B
Bubba Starling, CF
Blake Perkins, CF
Kort Peterson, 1B
Juan Carlos Negret, RF
Cristian Perez, SS
Gigliotti was a plus runner with feel for the zone who was a 40 runner this spring, his first back from an ACL tear. If the speed returns, he’s a likely bench outfielder. Cancel is a career .265 hitter, is at Double-A, and could be an infield utility bat. We still think Bubba Starling, who runs well and plays a fine center field but has never found a good swing foundation, plays in the big leagues. Perkins is now 23 and still lacks physicality, but he can really run and play center. Peterson is a corner guy with some contact skills. Negret has plus power but little feel for contact. Perez is an instinctive defender with some feel to hit.
System Overview
We spent a lot of effort trying to discern what the Royals were trying to do with their 2018 draft bonus pool, which was the biggest in baseball last year, because it was going to have such a profound impact on the rest of the draft. They ended up with all college value picks (and, eventually, Rylan Kaufman), which tasted disappointingly vanilla at the time, but now looks like a clear-headed approach as it yielded five of the org’s top 10 prospects and several other interesting ones, our Bowlan skepticism be damned.
This is a top-to-bottom reset, with maybe four or five players on the big league roster who are realistic parts of the next competitive Royals team, at the same that there aren’t any top 100 prospects currently in the system. The big wave of talent that represents the crest of the rebuilding wave is at Hi-A Wilmington right now, and whomever becomes the second pick in the upcoming draft (be it Adley Rutchsmann or Andrew Vaughn, the two players we think are the most likely to go first or second based on talent) should be advanced enough to join them pretty quickly, so long as the Royals don’t take a high schooler. Whoever the pick, barring a sizable leap from one of the 45 FV players on this list, the new 2019 draftee will immediately be the club’s No. 1 prospect. Perhaps, if enough of that wave actually pans out, they’ll be good again sooner than the overall quality of the farm indicates.
We also have them linked to outfielder Erick Pena, who is No. 4 among our 2019 July 2 prospects at the time of publication. So there’s some more exciting talent coming. But right now, the most important parts of the org are the amateur scouting and player dev staff who might help Kansas City create tradable big leaguers.
Not even 1 player with a 50 FV. This is going to be a very long rebuild for the Royals. Very cool!
Those grades are subjective. I have a feeling that if some of these players were in the Braves or Rays systems they would be at least 50s.
Why? You think the authors here have an actual bias against teams? Any proof of that?
Dan Szymborski makes no secret of the fact he enjoys antagonizing Royals fans and taking shots at the org. Which is, whatever, but also seems kind of petty and dumb for someone who wants to be taken seriously as a writer/analyst.
I dont think there is specific biases but the larger analytics community, not just fangraphs, does seem to give certain teams the benefit of the doubt a lot more than others though. Even when its an objectively questionable/bad move. When the A’s do something strange its often framed as “maybe they know something we dont” and when say KC does something strange its “lol, the Royals are being dumb as always”
Dayton Moore built one of the best farm systems ever seen and went to back to back world series just a handful of years ago. Yet the general feeling around here is that it was all luck and the Royals have no idea what they are doing in this rebuild. And hey, that might turn out to be right and maybe this goes horribly. but you would think that recent history would have earned Moore and the Royals a bit more leeway/credibility.
(heads for higher ground to avoid the tsunami of downvotes coming. lol)
I’ve just spent about five months ragging on the Indians for their OF situation and for doing what the Rockies do.
umm…cool?
That doesnt change the fact that you admittedly (proudly even) actively seek to annoy a specific team’s fanbase. Which might be acceptable for @randominternetblogger or a dedicated internet troll but I tend to hold Fangraphs to a higher standard. Largely because they have always been a higher standard. To me, it just undercuts everything you write and lowers the discourse.
But I can only speak for myself. Obviously it works for you.
The specific example of the Royals is weird, because I don’t think anyone really has biases against them–they deserve a good chunk (maybe all) of the criticism they get on these pages.
