Walker Buehler May Be Key to What Comes Next for Dodgers

The Dodgers made a big trade with the Braves over the weekend, and Jeff Sullivan did a great job of illustrating how, for Los Angeles, it mostly represented a trade of debt this season for debt next season. The deal allows the club to avoid the tax threshold for a year, resetting their penalty and allowing them (if they choose) to cross back over the threshold next year at less cost.

There’s certainly a reason they’d make that choice: next year’s offseason features a number of top free agents, Manny Machado and Bryce Harper chief among them. But we’re not done yet with the current offseason yet, and it’s an offseason following a World Series appearance for the Dodgers. What’s left for them to do? And what does Walker Buehler’s curveball have to do with it?

Just to be clear: it’s not just idle speculation by Sullivan that avoiding the tax was the object of the weekend’s trade. Dodgers president of baseball operations Andrew Friedman said as much to Bill Plunkett of the Orange County Register on Saturday.

“It’s been a focal point for us this winter. We’ve had numerous conversations related to it,” Friedman said Saturday.

“Obviously one of the main considerations in this deal were economic. But they’re part of the bigger picture, the longer-term plan, and it’s a necessary strategic part of moves yet to come. Whether that’s this offseason, in July or next year, this move allows for increased flexibility going forward.”

The long-term implications are important. They won’t want to go over the cap if they just made a huge trade to get under it. But that leaves questions regarding the short-term implications. How far under the cap did the Dodgers get? And what does that mean for this offseason?

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Eric Stephen over at True Blue LA took a comprehensive look at the situation, pointing out that, if you use the best available arbitration projections, remove costs that don’t contribute to luxury-tax numbers (like the major-league money due to Erisbel Arruebarrena and Yaisel Sierra), and use the correct average annual value numbers, etc., you see that the Dodgers are currently around $171 million for their tax number.

If correct, this figure suggests that, absent further cost-cutting moves, the Dodgers still have around $27 million to spend before they hit the $19y million luxury-tax number again.

But that might be too simplistic. It’s possible that the club will want to preserve some kind of buffer so that they can take on a midseason contract and fill a need heading into the playoffs. Last year, the Dodgers accepted nearly $4 million of Yu Darvish’s salary, for example, and Stephen estimates their total number at $7.2 million. Between the “let’s make sure we’re under” and the “let’s leave enough to add a player at the deadline” and the pending details of the Tom Koehler contract, and you may say that the Dodgers still have $15-20 million to spend.

They’ve been linked to outfielders like Lorenzo Cain and Andrew McCutchen, both of whom would take up most of that money. But it’s also important to note that two big position-player headliners of next year’s free-agency class — both Harper and Charlie Blackmon — play the outfield.

You might also notice that the most notable free agents departing Los Angeles this past offseason were pitchers. Yu Darvish, Brandon Morrow, and Tony Watson were all useful for a team that had the third-best pitching staff this past season. It might make a lot of sense for them to buy a reliever or two — and maybe a veteran starting pitcher to give them back some of the depth they lost when they traded away Scott Kazmir and Brandon McCarthy.

You might notice that the budget is probably not big enough to pursue a second ace, or even to bring back Darvish. The median crowdsource figure for Darvish has him at $25 million a year, and Jake Arrieta at $22 million.

In an offseason that looks like it might only produce a few smaller signings for the Dodgers, designed mostly to beef up the bullpen and make a modest addition to the rotation or outfield, it’s fair to look at the rotation behind Clayton Kershaw and wonder who merits the No. 2 slot. Rich Hill is obviously capable of fulling that role when healthy, but his injury history suggests that a backup plan should be present. The same is true of Alex Wood, especially following his late-season fade in 2017.

The Dodgers don’t necessarily need to make a trade for a high-upside starter with wipeout stuff, though. In fact, they already possess a pitcher who matches that description, one who displayed the best curveball (by velocity and movement) in the second half of this past season. He’s seventh on their current depth chart.

