Wade Davis, the Ultimate Deadline Gamble

The Royals are apparently listening to offers for Wade Davis. The Royals would be stupid if they didn’t listen to offers for Wade Davis. Any team would be stupid if it didn’t listen to offers for anyone. Listening comes at basically zero cost! There seems to be a real chance here, though, a chance of something happening. The Royals haven’t been very good, and while Davis has another year of control, you know where the reliever market is. If nothing else, you have to find out. You have to see what a guy like Davis could pull.

Davis could represent a proven, dominant addition. There’s no questioning his track record, and he was fantastic in last year’s playoffs. Davis is right there in the argument for the best reliever in the game, and relievers are being valued more highly than ever. It’s easy to see why Davis could command a huge trade return. It’s also easy to see how he could bust. These negotiations might well be complicated, because Davis looks like one massive gamble.

Do I really need to sell you on Wade Davis? The answer is, no, probably not, because we’ve all been over this, but let me just get something out of the way. According to our leaderboards, there are 1,209 relievers in history to have thrown at least 200 innings. Davis leads them all with a career 37 ERA-. Mariano Rivera is in second, at 46. Obviously, there’s a difference between the two — Davis isn’t finished, and Rivera is. Davis will probably have a decline period. But he has been historically great. He’s been, probably, the best. The best predictor of the future is the recent past, right?

Two years ago, among relievers, Davis ranked third in OPS allowed. Last year, he ranked second. This year, he ranks sixth. Davis, factually speaking, just hasn’t been hit. And yet, there are those question marks. Another team wouldn’t be trading for 2014-2015 Wade Davis. The team would be trading for 2016-2017 Wade Davis. The 2016 Wade Davis has already spent a little time on the disabled list with a forearm strain. And beyond that, observe this table. I think this captures the nature of Davis’ stock.

Wade Davis Year-to-Year
Pitcher Season K-BB% Zone% Contact% FA mph Exit Velo Rank Hard-Soft Rank
Wade Davis 2015 23% 50% 75% 95.9 94% 96%
Wade Davis 2016 13% 46% 73% 94.9 96% 99%
Exit velocity and hard-soft% shown as percentile rankings. Exit-velocity information comes via Baseball Savant.

It’s easy to see what makes him perplexing. Why wouldn’t a team want to trade for Davis? Just a few weeks ago, he was sidelined with arm discomfort. That’s a clear worry. He’s had some issues throwing his cutter for strikes, his velocity is down a tick, and as strikeouts and walks go, the trend is ugly. Look at that K-BB% column. There are 273 pitchers who have thrown at least 30 innings in each of the last two years. Davis’ drop in K-BB% is sixth-greatest. Some names around him: Mark Lowe, Drew Storen, Mat Latos, Clay Buchholz. I wouldn’t say we worship at the feet of strikeouts and walks, but they’re extremely important statistics, and this doesn’t look good.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

But…there’s…the rest. Sure, maybe Davis hasn’t had his pinpoint command. By swings and misses, he actually hasn’t been easier to hit. He’s gotten more swings out of the zone. The strikeout rate and the contact rate don’t quite match up. And as a fun fact, Davis has allowed one extra-base hit. Opponents have a batting average of .186, and a slugging percentage of .195. Good contact hasn’t been there, and that’s reflected in a few columns.

By exit velocity, recorded by Statcast, Davis has been elite in each of the last couple seasons. And by the difference between hard-hit rate and soft-hit rate, recorded not by Statcast, Davis has also been elite in each of the last couple seasons. This year he’s almost at the very top. He’s in the 99th percentile, so while he hasn’t quite been Zach Britton, most other pitchers haven’t quite been Wade Davis. We’re still in the early stages of trying to figure out the significance of weak contact allowed, but Davis stands out in the category, even as other numbers have gotten worse.

One more related note of support: No pitcher has allowed a lower average exit velocity on balls hit at least 10 degrees above the horizontal. That’s basically flies and liners. Davis limits that force, because his pitches have avoided the sweet spots.

This is where it gets really hard. Davis has a tiny ERA, and a history of dominance. The Royals aren’t going to sell him short, not even with Kelvin Herrera further emerging. So if you want Davis, it’s going to be costly, and the hope is that you’ll end up with one of the best high-leverage relievers in the game. But what is a team to make of the condition of his arm? Most teams want to avoid pitchers who have so recently been on the DL. And then there are the declining strikeouts and the increasing walks. Those are known to be bad indicators. To what extent can a team believe in the weak contact, if the strikeouts are decreasingly present? How much faith does another front office want to put in exit velocity? With worse peripherals, a pitcher’s margin of error is slim. Maybe Davis is worse than he looks.

Or maybe the strikeouts will regress in the direction of the contact rate, and not the other way around. There’s nothing easy about this, as one could very reasonably conclude that Davis is great, or that Davis is worrisome. The Royals are going to lean more toward the great side, but they’re also the team that knows the most about what’s going on in his arm. You could say it might benefit them to wait to move Davis until the winter, figuring he could have a strong second half. Yet they might not want to take that chance, if they think Davis could come apart. These are complicated times. For everyone involved.

The fact of the matter is that I don’t know what’s going on with Wade Davis. I doubt anyone has a full understanding, and that’s what makes him such a gamble. There’s the potential here for a contending team to land the latter-day Mariano Rivera. Pitchers don’t get much more valuable than that. But there are some cracks that’ve formed, and with enough cracks, any structure will collapse. Wade Davis can’t and won’t be great forever. This season has another two months.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
rauce1
10 years ago

“Wade Davis can’t and won’t be great forever.”

Cyborgs have no expiration date

LHPSU
10 years ago
Reply to  rauce1

You know, Bartolo Colon’s probably the last person I’ll associate with the word “cyborg”…

JoserMember since 2021
10 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

Shorten it to just “borg” though….

dtpollittMember since 2016
10 years ago

In 2013 and 2014 the Royals had Holland on top of the RP world–47 and 46 saves. Herrera was pretty damn good, and in 2014 they added Davis. They didn’t sell Holland high, he got injured, and Davis took over. I’ll be interested to see if Dayton is willing to part with Davis.

RoyalsFan#14321Member since 2024
10 years ago
Reply to  dtpollitt

I wonder if the market for Davis (and his lack of 105mph heat) will make it hard to move him now that the Chapman trade established some sort of expectations for the return… I think we all agree he is at this point probably worth more, given his contract situation, but I imagine he’s not going to bring back near the prospect return, or even a dump of Kennedy’s contract…

Paul22
10 years ago

I wonder if some of the risk can be alleviated by having the key piece of any trade as a PTBNL who may be a top 25 prospect. If Davis finishes the season strong, that who the team gets (plus the other agreed pieces, which are lesser names). If Davis blows out his UCL, then the PTBNL becomes someone outside the top 100 (name already agreed upon at time of deal). Maybe this type of deal is not permitted, I don’t know

lesmashMember since 2017
10 years ago

Branch Rickey wisely stated that it’s better to trade a player a year too soon than a year too late. I think this is the time to trade Davis, and I come at this as a Royals fan who just does not see 2016 working out for them. If they wait until next year then I think the Royals have only downside risk in front of them.

I would not expect or demand a Chapman-type package in return; settle for a bit less than that and restock the shelves as best you can, and hand the 9th inning keys over to Kelvin Herrera. Likely Washington and LA would make solid offers, though you’ll have to live with not getting Giolito or DeLeon or Urias.

Shirtless George Brett
10 years ago

Even a regressed Davis is probably going to make any teams bullpen better though. Probably significantly better even. The major concern should be his arm which you assume would be examined thoroughly before making any trade.