Top 35 Prospects: St. Louis Cardinals
Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the St. Louis Cardinals. Scouting reports were compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as my own observations. As there was no minor league season in 2020, there are some instances where no new information was gleaned about a player. Players whose write-ups have not been meaningfully altered begin by telling you so. Each blurb ends with an indication of where the player played in 2020, which in turn likely informed the changes to their report if there were any. As always, I’ve leaned more heavily on sources from outside of a given org than those within for reasons of objectivity. Because outside scouts were not allowed at the alternate sites, I’ve primarily focused on data from there, and the context of that data, in my opinion, reduces how meaningful it is. Lastly, in an effort to more clearly indicate relievers’ anticipated roles, you’ll see two reliever designations, both on my lists and on The Board: MIRP, or multi-inning relief pitcher, and SIRP, or single-inning relief pitcher.
For more information on the 20-80 scouting scale by which all of our prospect content is governed, you can click here. For further explanation of Future Value’s merits and drawbacks, read Future Value.
All of the numbered prospects here also appear on The Board, a resource the site offers featuring sortable scouting information for every organization. It can be found here.
| Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dylan Carlson | 22.5 | MLB | LF | 2021 | 60 |
| 2 | Nolan Gorman | 20.9 | A+ | 3B | 2022 | 55 |
| 3 | Ivan Herrera | 20.9 | AA | C | 2023 | 50 |
| 4 | Matthew Liberatore | 21.4 | A | SP | 2022 | 50 |
| 5 | Jordan Walker | 18.9 | R | 3B | 2025 | 45+ |
| 6 | Zack Thompson | 23.4 | A+ | SP | 2022 | 45 |
| 7 | Masyn Winn | 19.0 | R | SIRP/SS | 2025 | 45 |
| 8 | Johan Oviedo | 23.1 | MLB | MIRP | 2022 | 45 |
| 9 | Jhon Torres | 21.0 | A | RF | 2023 | 40+ |
| 10 | Luken Baker | 24.1 | A+ | 1B | 2021 | 40+ |
| 11 | Tre Fletcher | 19.9 | R | CF | 2024 | 40+ |
| 12 | Tink Hence | 18.7 | R | SP | 2025 | 40+ |
| 13 | Ian Bedell | 21.6 | R | SP | 2023 | 40+ |
| 14 | Edwin Núñez | 19.4 | R | SP | 2025 | 40 |
| 15 | Junior Fernández | 24.1 | MLB | SIRP | 2021 | 40 |
| 16 | Edmundo Sosa | 25.1 | MLB | SS | 2021 | 40 |
| 17 | Seth Elledge | 24.9 | MLB | SIRP | 2021 | 40 |
| 18 | Kodi Whitley | 26.1 | MLB | SIRP | 2021 | 40 |
| 19 | Justin Williams | 25.6 | MLB | LF | 2021 | 40 |
| 20 | Alec Burleson | 22.4 | R | RF | 2024 | 40 |
| 21 | Juan Yepez | 23.1 | AA | 1B | 2022 | 40 |
| 22 | Malcom Nunez | 20.1 | A | 1B | 2024 | 40 |
| 23 | Jake Woodford | 24.4 | MLB | MIRP | 2021 | 40 |
| 24 | Leonardo Bernal | 17.2 | R | C | 2025 | 35+ |
| 25 | Andre Pallante | 22.6 | A- | SP | 2023 | 35+ |
| 26 | Ali Sánchez | 24.2 | MLB | C | 2021 | 35+ |
| 27 | Patrick Romeri | 19.8 | R | RF | 2023 | 35+ |
| 28 | Adanson Cruz | 20.5 | R | LF | 2023 | 35+ |
| 29 | Steven Gingery | 23.5 | R | SP | 2022 | 35+ |
| 30 | Jesus Cruz | 26.0 | MLB | SIRP | 2021 | 35+ |
| 31 | Connor Jones | 26.5 | AAA | SIRP | 2021 | 35+ |
| 32 | Roel Ramirez | 25.9 | MLB | SIRP | 2021 | 35+ |
| 33 | Edgardo Rodriguez | 20.4 | R | C | 2023 | 35+ |
| 34 | Griffin Roberts | 24.8 | A+ | SIRP | 2022 | 35+ |
| 35 | Rodard Avelino | 21.8 | A | SIRP | 2024 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
Catching Depth
Julio Rodriguez, C
Pedro Pages, C
Rodriguez, 23, has some power and arm strength, and aside from a bad 2018, he’s always performed. He missed 2021 spring with a wrist injury. Pages, 22, is similar but faces an uphill climb as far as visual evaluations are concerned because he’s closer to Alejandro Kirk on the physical spectrum. Both of these guys have good minor league stat lines.