Best Curveballs by Velo & Movement
Player Curves Drop off Fastball Velocity Whiff% GB% Combo Z Score
Walker Buehler 45 -17.9 83.6 6.7% 100.0% 2.9
Craig Kimbrel 239 -13.7 87.6 18.0% 83.3% 2.7
Alex Cobb 438 -19.4 81.3 8.7% 87.0% 2.7
Corey Knebel 222 -19.3 81.0 10.4% 80.0% 2.6
Ryan Garton 24 -18.6 80.9 8.3% 100.0% 2.3
Cody Allen 329 -15.4 84.3 21.9% 44.8% 2.3
Joe Kelly 108 -14.7 85.0 13.0% 44.4% 2.2
Drew Pomeranz 718 -19.1 79.9 10.5% 90.1% 2.2
Ryan Madson 91 -15.6 83.5 14.3% 100.0% 2.1
Matt Barnes 237 -17.8 81.1 14.8% 69.7% 2.1
Ross Stripling 188 -17.8 80.9 15.4% 70.6% 2.0
Wade Davis 121 -15.3 83.5 14.1% 70.0% 2.0
Garrett Richards 31 -19.0 79.4 12.9% 100.0% 2.0
Lucas Giolito 104 -19.9 78.4 2.9% 93.3% 2.0
Brandon Workman 163 -17.3 81.2 9.8% 62.5% 2.0
Daniel Coulombe 235 -16.8 81.2 8.1% 92.7% 1.8
Justin Grimm 171 -16.2 81.9 19.9% 57.9% 1.8
Dovydas Neverauskas 107 -14.3 83.8 18.7% 66.7% 1.8
David Robertson 284 -15.1 82.9 23.6% 84.2% 1.8
Tommy Hunter 136 -12.8 85.2 12.5% 36.4% 1.7
SOURCE: Brooks Baseball / Pitch Info
Second-half stats on curves.
Combo Z Score = z-scores for drop and velo added together.

Buehler obviously had a difficult debut, recording an ERA over seven and the home-run rate to support it. Also, his curveball didn’t even get a ton of whiffs. But it should.

Research suggests that curveball velo is great for whiffs and that drop off the fastball is great for grounders. Those two traits, when paired together, make for great curveballs. Spin is included on the table above, though it’s exhibited no significant relationship with whiff rate in my research. It does show a small relationship to grounders — and we do know that some front offices (including the Dodgers) — have selected for curveball spin.

Buehler is in the top 10% when it comes to drop. His riding fastball and huge curveball are a great combo in that the ride on the former improves the perceived drop on the latter. He’s in the top 10% when it comes to curve velocity; even if he loses a tick when he steps into the rotation, it’ll be a strength. He’s in the top 20% in spin and, maybe in a related matter, every single curve that was put in play was a grounder.

With a big fastball, a good spin combination on his fastball and curve, and a high-velocity cutter/slider with slider-like drop, Buehler has the tools he needs to be an exciting young pitcher. In many ways, he looks like a young (plus fastball) Alex Cobb, who rode a high-spin fastball and curveball combo to good success last season in a difficult league and division. That’s interesting because Cobb is the best pitcher that the Dodgers can afford without going over the luxury tax — FanGraphs readers put the former Ray into a contract that would average $14 million a year, at least.

Maybe the Dodgers already have Alex Cobb, though. Maybe the newly budget-conscious National League champs look to the seventh starting pitcher on their own depth chart for cheap upside and spend their remaining budget elsewhere.





With a phone full of pictures of pitchers' fingers, strange beers, and his two toddler sons, Eno Sarris can be found at the ballpark or a brewery most days. Read him here, writing about the A's or Giants at The Athletic, or about beer at October. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris if you can handle the sandwiches and inanity.

33 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
mikejuntMember
8 years ago

Buehler had a great year in his return from TJS and was fantastic until his late promotion to AAA and MLB. I look forward to the Dodgers prospect list to see if Eric thinks his performance drop off was fatigue related after not pitching in 2016 or if it was indicative of a need for further command improvement. In his brief MLB stint he got hammered because he was consistently behind in the count.

