Top 47 Prospects: Boston Red Sox
Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the Boston Red Sox. Scouting reports were compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as my own observations. As there was no minor league season in 2020, there are some instances where no new information was gleaned about a player. Players whose write-ups have not been altered begin by telling you so. For the others, the blurb ends with an indication of where the player played in 2020, which in turn likely informed the changes to their report. As always, I’ve leaned more heavily on sources from outside the org than within for reasons of objectivity. Because outside scouts were not allowed at the alternate sites, I’ve primarily focused on data from there. Lastly, in effort to more clearly indicate relievers’ anticipated roles, you’ll see two reliever designations, both in lists and on The Board: MIRP, or multi-inning relief pitcher, and SIRP, or single-inning relief pitcher.
For more information on the 20-80 scouting scale by which all of our prospect content is governed, you can click here. For further explanation of Future Value’s merits and drawbacks, read Future Value.
All of the numbered prospects here also appear on The Board, a resource the site offers featuring sortable scouting information for every organization. It can be found here.
Editor’s Note: Miguel Bleis was added to this list after he agreed to a deal with the Red Sox on January 15.
Frank German was added to this list after he was traded to the Red Sox from the Yankees as part of the Adam Ottavino trade.
| Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jeter Downs | 22.5 | AA | 2B | 2022 | 50 |
| 2 | Triston Casas | 21.0 | A+ | 1B | 2023 | 50 |
| 3 | Bryan Mata | 21.7 | AA | MIRP | 2021 | 45+ |
| 4 | Gilberto Jimenez | 20.5 | A- | CF | 2023 | 45+ |
| 5 | Noah Song | 23.7 | A- | SP | 2023 | 45 |
| 6 | Tanner Houck | 24.6 | MLB | MIRP | 2021 | 45 |
| 7 | Jarren Duran | 24.4 | AA | CF | 2022 | 45 |
| 8 | Connor Seabold | 25.0 | AA | SP | 2021 | 45 |
| 9 | Bobby Dalbec | 25.6 | MLB | 3B | 2021 | 45 |
| 10 | Eduard Bazardo | 25.4 | AA | SIRP | 2021 | 40+ |
| 11 | Brayan Bello | 21.7 | A | SIRP | 2022 | 40+ |
| 12 | Jay Groome | 22.4 | A | SP | 2022 | 40+ |
| 13 | Thad Ward | 24.0 | A+ | MIRP | 2022 | 40+ |
| 14 | Aldo Ramirez | 19.7 | AAA | SP | 2023 | 40+ |
| 15 | Nick Yorke | 18.8 | R | 2B | 2025 | 40+ |
| 16 | Jeisson Rosario | 21.3 | A+ | CF | 2021 | 40+ |
| 17 | Brainer Bonaci | 18.5 | R | 3B | 2023 | 40 |
| 18 | Hudson Potts | 22.2 | AA | 3B | 2021 | 40 |
| 19 | Connor Wong | 24.7 | AA | C | 2021 | 40 |
| 20 | Eduardo Lopez | 18.7 | R | CF | 2023 | 40 |
| 21 | Blaze Jordan | 18.1 | R | 1B | 2025 | 40 |
| 22 | Juan Chacon | 18.1 | R | CF | 2024 | 40 |
| 23 | Cameron Cannon | 23.3 | A- | 2B | 2023 | 40 |
| 24 | Nick Decker | 21.3 | A- | RF | 2023 | 40 |
| 25 | Frank German | 23.3 | A+ | RHP | 2022 | 40 |
| 26 | Jacob Wallace | 22.5 | A- | SIRP | 2023 | 40 |
| 27 | Brendan Cellucci | 22.6 | A- | SIRP | 2022 | 40 |
| 28 | Matthew Lugo | 19.7 | A- | SS | 2024 | 40 |
| 29 | Bryan Gonzalez | 19.4 | R | RF | 2024 | 40 |
| 30 | Garrett Whitlock | 24.6 | AA | MIRP | 2021 | 40 |
| 31 | Durbin Feltman | 23.8 | AA | SIRP | 2021 | 40 |
| 32 | Miguel Bleis | 16.9 | R | RF | 2025 | 40 |
| 33 | Chih-Jung Liu | 21.8 | R | SIRP | 2024 | 40 |
| 34 | Jorge Rodriguez | 20.4 | A- | SP | 2023 | 35+ |
| 35 | Christian Koss | 23.0 | R | SS | 2022 | 35+ |
| 36 | Eduardo Vaughan | 19.0 | R | RF | 2024 | 35+ |
| 37 | Andrew Politi | 24.6 | A+ | SIRP | 2022 | 35+ |
| 38 | Ryan Zeferjahn | 22.9 | A- | SIRP | 2022 | 35+ |
| 39 | Shane Drohan | 22.1 | R | SP | 2024 | 35+ |
| 40 | Bradley Blalock | 20.1 | R | SP | 2025 | 35+ |
| 41 | Naysbel Marcano | 18.7 | R | C | 2023 | 35+ |
| 42 | Marcus Wilson | 24.4 | AA | CF | 2021 | 35+ |
| 43 | Chris Murphy | 22.6 | A- | MIRP | 2023 | 35+ |
| 44 | Antoni Flores | 20.3 | A- | 3B | 2023 | 35+ |
| 45 | Luis Perales | 17.8 | R | SIRP | 2025 | 35+ |
| 46 | Albert Feliz | 18.8 | R | LF | 2023 | 35+ |
| 47 | Jeremy Wu-Yelland | 21.6 | R | SIRP | 2024 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
Pitching Depth Types
Brock Bell, RHP
Yusniel Padron-Artilles, RHP
Joan Martinez, RHP
