Top 38 Prospects: Chicago White Sox
Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the Chicago White Sox. Scouting reports are compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as my own observations. For more information on the 20-80 scouting scale by which all of our prospect content is governed, you can click here. For further explanation of the merits and drawbacks of Future Value, read this.
All of the numbered prospects here also appear on The Board, a resource the site offers featuring sortable scouting information for every organization. It can be found here.
Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Luis Robert | 22.7 | AAA | CF | 2020 | 60 |
2 | Michael Kopech | 24.0 | MLB | RHP | 2020 | 60 |
3 | Andrew Vaughn | 22.1 | A+ | 1B | 2021 | 55 |
4 | Nick Madrigal | 23.1 | AAA | 2B | 2020 | 55 |
5 | Dane Dunning | 25.4 | AA | RHP | 2020 | 45 |
6 | Jonathan Stiever | 23.0 | A+ | RHP | 2022 | 40+ |
7 | Zack Collins | 25.2 | MLB | C | 2020 | 40+ |
8 | Yermin Mercedes | 27.2 | AAA | DH | 2020 | 40+ |
9 | Codi Heuer | 23.8 | AA | RHP | 2021 | 40+ |
10 | Micker Adolfo | 23.6 | AA | RF | 2020 | 40+ |
11 | Matthew Thompson | 19.7 | R | RHP | 2024 | 40 |
12 | Andrew Dalquist | 19.5 | R | RHP | 2024 | 40 |
13 | Zack Burdi | 25.1 | AAA | RHP | 2020 | 40 |
14 | Danny Mendick | 26.6 | MLB | SS | 2020 | 40 |
15 | Blake Rutherford | 23.0 | AA | LF | 2020 | 40 |
16 | Luis Gonzalez | 24.6 | AA | RF | 2020 | 40 |
17 | Benyamin Bailey | 18.6 | R | RF | 2024 | 40 |
18 | Jose Rodriguez | 19.0 | R | SS | 2023 | 40 |
19 | Yolbert Sanchez | 23.2 | R | SS | 2025 | 40 |
20 | Gavin Sheets | 24.0 | AA | 1B | 2020 | 40 |
21 | Konnor Pilkington | 22.6 | A+ | LHP | 2021 | 40 |
22 | Luis Alexander Basabe | 23.7 | AA | CF | 2020 | 40 |
23 | Tyler Johnson | 24.7 | AA | RHP | 2020 | 40 |
24 | Seby Zavala | 26.7 | MLB | C | 2020 | 40 |
25 | Jake Burger | 24.1 | A | 3B | 2021 | 35+ |
26 | Bryan Ramos | 18.1 | R | 3B | 2023 | 35+ |
27 | Lency Delgado | 20.9 | R | 3B | 2023 | 35+ |
28 | Lenyn Sosa | 20.3 | A | SS | 2022 | 35+ |
29 | Ian Hamilton | 24.9 | MLB | RHP | 2020 | 35+ |
30 | James Beard | 19.6 | R | CF | 2024 | 35+ |
31 | Zach Thompson | 26.5 | AAA | RHP | 2020 | 35+ |
32 | DJ Gladney | 18.8 | R | 3B | 2024 | 35+ |
33 | Bryce Bush | 20.4 | A | RF | 2022 | 35+ |
34 | Alec Hansen | 25.6 | AA | RHP | 2021 | 35+ |
35 | Jimmy Lambert | 25.4 | AA | RHP | 2020 | 35+ |
36 | Johnabiell Laureano | 19.6 | R | CF | 2023 | 35+ |
37 | Caleb Freeman | 22.2 | A | RHP | 2023 | 35+ |
38 | Luis Mieses | 19.9 | R | CF | 2022 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
Catching Depth (and Remillard)
Carlos Perez, C
Gunnar Troutwine, C
Ricardo Aguilar, C
Zach Remillard, SS
Perez, 23, has good bat-to-ball skills and arm strength but little power. He might be a third catcher. Troutwine is a tough dude with great feel for the strike zone. Aguilar just signed. He’s a converted infielder with a compact frame and contact-oriented approach. Remillard is upper-level depth capable of playing almost every position on the field.
High Probability Depth Arms
Andrew Perez, LHP
Matt Foster, RHP
Vince Arobio, RHP
Bernardo Flores, LHP
All of these pitchers are in their mid-20s. Perez needs to find a breaking ball, but he will touch 95 from the left side and his changeup is plus. So, too, is Foster’s; he is also up to 95 with a backspinning axis and relatively flat approach angle. Arobio has a high spin, backspinning fastball, too, but his angle is more downhill. He has the best breaking ball of this group. Flores is a four-pitch lefty with good breaking stuff and a 40 fastball.