If it was just fatigue he is probably ready to contribute to the MLB squad next year. If the command needs work he may not yet be there.

BrocNessMonsterMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  mikejunt

Yeah I saw the same thing. Amazing stuff but always behind in the count. The stuff you can’t teach is there. Very excited for what 2018 has in store for him.

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago
Reply to  mikejunt

I saw him pitch. He did not look tired. It simply looked like the first time in his life that the hitters were not over-matched. He looked good but his execution wasn’t great – he didn’t get any luck either. You need one of the two to succeed.

careaganMember since 2017
8 years ago

Buehler is the top prospect, but if he isn’t yet ready both Stripling and Stewart have demonstrated they can operate as serviceable depth. The Dodgers need to keep the door open for Buehler if he is ready, though, so I agree that they should avoid a SP signing.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  careagan

They’re probably going to ride with Kershaw, Hill, Wood, Maeda, Ryu, Stripling, Steward, Buehler, and Oaks. That’s plenty good for the regular season. They may want to upgrade the playoff rotation though.

I doubt that the Dodgers are going to go in on Alex Cobb given the value they’ve extracted from 2nd (and later) round draft picks. Signing him or Darvish would also put them over the tax line if they can’t ditch Kemp’s salary (which would also require giving away talent). And while it’s not crazy to think that they’ll go all in to trade for deGrom/Archer/others, something tells me the Dodgers are going to wait and see how their guys are doing.

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I think that the Dodgers will baby Buehler next year. I also don’t think that staff is necessarily enough – every one of those guys was hurt last year or looks like a AAAA starter. If they are all healthy or a guy is pitching over his head, then it works, but an injury or some ineffectiveness would hurt a lot. They are a team that could use an innings eater.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

To paraphrase Sherlock and Moriarty:
You: Pitchers got hurt.
Me: That’s what pitchers DO!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pno-QZRmmyk

AJ pro-Preller
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Haha yeah if they make the playoffs…giants dbacks Rockies pads are getting better while the Dodgers blew their load last 2 seasons. What does the current friggin outfeild project to lol

Mooondog
8 years ago
Reply to  AJ pro-Preller

Oh, you mean Puig,Taylor and Toles (likely)? Pretty darned good. And the Giants are getting better??? LOL, how exactly? Okay, maybe they finish 32 games out this year. Nobody in the NL West has done anything of note and that puts them substantially behind the Dodgers roster as it is.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  AJ pro-Preller

About 8.5 fWAR. #6 in LF, #17 in CF, and #4 in RF. Actually, for position players they project to be #3, for pitchers they project to #1.

I actually think the question about “if they make the playoffs” is valid since absolutely no one is guaranteed before the year even starts. But the logic you used to get there is seriously wack.

AJ pro-Preller
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Logic?? Sure its logical to assume Taylor Puig will repeat their great seasons…not. wherever you got your numbers from is wack…lol someone tell me what toles/pederson have done besides prove to be platoon outfeilders. Outfeild/starting pitching need serious $$$ before they start thinking playoffs

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  AJ pro-Preller

I got the numbers from Fangraphs…you know, the site where we are ostensibly reading the articles and commenting on them.

Take it up with them.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Even “ostensibly” is putting it too kindly at this point.

mikejuntMember
8 years ago

Pro-Preller is an anti-Dodger troll who doesn’t even try very hard.

johansantana17Member since 2026
8 years ago

The correct estimated payroll figure for the 2018 Dodgers is $179.3 million (Cot’s Contract: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12Fdcz-v1dHv7WUA6N73JhLNL7cZ-JCaUSRyh8LQvG7A/pubhtml#).

The 2018 luxury tax threshold is $197 million, not $198 million.

So the Dodgers actually have less than $18 million before they hit the tax threshold, and they will want to keep at least a few million for in-season transactions.

connjc
8 years ago
Reply to  Eno Sarris

Cot’s also includes Arruebarrena and Sierra which as the article states should not be included in the luxury tax number.

connjc
8 years ago
Reply to  connjc

Apologies, I looked at the incorrect tab. Those guys are not included.

