Top 36 Prospects: Cincinnati Reds
Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the Cincinnati Reds. Scouting reports were compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as my own observations. As there was no minor league season in 2020, there are some instances where no new information was gleaned about a player. Players whose write-ups have not been altered begin by telling you so. For the others, the blurb ends with an indication of where the player played in 2020, which in turn likely informed the changes to their report. As always, I’ve leaned more heavily on sources from outside the org than within for reasons of objectivity. Because outside scouts were not allowed at the alternate sites, I’ve primarily focused on data from there. Lastly, in effort to more clearly indicate relievers’ anticipated roles, you’ll see two reliever designations, both in lists and on The Board: MIRP, or multi-inning relief pitcher, and SIRP, or single-inning relief pitcher.
For more information on the 20-80 scouting scale by which all of our prospect content is governed, you can click here. For further explanation of Future Value’s merits and drawbacks, read Future Value.
All of the numbered prospects here also appear on The Board, a resource the site offers featuring sortable scouting information for every organization. It can be found here.
| Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jose Garcia | 22.7 | MLB | SS | 2021 | 55 |
| 2 | Tyler Stephenson | 24.4 | MLB | C | 2021 | 50 |
| 3 | Hunter Greene | 21.4 | A | SP | 2022 | 50 |
| 4 | Nick Lodolo | 22.9 | A | SP | 2022 | 50 |
| 5 | Austin Hendrick | 19.5 | R | RF | 2024 | 45+ |
| 6 | Lyon Richardson | 20.9 | A | SP | 2023 | 45+ |
| 7 | Jonathan India | 24.0 | AA | 3B | 2021 | 45 |
| 8 | Tyler Callihan | 20.5 | R | 2B | 2024 | 45 |
| 9 | Rece Hinds | 20.3 | R | RF | 2024 | 45 |
| 10 | Michael Siani | 21.4 | A | CF | 2023 | 45 |
| 11 | Christian Roa | 21.7 | R | SP | 2023 | 40+ |
| 12 | Jared Solomon | 23.5 | A+ | SIRP | 2022 | 40+ |
| 13 | Ivan Johnson | 22.2 | R | 2B | 2023 | 40+ |
| 14 | Tony Santillan | 23.7 | AA | SIRP | 2021 | 40+ |
| 15 | Jackson Miller | 19.0 | R | C | 2025 | 40 |
| 16 | José De León | 28.4 | MLB | MIRP | 2021 | 40 |
| 17 | Vladimir Gutierrez | 25.3 | AAA | MIRP | 2021 | 40 |
| 18 | Ryan Hendrix | 26.0 | AA | SIRP | 2021 | 40 |
| 19 | Bryce Bonnin | 22.2 | R | SIRP | 2024 | 40 |
| 20 | Riley O’Brien | 25.9 | AA | SIRP | 2021 | 40 |
| 21 | Allan Cerda | 21.1 | R | RF | 2022 | 40 |
| 22 | Graham Ashcraft | 22.9 | R | SIRP | 2022 | 40 |
| 23 | TJ Friedl | 25.4 | AA | CF | 2021 | 40 |
| 24 | Mac Wainwright | 18.4 | R | RF | 2025 | 35+ |
| 25 | Luis Mey | 19.5 | R | SIRP | 2023 | 35+ |
| 26 | Jacob Heatherly | 22.6 | A | MIRP | 2022 | 35+ |
| 27 | Eric Yang | 22.7 | R | C | 2023 | 35+ |
| 28 | Brandon Bailey | 26.2 | MLB | SIRP | 2021 | 35+ |
| 29 | Eduardo Salazar | 22.6 | A | MIRP | 2022 | 35+ |
| 30 | Mariel Bautista | 23.2 | A | CF | 2022 | 35+ |
| 31 | Miguel Medrano | 23.0 | R | SIRP | 2022 | 35+ |
| 32 | Noah Davis | 23.7 | R | SP | 2022 | 35+ |
| 33 | Michel Triana | 21.1 | R | 1B | 2024 | 35+ |
| 34 | Joe Boyle | 21.4 | R | SIRP | 2024 | 35+ |
| 35 | Debby Santana | 20.3 | R | 3B | 2023 | 35+ |
| 36 | Yan Contreras | 19.9 | R | SS | 2024 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
Sleeper Arms I Like
Reiver Sanmartin, LHP
Jhon De Jesus, RHP
Case Williams, RHP
James Marinan, RHP
Sanmartin has been traded a few times (Texas to New York to Cincinnati). He’s a little low-slot lefty whose tailing fastball and sweeping slider move away from one another in an effective way. He has a shot to end up with plus command and make a roster. De Jesus is a stallion with arm strength — 91-96, touch 98 — and 30 control/feel. Williams is a 2020 draftee who the Rockies picked and sent to Cincinnati as part of the Jeff Hoffman/Robert Stephenson swap. He was in the 88-92 range with middling projection as an underclassman, then was up to 95 in a indoor bullpen environment. Marinan has pedigree as a sinker/slider starter prospect. He was up to 95 in some starts and 88-92 in others.