Younger, Raw Pitching
Frander Veras, RHP
Davis Martin, RHP
Yoelvin Silven, RHP
McKinley Moore, RHP
Veras is 21 and spent 2019, his first pro season, in the DSL. He was up to 96 there and his changeup has late sinking action at times. Martin is another good Day Three pick out of Texas Tech. He sits 89-94 and has a plus slider. Silven was up to 95 as a 19-year-old in 2019 but his secondary stuff is in the 40/45 area right now. Moore is also arm strength-only right now but he’s a little older and bigger. He’s up to 98.
System Overview
This system remains top-heavy, with much of its oomph packed into the first couple prospects on the list rather than spread throughout the system. I was critical of the org’s ability to develop pitching in last year’s writeup as many of their arms had gone backward throughout 2017 and 2018, but 2019 (best exemplified by Lucas Giolito on the big club and Stiever on the farm) was better. What becomes of Dalquist and Thompson will be a terrific litmus test for the org’s direction since both are really athletic and seem capable of making adjustments. The org seems good at killing spin, as several of their pitchers have offspeed weapons, either splits or changeups, with very low spin compared to those on a lot of other teams.
The White Sox have not yet begun to move any of the players who make up their, uh, glut of big-bodied 1B/DH types, or who threaten to occupy that defensive space at some point soon. Here’s the list of players I think make up that group: Yermin Mercedes, Zack Collins, newly extended José Abreu, newly signed Edwin Encarnación, Micker Adoldo, Andrew Vaughn, Eloy Jiménez, Gavin Sheets, and (fingers crossed for him) Jake Burger. There’s not enough room for all of these guys but they all have value, so it makes sense several will be traded. Gavin Sheets’ 40-man timeline could mean he’s pried from the org for very little since they clearly don’t have room for him but his Rule 5 eligibility is coming.
The White Sox are perhaps the team that would most benefit from an International draft as they seem to sign players who become eligible later in the process, which is why they end up with a lot of Cuban players and signees who commit to deals several months after the signing phase opens. A draft would give them access to a player pool they don’t seem inclined to deal with right now — essentially, all the players who agree to deals well in advance of actually signing them.
Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.
I know it’s a small sample size but if Kopech’s strides in control are real, I still contend that his ceiling is that of an ace and not #3 starter.
This comes up every time and is mostly a matter of definitions. Eric defines an “ace” not as the best pitcher on the staff or even one of the 30 best pitchers in baseball but as: “Top 1-3 arms in baseball. ‘Ace’ if they do it several years in a row.” and being worth 7+ fWAR. These guys are overall 80FV’s. That’s a very high bar to clear. A number 3 is a 60FV worth 3.5 – 4.9 fWAR/year.
As far as his control goes, I’m also excited by the reduction in walks, but I don’t know how to square that with 5 HBP in 14.1 IP. None in that game against Detroit where he was hurt. He also hit 13 guys in 126 AAA IP in 2018. Those 18 HBP would have put him 1 behind Cole Hamels in 2018, but Hamels threw 50 more IP.
The definition of ace can certainly be argued and even though I personally feel he still has ace ceiling upside, even given Eric’s definition. However, he is saying Kopech has “No. 3 starter ceiling”. Not sure if he also has a different defintion for a “No. 3 starter” but I would think that would mean the average third starter in a rotation. If that’s his celiing I imagine the expecation is he’s a #4 or 5. Perhaps I’m misinterpretting it but that would be vastly underestimating his potential IMO.
If I were to hazard a guess at what Eric potentially means is that Kopech, while possessing the hellacious stuff required of true ace-level talents, probably cannot sustain the durability required for consistent 6-7 WAR seasons.
If he is only pitching an average of 140-160 innings a year, that caps his WAR output at around the level of a good #3.
Though perhaps given the steady change of IP requirements in starters, perhaps it will soon be worth revisiting what constitutes a 2 v 3 v 4.
What I find amazing is that Eric feels compelled to mention the “#3 starter upside” every single time with Kopech, so half the times it’s come up it’s come up with Kopech.
I find it incredibly frustrating that they have never directly addressed exactly why they labeled them this way. I get that they did by calculating deviations away in a normal distribution, but it still doesn’t explain the labels.
It gets mentioned every time because the write up hasn’t changed, since little has changed with him in 20 months.
https://blogs.fangraphs.com/the-new-fangraphs-scouting-primer/
Pitcher WAR Mapped to 20-80 Scale
20 Org Guy
30 Up & Down
40 Backend starters, FIP typically close to 5.00
45 #4/5 starters, FIP approx 4.20
50 #4 starters. Approx 4.00 FIP, at times worse but then with lots of innings
55 #3/4 starters. Approx 3.70 FIP along with about 160 IP
60 #3 starters, 3.30 FIP, volume approaching 200 innings
70 #2 starters, FIP under 3, about 200 IP
80 #1s. Top 1-3 arms in baseball. ‘Ace’ if they do it several years in a row
Thanks Bighurt, this helps understand Eric rationale a bit more. I’m still a little confused though as Eric has Kopech graded as a 60 meaning that #3 starter is his expectation, not his ceiling. I would think he’s at least got #2 starter ceiling if not #1.