Young Arm Strength Fliers
Levi Prater, LHP
Luis Ortiz, RHP
Logan Gragg, RHP
Yordy Richard, RHP
Alvaro Seijas, RHP
Luis Tena, RHP
Nathanael Heredia, LHP
Leonardo Taveras, RHP
Tyler Statler, RHP
Had the Cardinals had instructs, a couple of these guys probably would have shown enough improvement to be on the main section of the list. Alas, they did not. Prater is a super loose, athletic lefty drafted late during the shortened 2020 affair. He sat just 88-92 in 2020 but has great breaking ball and changeup command. If you think his looseness is a sign he’ll throw harder, he could break out in 2021. Seijas and Taveras are the oldest names in this group (they’re 22). Seijas gets up to 97 and has a good changeup, but for last year’s list I also spoke with someone who saw him sit 90-92. He has relief projection if the velo can settle into the 94-plus area. Taveras has a live arm (up to 98), and he’s somewhat projectable at 6-foot-5. His mechanical inconsistency impacts his control and breaking ball quality. He also has relief ceiling. Ortiz, 20, is the most projectable of the group at 6-foot-3 and 170 pounds. He was up to 94 with lots of spin and some curveball feel in 2019. Gragg’s velo was up after he was the Card’s eighth rounder in 2019. He’s 92-94, touching 95, with a slider that could use some tweaking. Yordy Richard is only 18 and up to 94 with an advanced changeup. His frame is a little more stout. Tena’s is, too. He’s 21 and has been up to 96, though the secondaries are fringy. Heredia is 19, projectable, and up to 95; the delivery is a little less good than others here. Statler is purely a physical projection lottery ticket. He’s a very wiry 6-foot-6, and up to 93 with a sinker.
Various Kinds of UTM (Up The Middle) Bats
Chandler Redmond, 2B
Franklin Soto, SS
Albert Inoa, 2B
Nick Dunn, 2B
Joerlin De Los Santos, CF
Ramon Mendoza, 2B
Redmond is a huge guy with huge power who is in the Muncy/Shaw non-traditional second base mold. Go peep his 2019 Appy League line. His exit velos from that year are obviously sky-high. Soto, 21, has plus bat speed and a good build, but his in-the-box footwork is rough right now. Inoa, 19, is a contact-oriented second baseman with a medium build and some speed. Dunn also has contact skills, but he’s a 40 athlete who needs to perform, and he didn’t last year. Mendoza is similar but a few levels behind Dunn. De Los Santos lacks physical projection but is twitchy and athletic.
Conversion Arms and Older Dudes
Ben Baird, RHP
Edgar Escobar, RHP
Evan Kruczynski, LHP
Angel Rondon, RHP
Mitchell Osnowitz, RHP
Escobar is 23, and has a swing-and-miss heater up to 96 and an average slider. Kruczynski’s velo and command backed up in 2019 but I liked him as a four-pitch, No. 5-7 starter before that happened. He’s now at the alt site. Rondon is also an arm strength-only relief type who shoved at the Cards’ alt site last year. His velo was back down in the low-90s this spring. Osnowitz is 29 but might pitch in the big leagues. He’s up to 98 with other bat-missing fastball traits (backspin, mostly). Baird was a 2015 Perfect Game All-American as a position player. He was into the mid-90s early during his 2019 conversion but that’s all we know at this point.
System Overview
My geographic proximity (or lack thereof) to Southeast Florida and all of the Cardinals’ affiliates makes their org one of the toughest for me to write up every year. But because they didn’t have instructs and many of their alt site players either appeared in the big leagues or were 2020 draftees, they were actually one of the easier teams to do this year. It also means they’ll likely have among the most volatile and active in-season updates since that whole group of young pitchers in the honorable mention section will be seen for the first time in a while, some of them for the first time in the States.
Note that this org seems to be zigging while everyone else zags on fastball shape. The org is full of sinker-oriented guys rather than ones with cut and carry; that they dealt Zac Gallen is further evidence of this. In the draft room, the Cardinals have been able to snag falling, high-profile high schoolers a couple of times over the last few years. Nolan Gorman unexpectedly fell into their laps after a bad senior spring; Jordan Walker did too, and Masyn Winn’s stock was likely impacted because he didn’t really pitch during his pre-draft summer. When it comes to the trajectory of a player’s multi-year, pre-draft narrative, it can be tough to decide what you should classify as recency bias and what you should classify as actual skill progression or regression. I think it’s clear this org is more apt to look at a player’s bigger picture in the draft room than they are to extrapolate performance.
Scouting Director Randy Flores was at Chase Silseth’s start last Thursday, for you mock draft nerds. This year’s mocks are going to be really tough because masks make it harder to recognize executives, but ex-big leaguers stand out.
We don’t know much about St. Louis’ pro scouting because they’ve been so consistently competitive for the last long while that they’ve not had to rebuild. Any of the prospects they’ve acquired from other clubs have typically been a part of larger trades. They have whiffed on some internal assessments, though (Luke Voit, Randy Arozarena, arguably Gallen).
Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.
“It makes sense to develop Winn as both a hitter and pitcher for a while if only to make sure the position you pick is the correct one.” Yes, that was what I was thinking too as I read his write-up. Clearly he has flaws on both sides of the ball but there’s a decent chance he can overcome either his lack of command or improve the hit tool enough to make one of them a more appealing choice than the other. And he’s obviously not playing shortstop (which puts a fair amount of stress on the arm) while pitching long-term.