College-Aged Outfielders With a Carrying Tool
Quin Cotton, LF
Fidel Castro, RF
TJ Hopkins, CF
Lorenzo Cedrola, CF
Cotton was in the third round mix for some clubs coming into his junior spring at Grand Canyon. Scouts hoped a swing change might unlock dormant raw power, and as Cotton tried to make one, he came undone and had a bad year. Now he’s in an org that has lately had some success making swing changes. He has 55 pull power. Castro’s frame is still really projectable for a 21-year-old and he has natural low-ball lift. He’s got a shot to grow into power yet. Hopkins is a senior sign who hit .295/.371/.463 at South Carolina. Cedrola is a speedster without viable strength.
Up-the-Middle Depth
Miguel Hernandez, SS
Errol Robinson, SS
Gus Stieger, SS
Jacob Hurtubise, CF
Wilfred Astudillo, C
Jose Tello, C
James Free, C
Chuckie Robinson, C
Hernandez can still pick it and make an average amount of contact, but hasn’t filled out like I thought he might when he was 19. Errol Robinson, a minor league Rule 5 pick, is like this but a few years older. Stieger is a 2020 undrafted free agent out of South Dakota State. He played against Minnesota on either side of a big college tournament in Minneapolis, got seen there, and looks like a potential infield bench piece. He’s a capable shortstop defender and has fair feel for contact for a small-school hitter. Hurtubise is another 2020 NDFA, from West Point. He can really run and play center field. Astudillo (yes, he’s Willian’s brother) is only 20 and, like his brother, has precocious feel for contact and swings too much. The other two are big-bodied catchers with power. Free signed for $125,000 as an undrafted free agent in 2019. Tello was too old for the 2019 AZL but hit well. Robinson (and Astudillo) was a Rule 5 minor league pick from Houston. He’s hit for power in the past but really can’t catch.
Older Relief Types
Joel Kuhnel, RHP
Francis Peguero, RHP
Kuhnel has a heavy mid-90s fastball when healthy but he’s often not and cleared waivers when he was outrighted off the roster recently. He did have some Rule 5 buzz, though. Peguero was up to 96 in 2019, strong velocity for a lower slot guy, but his breaking ball isn’t great.
Young Dominicans
Junior Tamares, CF
Braylin Minier, SS
Esmil Torres, SS
Tamares is a plus runner with some feel to hit. Last year in this space, I said he needed to get stronger and he has. He has the best physical projection of the three players in this group now. This is an especially relevant group because for over a decade, Cincinnati’s most prominent international talent acquisitions have typically come from Cuba. It’s been the Reds’ M.O. to avoid the teenage demographic and instead sign older Cuban players when they hit the market later in the process. Most of the 2019 17-year-old class had verbal deals long before new International Scouting Director Trey Hendricks arrived. It makes sense then that they ended up with Triana, who hit the market at age 19, and Minier, who popped so late that any info on him is hard to come by since clubs had most of their money committed and had stopped scouting 2019s. Baseball America has noted that Minier was trained by Patrick Guerrero, who used to work under Reds International crosschecker Bob Engle in Los Angeles and Seattle. Minier was the youngest player on the 2020 instructs roster but didn’t end up coming to the US and was noticeably thicker in the D.R. Torres was in the DSL last year. He had a medium frame that has gotten bigger and fuller since signing, good defensive footwork, and a downward-cutting swing from both sides of the plate.
