Unlocking Juan Soto’s Power Potential
On Friday, MLB.com reporter Sarah Langs wrote an article entitled, “Juan Soto is even better than you think he is.” Soto is already good. Like, really good. And he’s only 21 years old. Langs took Soto’s 2020 ZiPS projections and envisioned the continued growth he could see this upcoming season. If the projections hold up, we could be seeing a historic season from the young Dominican, as Langs explained:
“The only players to have multiple qualified seasons with a 140 or higher wRC+ before their age-22 seasons are Mel Ott (3), [Mike] Trout, Mickey Mantle, Ty Cobb, Rogers Hornsby and Ted Williams. Each of those players’ outstanding starts to their young careers resulted in a Cooperstown plaque, except for Trout, who’s still active but by all measures seems headed there, too.”
ZiPS projects a 5.5 WAR season for Soto with a 149 wRC+, a seven point increase over his 2019 mark. Only six other players are projected to accumulate more WAR and just three are projected to post a higher wRC+ than Soto. After placing second in Rookie of the Year balloting and a year after placing ninth in the NL MVP voting, Soto has a strong case to be one of the early frontrunners in the NL MVP race heading into this season:
| Year | BABIP | ISO | K% | BB% | wRC+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 0.338 | 0.225 | 20.0% | 16.0% | 145 |
| 2019 | 0.312 | 0.266 | 20.0% | 16.4% | 142 |
| ZiPS 2020 | 0.323 | 0.270 | 18.7% | 16.7% | 149 |
ZiPS sees moderate improvements to Soto’s plate discipline, projecting a lower strikeout rate and a higher walk rate. That’s pretty terrifying because Soto’s ability to lay off bad pitches and crush the right ones is a big reason why he’s had so much success so quickly.
The projections also see a slight improvement in his power output. His .266 ISO from 2019 ranked 18th among all qualified batters. ZiPS sees him posting the 13th highest ISO in the majors in 2020, a pretty decent jump. Soto’s hard hit rate, barrel rate, and average exit velocity are all elite — each of them sits in the 89th percentile or higher. He certainly has the raw tools to be considered one of the premiere power hitters in the game.
The ZiPS projection shown in the table above is his 50th percentile projection. What does the computer think he’s capable of if he’s able to take a bigger step forward?
| Percentile | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90% | .299 | .431 | .644 | 545 | 119 | 163 | 35 | 6 | 47 | 130 | 127 | 101 | 17 | 186 | 8.4 |
| 80% | .289 | .416 | .595 | 551 | 117 | 159 | 33 | 5 | 42 | 121 | 121 | 110 | 14 | 170 | 7.2 |
| 70% | .287 | .412 | .578 | 554 | 115 | 159 | 31 | 5 | 40 | 117 | 118 | 115 | 12 | 164 | 6.7 |
| 60% | .284 | .406 | .558 | 557 | 113 | 158 | 31 | 4 | 38 | 114 | 115 | 123 | 11 | 158 | 6.2 |
| 50% | .284 | .404 | .553 | 559 | 113 | 159 | 31 | 4 | 37 | 112 | 113 | 129 | 11 | 156 | 5.8 |
| 40% | .279 | .398 | .528 | 562 | 110 | 157 | 30 | 4 | 34 | 107 | 111 | 133 | 10 | 148 | 5.5 |
| 30% | .276 | .391 | .508 | 565 | 109 | 156 | 29 | 3 | 32 | 104 | 107 | 140 | 8 | 141 | 4.9 |
| 20% | .277 | .386 | .495 | 570 | 108 | 158 | 28 | 3 | 30 | 101 | 102 | 151 | 7 | 137 | 4.6 |
| 10% | .274 | .379 | .474 | 574 | 105 | 157 | 27 | 2 | 28 | 96 | 98 | 162 | 5 | 130 | 3.9 |
While hitting his 90th percentile projection would certainly be fun, by its nature, it’s incredibly unlikely to happen. But the 60th and even 70th percentile projections are within the range of likely outcomes and they indicate there’s some untapped power potential in Soto’s bat. But what would need to change in his approach to unlock the ability to hit 40 or 50 home runs in a season?
The key to unlocking Soto’s power could lie in this extremely impressive home run he hit in Game 1 of the World Series off of Gerrit Cole:
As Craig Edwards put it the day after the game, “Crushing a tough-to-hit ball is difficult, but crushing it the other way is near-impossible.” That homer off Cole was a phenomenal piece of hitting and it’s indicative of Soto’s ability to hit for power to all fields. Of his 34 home runs last season, 10 were hit to left field, nine were hit to center field, and 15 were pulled to right. Soto’s spray chart is a magnificent display of using the entire field:

This ability to hit with power to all fields is a signature piece of Soto’s approach. He’s able to take whatever the pitcher gives him and deal damage no matter where it’s located in the zone. That kind of approach allowed him to launch a 96 mph elevated fastball 417 feet the other way. But even though he possesses such prodigious power to left, would he be better off if he adjusted his batted ball profile to swing to the pull side more often?