That said, there are definitely teams that get a pass. The Rays are probably the prime example of this. The Rays have been making strange personnel moves for about two or three years now, and a bunch of us are sitting there, trying to read through the lines and figure out what they are seeing. I think there is some value in trying to figure out why the Rays are doing what they’re doing, but it doesn’t change the fact that many of their moves are bad ones. (And yes, I know they’re 12-4, but that doesn’t owe much to their weird moves).
They also won 90 games last year and possess a farm system that is universally (not just here) regarded as one of the best. I think they are doing something right and the majority of their moves the last few years look good so far
The Rays have a great development system and have been insanely lucky with the Pham and Archer trades. They do lots of things right, too.
I think it is pretty clear when you read the work. Everyone has favorites. Go ahead and dismiss it if you want. I feel confident in my statement that you are free to ignore. This isn’t science – there isn’t going to be any proof of anything. Choose what you believe. It’s what we all do.
Its not like these grades are foolproof. the difference between a 45+ guy and a 50 is subjective at best and non existent if you want to be cynical.
The Royals have eight 45-45+ guys and presumably will be adding to the high end (50+ FV) with the second overall pick this year, and likely another high pick in 2020. Plus whatever they get if they decide to deal Merrifield (which they absolutely should do). So they really are not that far off, relatively speaking. They are kind of just going about it in a weird way.
this is by no means an endorsement that this strategy will actually work
They aren’t trading Merrifield. They are under the impression that he’ll be part of the next wave and Moore has stated that he wants the team to always be competitive. Trading your best player, even if it makes slam dunk sense, prevents the latter.
Internally they see their window starting to open in ~2021, which is flawed to me, but it’s what they’ve said.
Only 3 teenagers among their top 27 and none higher than Yefri Del Rosario at #15???!!! That strikes me as a very low percentage.
Just checking a couple of teams to confirm. Indians had 30 prospects listed and 16 of them were in their teens. Yankees has 38 listed, and 21 were in their teens. Brewers had 34 listed and 13 were teenagers.
So yeah….
I think this is right; the Royals are did something really weird by targeting all those college arms, but they got such good value at those slots it’s hard to be too hard on them. Liberatore and Jordyn Adams disappeared with the two picks prior. I would have gone for Nolan Gorman, but Singer looks like he could be fine.
What I do wonder about is the Whit Merrifield thing; this guy was clearly their best trade chip. Maybe they figured no one was going to give up much for a 2nd baseman when there was a huge glut of them on the market.
I think there’s enough mitigating factors to not second-guess them too much. The rhetoric is more alarming than the actual moves. Based on the rhetoric, I wonder if the Royals braintrust thinks that because they somehow managed to defy the odds and have a good run with the Gordon/Cain/Moustakas/Hosmer core and iffy starting pitching that they can make it work with lots of low-ceiling but higher-probability college arms. But based on the results, it’s hard to argue with what they’re doing so far. They don’t have a lot of attractive trade chips left, either.
They are certainly banking on the “next wave” being that Wilmington roster of Melendez, Matias, Pratto, Singer, Lynch, and Kowar, then with Lee in AA and Lopez in AAA.
It’s not hard to see it being a solid strategy IF (if I could double capitalize something I would) all these guys work out, or at least most of them.
The problem is of course that 1) they all won’t work out and 2) right now these guys are at best fringe top 100ers and at worst #4/5 starters and role players mostly (assuming they don’t bust outright).
If you look at the 2011 org (the Royals wave template) it was (using BA’s list):
#8 Hosmer
#9 Moustakas
#10 Myers
#18 Lamb
#19 Montgomery
#51 Colon
#68 Duffy
#69 Odorizzi
#83 Dwyer
We can count what, 3(Hosmer/Moustakas/Myers)? 4(+Duffy)? 5 (+Odorizzi)? worked out? So anywhere from 33-55% and those were top 100 guys.