Brian Van Belle, RHP
Alex Scherff, RHP
Bell’s fastball has carry and has been up to at least 95 (he sat 91-94 in 2019) and he has a good curveball that gets its depth from its axis rather than raw spin. Padron-Artilles, 23, was born in Cuba but drafted out of Miami-Dade College a couple of years ago. He also has a really sneaky fastball even though he doesn’t throw that hard. Martinez and Scherff have premium arm strength — Martinez is 94-97 touching 99, Scherff is 92-96 with a good changeup — but relief-only projections, and their fastballs don’t play like you’d expect given the velo. Van Belle (undrafted out of Miami) has a plus changeup and a chance to be a spot starter.
Young Sleepers
Wilkelman Gonzalez, RHP
Ceddanne Rafaela, SS
Darel Belen, RF
Ricardo Cubillan, SS
Nathanael Cruz, RHP
Kelvin Diaz, CF
Jhostynxon Garcia, RF
Gonzalez is 6-foot-3 and has already touched 95 at age 18. He had some support for the main section of the list after his 2020 instructs performance. Rafaela has contact skills and can play all over the field. He’s 17, but is only 5-foot-8 and has very little room on the frame. Belen is the opposite. He’s a broad-shouldered power projection bat at 6-foot-4, with average raw, and a plus arm, another right field look. Cubillan was hurt for much of 2019. He’s 22 and plays a good short and has contact skills, but very little power. Cruz is somewhat advanced for a 17-year old pitcher. He’s in the low-90s with fringe secondary stuff right now. Diaz was a shortstop but moved to center field; he’s another wiry frame to keep an eye on in case he grows into impact power. Garcia has similar tools but a slighter build.
Frames with Power
Pedro Castellanos, 1B
Mario Campana, RF
Tyler Esplin, RF
Brandon Howlett, 3B
This is a self-explanatory group. All have very high offensive bars to clear at their respective positions.
System Overview
This system is not very good because it still lacks the top end prospects that drive the empirically-derived farm rankings here at the site. But it is about 10 prospects deeper than last year’s list as the Red Sox were 2020 sellers at the onset of a rebuild that was partly ownership-imposed and partly caused by the unsustainable way Dave Dombrowski ran the show.
Boston’s 2020 was the rebuild equivalent of a sprinter made of molasses coming out of the blocks. Part of this is because the most talented part of the Betts trade, Alex Verdugo, is no longer a prospect, part of it is because Boston had no second rounder in 2020 because of their sign-stealing scandal, and part of it is because the young Latin American core of this system didn’t really have a chance to get a traditional year of development and evaluation.
Some of it is also, at least at this website, because I didn’t like their draft. I watched film (some from last summer and some from the alt site), talked to pro scouts who saw Nick Yorke after the draft, and doubled back to some crosscheckers on the West Coast who saw him before it. Their opinions were enough to move my pre-draft evaluation of him pretty considerably, but their class still feels sub-par to me. I’m not keen on positionless hitters, and the Red Sox may have drafted two of them. The shortened draft also punished Boston and other teams with thin farm systems, and made it impossible to find late-round diamonds in the rough like Boston did with Blalock and Cellucci in 2019. They did sign more undrafted free agents than other clubs, which makes sense considering the state of this system, though it’s also confirmation that the org is aware it needs more talent.
It’s fairly likely that whoever the Red Sox draft fourth overall in the 2021 Draft will immediately become their top prospect, and rumors of an Andrew Benintendi trade may yet cause this list to grow before the end of the offseason. It’d be smart if Boston flexed its financial might to take on some bad contracts (with prospects attached, of course) while other teams are especially desperate to get rid of them, but it doesn’t seem like ownership would allow that.
Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.
Very cool, thanks for this! As a Sox fan I can’t manage to get too happy about the overall list, but there are some interesting guys to look out for.
