Twins Skidding, But No Need to Panic
On the morning of June 1, the Twins awoke a happy team. They had just beaten Seattle in the first of a four-game series, extending their lead in the AL Central to 4.5 games, their largest of the year. Their record, 31-20, was tied for the second best in baseball. With three more games against the offensively hapless Mariners, it looked like the Twins might extend their lead even further. Alas, the situation didn’t play out as anyone had expected.
After their 6-0 loss to the Mets yesterday the Twins find themselves just a half game ahead of the Tigers, who head to Target Field for a three-game set this week. Things don’t get easier for the Twins after that, as they have to play four against Tampa Bay this weekend, and will eventually play Detroit three more times, this time away, leading into the All-Star Break. There exists a distinct chance that the Twins enter the break not only out of first place in the Central, but perhaps all the way down to third place. The White Sox, after all, have gone streaking.
The biggest change for the Twins in June comes from the offense. During the season’s first two months the Twins had scored 4.92 runs per game. In June that mark is down a full run to 3.92 per game. Part of this comes from players leveling out. Justin Morneau, for instance, wasn’t going to hit .377/.493/.680 on the season. In June he’s hit .282/.333/.471 — not terrible numbers but still not to the standard he set earlier in the season. That brings his season marks to .346/.445/.612, which, if he could finish there, would still be quite remarkable. Joe Mauer, too, has skidded a bit, hitting .273/.354/.398 in June after hitting .321/.396/.453 in the first two months. Also slumping in June: Denard Span (.240/.283/.340) and Michael Cuddyer (.216/.284/.284).
The injury to Orlando Hudson has also hurt the Twins. He hit the DL on May 31 with a left wrist sprain and missed 18 days. Matt Tolbert replaced him both in the field and in the batting order, and during that 18-day span he went 8 for 38 with four walks and two extra base hits. Since his return Hudson is just 7 for 38 with three walks and one extra base hit, so it appears that his wrist still isn’t at full strength. On the other end, J.J. Hardy’s left wrist injury has turned out to be a net gain for the team. His replacement, Nick Punto, has hit .354/.425/.462 since the injury, and Punto’s replacement, Danny Valencia, has also filled in admirably. Then again, it’s not difficult to improve on Hardy’s .217/.265/.333 batting line.
In his State of the Twins post, Seth Stohs makes an observation about the injuries:
There have been times that the Twins have had four starters out of the lineup. Are injuries an excuse? Yes, they are. But what the injuries did was show that the Twins depth was not real good. Their weaknesses have been exposed.
It seems, however, that the only injury that has really cost them was the Hudson one. Mauer missed time, but the Twins played well enough in his absence. Punto missed half a month, but he was hitting horribly then. His replacement, Brendan Harris, actually hit better during Punto’s DL stint. And, again, that doesn’t really explain the Twins’ June performance. The drop of one run per game is really attributable to some routine slumps and Hudson’s injury and poor return. Aaron Gleeman, I think, nails it:
Had the timing of the good and bad stretches been flipped, with the Twins starting 10-14 and then playing well for two months, the perception of their current situation would be different. It’s similar to how a player who follows a big April with a mediocre May through September will spend most of the season with nice-looking numbers, but a player who follows a terrible April with a strong May through September will spend much of the season with bad-looking stats.
They may both end up hitting the same .300 with 25 homers and an .850 OPS, but one guy will probably make the All-Star team while people spend months talking about how the other guy is slumping. At the end of the day a hit in April or May counts the same as a hit in September, and along those same lines while it certainly would have been nice for the Twins to go through the entire season without a lengthy rough patch that was never particularly likely.
There is, of course, also the pitching to consider. In April and May the Twins allowed just 3.82 runs per game, but since the calendar flipped they’ve seen that rise to 4.46. Chalk that up to Scott Baker, Kevin Slowey, as Nick Blackburn. Carl Pavano — 2.25 ERA, .187 BABIP, 84.5% strand rate — and Francisco Liriano — 1.50 FIP, 11.33 K/9, 0 HR — have held up their ends. The other three have been quite terrible this month, which, combined with a poor offensive showing, will surely lead to a team slump.
Does that mean that the Twins have to change anything between now and the deadline? We’ll surely learn more about that when the Twins come up in our What Should They Do series. As a quick preview, yeah, it appears as though they could use one more starter. Slowey, Blackburn, and Baker are all better than they’ve shown in June, but the rotation as a whole could use an upgrade on one of them later in the season. They could probably use a third baseman as well, unless Valencia keeps hitting. But what they need most is patience. This is still a good team, talent-wise still the best in the AL Central. They’ve hit a rough patch, and it’s easy to lose sight of the big picture during one of those. The Twins needn’t panic, though. They’re still in a good position, and will likely be in a better one once the offense turns back around.
Joe also writes about the Yankees at River Ave. Blues.
IMO, the Sox are in the much better position of just needing one (maybe 2) above replacement-level bats (and most importantly one that doesn’t have to be a position player) in the open market. Every playoff contender, you could argue, ‘needs’ another starting pitcher; thus the Twins will have to pay very infalted prices for a marginal upgrade. Also not mentioned here is how many runs the Twins are giving up every day Hardy is on the bench (which mitigate any benifits replacing his offense might); he is after all, a UZR superstar).
