Understanding Matt Carpenter

Matt Carpenter just hit another home run. Here, look at it:

That home run was hit on August 13, and for Carpenter, it was his career-high 33rd. He had set a new career high with his 29th, and so this is all just uncharted territory. Right now, Carpenter leads the National League in wRC+. He also leads the National League in Statcast’s expected wOBA, so it’s not like this is all luck. Carpenter has been absolutely outstanding, and he’s likely to generate support for the league MVP. He’s helped to fuel the Cardinals’ recent run toward a wild-card spot, and heaven only knows where the club would be without him.

I should also point out that, according to Statcast again, Carpenter’s top exit velocity this season ranks in the 35th percentile. We’re mostly accustomed to sluggers who slug the ball. Carpenter would never be confused for another Giancarlo Stanton. So let’s quickly walk through how Carpenter makes this all work. To a certain extent this is all pretty basic, but Carpenter happens to be one of the world leaders in bat control.

First things first. The rest of this article is going to focus on Carpenter’s batted balls, but he wouldn’t be what he is without his eye. You can’t separate the batted balls from the discipline, since it’s the discipline that determines when Carpenter swings, and from the very beginning, Carpenter has proven he knows how to walk. He routinely puts up one of baseball’s lowest chase rates. It’s always been tough to get Matt Carpenter to expand. He has a track record of waiting for his pitch, and then attacking it. Carpenter’s approach is what got him to the bigs.

On to the batted balls, now, because I think this is where Carpenter really shines. He’s a left-handed hitter, and out of everyone this year with at least 50 ground balls, Carpenter has the second-highest grounder pull rate. It’s unsurprising, then, that according to numbers at Baseball Savant, Carpenter has seen a higher rate of defensive shifts than all but six other players. Whenever Carpenter hits a ball on the ground, he yanks it toward the right side. He calls for a shift. He begs for a shift. He’s why the shift was invented in the first place. It wasn’t because of literally Matt Carpenter, but it was because of figuratively Matt Carpenter. When Carpenter’s up, the infield is right to overload.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

He has put down some successful bunts. That’s one way to try to beat the shift. Another way is to try to become more of an all-fields hitter. That’s a lot more difficult to do in practice than it is to do in theory. A hitter’s tendencies are not so easy to adjust on the fly. There’s a third way to try to beat the shift. And I’ll insert a funny Mark Saxon excerpt:

Matt? Carpenter? stood? at? his?? locker stall adjacent to the front door of the St. Louis Cardinals’ spring training clubhouse last March for nearly 30 minutes explaining how serious he was about not chasing home runs in the upcoming season.

He would return to his roots, with a level swing that hit the ball hard, low and, often, up the middle. He would get off the track he had gotten on a few seasons earlier, in which he had built a little uppercut into his swing intent on generating fly balls.

Carpenter spoke as if he was going to hit more grounders and liners. That’s not at all what’s happened. The third way to try to beat the shift is to simply hit the ball over the shifted defenders. This year, 255 different hitters have batted at least 250 times. Carpenter owns the very lowest ground-ball rate, at 24%. That proposed swing adjustment hasn’t shown up. Carpenter has stayed in the air, and he’s thrived as a consequence.

That’s not it, however. See, there’s another thing. Staying with that same list of 255 hitters, we can sort by the rate of infield flies per fly ball. Joey Votto is at 0%. Joey Votto pretty much never pops up. It’s one of the reasons he’s famous. Just behind Votto is Carpenter, at 1%. Even though Carpenter has been trying to hit the ball in the air, he’s almost never popped the ball up. He’s made consistently superior contact, which isn’t easy when you think about what a hypothetical batted-ball distribution would look like for a fly-ball hitter. A pop-up wouldn’t require getting under the ball very much more than usual. Carpenter has still stayed away. Here’s a plot with infield flies per fly ball on the y-axis, and ground-ball rate on the x-axis. Carpenter is in yellow.

We know there’s not much available for Carpenter on the ground, and so we know he doesn’t hit many grounders. We also know there’s not much available for anyone when you hit the ball too high in the air, and Carpenter doesn’t appear to do that often, either. I have one more plot for you, showing league-average data for 2018. What you’re seeing is wOBA by launch angle, broken down into 5-degree buckets.

