Top 38 Prospects: New York Yankees
Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the New York Yankees. Scouting reports are compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as from our own (both Eric Longenhagen’s and Kiley McDaniel’s) observations. For more information on the 20-80 scouting scale by which all of our prospect content is governed you can click here. For further explanation of the merits and drawbacks of Future Value, read this.
All of the numbered prospects here also appear on The Board, a new feature at the site that offers sortable scouting information for every organization. That can be found here.
| Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Estevan Florial | 21.2 | A+ | CF | 2020 | 50 |
| 2 | Jonathan Loaisiga | 24.2 | MLB | RHP | 2018 | 45+ |
| 3 | Deivi Garcia | 19.7 | AA | RHP | 2021 | 45+ |
| 4 | Antonio Cabello | 18.3 | R | CF | 2023 | 45+ |
| 5 | Roansy Contreras | 19.2 | A | RHP | 2022 | 45 |
| 6 | Albert Abreu | 23.3 | AA | RHP | 2019 | 45 |
| 7 | Everson Pereira | 17.8 | R | CF | 2023 | 45 |
| 8 | Anthony Seigler | 19.6 | R | C | 2022 | 45 |
| 9 | Luis Gil | 20.7 | A- | RHP | 2021 | 45 |
| 10 | Clarke Schmidt | 22.9 | A- | RHP | 2020 | 45 |
| 11 | Luis Medina | 19.7 | R | RHP | 2022 | 45 |
| 12 | Kevin Alcantara | 16.6 | None | CF | 2024 | 40+ |
| 13 | Trevor Stephan | 23.2 | AA | RHP | 2019 | 40+ |
| 14 | Osiel Rodriguez | 17.2 | None | RHP | 2022 | 40+ |
| 15 | Nick Nelson | 23.2 | AA | RHP | 2020 | 40 |
| 16 | Raimfer Salinas | 18.1 | R | CF | 2023 | 40 |
| 17 | Anthony Garcia | 18.4 | R | RF | 2023 | 40 |
| 18 | Alexander Vargas | 17.3 | None | SS | 2024 | 40 |
| 19 | Josh Breaux | 21.3 | A- | C | 2021 | 40 |
| 20 | Ryder Green | 18.7 | R | RF | 2023 | 40 |
| 21 | Josh Stowers | 21.9 | A- | CF | 2021 | 40 |
| 22 | Oswaldo Cabrera | 19.9 | A | 2B | 2021 | 40 |
| 23 | Antonio Gomez | 17.2 | None | C | 2024 | 40 |
| 24 | Ezequiel Duran | 19.7 | R | 2B | 2022 | 40 |
| 25 | Matt Sauer | 20.0 | A- | RHP | 2021 | 40 |
| 26 | Thairo Estrada | 22.9 | AAA | SS | 2019 | 40 |
| 27 | Garrett Whitlock | 22.6 | AA | RHP | 2020 | 40 |
| 28 | Pablo Olivares | 21.0 | A+ | CF | 2021 | 40 |
| 29 | Michael King | 23.7 | AAA | RHP | 2019 | 40 |
| 30 | Yoendrys Gomez | 19.3 | R | RHP | 2022 | 40 |
| 31 | Juan Then | 19.0 | R | RHP | 2022 | 40 |
| 32 | Frank German | 21.4 | A- | RHP | 2021 | 40 |
| 33 | Freicer Perez | 22.9 | A+ | RHP | 2021 | 40 |
| 34 | Oswald Peraza | 18.6 | R | SS | 2022 | 35+ |
| 35 | Roberto Chirinos | 18.4 | R | SS | 2022 | 35+ |
| 36 | Ronny Rojas | 17.4 | R | 2B | 2022 | 35+ |
| 37 | Angel Rojas | 18.2 | R | SS | 2023 | 35+ |
| 38 | Dermis Garcia | 21.1 | A | 1B | 2021 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
Tools Goofs
Juan De Leon, RF
Alexander Palma, RF
Isiah Gilliam, LF
Miguel Marte, SS
Stanley Rosario, LF
Isaiah Pasteur, CF
De Leon got $2 million in the 2014 July 2nd class and still has the loud tools — 70 bat speed, 60 raw, 55 speed, 60 arm — that had scouts so excited, but his conditioning and quality of play have fluctuated. Palma, 23, signed for $800,000 in the 2012 July 2nd class and was having a breakout year at Hi-A until he broke both his fibula and tibia. Much of his 2017 season was lost to injury, as well. He’s a 55 runner with above-average hit and raw power, and the power was starting to play in games. Gilliam has 65-grade raw power from both sides of the plate but is limited defensively and instinctually. Marte signed for $200,000 in 2017 and was arguably the best Yankees prospect in the DSL. He’s a legit shortstop with a plus arm, plus speed, instincts, and some contact skill. Rosario is a poor man’s version of Anthony Garcia; he takes a healthy hack but there’s not a whole lot else yet. Pasteur was a 13th rounder in 2018 out of George Washington (he transferred from Indiana) and he’ll turn 23 next season so he’ll need to perform, but he’s an 80 runner and freak athlete with a weird swing and a chance to play the infield.