System Overview
This group is pretty shallow, and the Reds’ pro-active pursuit of undrafted free agents during the summer, along with the fact that they made the most selections in the minor league phase of December’s Rule 5 draft, indicates that they know it and are exploring all avenues to add depth. The severely abbreviated nature of the 2020 draft was especially unkind them org for this reason. Nine of the top 17 prospects on this list are either from Cuba or went to school in Georgia or Florida, and several prospects the club has dealt away in recent years have been from there, too.
The Reds cashed in a bunch of chips to be able to compete in earnest in 2020 and they were rewarded with an empty Great American Ballpark because of the pandemic. Now they seem to be in cost-cutting mode, willing to listen to trade offers for some of their talented-but-expensive veterans. The logjam most in need of clearing is at third base, where Eugenio Suárez, Nick Senzel, Jonathan India, and maybe Mike Moustakas can all play. Suárez is due about $10 million annually through 2024 while India and Senzel are still pre-arb and Moose, a better handedness fit with the other two, is signed through 2023. Suárez presents teams interested in Nolan Arenado with an interesting secondary option, and the Reds should try to get a grasp on what the Arenado offers are like to position their asking price for Suárez.
Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.
“The Reds weren’t getting much offense from their middle infield this year, so in late-August they decided to promote Garcia. You’ll never guess what happened next!”
I do wonder a bit about Jonathan India. The FV55 on the arm and the FV50 on the fielding suggests Eric thinks he will stick at third base, but the writeup suggests he probably won’t. The report makes him sound a lot like Kevin Seitzer, or a righty version of Dave Magadan, type of player. Obviously if he wound up having a career like one of those guys it would be an enormous success but it seems more likely that he’d be a better fielder, and probably a worse hitter, like Martin Prado.
I hear David Bote in my mind when I read that report
If Eugenio Suarez is still viewed as a 4-win player than the Quintana trade might be a good proxy since Suarez has 4 years of control at a very reasonable $45M. So they should get Carter Kieboom (whose stock is down) and Jackson Rutledge. However, if there’s a pandemic-discount for players with guaranteed contracts around the league or if Suarez is viewed as more of 3-win player, than the Reds should expect less. Should be interesting to see what they do with Suarez, Gray, and Castillo. (Again, signing Moustakas and Castellanos was stupid.)
On a related note, the Braves seem to get 1-year rentals of Donaldson, Hamels, Ozuna, and now, Morton without having to give up prospects. The White Sox had to give up an FV50 in Dunning and an FV40 in Weems for 1 year of Lynn, who I think is better (younger, less injury-prone) than Morton, but not by much. I hope Eric covers their signing of Yoelkis Cespedes, reputedly the #1 IFA, and let’s us know if he starts at AA or another level.
Suarez makes a ton of sense to the Mets for JD Davis and a strong prospect. The Mets should be more focused on the FA market than the trade market unless the right player at the right position comes along at the right price. (The real dream is Suarez and Castillo for a strong package but that seems very unlikely on both sides.)
JD Davis is a perfect fit for the Reds, in the sense that they are incredibly optimistic about defense. They very well might run Davis out at shortstop.
That trade only makes sense for a Mets fan. I was thinking Gimenez & Peterson for Suarez. Maybe more
In prior years, yes, that would be a fair expectation for Suarez. However, prospect value is higher than in the past, controllable pre-arb MLB talent is incredibly valuable, and teams looking to move $10m-and-up contracts are going to get less in return because there are less buyers willing to take on payroll right now. The market favors contract buyers more than it does contract sellers in a very lopsided way. Which is why Raisel Iglesias only retuned Noe Ramirez.
Raisel Iglesias only returned Noe Ramirez bc he’s getting paid ~10M on a one year deal as a reliever and there just isn’t much surplus value on that, even in a healthy market. Suarez is getting paid ~45M over next 4 years, with a 15M option. Compare directly to Arenado’s 6 year ~200M and sub .800 OPS away from Coors. Suarez is A much more valuable trade asset than Iglesias, and probably has more value than Arenado when you figure in the contracts
Yes to both – he obviously has more trade value than Iglesias or Arenado. He’s still not worth Gimenez and Peterson in the current economy of baseball.
