Top 36 Prospects: Cincinnati Reds
Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the Cincinnati Reds. Scouting reports are compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as my own observations. For more information on the 20-80 scouting scale by which all of our prospect content is governed, you can click here. For further explanation of the merits and drawbacks of Future Value, read this.
All of the numbered prospects here also appear on The Board, a resource the site offers featuring sortable scouting information for every organization. It can be found here.
| Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tyler Stephenson | 23.8 | AA | C | 2020 | 50 |
| 2 | Hunter Greene | 20.8 | A | RHP | 2022 | 50 |
| 3 | Jose Garcia | 22.1 | A+ | SS | 2021 | 50 |
| 4 | Nick Lodolo | 22.3 | A | LHP | 2022 | 50 |
| 5 | Jonathan India | 23.4 | AA | 3B | 2021 | 45+ |
| 6 | Lyon Richardson | 20.3 | A | RHP | 2023 | 45+ |
| 7 | Michael Siani | 20.9 | A | CF | 2023 | 45 |
| 8 | Tyler Callihan | 19.9 | R | 3B | 2024 | 40+ |
| 9 | Tony Santillan | 23.1 | AA | RHP | 2020 | 40+ |
| 10 | Rece Hinds | 19.7 | R | RF | 2024 | 40+ |
| 11 | Stuart Fairchild | 24.2 | AA | CF | 2020 | 40+ |
| 12 | Tejay Antone | 26.5 | AAA | RHP | 2020 | 40 |
| 13 | Joel Kuhnel | 25.3 | MLB | RHP | 2020 | 40 |
| 14 | Allan Cerda | 20.5 | R | RF | 2022 | 40 |
| 15 | Ivan Johnson | 21.6 | R | 2B | 2023 | 40 |
| 16 | Graham Ashcraft | 22.3 | R | RHP | 2022 | 40 |
| 17 | TJ Friedl | 24.8 | AA | CF | 2020 | 40 |
| 18 | Jared Solomon | 22.9 | A+ | RHP | 2021 | 40 |
| 19 | Noah Davis | 23.1 | R | RHP | 2022 | 40 |
| 20 | Packy Naughton | 24.1 | AA | LHP | 2021 | 40 |
| 21 | Vladimir Gutierrez | 24.7 | AAA | RHP | 2020 | 40 |
| 22 | Jameson Hannah | 22.8 | A+ | LF | 2021 | 40 |
| 23 | Miguel Medrano | 22.4 | R | RHP | 2021 | 35+ |
| 24 | Ryan Hendrix | 25.4 | AA | RHP | 2020 | 35+ |
| 25 | Jose Salvador | 20.7 | R | LHP | 2022 | 35+ |
| 26 | Eric Yang | 22.2 | R | C | 2023 | 35+ |
| 27 | Jacob Heatherly | 22.0 | A | LHP | 2022 | 35+ |
| 28 | Francis Peguero | 22.8 | R | RHP | 2022 | 35+ |
| 29 | Mariel Bautista | 22.6 | A | CF | 2021 | 35+ |
| 30 | Michel Triana | 20.5 | R | 1B | 2024 | 35+ |
| 31 | Jose De Leon | 27.8 | MLB | RHP | 2020 | 35+ |
| 32 | Aneurys Zabala | 23.4 | A+ | RHP | 2021 | 35+ |
| 33 | Debby Santana | 19.7 | R | 3B | 2023 | 35+ |
| 34 | Danny Lantigua | 21.2 | R | RF | 2023 | 35+ |
| 35 | Luis Mey | 18.9 | R | RHP | 2023 | 35+ |
| 36 | Yan Contreras | 19.3 | R | SS | 2024 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
Sleeper Arms I Like
Reiver Sanmartin, LHP
Jhon De Jesus, RHP
James Marinan, RHP
Sanmartin has been traded a few times (Texas to New York to Cincinnati). He’s a little low-slot lefty whose tailing fastball and sweeping slider dovetail from one another in an effective way. He has a shot to end up with plus command and make a roster. De Jesus is a stallion with arm strength — 91-96, touch 98 — and 30 control/feel. Marinan has pedigree as a sinker/slider starter prospect. He was up to 95 in some starts and 88-92 in others.