Potential Reserves/Platoon Types
Hoy Jun Park, SS
Diego Castillo, SS
Ben Ruta, LF
Jason Lopez, C
Saul Torres, C
Park, recently passed over in the Rule 5 Draft, originally signed out of Korea for $1,000,000. He’s a bit passive at the plate and doesn’t have much game power, but he’s a plus runner with some contact skills and can play at least an average shortstop. He turns 23 in April. Castillo is a gritty, plus makeup shortstop with great instincts and middling raw tools. Ruta is a grinder reserve outfield type who one scout compared to Sam Fuld. Lopez is a prototypical potential backup catcher who converted from the infield, and it looks like he’s going stick back there, but probably not have much offensive impact. Torres has a 70-grade arm and is a 50 or 55 defender with 50 raw power, but has a lot of trouble making hard contact.
Power Arms with Likely Bullpen Futures
Glenn Otto, RHP
Domingo Acevedo, RHP
Chance Adams, RHP
Raynel Espinal, RHP
Alexander Vizcaino, RHP
Otto was a reliever at Rice (winces) who the Yankees wanted to develop a changeup and try to start, but he missed nearly the whole season with a blood clot issues in his shoulder. He’s up to 96 mph and flashes a 70 curveball in short stints, so relief wouldn’t be such a bad thing, but it sounds like they’ll give starting one more try. Acevedo has solid middle relief stuff and command but can’t stay healthy. He’s up to 98 mph and could be a two-pitch reliever (the changeup is the best secondary). Adams was drafted as a power reliever and was asked to start, and his stuff held up for a while, but then it slowly backed up last year. It may now make sense to put him in the bullpen and see if it bounces back. Espinal was passed over in the Rule 5 Draft but he’s got a funky three-quarters delivery, a good slider, and his velo was up last year, as was his K%. Sources we spoke with have varied opinions of Vizcaino’s secondary stuff, which could just be evidence of inconsistency. His fastball is into the upper-90s, sitting 93-97, and he’s shown an above-average slider.
Starter Types at the Lower Levels
Miguel Yajure, RHP
Denny Larrondo, RHP
Jhonatan Munoz, RHP
Rony Garcia, RHP
Nolan Martinez, RHP
Dalton Lehnen, LHP
Harold Cortijo, RHP
Yajure (pronounced yah-HOOR-ray) has command of above-average offspeed, which gives him a chance to be a backend starter. Larrondo is a 16-year-old Cuban who signed for $550,000 last summer. He sits 89-92 mph with touch and feel, is athletic, and can spin it. Munoz is a 5-foot-11 bulldog reliever with solid average stuff. He came right at hitters and had success in 50-pitch outings during extended and short-season ball last year. Garcia is another potential backend starter who’s up to 95 mph with a solid average curveball. Martinez was an overslot third rounder in 2016 but has had trouble adding weight and staying healthy, so his above average stuff has backed up. Lehnen is a finesse lefty who may benefit from a new weapon, perhaps a cutter, a pitch this system has more of than is usual. Cortijo is 5-foot-9 and has a fringy slider but he’s up to 95 mph and gets good extension, and he has an above average changeup.