Among the qualified batters with an ISO higher than Soto’s, only one pulled the ball less often than he did: Christian Yelich. They both pulled the ball around 39.4% of the time, a surprisingly low rate considering the power they’re capable of generating. If we focus our attention just on elevated contact — fly balls and line drives — both of them stand out even more. The league average pull rate on fly balls and line drives is around 31%. Both Soto and Yelich sat below that mark in 2019. But for other elite power hitters, their rate of pulled contact in the air is much higher. Players like Mike Trout, Cody Bellinger, and Alex Bregman are pulling 40% or more of their elevated contact.
Here’s a look how Soto’s key pull power metrics compare to the four other players mentioned above:
| Player | Elevated Pull% | Hard Hit% | Avg. Exit Velocity | Avg. Distance | wOBA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Trout | 40.5% | 25.9% | 98.4 | 334 | 0.956 |
| Cody Bellinger | 42.7% | 30.7% | 98.5 | 293 | 0.834 |
| Alex Bregman | 43.0% | 22.1% | 93.9 | 326 | 0.858 |
| Juan Soto | 28.3% | 20.6% | 99.5 | 308 | 0.886 |
| Christian Yelich | 27.2% | 17.4% | 100.3 | 329 | 1.143 |
Soto doesn’t pull the ball in the air all that often, but when he does, he simply crushes it. How high would Soto’s ceiling be if he started pulling even a league average amount of his contact in the air? Is elevated contact to right field the best form of contact for Soto? Here’s a look at his key power metrics based on the batted ball direction:
| Player | Elevated Contact% | Hard Hit% | Avg. Exit Velocity | Avg. Distance | wOBA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pull | 28.3% | 20.6% | 99.5 | 308 | 0.886 |
| Center | 34.5% | 24.7% | 98.5 | 321 | 0.611 |
| Opposite | 37.2% | 18.4% | 93.7 | 303 | 0.481 |
Soto has the most productive outcomes when he’s pulling his elevated contact. That’s not surprising. Pulling the ball produces more favorable contact. But such a dramatic change in his approach might have other knock on effects. I don’t think Soto should adjust his approach to match the Joey Gallo’s of the world. Actually, Yelich might possess a batted ball approach that could fit Soto’s strengths. He doesn’t pull the ball in the air any more often than Soto already does, but he does produce a ton of contact to center field. That shift away from contact to the opposite field, even if it isn’t pulled, should have a beneficial effect on Soto’s production.
Last season, Soto added a ton of elevated contact over what he produced in his rookie year. His fly ball rate increased by more than eight points but his spray distribution stayed relatively the same. He was able to make the adjustment without negatively affecting the rest of his approach. His ability to recognize pitches and adjust his swing to maximize damage go hand-in-hand. If he’s able to make a similar adjustment, this time focusing on pulling the ball in the air a little more often, he could see huge improvements in his power output. That’s one of the primary avenues he has to hit those upper echelon projections.
Jake Mailhot is a contributor to FanGraphs. A long-suffering Mariners fan, he also writes about them for Lookout Landing. Follow him on BlueSky @jakemailhot.
Is boner one of them?
10% != “incredibly unlikely”
Also, the fact that his 10th percentile still works out to about 4 WAR is silly.
so many boners
When even a 10% of his possible output is still a very productive result…
Looking at that Soto’s percentile projections makes me feel like the variance isn’t high enough.
Probability Soto hits 47+ HRs feels like it should be higher than 10%.
Similarly, probability Soto hits wrc+ 130 or lower feels like it should be higher than 10%.
Or maybe it is just me.
Based on what? I think either scenario you’re suggesting is certainly possible, but the thing projection systems do so well is eliminate that “gut feel”-type analysis and instead produce expected outcomes based on all available data, and as such I am inclined to side with the projections over pure speculation.
Maybe because it’s easy to name players who we thought were super-elite, and had step-back seasons in their early 20s anyway (Harper, Machado, Bryant, Stanton off the top of my head). Soto has such a narrow band of comps already, but I was also surprised at the narrow range of outcomes. Nagging injuries happen. Slumps happen.
Interestingly, algorithms typically ascribe larger ranges of outcomes than people do. It’s a known behavioral economics tendency that humans are overconfident in their predictions of ranges (eg. “How confident are you that X is between Y and Z?”) … X is systematically too high. So it’s interesting, in this case, that some folks have an intuition on Soto’s outcomes suggesting the opposite error.
Even the best imaginable projection system is liable to have trouble with extreme outliers like Soto where there are not that many close comparisons.
For one thing, the possibility of injuries seem underrated.
There were 66 qualified batters in 2018 who recorded more than 2 WAR and were 28 or younger.
Only 54 of them had enough PAs to qualify in 2019. (~81%)
If you restrict your attention to players with 3 war, then it becomes worse with 32 out of 45 players. (~71%)
Doing the same exercise comparing hitters in 2016 to 2017 also result in similar numbers with around 20~25% of them failing to qualify next season.