College-Aged Outfielders with a Carrying Tool
Quin Cotton, LF
Fidel Castro, RF
TJ Hopkins, CF
Michael Beltre, LF
Lorenzo Cedrola, CF
Andy Sugilio, CF
Cotton was in the third round mix for some clubs coming into his junior spring at Grand Canyon. Scouts hoped a swing change might unlock dormant raw power, and as Cotton tried to make one, he came undone and had a bad year. Now he’s in an org that has lately had some success making swing changes. He has 55 pull power. Castro’s frame is still really projectable for a 21-year-old and he has natural low-ball lift. He’s got a shot to grow into power yet. Hopkins is a senior sign who hit .295/.371/.463 at South Carolina. Beltre is 25, so assume he’s getting his doctorate. He’s physical and fast and plays really hard, but his swing just doesn’t work. Cedrola and Sugilio are speedsters without viable strength.
Up-the-Middle Depth
Miguel Hernandez, SS
Hendrik Clementina, C
Jose Tello, C
James Free, C
Hernandez can still pick it and make an average amount of contact, but hasn’t filled out like I thought he might when he was 19. The other three are big-bodied catchers with power. Free signed for $125,000 as an undrafted free agent.
Young Dominicans
Braylin Minier, SS
Esmil Torres, SS
Junior Tamares, CF
Jose Acosta, 3B
This is an especially relevant group because for over a decade, Cincinnati’s most prominent international talent acquisitions have typically come from Cuba. It’s been the Reds’ M.O. to avoid the teenage demographic and instead sign older Cuban players when they hit the market later in the process. Most of the 2019 17-year-old class had verbal deals long before new International Scouting Director Trey Hendricks arrived, as he told the Cincinnati Enquirer’s Bobby Nightengale last July. It makes sense then that they ended up with Triana, who hit the market at age 19, and Minier, who popped so late that any info on him is hard to come by since clubs had most of their money committed and had stopped scouting 2019’s. Baseball America has noted that Minier was trained by Patrick Guerrero, who used to work under Reds International Crosschecker Bob Engle in Los Angeles and Seattle.
Torres was in the DSL last year. He has a medium frame, good defensive footwork, and downward-cutting swing from both sides of the plate. Tamares is a plus runner with some feel to hit. He needs to get stronger. Acosta has a good frame and crude bat control.
System Overview
This system looks rough in large part due to a combination of graduations (Nick Senzel, Aristides Aquino) and trades (Taylor Trammell, Josiah Gray) made with an eye toward competing for a playoff spot in a strong division.
The international program seems inclined to re-engage with a significant portion of the market it had previously avoided. The Reds also seem more inclined than other clubs to draft older high schoolers, and an unusually high number of their slugging corner bats have among the most reckless approaches in all of baseball. The current pillars of the org’s scouting and player development haven’t been in place for very long and 2020 is a key year for understanding the org’s new tendencies as they reveal them. It was hard not to write this list with the org’s new pitching development processes in mind, as Pitching Coordinator Kyle Boddy’s body of research and thinking is basically available online.
Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.
Yeesh, Stephenson might be the only prospect in this system I like right now. Glad to see he got the top spot. Santillan’s step back was disappointing, thought he’d be getting MLers out in 2019
JMO so it’s sacred, Greene is one of the most overrated draft prospects I can remember. Who drafts a HS RH without a breaking ball at #1? Maybe it was part of some long term league agenda to get more HS talent working for free (sorry, working on that super valuable bachelors too) under the NCAA
Tyler Kolek.
Greene didn’t go at #1
Oops
Thanks Eric! Wow, the Reds system sure looks “iffy”. I think Lodolo could surprise and I’m rooting for Greene to stay healthy.