The current 8 or so are a mixture of 40+, 45, and 45+ prospects, a far cry from the prior wave, who didn’t pan out as well as I think we expected from one of the better systems in recent history (no one on that list ended up being anything perhaps better than an above average regular).
This is all true, although it’s notable that the two best players on those teams were easily Gordon and Cain. Gordon was a 2005 draft selection (two years before Moustakas, three before Hosmer), and Cain was an afterthought in the Greinke trade. I don’t know that you can count on guys like Lorenzo Cain coming out of nowhere like that, but Gordon was the #2 pick in the draft.
Alright, now that we’ve got that out of the way, I sort of agree with you. Part of the reason for this is that they haven’t been picking at the top of the draft for close to a decade. For better or worse, they’ll have that shot going forward. The issue, of course, is that now that we have clearly established that this “wave” isn’t going to be big enough is that it is doubtful they’re going to be able to keep these guys around long enough to keep up with the group coming in from the 2019/2020/2021 drafts (they’ll be terrible at least for that long).
I think it’s pretty obvious that from that perspective, they would have been better off with HS players than college arms…but they did actually get very good value for those picks. At some point the team just needs to take the best player available, and you could make a plausible argument that they did last year.
I mostly agree with the value picks. It’s hard to not go after those (though I’m not convinced Singer was a value pick really and I would have preferred Gorman) given that they SHOULD be higher floor-ish guys with low variance but it also feels like that loading up on those picks would maybe be better for a team that is further along the rebuild timeline.
The Royals don’t need a bunch of #4/5 guys, they probably should be looking for high variance potential stars because 1) they aren’t likely to sign those guys in free agency and 2) they need them in a weak system.
I think it makes sense to grab one of them, like Lynch, after their first pick but I don’t know about spending significant draft capital on value over growth.
On the other hand, the Royals have been pretty poor at developing first round picks for almost a decade, so maybe these types of guys can help buck that trend a bit if they don’t need wholesale refinement.
This is going to depend a lot on what you think of Singer. Some people had him as a Top 5 pick. I think the biggest difference is that some people think the slider is a plus pitch, while others think it could top out as average if everything breaks right (ha).
“but Singer looks like he could be fine”
This reminds me of those “Just ok is not ok” commercials that are on all the time now.
Where would Elvis Luciano have placed if he was still in the system?
He was rated a 35+ which would put him between #21-28 for the Royals.
Carlos Hernandez’s Curveball is not listed despite being talked about in the summary.
Seuly Matias joins the #RGWMRP list.
I don’t think that a teen posting elite EV is as significant as it may seem. If he is so burly and swings so hard, where are the gains going to come from? In all likelihood, he will have to tone everything down to have any chance at a successful career.
I would gladly welcome a study on this, but I can imagine that the better EV at whatever age suggests continued/further success.
It depends what you mean by success. I think we have been playing the EV game long enough to understand that EV is not success, but it can contribute to it. Personally, I don’t get overly excited by early physical development – the best players keep developing.
Mattias is currently listed at 6’3″ and 198 lbs. So he isnt really that “burly”. There is likely a decent amount of filling out to come.
He’s heavier than his listed weight, I’m very sure of it.
Here he is next to Nelson Cruz and this is from June of 2017…almost two years ago
Since I started reading FG about eight years ago they haven’t had a very good record of projections on the Royals, likely because the Royals are forced into an atypical construction model for modern teams. Royals don’t fit into FG’s box and FG writers have become their own set of conventional wisdom. Kiley at least puts some effort into the analysis but putting Seuly at the top shows that he thinks he’s looking at the Yankees or Red Sox in their high school sized parks and federal reserve sized money instead of the Royals on the Great Plains with a small market and lousy TV contract.
What exactly does location, market size, TV contracts, and money have to do with which Royals prospect is best?
When did “average regular” become a 45 FV instead of 50? Both Lopez and Lee are described this way.