We’re in for One Heck of a Second Half

Time is flying. It seems like only weeks ago that Shohei Ohtani struck out Mike Trout with a picture-perfect sweeper to finish off the World Baseball Classic, the Rays started the season with a franchise-record 13-game winning streak, and the Pirates shocked the baseball world with a 20-9 April. But no – the calendar turns to July this weekend, those Rays just played their 81st game on Sunday, becoming the first team to reach the halfway point, and Pittsburgh has fallen into fourth place in the NL Central. The days are getting shorter, now, and so is the remaining calendar – by the end of the week, most teams will have more regular season baseball behind them than ahead of them.
If that’s the bad news, here’s the good news: We’re poised for an exciting run over these next three months. With July around the corner, there are 23 teams within six games of a postseason spot, and 19 within four. No division lead is greater than 6.5 games. According to our playoff odds, 21 of the 30 clubs – a full 70% – have between a 10% and 90% chance of ending up in the playoffs. At this point in the baseball calendar last year, just 12 teams fell in that range:

After play on July 3, 2022, when teams had averaged the same number of games – just over 79 – as they have now, the Yankees and Astros had division leads of more than 13 games, making them virtual locks to make the playoffs. The Dodgers, who led the National League with a .628 winning percentage, and the Mets and Braves, who were battling it out in the NL East, all had better than 90% odds, as did the Blue Jays. As of Tuesday, only the Rays and Braves, who lead their respective circuits in wins, have eclipsed 90% – both are north of 98%. The Dodgers and Rangers are over 80%, and Arizona sits at 75.9%, but none of the 25 other teams have a 3-in-4 shot or better:
| 2022 Team | Playoff Odds | 2023 Team | Playoff Odds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Astros | 100% | Braves | 99.9% |
| Yankees | 100% | Rays | 98.9% |
| Dodgers | 98.3% | Dodgers | 89.7% |
| Mets | 97.1% | Rangers | 81.3% |
| Braves | 93.3% | Diamondbacks | 76.1% |
| Blue Jays | 92.9% | Giants | 75.2% |
| Padres | 87.5% | Orioles | 68.3% |
| Brewers | 85.4% | Marlins | 63.3% |
Things may be even murkier among the bottom tier of the postseason hopefuls. On July 3 last season, 12 teams, or 40% of the league, had less than a 1-in-10 chance of extending their season into the playoffs. On Tuesday, just seven teams fit that bill – the White Sox, Pirates, Tigers, Royals, A’s, Rockies and Nationals. Most everyone else is going to head into the second half of their schedule thinking they have at least a shot to grab a Wild Card. By that measure, we have about as much uncertainty left to sort out in the back half as we did when the season began – our Opening Day playoff odds also had seven teams shy of 10%. Only the Reds have played themselves over that threshold, and only the White Sox have played themselves under it.
There are a good handful of teams in the 10-20% range right now, but I’d say the difference between below 10% and 10-20% is a meaningful one. In that 10-20% bin are the Reds, who lead their division and who the projections may be underrating; the Cubs, Mariners, and Red Sox, who are a hot week or two from a playoff spot (and who seem capable of stringing a couple of hot weeks together if things fall the right way for a stretch); and the Mets and Cardinals, who, for as bleak as the first half has been, are 8.5 and 8.0 games out of a playoff spot, respectively, with enough talent on their rosters to make a significant second-half improvement feasible:
| Team | Record | GB from Closest Playoff Spot | Playoff Odds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Twins | 40-41 | – | 62.2% |
| Yankees | 43-36 | – | 60.1% |
| Blue Jays | 43-47 | 0.5 | 58.9% |
| Astros | 43-37 | 1.0 | 51.1% |
| Brewers | 41-38 | 0.5 | 50.1% |
| Angels | 44-37 | – | 46.7% |
| Phillies | 41-37 | 3.0 | 45.0% |
| Guardians | 38-40 | 0.5 | 33.6% |
| Padres | 37-42 | 7.5 | 32.1% |
| Reds | 42-38 | – | 19.0% |
| Cubs | 37-40 | 3.5 | 18.6% |
| Mariners | 38-40 | 4.5 | 16.1% |
| Red Sox | 40-40 | 3.5 | 15.9% |
| Cardinals | 33-45 | 8.0 | 14.1% |
| Mets | 36-43 | 8.5 | 13.5% |
In terms of the ultimate end goal, at this time last year, our playoff odds had just 10 teams with a 2% shot at winning the World Series – with the eventual NL champion Phillies notably not among them – with about two-thirds odds that it would be the Dodgers, Braves, Astros, Yankees, or Mets. This year, though we give about a 47% chance that it’ll be any of the Braves, Rays, or Dodgers, half of the league has a better than 2% chance.