Not every hitter is the same, of course, and some speedier types do better on grounders, but Carpenter doesn’t number among them. For someone more like Carpenter, it looks like the ideal batted-ball angles are roughly between +5 and +35 degrees. Wouldn’t you know it; here’s a leaderboard of the hitters with the highest rates of batted balls hit between those very angles:

Ideal Batted Balls
Player Rate (%)
Matt Carpenter 56.4%
Joey Votto 56.2%
Nicholas Castellanos 54.2%
Freddie Freeman 53.3%
Eugenio Suarez 51.9%
Matt Kemp 50.9%
Yan Gomes 50.7%
Brandon Belt 50.6%
Gleyber Torres 50.5%
Yadier Molina 50.3%
SOURCE: Baseball Savant
Rate of batted balls with launch angles between +5 and +35 degrees.

Carpenter’s in first. Really, it’s essentially a tie between himself and Votto, and there are abundant similarities between the two hitters. Neither generates especially high peak exit velocities, but you see an elite combination of discipline and bat control. Votto doesn’t strike out as often as Carpenter does, but then, Votto probably has the best eye in the sport. Carpenter sells out for more power, and his contact rate has dropped over the years as a consequence, but he’s not really making that much of a sacrifice. Carpenter will never hit a ball 500 feet, but he manages to avoid bad contact. The quality of his batted balls is enviably consistent.

Statcast might not have even been necessary, here. Carpenter is presently tied for the league-lead in hard-hit rate. He has the third-lowest soft-hit rate, and he has the second-greatest difference between the two rates. Eugenio Suarez is in first — it’s probably time for a standalone article on Eugenio Suarez. But that’s beside the point, for this post. By pretty much whatever measure you choose, Matt Carpenter is performing like the best version of himself. He’s avoiding grounders more than anyone, but he’s also avoiding pop-ups more than almost anyone, concentrating the majority of his batted balls within that band where they can do the most damage. It’s so easy and fundamental a concept, but it’s so difficult to execute. To execute, anyhow, with Carpenter’s frequency.

There are batters who hit the ball harder than Matt Carpenter does. There are an awful lot of them, in fact. When those batters make their perfect contact, you might think they have a leg up. But those batters will also make occasional weak contact, and that contact drags their numbers down. Carpenter effectively shifts some number of weakly-hit balls into the hard-hit category. Understanding Carpenter is a little like understanding jazz: It’s as much about the batted balls he doesn’t hit. He doesn’t hit many of the bad ones. It’s more of the good ones that fill up a season.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

40 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
easymacbb
7 years ago

“…and heaven only knows where the club would be without him.”

Isn’t that the point of having a site dedicated to figuring out his WAR? That should give you an idea on where the Cardinals would be without him, not prayer.

Ham
7 years ago
Reply to  easymacbb

Lol you really got him

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
7 years ago
Reply to  Ham

Absolutely EVISCERATED that figure of speech. That idiomatic fixed phrase is TOAST

garrettfunkel
7 years ago
Reply to  easymacbb

Haha hilarious. Wish I could vote up several more times.

channelclemente
7 years ago
Reply to  easymacbb

Well you’ve nailed down 50-60% of the variance in the model.

Brian Cartwright
7 years ago

As I was reading, before you stated it, I was thinking of Joey Votto. Before him, guys like Brian Giles and Barry Bonds. Don’t chase, but attack your pitch when you see it. Don’t put the ball on the ground, but don’t pop it up either. Maximize the number of balls hit into the most productive angles. It’s not just the mean – you want to also have a small distribution.

Giancarlo Stanton hits the ball perhaps harder than anyone in history. 45% of the balls he hits in the air to the outfield leave the park – but because he strikes out so much, he only can manage 100 or maybe 120 of those batted balls.

Joey Votto may only put 15% of his balls in the air to the outfield over the fence, but he’ll hit 250 to 270 of them.

Lower rate, but more opportunities.

tb.25
7 years ago

2017 stats:

Matt 189 FB, 50.8% FB, 12.2% HR/FB, 4.8% IFFB
Stanton 172 FB, 39.4% FB, 34.3% HR/FB, 16.9% IFFB

So they hit similar amounts of balls in the air, but Stanton both hits more out and pops more up. Isn’t really the ‘lower rate, but more opportunities’ narrative, given their similar FB counts. Matt Carpenter had to hit more fly balls to get to the same amount of opportunities, because of his walk rate. Stanton had a few more PA’s, though, which helped.

Brian Cartwright
7 years ago
Reply to  tb.25

Balls in the air to the outfield, not fly balls. There is a difference, especially since 15% of line drives go for homers, which makes it kind of silly to exclude line drives from the denominator.