Also, after reading this I’m very excited to see Eduard Bazardo in the bullpen. There’s nothing like the combo of 1) 98+ fastball, 2) hammer curve, 3) questionable control, and 4) a kickass name to come in to get outs in the 9th. Heart attacks for fans and opposing batters alike.
By that logic Sam Coonrod should be a Red Sox.
Last place team with a high payroll and a weak farm system. How does the big budget team with the Betts, Bogaerts, Benitendi, Devers core turn into this so quickly? They could have been a dynasty! It would be interesting to read a book documenting how they fell so spectacularly.
giving half a billion dollars to pitchers
The Yankees do this too and they’ve never crashed like this.
Red Sox injuries, declining ability, and the inability to develop pitchers make a difference.
Yankees were rebuilding until they hit on some solid replacement players in the last couple of seasons. Now that there is a salary “limit” big spenders have changed how they manage. Look at the Yanks this winter. They could have been going after big names to improve their rotation, but they are penny-pinching LeMahieu.
The yankees at least develope hard throwing relievers, the red sox don’t develope productive mlb pitchers at all.
The real reason is not developing a credible starter in about 15 years except for maybe eduardo Rodriguez.
The approach to develope hitters and sign or trade for hitters that epstein did both in chicago and boston and that his successors couldn’t correct in Boston is good in theory because hitting prospects bust less often but it means also you have to spend a ton of prospects and money on pitchers and then 1 or 2 injuries and everything explodes like we have seen with both the cubs and red sox.
You don’t want to focus the farm too much on pitching but you need some contribution of the farm on pitching or you will eventually run out of money and prospects. The issue wasn’t bad trades (actually most trades weren’t that bad) but that so many trades and signings were necessary due to the utter failure of the red sox pitching development.
The biggest priority of the new front office must be to develope a credible pitching development staff. You can’t really plan to develope a sale or verlander (it would help though:)) but you at least must be able to develope some reliable back end starters and good relievers, both of which the sox weren’t good either in the last years.
This take is way too pessimistic.
All those guys, with the exception of Betts (who they got two top 100 types for) are still on the team.
-depth charts projects the Redsox as a middle of the pack team inching towards a wild card spot. Their 2020 season was an aberration. This is not a bad team.
-they probably COULD have kept pushing an all in approach, but decided it was in their best interest to retool, which I think is smart. They *avoided* becoming the next Giants/Tigers/Phillies
Well there is talk that Benny is next of those 4 out the door. Maybe a core of a dynasty takes more than 4 guys.
Sox had some serious injury losses last year, but they were also in trouble in multiple areas – rotation, bullpen, some positional holes, etc. But I’d agree they aren’t likely quite as bad as they were in ’20.
But really the initial premise about them falling so far may be the problem. Its not at all unprecedented for Boston to do so. They were 1st in the AL East in 16-18 with their great ’18 season capping it, but they’d been last in the East in ’14 and ’15, following on a championship year in ’13 following 3 seasons where they were in 3rd to 5th (in 2012) in the division. Not sure that anyone has gone last to first to last in their division in 3 seasons. So its been a bit of a roller coaster ride just in the last decade.
Great work as always Eric!
All those 30 bats…there’s almost no role for guys like that unless they are left handed or play good defense at a premium spot, and then it is limited.
To follow up on this, I’m pretty high on Downs, Celestino, and Casas (and Mata) but once we get to FV45 there is not a single prospect here that I would get too excited about, and for some of them I’ve got some real pessimism about. Dalbec might do better if he could show off plus defense at 3rd but I find it nearly impossible to believe he’ll be as valuable a player as CJ Cron at 1B, ever. Potts and Cameron are kind of in the same boat. Brandon Howlett doesn’t even get a grade anymore. Wong might fit simply because so few guys hit at catcher but there’s a decent chance he’s out of the majors once he’s out of options.
Is Downs really only a 45 runner? I know MiLB stolen base numbers aren’t super trustworthy, but he has a good amount of them. Plus being a middle infielder, I mean, even Gleyber Torres is a 50 runner; exactly league average in sprint speed, iirc.
Don’t know why this is being downvoted, I’ve seen other reports that had more positive opinions of Downs’s speed. But IIRC Longenhagen and Kiley base their speed grades heavily on HP to 1st times as opposed to anything resembling sprint speed. For example, they gave Keston Hiura a 45 speed grade, and per statcast, he had a 23rd percentile HP to 1st times last year despite 54th percentile sprint speed. A 45 grade would be more in line with the HP to 1st time than the sprint speed mark
Yeah, I’m not quite sure what goes into the speed grades. Kyle Tucker for example stole a bunch of bases in the minors and has faired well in the majors too. He has a 71% sprint speed a 70% HP to 1st but is graded as a 40. Not sure if that’s just a mistake or if there’s something I’m missing.