System Overview
Perhaps no team’s talent cup runneth over quite like the Yankees. Since 2015, they have had 11 players selected from their org in the Rule 5 draft and made countless trades sending away viable major leaguers who couldn’t crack their 40-man roster. As they’ve enacted this 40-man churn, the Yankees have specifically targeted players far away from the big leagues, guys who don’t have to be added to their crowded 40-man for several years.
Because more and more teams have placed value on certainty and player proximity to the majors, the Yankees have been able to flip a bunch of relievers in their mid-20s for young, high-variance players who have sizable upside if things click. Our prospect asset values put big numbers on 50 FV or higher guys, and the Yankees only have one of those, so they won’t rank highly in our farm system rankings. But they definitely have the most of the high ceiling, high-variance sorts, including a few who, as we point out in the scouting reports, could be Top 100 caliber by midseason, giving the Yankees a high likelihood of moving into the top half of systems during 2019, barring trades.
When we spoke with scouts who were excited about talent from the low levels of this system, we asked why their team hadn’t traded for one of those players. The answer? The Yankees won’t discuss them. Their 40-man crunch, big payroll, and talented major league roster have driven the youth movement at the lower levels. This is interesting to contrast with the Rays, who have one of baseball’s smallest payrolls, have stocked their big league team with pre-arbitration talent, and have a farm system clogged with prospects at Double- and Triple-A.
A few other teams have begun to experience a similar 40-man crunch (San Diego and Tampa Bay come to mind) but the Yankees have been employing this methodology for a few years now, and it has had a drastic impact on the shape of their farm system. This, combined with a strong international program and a willingness to acquire additional pool space in recent years, has helped lead to a whopping 58% of the players on this prospect list being teenagers. On average, this is the youngest farm system we’ve written up so far, with players in the 35+ FV or better tiers averaging 20.2 years old, two years younger than in most other systems.
Last year’s Brandon Drury saga is a great example of why that strategy is necessary. Perfectly fine big leaguers are hard for the Yankees to roster right now. They have stars, who will need to be usurped by other players of similar caliber. 25-year-old relievers and utility infielders may be viable big leaguers, but they don’t often suddenly turn into stars. Some of these teenagers might.
thanks guys for the work. For me this verifies how bias the international draft is. Look at this list most are international signees. And there is history there as well. Penalize the Braves for their shenegigans and yet the biggest culprit and the innovators of under the table dealing are the Yankees. MLB need to make some changes. Fund these academies so it can have a legimate drafts….
What is the complaint here? The Yankees do a good job signing international prospects, therefore…bad? I see no evidence the Yankees have broken any rules like the Braves under Coppolella. Maybe they should, ya know, be commended for doing a good job at scouting and development? Especially since they never have high draft picks (down with drafts, btw)
Not sure why you’re pounding the table for this considering there are a handful of teams that barely, if at all, utilize or even sign guys from the carribean.
There’s been a base level of under-the-table dealings in Latin America for years (mostly the fact that players not eligible to sign until 16 are in reality locked up by 14) but I’ve never seen any evidence the Yankees are particularly bad actors in that space.
Consider, instead, their name recognition advantage. The D.R. doesn’t have a home team, all they see are akin to national broadcasts, which means their Yankees exposure is even more disproportionate than what we see here in the U.S. They’re one hour past the East Coast time zone, so Dodgers/Giants games don’t start until 11 p.m. Dominican time. Dominican TV is all East Coast, all the time. Consider also where the largest concentration of Dominican immigrants live in the United States. It’s New York and Miami, and nobody really loves Miami. So Dominicans’ U.S. relatives root for their home teams, and those connections mean something. And of course, the Yankees win, obnoxiously consistently.
Put it all together and the Yankees (and to a lesser degree the Red Sox and Mets since they also get tons of media exposure) have a massive structural advantage that has nothing to do with wealth or underhanded dealing. These kids sign between 14 and 16. Some of them have little choice, going where the money’s greatest or where their buscons tell them to, but what would you expect a kid with any say in the matter to do when faced with roughly equal offers? Tiebreaker goes to the handful of teams that are basically synonymous with baseball on the island.