I just want to make one statement, Nick Blackburn is a bad pitcher. He is a white Livan Hernandez without the luck. I think he needs to work on changing his approach as a pitcher, I just can’t see how you can expect to have success by striking no one out. Some guys will have success with a K rate between 5-6/9, but his is just insanely low, I feel like he just hurls fastballs over the plate when he has batters 0-2, how else can you explain it?
Is it really surprising that Baker, Blackburn and SLowey have been not so great? None of them has ever posted an xFIP below 4.0 for a full season. Wasn’t the knock on this team going in that the starting pitching had question marks? Rather than worrying if those three will turn it around, maybe the Twins should worry about whether Pavano can sustain a BABIP against of .187.
I’m sorry, Pavano has a BABIP of .187? That’s incorrect, it’s .256.
Baker and Slowey should turn it around, Blackburn I’m not so sure, not many guys can survive with such a hideously low strikeout rate.
I was quoting the article. Maybe that’s just for June becasue according to his player page it is .256 for the season. neither seems sustainable as he is at .308 for his career with a best of .274 his rookie year.
Yes, the SP was the concern. SP’s were the CWS big advantage over MIN (at least, IMO).
[1] Liriano’s FIP is ~1.5 lower than his career average, namely because his HR/FB rat is 1/5th of his career avr.
[2] Pavano’s BABIP is 50 points (!) below his career mark. He’s outperformed his FIP by 60 points, and for his career his ERA is 20 pts higher than his FIP.
Baker has a higher KRate and lower walk rate than 09. His BABIP is high and he’s probably getting a little unlucky on the long balls. He’ll pitch a little better, but it’s still “Scott Baker”.
Slowey will probably pitch about the same for the remainder of the year. That’s not necessarily a good thing.
Blackburn’s K/9 number is ALMOST the same as his BB/9, which to me does not represent luck, but something worse.
What I am getting at is that the Twins rotation, like it’s lineup, is over-performing. When they all pitch at their “norm” it’s an average rotation. Liriano has been out of this world, and Pavano has pitched well (but should drop a little).
I agree that the Twins should not panic, but I think the should be concerned. The ChiSox and Tiggers are not as bad as FG seems to think, and the Twinkies aren’t as good. That part really does get old oveand over.
Any 2 of the 3 teams could end up playing in a “Game 163” in 2010.
At 98M, I am going to stop referring to MIN as a “small budget team”.
There’s no way the Twins lineup is overperforming. It’s the exact opposite.
Let’s look into it …
– The Twins are the 7th hghest scoring team in the AL. Were they projected to be significantly higher than that?
wOBA — projected/2010 (Diff)
—————————
Span — .340/.332 (-.008)
Morneau — .402/.449 (+ 047)
Cuddyer — .351/.35 (-.026)
Mauer — .401/.355 (-.046)
Kubel — .362/.350 (- .012)
Hudson — .337/.338 (+ .001)
Young — .337/.345 (+ .008)
Punto — .304/.309 (+ .005)
Hardy — .315/.268 (- .047)
Thome — .348/.375 (+ .027)
Harris — .304/.211 (- .093)
You could be right, their lieup may be underperforming. Mauer’s drop and Morneau’s rise seem to cancel each other out (combined they’re on pace for ~14 WAR).
Span, Kubel, Hudson, Young, and Punto are close enough to projections. Thome is a plus.
So, basically it comes down to Cuddyer, Hardy, and Harris. Hardy’s 2010 wOBA seems to follow a pretty consistent pattern of dropping (.355, .292, .268), Harris has been terrible. If the Twins success stems from his regression to the mean, they may be screwed. That leaves Cuddyer … who should improve as the year goes on. He’s been consistently above average the plate, and he’s currently slightly below.
Agreed, the Twins lineup has underperformed, but not by much. Again, 7th in the AL in runs. I’m not sure thy were proected to be better than that.
I think the AL Central is going to be a struggle for MIN, DET, and CWS all year.
As a Twins fan, it seems like they go through a similar cycle every year. They struggle a bit, pick it up before the All-Star game and then take off during the second half. (This year they just reversed it with a strong stretch in April/May and some struggles in June) Most years I’m happy if they’re at .500 at the break because I’m just waiting for the late-season run. This year (Depending on how the next couple of weeks play out) they will be above .500 and in good shape in my opinion.
Pat – Blackburn is struggling this year. Hitters have an outstanding 88.1% contact rate on pitches out of the zone and 94.3% overall. Just ridiculous. A 2.94 K/9 mark is not going to cut it at the major league level.
Good team isn’t good enough. They added money at SS, 2B and the bench. They are going to make more revenue this year than any year in their history. Winning 87 games should not be the goal anymore.
The Twins offense is way better than this, though the run prevention in aggregate probably isn’t. Some of this is probably a product of Target Field, but I think at the end of the day, the Twins will hit their way into the playoffs (especially if they continue to go with Cuddyer at 3rd) and hopefully have a Haren or Lee on hand when they get there.
Target Field really seems to be affecting the Twins hitters negatively. It has one of the worst HR ball park factors. However the field doesn’t seem to be having a much of a positive effect on Twins pitchers. This is somewhat anecdotal but at least w/ places like Oakland and San Diege you see a correlation between better home pitching and worse home hitting.