I think the key difference is that Cot’s adds in an estimated cost of filling out the rest of the rosters and Eric’s $171m number does not include that. Although he does mention it in his article putting his estimate at $175m after those costs are added in.

johansantana17Member since 2026
8 years ago
Reply to  connjc

Cots estimates those costs at a combined $7.65 million, while that only adds $4 million.

johansantana17Member since 2026
8 years ago
Reply to  Eno Sarris

Stephen only listed 18 players. He did not include any money for 0-3 year players getting paid at or near the minimum. Cot’s includes $5.4 million for these players. And $2.25 million for minor league players on the 40-man roster.

The difference in the arb projections is $4.6 million. I agree that MLBTR projections are better.

The true amount is likely somewhere in between the $171 million figure you cite and the $182.3 million figure Cot’s currently has and

nick_durangoMember since 2016
8 years ago

I posed this question to Eno on Twitter not 10 minutes before this article came out, but wanted to crowd source some opinions here. Do the Phils and Dodgers make sense as trade partners for something like Cesar Hernandez to the Dodgers for Kemp, Forsythe, and one of the Dodgers top prospects. My guess is the Dodgers would balk at Buehler and Verdugo, but perhaps Yadier Alvarez or Mitchell White plus some lower level pieces.

As Eno points out, such a move would free up significant additional salary for this year and make this offseason, and next, much more interesting for the Dodgers.

Any thoughts?

forum199Member since 2017
8 years ago
Reply to  nick_durango

I like the idea of re-visiting a trade with Minnesota for Dozier. What about Forsythe, White, and another lower-rated prospect for him? Exact same salaries for both on 1-year deals, while Twins add 6 years of a cost-controlled young starter and Dodgers upgrade significantly at 2B without adding any money.

johansantana17Member since 2026
8 years ago
Reply to  forum199

I don’t think the Twins are trying to downgrade at the MLB level in 2018.

TommyLasordid
8 years ago

Kershaw, Hill, Wood, Maeda and Buehler, with Stewart, Ryu, Stripling, Oaks, Santana and (dare I say it) Urias all on the 40-man for 10-day DL depth. That should be plenty to win the NL West, and then add the 2018 version of Darvish in July. If they can squeeze in Addison Reed, that would be fabulous.

YKnotDisco
8 years ago

I figured it was a typo when the article first posted – but I haven’t seen it changed yet – so does that mean Garrett Richards spin rate really is 3889? Thats double the next highest rate. I assumed it probably should’ve read as 1889. I guess not…?

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
8 years ago

Fan boredom aside — even here it’s surprised me to see people complain that they’re not “winning the offseason” — it’s hard to see why the Dodgers really need to do much more than stand pat at this point. At most what’s called for is tinkering around the edges, adding in a few lower-cost upside gambles and additional depth that won’t hurt anything if no specific player among them pans out. Financial moves aside it seems clearly like a “stay the course” kind of offseason.

piddy
8 years ago

You should’ve seen the apoplectic reactions on Twitter when Zaidi said the team didn’t have any big needs.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
8 years ago
Reply to  piddy

Ha, maybe I’ll go search them up for entertainment. On the other hand “You should’ve seen the apoplectic reactions on Twitter when” can be followed by pretty much anything.

Spitball McPhee
8 years ago

🙁 we aren’t talking screwball

Spitball McPhee
8 years ago

Oooops a daisies mixing him up with Honeywell

rounders
8 years ago

My son is a huge Dodger fan. When that pip-squeak parking lot magnate was selected by the owners for the Dodger franchise I told him exactly who he was and that the owners had deliberately taken him over qualified owners to immunized themselves from that franchise dominating them. Then that same fool and his wife so embarrassed mlb that they finally did not stand in the way of giving Andrew Friedman the tools (an equal playing field) to rule baseball for a generation. There is Friedman and then there is everybody else. The only thing that is going to beat the Dodgers in the coming years is the occasional bad bounce and multiplication of playoff series. I am a Red Sox fan and hater at the same time but this is just reality.