One apology – after I queried the numbers just now I realized the opportunities and rates I quoted earlier must’ve been from Statcast data, selecting by the best vertical angle range as Jeff has discussed here.

Using Gameday play by play to find line drives and fly balls which are fielded by an outfielder, these are the 2017 numbers –
Votto 276 .127
Carpenter 240 .092
Judge 198 .263
Stanton 188 .303

My general statement still stands. Hitters such as Votto and Carpenter, as Jeff pointed out, don’t hit the ball as hard so don’t have as high of an HR%, even when they hit the ball in the prime angles, but they can still reach 35 homers by putting a lot of balls in those angles (instead of wasting them on the ground or high in the air)

Lanidrac
7 years ago

Besides, those are the 2017 numbers, and we’re talking about 2018 here after Carpenter made his adjustment.

Brian Cartwright
7 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

I only used 2017 stats because I was replying to a post that did, and wanted to show the difference between using only FBs in the denominator vs FB+LD

Lanidrac
7 years ago

Don’t forget about Albert Pujols on that list, at least when he was in his prime. Even across his entire career to date, he’s never struck out more than 93 times in a season.

Brian Cartwright
7 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

True, but when Pujols got older (how old was that?) and lost some bat speed, like many other sluggers he started hitting the ball higher in the air. One doesn’t needs as much exit velo at 30 degrees to get the ball out as they do at 20 degrees, but hitting a lot of balls in those higher angles kills the BABIP even while generally maintaining a HR%.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
7 years ago

I was thinking about picking him from the waivers in my fantasy league were he was available because he was so terrible in April. His x stats looked good but I was not buying it due to rumors that his shoulder injury might have permantly robbed his power (thank you sporer:)).

Guess he was written off too early although age 32 and shoulder injury is scary (think adrian gonzalez).

Darryl
7 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

Why the downvotes? Because of the innocent poke at Paul Sporer, which even included a smiley face? Or because of invoking his fantasy team? Where’s the polling widget on here?

Jetsy Extrano
7 years ago
Reply to  Darryl

fantasy team = death

channelclemente
7 years ago

Very good article. It makes you rethink the word ‘pop’ in the context of a hitter attribute.

dustin0224
7 years ago

Yep, pretty much looks like he lives between 5 to 35:
https://imgur.com/a/tpdSvwK

williams .482Member since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  dustin0224

That may be the most beautiful launch angle chart I’ve ever seen.

bunslow
7 years ago

Yo Jeff, on that GB vs IFFB graph, who’s the other dot right near Carpenter? I assume Votto is the one with the 0% IFFB as you mention, but someone else is doing nearly as good a job as Carpenter at pumping out those line drives…

Doug LampertMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  bunslow

Not Jeff, but it looks like it’s Brandon Belt.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
7 years ago
Reply to  Doug Lampert

Huh. Belt makes this start to seem like a discrete skill that’d really be worth thinking more about — like, maybe what makes him seem like an outlier among hitters is that he has this Votto-like ability to avoid grounders and popups, but paired with otherwise middle-of-the-pack hitting skills rather than the rest of the Votto package.

baseballisrad
7 years ago

We need a Suarez article!

JCCfromDCMember since 2016
7 years ago

Matt Carpenter is amazing. What is also amazing is that the Nationals decided to pitch to him with first base open and the tying and go ahead runs in scoring position. Yes, it was a L on L matchup. But Carpenter doesn’t really have platoon splits (OPS is .963 vs. L, .998 vs. R), and the pitcher (Sammy Solis) actually has reverse platoon splits this season (lefties are OPSing .871 against him this year) and more narrowly for his career (.706 vs. .699 by righties). Walking the hottest hitter on the planet also at least creates the possibility of a GIDP to get out of the inning with the lead. I’m not a “blame the manager” person normally. But man, I sure didn’t understand that move

echong91Member since 2018
7 years ago

Is there an article out there on “a better version of the 5 tools”?

The hit tool is so much more important than the others that the five tools just seem like more of an anachronism every time I hear about them.

oozyalbies1
7 years ago
Reply to  echong91

This is a good point, and part of why I think that we undervalue BA too much. There’s been a bit of an over-correction in de-valuing BA in the baseball community as we better understand the value of OBP. BA still has some predictive value in how it can be used as an indicator of a player’s hit tool, and young hitters most commonly display their’s through their BA.