That’s just pure speculation based on nothing. The conclusion you’re asking to draw is that the Yankees are able to sign players for less money than other teams, and there’s no evidence that is the case.
No it’s not. I specifically said when the money’s roughly the same and referred to the advantage as a tiebreaker. I don’t think players regularly take discounts to play for the Yankees, but I think the Yankees have pretty much the best chance of any team to get any player who they decide to bid competitively for.
And it’s based on more than you think. In a previous life/career, I lived in the DR and worked on the periphery of this world. I’ll acknowledge my experience is nothing more than anecdotal but only a few teams get consistent coverage before the postseason because there’s no such thing as local coverage.
Fair point, east coast and especially New York teams have an advantage with DR and maybe even Venezuelan players. Not dissimilar to west coast advantage with Japanese and Mexican players. I realize you didn’t raise the issue but it kind of becomes an inane topic…
I actually think the Marlins have a chance to really improve their DSL operations and become the #1 player in the Dominican. Playing so close to home and in a very Latino-friendly environment should give them the edge.
what are you even talking about? yankees have been consistently losing out on top guys in every class who had prearranged deals before they even got a foot in the door.
Yes, I am aware that the Yankees don’t sign every top player on the international market.
The top of the market is its own animal, especially since bonus pools began. Each team basically needs to pick their 1, maybe 2 top-rated guys and go out and get them. There’s a lot more action in the low to mid six figures though where relationships and cache matter a ton, and I think that’s where the Yankees really thrive.
They’re also just a really well run organization with really talented people top to bottom, including international scouts, so there’s that too.
that’s not even the point which is disputing this guy’s assertion that yankees cheat the rules in IFA.
Cashman is in Venture Capital mode and looking for Unicorns
I can’t read the whole thing right now but I’m so excited to read this. Probably the post I most look forward to every year. Both of you do such great work. Thank you for this
Perhaps the last paragraph of the ‘System Overview’ explains why, but even if they’re not the type of prospects that the Yankees are trying to fill their farm with at the moment I’m a little surprised not to see Phillip Diehl or Brian Keller making it into this list.
no mention of stephen tarpley either, who could be a big weapon out of the big league pen this season. also they seem to be very low on domingo acevedo and chance adams, probably rightly so, but just a bit weird to see them on the “other prospects of note” section rather than somewhere in the middle where they seem to be ranked on the other major publications. but i think they are right though when it comes to those two
I’m not really all that enthused about the Yankees’ system, but I do think that they’re incredibly well-stocked in one area that gets overlooked: Guys who have a great chance of being power relievers, and catchers with high ceilings. Looking through this list, guys like Abreu, Gil, Medina, Nelson, Sauer, Stephan, Gomez, Perez, Acevedo, and Adams are all unlikely to stick as starters, but if the stuff plays up in the bullpen (and/or the command is tolerable) you’ve got a lot of replacements for the current fireballing bullpen; Contreras and Loasigia could be great in the bullpen if the control/injuries are too much.
Of all the guys on the list, I think Seigler and Schmidt might be flying a little bit below the radar. Average control and four 55s in your arsenal is a really good, and although he’s overaged for his level he was also hurt and shaking off rust. Seigler is a long way away from the bigs, but those projected tool grades (55 hit; 50 game power; 45 speed; 55 defense; 65 arm) put him in Willson Contreras territory, and something like the 5th best catcher in the game.
I worry a little bit about Florial and Garcia, but for very different reasons. Florial, because “stiff wrists” and “limited bat control” should raise huge red flags; you can easily see him becoming a useful big leaguer and the upside is clearly huge, but the odds of being a 4th outfielder/platoon guy seem pretty high. Garcia, on the other hand, looks like a possible star everywhere but Yankee stadiuim. Righties who generate fly balls like he does are going to have a tough time of it there; it’s important to note that . You wonder if the Yankees would be better off letting him work his way up the ladder to the upper levels of the minors and trading him for some established help–could be a win-win for both the Yankees and the team they trade with.