This is the worse the system has looked in years. Top of system is similar to Texas’ with a couple 50’s & 45+’s stacked near each other. Way, way prefer that group to Texas’.
The 50 FV on Jose Garcia seems surprisingly low for the profile and results. I’m not a Reds fan, so no bias there. What he did in the FSL is impressive in league context, and he led the league in doubles with a frame that could lead to some of those being over-the-wall in a year or two. He’s also most definitely not 6’2″, 175lbs – he’s grown and is bigger than that.
Maybe I’m committing the cardinal sin of thinking about small sample size spring training results and letting them seem into my bias, but dude looked like a DUDE this spring. Not like a good prospect, but like a DUDE. Meanwhile, when Barry Larkin wants to rave about someone’s intangibles, I’m inclined to listen – all the reports this spring were that he’s a high-IQ ballplayer with a very athletic body.
He seems to be shaping up as more than an “average every day regular” – he’s heading to 55+ and 60 isn’t out of the question.
AA is arguably the hardest transition
For sure, on the field. Although, if Garcia were a college draftee in 2019 with the skills he’s shown thus far, and maxed out in A+ in his draft year, I’d suspect he’d be a little higher than a 50 with his profile on both sides of the ball. Just a guess. I think that Garcia’s transition to pro ball and a new country was so difficult in 2018 that he started 2019 out-of-mind for many. Guys like that climb slowly, and I get it – you want to see it for more than just one season, in addition to seeing how they handle the transition to AA. But he was so darn good in the FSL and then again in spring training that it feels like even some of the helium he’s getting isn’t enough. At spring training, he wasn’t “hey there’s a cool young prospect for the future” good; he was “holy crap who is that DUDE” good.
One thing to know about Eric is that he is pretty conservative about changing grades on someone. So if he has an FV40 on someone and they blow up, he’s not going to make him an FV55. Sometimes guys have hot streaks and Eric plays it conservative on that. It drives me crazy, but he’s probably right as much as he is wrong on this (compared to other evaluators).
With respect to the performance–a 131 wRC+ for his age and level is fine, but it’s not a jaw-dropping line or anything. If the reports on his defense are right then he’s probably a major leaguer of some kind unless the bat doesn’t develop much and he can’t crack a wRC+ of 70 in the majors. But there’s also a non-zero chance of that happening. I think he’s graded right.
All fair points. And I appreciate that many (most?) evaluators are conservative about changing grades… I am the same way in my profession under very different circumstances. It takes compelling evidence to change an existing view. And I shouldn’t be “arguing” (which I’m not) about a 50FV grade on a player that hasn’t made it to AA yet.
To be fair, Garcia’s 2019 numbers are helped by a bonkers month of August at the end of the season. But it still feels like much of Garcia’s rankings come from old views of him and not where he is now. He’s not 6’2, he’s at least 6’4. Reportedly, all of his batted ball data showed tremendous improvement in 2019, in the FSL, in a pitcher’s league, compared to 2018 when he shook off a year of rust from not playing while also transitioning to a new country.
Then you get quotes like this, published by C. Trent Rosencrans in The Athletic:
“One National League scout from outside the organization agreed, saying that his team’s internal metrics on Garcia’s batted ball profile spit out a comparison to a 21-year-old Nolan Arenado.”
No, I’m not putting an Arenado comp on the bat. Just saying that’s not a comment to take lightly from a writer that I like.
And then you get all the Reds talk of his maturity, unflappable nature, ability to learn and make adjustments, on top of his athleticism, etc….
Maybe I’ll just close with this. Geraldo Perdomo, Brice Turang, Xavier Edwards and Tyler Freeman are all 50FV middle infielders who haven’t made it to AA yet. Andres Gimenez and Luis Garcia are 50FV middle infielders with significant AB at AA. And there are lower minors guys with 50FV tags on them – Liover Pegeuro, etc. For my money, I’d put Perdomo atop that list in terms of long-term value. But I’d take Jose Garcia over any of the rest in terms of complete skillset and ability to be more than just an average, every-day player. Just my opinion.