His performance this year and next will likely make him one or the other. Until he gives you a reason to do that I agree with it, just let him do it.
I read his prospect rankings and came to the conclusion this was an infield version of Michael Lorenzen, but then the write up sounded much more glowing. He’s definitely got my attention either way.
Another great list, thanks Eric. I know the Luis Mario Pino deal hasn’t been 100% confirmed yet, but where would he rank on this list? Any intel on him?
I like this system more than I expected. I was planning on seeing mostly boring 24 year olds who will contribute – because that’s what STL typically does. But this has a lot of really young guys with high variance and that’s interesting to see.
Take a look at the guys the Cards have picked in recent drafts. There are a lot of guys who were pretty young HS guys. In 2020, Markavian Hence was under 18 years old on draft day, Jordan Walker had just turned 18 that month, Masyn Winn was only a couple of months older than 18. In 2018, Nolan Gorman was something like a month older than 18, Mateo Gil was under 18; in 2019, Tre Fletcher was about the same age. Every team takes a guy like this every year, and they also took Zack Thompson who doesn’t fit that mold. But if you want to know what their draft model looks like, it’s pretty clear that age is weighted really heavily.
This, by the way, is why you should keep an eye on Josh Baez if you’re a Cards fan. He’s got the same sort of raw power that Gorman and Walker have, and he’s only going to be 18 on draft day.
I grew up a Cardinals fan and still follow them a little more than any other team, so their draft model recently has been interesting. For so long they took low ceiling/high floor college guys early, it’s definitely been startling to see the difference. I was a big Randy Flores fan as a player (cause he talked to me at Spring Training once as a middle schooler lol) and I’ve been pretty big fan of his time as their scouting director now
On one hand, that’s partly because they generally don’t get to pick until close to the end of the 1st round. On the other hand, the recent switch is partly because guys like Gorman have fallen to them.
Delvin Perez! The less said there, the better
Oh yeah, I forgot about that dude. He was sorta considered a steal at the time, wasn’t he?
He finally put on weight! His Exit Velos in spring were so much better, and he definitely looked like he had filled out. I’m actually optimistic about him again.
That’s Tink Hence to you, sadtrombone!
Dylan Carlson was also drafted as a high schooler! And I distinctly remember being rather disappointed that they didn’t take Jordan Sheffield with that pick…just another addition to the overwhelming evidence that I have no clue what I’m doing lol
It’s pretty easy to remember the guys you think went lower than they should (in my case, Jo Adell) and not the ones who you totally whiffed on (in that same draft, Adam Haseley).
It’s surprising to me that Angel Rondon never lands on this list higher than he does. The Cardinals named him the entire organization’s pitcher of the year a few years back, he’s 23 and projected for AAA this year, and has performed well at every level he’s pitched at. I’d honestly be surprised if he doesn’t get some MLB innings by next year, considering the Cardinals put him on the 40 man roster this past winter.
I think he must have very high character makeup/coach ability or something, and so he stands out to them extra. His numbers don’t jump off the page at all anywhere (k/bb, ERA, FIP, eating innings, etc).
I agree there’s not really one particular stand out skill that points to Rondon as a for sure big leauger. However, he’s pretty good at everything: 8.8 k/9, 3.1 BB/9, got up to 160 innings already in 2019, career minor league ERA of 3.01. I just hope he continues to put it all together at AAA this year.
Tre Fletcher gives me a Brandon Nimmo vibe in many, many ways from the cold-weather state to the skillset to the early minor league concerns. And I think Nimmo, when healthy, is very underappreciated.
I’m surprised that Ivan only got a future 50 hit+55 game power given the bat to ball skills and very strong exit velo numbers. You also seem slightly higher on his defense than I’ve seen other prospect evaluators
Tommy Parsons ?
Missing so hard on Patrick Romeri. This kid is going to explode several megatons worth this next year.
Gorman has all sorts of strikeouts and barely and walks at low monor league levels. My prediction is that he wont crack big leagues and if so not for long.
Is part of the zig when they zag logic that, it’s going to work at least a few times. So a simple math expression of it might be:
Trendy profiles – 20% success rate, but you’re competing with 20+ teams in a limited pool to find those 20 percenters.
Zig when they sag profiles – 10% success rate, but you have access to virtually the entire pool.
Their gd 2020 draft was among the few best IMO. Walker was in a group of HSers (Howard, PCA, Kelley) that to me blended the kind of ceiling and polish that makes for a great draft prospect in a normal year. Both Winn and Tink Hence were among my handful favorite non-first preps in the class, maybe even Winn having a shot at the first if someone didn’t mind unusual confidence
Big fan of the Luken Baker placement. First division 1B prospects are not so common, he’s been one to watch since HS, and is a little more toolsy than I think his size/position combo might allow him to be perceived without any looks. He’s hit .300/.400/.480 in 1325 PAs between NCAA (a pro level!) and MiLs
Conner Jones…another arm the NCAA was funneled, allowed to grind down for profit, and can/will be spun off as just another casualty of pitching…This is going to get so so bad, the NCAA is only getting fatter