Roansy Contreras, Everson Pereira, Raimfer Salinas, Ezequiel Duran, Thairo Estrada, Yoendrys Gomez, Freicer Perez, Ronny and Angel Rojas, Stanley Rosario, Juan De Leon, Raynel Espinal, Miguel Yajure, Jhonatan Munoz, Harold Cortijo…
At what point do we start holding you guys accountable for trying to sneak made up players on teams lists? It’s like you pulled these names from FIFA career mode.
Do the Yankees actually like Stowers (40 FC here) >Long (50 FV on the Reds list)?
Or was it 100% informed by 40-man issues? (My assumption).
It was likely that they thought the marginal difference between Long and Stowers was less than that of an additional 40 man spot in the upcoming years.
They might also think that Long doesn’t stick at 2B, and that Stowers sticks in CF…which makes the choice between a Future 55 Hit/45 Power CF and a 45 Hit/50 Power LF pretty easy, in a situation where proximity to the majors is actually a negative.
Long’s also pretty close to MLB ready, requires a 40-man spot, and they’re fairly stacked at the only positions he can play, while their OF depth chart is a bit thinner. It’s defensible to see them as roughly equal prospects if they have good grades on Stowers, and if that’s their organizational take it’s a solid move to get a few years younger, rearrange organizational depth, and get a few more years to make a decision on a guy.
Long is kind of overrated, and I think this move proves it. Guys who need 40-man protection usually need to be immediate contributors or have big upside, and Long has neither.
Or be on teams that don’t consider 90 wins disappointing – Long belongs on plenty of 40-man rosters, just not the Yankees’.
He’d be on the bubble nearly everywhere. Virtually every team either needs that space to keep prospects or depth pieces. Only places like Seattle or Texas or the Orioles, where the team isn’t competing and they don’t have any quality prospects to stick on the 40-man are interested in keeping a not-quite-yet-finished left fielder who probably won’t hit enough to play everyday.
People are focusing on the 40-man protection, and that’s the precipitating factor, but the bigger issue is he’s just not that good. Stowers is more or less an equivalent prospect.
I think you’re underrating the bat a little bit and prematurely calling him a LF. He’s been a comfortably above average hitter at every stop save for his mid-season promotion to Double-A in 2017, and the Mariners are talking about him as a multi-positional guy who primarily plays 2B. If he can stick in the infield he projects as a decent regular even if the glove’s below average. At corner OF, he projects as a second division type, but with the potential for more if he either takes a step forward with the bat or shows some plus defensive ability out there (he’s got the physical tools to be a rangy defender so there’s a chance he’s more than a tweener).
A dip in performance this year and I’m right there with you, but I think there’s still some shine left. Count me as someone who thinks he’d crack most teams’ 40-man rosters, at least this year (with the potential to fall off with a slow start or an “arrives to camp out of shape” type development).
I’m sure there’s still a chance that he becomes a productive everyday 2nd baseman. But for a guy who’s not very toolsy, doesn’t have outstanding offensive performance, is not young for his level, and has major defensive questions, he sure gets a lot of love.
Honestly…the fact that he consistently gets projected as a solid regular, despite lacking any of the traits that usually result in scouts overrating players, might well be a selling point.
I don’t think wRC+’s of 146, 153, and 167 across A and A+ at ages 20/21 followed by 120 in AA at 22 is that far away from outstanding.
Nobody’s projecting him as a superstar (at least nobody I’ve seen). Just a decent bet to be a decent regular.
That sweet, sweet swing though… if I squint hard and long enough I see a lefty version of Brandon Phillips, but maybe without any 30/30 seasons. Lackluster comps aside, Shed will be a fine ballplayer and has an 80 grade name. I like to call him Sheddy Spaghetti… don’t ask.
Since Long’s numbers are better at an earlier age, I’m glad the Yankees dealt him to avoid Rob Refnsydermania among Yankee fans. I assume the Yankees saw potential in Stowers, as well as the value of the roster spot. The organization had plenty of time to shop Long and determine potential return.
i think the yankees have made it a point to really bolster their depth lately, they were lacking in C prospects so they took two in the first two rounds of the past draft. they’ve sent a lot of OF prospects out in trades, so they wanted to restock a bit with Stowers. i think the fact that Long has issues about position and 40 man status obviously played a factor but i think they also wanted an OF
I’m a little surprised Chance Adams didn’t make the list… overall the system is pretty deep but lacks 50 FV guys although a few could make that jump.