I don’t mean to belabor the point, but Arenado has never run a K% (majors/minors) as high as Garcia did in A+ last year. Garcia’s not at a red flag problem level, but it’s also not great. He certainly has a lot of upside, absolutely. If you gave me only one stat for low minors performance, pick K%, hands down. The big pile of doubles is a positive indicator but doesn’t completely mitigate K%. Totally a wait for AA transition scenario. Young enough/defensive spectrum positive enough where he can need two tries at AA and still make it.
Me either 🙂 Agree on K rate, for sure. I mean, I wouldn’t pick any one stat but I agree that it’s very important. And small sample size and all, I got it, but the K rate dropped to 18% last July, then 10% in August, then 10% in 30 spring training AB’s. I’d bet he settles in closer to 15% than 20% which is a huge difference.
I also am willing to make manual brain adjustments for Cuban players. In other words, when you say “low minors performance,” I am basically tossing out 2018. Coming from Cuba to the US is a completely different situation than the Dominican Republic, etc. Garcia sat a whole year out and then went to Dayton, Ohio to play A ball. There’s a reason a lot of teams don’t put Cuban players in cold-weather locations for their first assignment…
Either way, this is a strong-fielding, 20 HR/20 SB shortstop. I can live with a 15-18% K rate, but I’d like to see the BB rate go up. The batted ball profile tells me he’s growing into his power.
And the fact that I’m writing this much about it should not be read as any desire to be argumentative, but rather an indication of how much I miss baseball right now.
“And the fact that I’m writing this much about it should not be read as any desire to be argumentative, but rather an indication of how much I miss baseball right now.”
Same!!!!
Eric, thanks for all the great content. Only 4 teams left!
I noticed several things this spring.
1. As pointed out by Tomerafan Garcia was a stud this spring. I was expecting big things this summer and him being a top 10 prospect next fall. Until Stevenson shows some power I have Garcia as my top prospect in the system. That said last fall it was Stevenson and maybe I should not let Spring Training impact my ratings so much.
2. I heard Tejay Antone was sitting in the upper 90’s in spring training so am hoping that still persists in outings longer than 1 or 2 innings. If it does I really expect him to make the overall top 100 next fall.
3. Alf Rod hit .286 in AA last year but showed no power (0.062 ISO). However, in a small sample size he was a different man this spring. His OPS was 0.900. That is pretty solid. I am not sure what his ISO was but he had at least two HR and was thinking his ISO was > .150. I know it is a small sample size but I am hoping his omission here is an oversight.
4. Disappointed you had DeLeon so low. Was really hoping he would slot in as a quality RP in 2021.
5. Glad to see Salvador make your top 25 but was hoping he would be higher. Overpowering last year and good BB%.
6. I am glad to see that someone other than me put Richardson and Siani in their top 10. I have them at 5 and 7. You have them at 6 and 7.
8. Clementina posted an OPS of .828 in the second half last year. That works if he can stick at Catcher. Disappointed not to see him in your top 25.
9. The Homer Bailey/Puig trade gets uglier and uglier.
10. If no baseball this year then giving Trammell away hurts even more.
Good job.
Given where the offensive performance of catchers is right now in MLB, and Stephenson’s ability at the plate and proximity to the majors, I’d put Stephenson #1 and Garcia #2.
The Reds got a lot of credit in the media for “being bold, taking some risks, and going for it”, but this is the predictable cost of their approach. Yikes.
And in their case “going for it” meant being a quasi-contender without a serious chance at winning a championship
All I’m certain of is that every single player on this list will be playing one slot higher on the defensive spectrum than they’re listed here. The Reds are very predictable this way.
Can’t tell if a 21yo RF who just put up a 3.4% BB rate/ 47% K rate in rookie ball still making this list says more about his tools or the depth of the system
The Reds could have a million 35+ or higher prospects and he still would’ve made the list.