And… the Josh Bell trade gives us another data point. Yes, 1B is a position that is relatively easy to replace, but what a staggeringly low return for a relatively inexpensive contract, still with arb years remaining. Trade values are changing right in front of our eyes. It reminds me of financial markets during unstable times, when different parties begin to diverge rapidly on valuation and those with cash have a significant advantage.
I wouldn’t say it’s staggeringly low. Josh Bell just simply isn’t a very good baseball player. He has 3.5 career WAR in over 550 games
Josh Bell doesn’t have a position and there are uncertainties about the DH. I wasn’t surprised he got tendered because of all the extra years of team control but if there was only one year of team control remaining I wouldn’t have been surprised if he got non-tendered.
According to UZR, he is the worst first baseman on a per-inning basis since they started tracking it. DRS is a little more optimistic, putting him #2 behind Prince Fielder. But Josh Bell does not hit like Prince Fielder. OAA tells a similar story.
If the Nationals think they can teach him to play first base then he’s a fantastic pickup, but I’m not sure why he would suddenly pick it up now.
‘Staggering low’ is ridiculous- I don’t like Crowe at all but Yean is a serious piece-would be surprised if he isn’t a 45 in Pirates writeup. He’s one of the top teenage arms in the minors and comps pretty directly to Milone from the Marte trade-probably a top 100 guy once he gets data points at A ball and above.
And that is for Bell, who was awful last year, isn’t cheap, and has 2 years left. Has always had major potential but the big year may have been an outlier
Suarez was awful off the injury to begin the year, then raked down the stretch as him, Bauer, and Bradley carried the team to the playoffs. Suarez is underrated and undervalued.
Agreed. I don’t want to speak for Eric but I surmise that Crowe falls to a 40+ (essentially replacing Brubaker on the list) and Yean rises to a 45. $7M in value for a guy STEAMER projects for 1 win (despite the 115 wRC+) seems fine with the Nats hoping for right tailed outcome (like 2019) but the defense and base running seem to limit Bell to a 2.5ish win ceiling.
WAR undervalues first basemen by assuming that teams could trot out anyone at 1B despite the fact that no team has really employed that strategy. Think about it – with shifting, openers, and all the changes in the game that have been driven by analytical data, teams are still acquiring and signing “true” 1B to play 1B rather than re-tooling other players to man the position.
If the analytical community applied the same ongoing rigor to the things it believes en masse are true and settled as it once did to the things it thought were patently incorrect, we’d find some faulty assumptions that are accepted as analytical gospel. I believe this is one of them.
I’m not equating Suarez to Bell (or 3b to 1B). I’m saying that the calculus for trade value is changing. I’m saying that I think a player with the profile and contract of Josh Bell (or Raisel Iglesias) would have returned more a couple years ago, just like a player with the profile and cheap contract of David Dahl would not have been non-tendered. The value of a contract is changing rapidly in the short term and the data points are coming together quickly.
I completely agree with you-I view the ‘modern’ period of Front Office management as beginning with the Addison Russell-Jeff Shark deal and it has changed in a major way every offseason since then. But to loop back to my Yean-Milone comparison, 2 years of Starling Marte at ~20M returned Milone and Peguro last offseason. Yes, the market has changed dramatically since then, and yes, Milone and Peguro are in the low minors and I would prefer the higher floor and increased certainty of Gimenez and Peterson, but that is still a 50 and a 45 for 2 years 20 M of Marte. 4 years of Suarez at 45 M with the option should return at least as much.
Also would like to reiterate that that was a very healthy return for Josh Bell, Bucco’s front office should be pleased with themselves.
ZiPs sees him at 3.2, plus there’s always a pitching shortage so that pumped up Quintana’s value, plus teams are getting really stingy with their prospects these days.
System definitely seems kinda thin for a team that won the 2nd fewest games in all of MLB from 2015-19.
There are a lot of 30-40 bats with 60-70 raw power in this system. Stephenson looks like he’ll be good, and they seem to have good people working on pitching, so that’s good. But aside from a handful of guys I see a lot of loud tools with scary red flags.