Carpenter came into the league as a plus BA type (.294 in his rookie season over 314 PAs, and then .318 in his first full season in 2013) with above average plate discipline (~10% BB% in 2013) and average power (.170 ISO in 2013, decreased to .100 in 2014). He then started to trade some of this hits for walks (increased BB% by ~3.5% from 2013 to 2014), and then started to exhibit plus power in 2015 (ISO increase of .130 from 2014 to 2015, up to .233).

Just something to be mindful of with young players before we entirely dismiss the meaning of BA. We’ve seen players other than Carpenter who look like “empty BA” types make the star jump later in their careers (see Jose Altuve and Daniel Murphy). Christian Yelich might be doing it before our eyes (although he has considerable prospect pedigree and is by no means at the stage of his career that guys like Murphy or Carpenter were / are).

I’ll be keeping an eye on guys like Miguel Andujar and Albert Almora for this reason. I get that they don’t necessarily have a second tool at this point comparable to a young Carpenter’s discipline, but if they can develop in that aspect and / or grow into a bit more power, look out.

dl80Member since 2026
7 years ago
Reply to  oozyalbies1

Jose Ramirez, also. I would love to see if Adam Frazier could do this.

Lanidrac
7 years ago
Reply to  echong91

Yeah, and even the power tool is significantly more important than any of the other three (unless your name is Ozzie Smith).

carterMember since 2020
7 years ago

Coming into today Matt Carpenter was hitting .340/452/864 over his last 27 games, good for a 1.316 ops. Barry Bonds had a 1.316 ops from 2000 to 2004.

Powder Blues
7 years ago
Reply to  carter

Great point. I’d be curious to know how good carpenter could be if he too juiced the crap out of his body.

Brian Cartwright
7 years ago
Reply to  Powder Blues

This article shows how one doesn’t have to juice the crap out of their body to pile up a bunch of homers. Even before anyone accused Bonds of using PEDs, from 1992 to 2000 he averaged a 1.067 OPS, raning between 1.006 and 1.136. His 3rd highest OPS of that 9 year stretch was his last in Pittsburgh, with a 1.080 in 1992.

Lanidrac
7 years ago
Reply to  carter

Except Carpenter isn’t juicing (I assume) or scared most of his opposing managers into giving him an obscene number of intentional walks, many of them in situations where it really doesn’t make that much sense to do so.

Famous Mortimer
7 years ago
Reply to  carter

Comparing people to peak Bonds is becoming one of this site’s more boring memes.

Lanidrac
7 years ago

Actually, Carpenter has done exactly what he said he would in returning to his roots. He’s adjusted to just hitting the ball hard rather than selling out for hitting more fly balls. That does NOT necessarily mean he intended to hit significantly more ground balls. It does mean hitting more line drives and less pop-ups and routine fly balls, which as you’ve shown is EXACTLY what he’s done.

The only surprising thing is that he’s somehow sending more of these line drives over the outfield fence than he did early in his career and even more often than when he was selling out for fly balls.

Maybe more of these hitters should rethink the idea of trying to increase their launch angles with upper-cut swings, as it may just not be worth it even if it does cost them a few extra homers per season.

Brian Cartwright
7 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

This year Carpenter has hit fewer ground balls than ever, while still avoiding popups. Mission accomplished.

hjunek
7 years ago

Reading this article… I recalled one of my personal favorite hitter Joey Gallo who yields high rate ‘barrel’ but not get pretty result for it.

I usually like this kind of finesse thing… I will just track Matt Carpenter’s ABs from now on more thoroughly.

Redneck Redbird
7 years ago

Wow. Great read.

dl80Member since 2026
7 years ago

Carpenter is also the only qualified hitter in the league to have ground into zero double plays. (Jose Ramirez is tied for second with Aaron Hicks and Billy Hamilton.

Wu-Bacca
7 years ago
Reply to  dl80

(a) That’s totally awesome, esp for a guy whose Statcast sprint speed ranks 359th out of 505 qualified runners. (b) Jose Ramirez has been almost as awesome, given that he frequently bats right-handed AND he’s had way more PA’s with a runner on first and fewer than 2 outs (119 to Carpenter’s 71).

UnitedStatesofMisery
7 years ago

Yeah, but he ever had a 100 RBI season?

Lanidrac
7 years ago

No, he’s mostly been a lead-off hitter in his career, so he racks up runs scored instead.