Two Trade Rumors Destined to be True

It’s trade rumor season. It’s time for fans of contenders to lust after the best players on lesser teams. The airways of AM radio are already full of trade ideas, many of them ridiculous. Their most valuable player for your least valuable prospects is no way to build a trade, and those rumors are easy to dismiss.

The problem is, even if we set the filter higher, and listen only to rumors that come from reputable sources and concern acquirable names, we are still going to hear a decent amount of hogwash. Let’s just take a couple tasty morsels and examine why the rumored swap makes little sense for one team in the dance. Even a real rumor from a real source can be a real silly idea.

Wilson Betemit to the Angels
This tidbit comes from Ken Rosenthal, the best scooper by at least one metric, but it has problems. Alberto Callaspo is no foundational piece for a franchise. This year’s walk rate aside, his only above-average skill so far has been the ability to avoid the strikeout. He makes contact. Not powerful contact — his .108 career ISO looks more like a middle infielder’s output — but contact nonetheless. Add in some suspect fielding and below-average speed and it’s not the most attractive package. Here’s the thing though. Betemit is no improvement. Well, sure, Betemit walks a little more and his .175 career ISO is a little better. But he strikes out more than twice as often as Callaspo, and by most accounts, he’s a worse defender. That takes most of his added value away. Callaspo is showing a .326 wOBA and has a career .317 wOBA. Betemit has a .322 wOBA this year, and .334 for his career. Add in the defense, and it’s a wash. Sure, Sean O’Sullivan is not a great pitcher, but that doesn’t mean that the Angels have an infinite number of mediocre prospects to keeping sending to the Royals for their mediocre players that provide a mediocre upgrade over their in-house options at best.

Conor Jackson to the Pirates
This one is a real head-scratcher. Who is Conor Jackson to replace on the first-place Pittsburgh team? His .249/.323/.330 line and resulting .298 wOBA this year represent his third-straight year with a sub-par offensive performance, and it only gets worse if you include the fact that he’s a first baseman or corner outfielder in the field. He certainly won’t replace Garrett Jones (.328 wOBA) even if Jones is struggling. With the emergence of rookie Alex Presley (.402 wOBA in 76 PAs), the team doesn’t have an obvious outfield position waiting for Jackson. At first base, Lyle Overbay has been bad enough to consider for an upgrade, but even in his reduced state, Overbay comes out ahead (.301 wOBA). Before a platoon is recommended, remember that righty Steve Pearce (.318 wOBA) is due back Friday. And once Jose Tabata returns, the team can move Jones to first most nights. In the end, Conor Jackson is just too much like the other dudes hanging around on the Pirates already (Matt Diaz, Xavier Paul and John Bowker) to spend any resources on his acquisition.

Those are two trades, and they aren’t even of the “Ubaldo Jimenez for Eduardo Nunez” variety. Though the names in these trades are easily movable, they don’t seem likely to move. Neither player is a real upgrade for the acquiring team, and so they aren’t worth the assets they may cost. These rumors don’t make sense. Which is why, of course, they’re likely going to happen.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.




With a phone full of pictures of pitchers' fingers, strange beers, and his two toddler sons, Eno Sarris can be found at the ballpark or a brewery most days. Read him here, writing about the A's or Giants at The Athletic, or about beer at October. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris if you can handle the sandwiches and inanity.

29 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
sean
15 years ago

on the first-place Pittsburgh team?

Levi
15 years ago
Reply to  sean
Yirmiyahu
15 years ago
Reply to  Levi

Shit. So this is the Apocalypse, huh?

dr.brule
15 years ago
Reply to  Levi

Yep, I feel like I’ve died and gone to 1992.

matt w
15 years ago
Reply to  sean

Rec’d this comment just because I like reading “first-place Pittsburgh team.”

Confused
15 years ago

I’m having a hard time understanding the correlation between the title of this article and the actual content. Is it missing a word a la “Two Trade Rumors Destined to be True Hogwash” or is my reading comprehension failing miserably?