I hadn’t seen that particular video of Stephenson. I’m always surprised how much bat speed he has and how short to the ball he is. Could be a few years, but if he can settle in to regular PT I can see him getting to more of his power.
I’m not incredibly sanguine about the bats beyond him and Garcia. Good thing the top bats happen to man premium positions.
Not when you consider how many pieces they’ve traded away to try to compete in 2020.
Unpopular opinion, but their rumored plan to rebuild makes a lot more sense when you read this list
Updated farm rankings:
LAD: $250.00M
CHW: $204.0M
CIN: $185.50M
I’m not really sure what to make of the Reds and their FO. Using The Board pre season rankings, Reds rank in farm value is
2017: 11
2018: 5
2019: 8
2020: 25
2021: likely another bottom 10 season
They haven’t won games under current FO (I know Williams resigned but the rest is still there) and their farm is weakening despite not winning many games in a weak division. They don’t project to be a winning team and are looking to cut payroll from the pandemic. Perhaps Boddy will help with the pitching side but as Dan pointed out in his ZiPS projection article, the offense has been lacking for the club. They’re kind of in a weird state similar to how the Pirates were 2017-2018 I think. They can *compete* if things break but it’s a weaker farm and they’re likely not going to add the pieces they need to financially to get over the hump and instead will tread water and try to sneak into the playoffs since the other four teams aren’t serious threats.
Thank your for these recaps, and happy holidays to all!
@Eric L: FYI the link to your book Future Value book displays the message “Page Not Found”.
I think Antone is still eligible for ROY so shouldn’t he still be considered a prospect?
He lost eligibility due to exceeding the fifty days of service time on active roster threshold. He’s not rookie of the year eligible.
The rule is
1. 50 IP or 130 AB (Antone had 35.1 so good here)
2. 45 total days on an active Major League roster prior to Sept. 1 (Antone had 35-40 days on the ML roster so good here)
From Sept. 1 through the end of the regular season, both at-bats and innings pitched count against rookie eligibility but days on a big league roster do not.
Also Mark Payton (31 days on roster and 20 PA) should be on this list.
See below for details on eligibility:
http://m.mlb.com/glossary/rules/rookie-eligibility
I think, for 2020 only, the stipulation for Sept AB/IP did not apply – i.e. the service time does in fact count.
For the 2020 season, MLB got rid of the September rule. I.E. September service counted towards the 45 total days on an active roster.
https://www.mlb.com/news/mlb-rookie-status-for-2020-amended
I think the only hope Cincinnati has for the future is that their pitching development proves to be one of the best in the game. If they can churn out guys like Cleveland, then I think this fairly weak system will “play up”. If they’re not able to develop a few gems, then they will probably have to tear down the roster and rebuild.
Please tell me I can get a Fidel Castro bobble head somewhere
Love me some Tyler Stephenson. Pretty classic first division starter profile: first round pick, premium frame, no K issues, steady and productive through the minors, premium position, unlikely to move, still has power to unlock….In a less noisy prospect era, not even so long ago, I feel like he’d be ranked higher nationally especially after his age 22 in AA and the AFL last year
Garcia seems like a knockoff Ed Howard who is both older and more raw with a worse hit tool. There’s worse ways to be a SS prospect though, in a weird way I think this is a compliment since Howard is a whale. Seems interesting
Siani seems underrated, especially within the system. His speed and defense give him a solid floor, position is premium with the league really short on true CF defenders, there’s a decent approach that played well enough in the MWL during 2019, and my guess is while the frame isn’t elite there’s more power to mine out given the breadth of his skillset and just enough frame
India at 2B seems very much up the Reds alley, as they don’t seem opposed to moving players up the defensive spectrum. And even signed Moose for it already. I think India might still succeed, but last year was particularly brutal for him not getting development in.
Help me understand the prospect rating system. Are the rating numbers completely subjective? For example: Vladimir Gutierrez (ranked 17th). He has four pitches that are 55+, with two of those at a 60, and his command is at a 50 potential, yet his overall FV is 40. Is the rating basically saying that something other than the quality of his pitches and his command will radically affect his potential value? Does he have very little stamina, for example, limiting him to a short reliever role?