I’m not saying that there is 25% chance that Soto doesn’t qualify next year, but 10% doesn’t seem too unreasonable as a starting point.
Unless I’m missing something, all the deciles have the same probability of occurring according to ZiPS, that’s the point of breaking it out like that.
When you say “But the 60th and even 70th percentile projections are within the range of likely outcomes and they indicate there’s some untapped power potential in Soto’s bat.” Maybe you meant it’s more likely that he hits that level or better?
So trash-can jokes aside, I’m really impressed by Bregman’s butter profile. He’s one of the most productive hitters in the game despite less-than-stellar exit velo. Does he just have an optimal swing plane?
I think its his discipline plus a pull approach in a hitter’s park with a short left field fence
He has an uncanny knack for laying off off-speed pitches.
A VERY wise man once said, “You’re only s good as the pitches you swing at”. And I think, at 21 years old, Juan Soto has that part down given his plate discipline skills. The kid is a stud – I think everyone can agree on that. My question is, why in the hell would he change anything? He’s not going to hit his physical peak for 6-7 years. Think about that. 6-7 YEARS!!! Right now he’s 2013 Mike Trout, except with two years in already. What could he look like in 2026 when he’s physically mature? He could look like Ted Williams, except they can’t shift him like they did Ted because of his all fields, hit it where it’s pitched approach.
I’ve seen so many guys with so much talent really screw themselves up trying to attain something they don’t need. Think Jordan Spieth in golf. Guy was a three time major champion at 23 or 24, but felt that 295 yards just wasn’t enough off the tee. So he goes and messes up his swing searching for the Holy Grail, an extra 10-15 yards. Result? He’s happy to make a cut the last three years. And the same in baseball. MLB is littered with 15 HR, 80+ ct%, .280 guys who sold out for power, and now they’re 28 HR, 68 ct%, .240 guys. Don’t believe me? Read the Baseball Prospectus or Baseball Forecaster annual publications. Are there exceptions to the rule? Of course. JD Martinez comes immediately to mind, but if you really get into it, whenever you sell your soul in baseball, there’s a price to be paid… somewhere.
I’d hate to have that happen to Juan Soto. He’s so damn exciting to watch when he’s in the batter’s box. Why in the frick would he or should he change???
Not all players mature the same. I’m sure Kylie or Eric would tell us that there isn’t much physical projection left for Soto. He doesn’t look thin or weak and I don’t see much more physical development in his future. Yes, he’ll get stronger, but he is likely closer to peak physicality than almost any 21-22 year old in baseball if I had to guess.
He is a little chunky. Sure, he might already be at his physical best, but physical build is not everything. Here are players under 180 pounds who hit 250+ career homeruns:
Joe Morgan (160 pounds, 268 homers)
Billy Williams (175 pounds, 426 homers)
Brian Downing (170 pounds, 275 homers)
Jim “Toy Cannon” Wynn (160 pounds, 291 homers)
Rogers Hornsby; One of the Greatest Hitters ever (170 pounds, 301 homers)
Carl Yastrzemski (175 pounds, 452 homers)
Mel Ott (170 pounds, 511 homers)
Willie Mays; The Greatest Ever (175 pounds, 660 homers!!)
Eric Davis (165 pounds, 282 homers)
Here are players over 6’2″ or 210 pounds with 250+ career steals:
Alex Rodriguez (6’3″, 329 steals)
Andre Dawson (6’3″, 314 steals)
Bobby Abreu (220 pounds, 400 steals)
Carlos Beltran (215 pounds, 312 steals)
Willie Wilson (6’3, 668 steals!!)
Carl Crawford (230 pounds, 480 steals)
Maybe not the best way to make this point, but build doesn’t drive everything. A lot of it is your approach.
Henry Aaron was listed at 180 for much of his career.
I get you, but I preferred to be more conservative lest I have forgot one year where someone was 1 pound over
He is not 2013 Mike Trout right now, no matter how you slice it. And 2013 Mike Trout had a wRC+ of 176. His past 3 years? 180, 190, 180. You change things to try and get better. Yes, even Mike Trout does
Is there a way to view Zips percentile projections for any player? And when I say “any player” I mean Mike Trout.
https://www.fangraphs.com/players/mike-trout/10155/stats?position=OF
Thanks for the reply, Hank. I’m actually looking for a table with possible outcomes and their corresponding probabilities. Tried looking at the player pages but didn’t find anything.
Looking at his ZiPS projections for ’20, ’21 and ’22, he has the chance to be phenomenal. Then I think about the fact that he’ll only be 24 going into 2023, which just blows my mind.
A mild increase in pull% would be good but does he need it? Pulling helps power but hurts babip and Soto has enough pop to hit 35 homers anyway. So why not take the extra babip that comes with that approach?
Many could use morepulled fbs but he might be fine the way he is