How can a rumor be “destined to be true” when you write in the closing paragraph that “they don’t seem likely to move”?

Just curious and no offense intended…I’m a big fan of your writing.

Confused
15 years ago
Reply to  Eno Sarris

Comprehension fail on my part; it makes sense to me now. Forest for the trees and all that…

ecp
15 years ago
Reply to  Eno Sarris

I’m with Confused; I didn’t get it either. I was expecting to read an article that was…well, about trades that seemed to make perfect sense and were fair to both parties.

joser
15 years ago
Reply to  Eno Sarris

Yeah, I’m with you guys. After reading it I actually scrolled back to the top to re-read the headline again and then decided it was either some kind of weird typo or intended for a completely different piece that hadn’t been published yet. (When working on documents with a standard format I sometimes just re-save one under a different name and then edit it to produce a new one, so sometimes things like that happen).

Shaggychild
15 years ago
Reply to  Eno Sarris

Made sense to me!

Chadam
15 years ago
Reply to  Eno Sarris

@Eno: Adding the last few sentences did make it more clear – and you’re right, the fact that I don’t usually expect the sarcasm from you is what threw me off.

My echo and bunnymen (Dodgers Fan)
15 years ago
Reply to  Eno Sarris

@ Eno: “honest question: do the new final lines help emphasize that the title is a joke? I usually refrain from snark, so perhaps it’s a little bit about expectations as well.”

Clarifies it very well for me, it’s probably more the fault of the notgraphs and fangraphs part of the website but I always expect one to be overly sarcastic and the other to be overly serious.

My echo and bunnymen (Dodgers Fan)
15 years ago
Reply to  Confused

I agree, this article was extremely confusing. I expected to see reports of trades destined to happen, but then I see they are not so?

I was also disappointed by the rushed writing on this article as well. Short and to no point. 🙁

Paul
15 years ago

I think Eno’s next logical column to sorta correct this flaw is to analyze all the shitty Royals players who are available and match them up to shitty Angels org players. It’s true that Wilson Betemit is not a good fit, even Tony Reagins could see that, but tell me Mike Sciocia isn’t just dying to grab Matt Treanor to fill that under-rated fourth catcher role.

My echo and bunnymen (Dodgers Fan)
15 years ago

Matt Treanor is the next Jeff Mathis!!!!

Bronnt
15 years ago
Reply to  Confused

Too long; didn’t read

Sitting Curveball
15 years ago

Was anyone else disappointed that the link on Ken Rosenthal didn’t go to a player page? With some of the rumors he spits out, I’d say his chase% is pretty high.

joser
15 years ago

Statistical modelling of journalists is still very rudimentary and the data is mostly proprietary, alas. The sample sizes aren’t a problem, as they generally churn out way too many data points, but extracting any kind of projectable quality certainly is.

Spencer
15 years ago

I wish I could say how stupid you were for saying that Reagins would upgrade a shitty thirdbaseman with an even shittier thirdbaseman but we are talking about Reagins…

JKB
15 years ago

Please consider adding: Joe Girardi to the Angels, Dodgers, or Astros as starting catcher, for Mike Scioscia, Steve Yeager, or Joe Ferguson.

IvanGrushenko
15 years ago

Conor Jackson could be an upgrade over Matt Diaz for the Pirates. Sure he wouldn’t play much and it’s not a very important upgrade, but it’s still not non-sensical

baty
15 years ago

I would absolutely take a chance on Conor Jackson. Why not replace Overbay with him?

Tony Reagins
15 years ago

Hey guys I do this baseball thing and some guy named Mancash or something called me and I totally want to know if I shud do his trade help me plz I want people to like meh. He said he’d give this guy he has thats really badass he can throw with both arms and I just have to give him this lame teenage guy who is batting like less than .200 so Yes or NO ? 2 ARMS (OMFG!!!) for underage?? THanks for help xoxox Tony

Tony Reagins
15 years ago
Reply to  Tony Reagins

Oh and the names are pat vendiette and Mike Fish (?)