And from someone who watches about every Astros game (and focuses on Kyle Tucker) he is nothing short of a 60 runner- a 45 runner doesn’t hit 6 triples in 60 games
Surprised to see that C.J. Chatham didn’t make the list at all – any particular reason why he fell all the way off?
He’s already 26 and Boston was happy to play guys like Marco Hernandez, Tzu-Wei Lin, Arauz, and Christian Arroyo over him when they are in rebuild mode (plus they signed Peraza). Any age 26+ prospect that didn’t even get a whiff of playing time on bad clubs in last years weird season is safe to cut bait on I think
I’m digging the Gilberto Jimenez profile. If the power actually develops, he could be a stud.
Farm values (with the international signings):
CLE: $296.00
LAD: $250.00
CHW: $204.00
CIN: $185.50
BOS: $151.00
After a quick check with last year’s end of season, it appears the Sox farm dropped by $2M while the other 4 all improved. Boston’s biggest hit is Downs going from a 55 in the midseason update to a 50 in this update. This system has added the needed depth but seems like they could be a lot better with some of the upside players like Downs, Jimenez, Song (post service), and Groome developing. There’s no certainty with their prospects with guys having lower floors but this seems to be more variance than a typical farm. Bloom we know in Tampa Bay loved depth, which he’s starting to build here. Given the state though in which he started, the depth was a first big change for the club. There’s always pressure in Boston so it will be interesting to see how quickly Bloom can turn the Sox around both at the big league level and in their farm.
I would do dirty things, eat at least a pint of cannoli ice cream for instance, for Casas to be a Cub. Send him over with Darwinzon Hernandez, Ed Rodriguez
Also also I read a BRAG that the Red Sox were becoming the Rays of the North East. Really cool, we’re building great things…The key to sports is payroll efficiency and depth. Do sports fans care or notice that it’s getting worse and worse for the vast majority of people, likely in part because of what suckers the global sports loving chunk of the population are? Including myself! They got me extremely young!
im so beaten down at this point that im texting this article link to a few friends like ‘hey this is a pretty solid improvement over last year!’ hoping they wont point out that while we do have downs and verdugo now we traded the greatest player we’re ever going to watch while in his prime to get them. this is where red sox fans are at nowadays i guess. i know nobody feels sorry for us but this is sad times.
I wonder how many prospects put on a bunch of unsustainable weight in 2020. Consider that they had to go through no grind whatsoever and had a greatly extended window to pack on weight. He put on a bunch of good weight seems like a common refrain this off-season.
Eric, has Mata’s SL/CUT taken a step backwards since 2019? I saw him for a good outing in ’19 and had a future plus SL/CUT on it and just wondering if the reports from the alt site suggested it had taken a step back? Thanks!
The system still lacks high end upside (with the exception of Casas, and maybe Downs). However, this is a farm that has improved quite significantly over the years.
I remember the farm, like two years ago, was almost puke-worthy. They had like, maybe 3(?) 45FV prospects. Zero depth. Now, they at least have built a nice stable of depth (and have a 4th pick incoming).
Still not a great system, but you can squint and see it becoming good within a year if some things go right.
Plus, I trust Bloom/Henry to build a good system. One of the most analytically driven owner/gm combos in game
I thought Tanner Houck might get to a 50 given how fantastic he pitched at the end of last season. Then I realized that Houck only looked fantastic because every other Sox starter was absolutely horrible and that anyone who threw more than a few great outings looked like a superstar. Clemens he ain’t, so a 45 he is.
No, his starts were not just terrific in comparison to the other Red Sox pitchers. The cumulative numbers are sensational and each start was exceptional in and of itself. I don’t know what more Houck could have done to move the needle. You will notice in the article that Eric chose to ignore how well Houck pitched this season. If Casey Mize had thrown those games he would be an 80 now. You have to understand that Houck had been discarded by the evaluating fraternity and it takes a lot more than three excellent starts to be reevaluated and establish himself again as a top prospect.
Eric thinks he can’t start with only two pitches. Personally, I’d be more worried about him hitting the strike zone, which Eric doesn’t seem to be as concerned about.
Oh, I definitely recall how much Houck got discarded after a really bad year prior to last year, so it was definitely a wonderful surprise to see him show up for a month or so and renew some faith. Hopefully, if Houck can prove to others that 2020 wasn’t a fluke, he might get some more respect going into 2022. I’ve seen some 45’s have great careers regardless, so whether Houck gets to 50 or not isn’t much consequence. Just win some games for the Sox, will ya Houck?! They’re desperate.
If he turns into Justin Masterson, that’s not a bad outcome at this point, but there’s still an outside chance that better command and a viable third pitch could have Houck turn the same corner that Derek Lowe did in his mid-20’s. For now though, we’ll have to wait and see.