Yeah, that’s a big drop from Adams.
Dude had a nightmare season, following his bone spur surgery in the spring, but I’d still have him in the 40 FV range.
I know he is with the Reds now but as a Reds fan I was hoping to see your opinion on Sanmartin at some point.
He is on the Reds list now, in the other names to know section.
Great stuff as always, guys. I’m a little surprised on how down you were on Jason Lopez’s offense. Showed some power last year and seems like there might be some upside considering how young he is to be a lower end starter in the Bigs. Also, what was the reference to wincing at Glenn Otto being a reliever at Rice? That one went over my head.
Rice has a reputation for running their pitchers into the ground.
Rice is the new Stanford…
I see the “80” Throw rating on Florial, and can’t help but wonder if he couldn’t be a decent pitcher if his hit tool never develops enough for him to be a big-league OF?
Moncada’s K issues are primarily due to pitch selection, not flailing at pitches. He takes a lot of strike threes. It seems like a slight to compare Moncada to Florial. Sorry to derail…
I’m surprised a bit at how low King is. Granted, nobody expects an ERA as low that (I guess a .167 BABIP at AAA will do that).
But comparing him to Chance Adams at this point last year, he looks a lot better. Comparing King’s 2018 to Adams’ 2017, there are some similarities (luck with balls in play, low k-rate) but King has significantly better control.
Adams ranked 8th last year, while King ranks 29th this year. Is this due to the rest of the players (i.e. all these teenagers leapfrogging them) or something else? Was the preseason 2018 Adams really a much better prospect than the preseason 2019 King?
The stuff just isn’t similar – Adams was sitting at 94, with an above average slider and an average change-up and curve.
King’s FB is a tick worse, and his only other above average pitch, in their estimation, is a cutter…which doesn’t offer nearly as much differentiation from a fastball as a proper breaking ball does.
Every time I see Venezuela mentioned I wonder what each team and MLB is doing to protect their players who call that strife torn country home. It seems that horrific incidents like what happened to Thairo Estrada are a constant danger. Venezuela is far worse today than a few years ago when Wilson Ramos was kidnapped and held for ransom. Players who have reached the majors can afford to stay away, if they so choose, but the young minor leaguers have little choice but to return. Are teams making an effort to help these kids and is the MLB hierarchy doing anything ?
I have no idea, but I sure hope that anyone with a major league contract has (a) stayed away, (b) bought everyone they care about a ticket out of there to somewhere else. Wow, is it ugly there right now.
A fine review.
Great write up as always. I do have a question on Kevin Alcantara. What did you mean by this?
“but it may behoove the team to leave him in the less-scouted DSL as a way of hiding him from clubs who don’t scout pro ball there.”
Is that so other teams won’t ask about him in trades? Or some other obvious reason I’m missing?
Also, as a Yankee fan it seems a bit curious that former Yankee Nick Solak (current Ray) is a 50 FV, and he’d be the second most valuable player on this list. He was 23 in AA and put up decent but not great numbers while playing an averagish 2B. Maybe I’m lower on Solak than most, but I’d give him a 45.
Solak put up a 140 wRC+, while showing more power than he had previously, as a 22 year old in AA.
If you think he’s an average defensive 2B, it’s very hard to view him as anything less than a 2-win player going forward, and likely closer to 3 – like a rich man’s Kolten Wong (excluding the outlier defense from 2018).
Solak just turned 24 last month, so he was 23 for all of last season. And he did show a bit more power than he’s shown in the past, but he still put up a (decent but nothing special) .167 isolated power. A 50 FV on him isn’t crazy, just seems like him being 2nd on this list would be a stretch. I think of him as a multipositional bench piece or a 2nd division regular.
If he’s a 110 wRC+ guy, he’s a proper regular…regardless of his position.