I largely opposed playoff expansion, and I still think it has made the postseason tournament too big, but that doesn’t mean we can’t appreciate what it does offer, which is that it can keep middling teams motivated to win through this point of the season and beyond. But some of the particulars of this competitive landscape are due more to the quirks of division alignment – the same quirks that have brought us an AL East with five teams better than any AL Central team. This season, these quirks mean that the Wild Card races are populated almost exclusively by East and West teams in both leagues, but the Central races are tight enough that second- and third-place teams like Cleveland, Cincinnati, and the Cubs are still very much within reach of the playoffs.
This isn’t a good thing for the general fairness of playoff qualification. We could easily end up in a situation in which the first Wild Card team out in either league has a better record than their league’s Central division champion – right now in the AL, Houston (42-37) and Toronto (43-37) would be left out in favor of Minnesota (40-41). But it’s a great thing if you’re rooting for total chaos in the second half. More teams in the hunt and fewer teams running away with division titles means more meaningful games late into the summer.
To put it another way, with 21 teams left with less-than-surefire playoff odds one way or the other, a 15-game day on the schedule should include on average between 13 and 14 games featuring at least one of these teams. With only 12 teams in that no-man’s land, as was the case last year, a 15-game schedule would include on average nine or 10 games with at least one of these contenders. That’s about four more games with playoff implications every day for fans.
As much as this has to do with extra Wild Cards and quirky division alignments, it seems like some of the credit is owed to the shifting sands of the league, as well. This year, we’ve seen the Orioles, Rangers, Diamondbacks, Marlins, Angels and now Reds emerge as playoff hopefuls – or safe bets, as the case may be – many of whom seem poised to stick around for years to come. It’s an impressive influx of teams trending upwards, and quickly – while the Orioles’ resurgence started early enough last year for the team to finish with 83 wins, the other five clubs averaged just 69.2 wins in 2022 and are projected to improve by an amazing average of 17.1 wins this season:
| Team | 2022 W | 2023 Projected W | Increase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rangers | 68 | 89.8 | 21.8 |
| Marlins | 69 | 87.6 | 18.6 |
| Reds | 62 | 79.1 | 17.1 |
| Diamondbacks | 74 | 89.4 | 15.4 |
| Angels | 73 | 85.5 | 12.5 |
On the flip side, most of 2022’s top dogs haven’t exactly ceded their spots – the Braves, Rays, Astros, Dodgers, Yankees and Blue Jays aren’t quite ready to give way. In the middle of the pack, the Brewers, Phillies, Red Sox, Mariners, Padres, Twins and Guardians are hanging on while they try to find a hot stretch the way the Giants have. And while there’s little joy in St. Louis and Queens at the moment, given the talent in those clubhouses, our playoff odds aren’t ready to write them off completely, either.
The next few weeks will be crucial for some of these teams on the cusp of contention. With such a competitive field heading into the month, we might soon be closing in on an August 1 trade deadline that could feature far fewer sellers than buyers. Even the teams with comfortable playoff outlooks will be looking to add, so asking prices will likely be high, and it’ll be interesting to see which teams bite at those high prices knowing their own chances of a deep playoff run might be diluted by the field around them, not to mention an extra round of playoff randomness.
Last September, I wrote about the lack of intensity in the chase for playoff spots, much to the chagrin of anxious Mets and Braves fans enduring a nail-biting division race. So far this year, it looks like we’re in better shape to send a number of playoff races into the deep summer and early fall, with some fresh faces to boot. There’s a lot to sort out between now and October, and the sorting out is the best part. Here’s hoping this season stays messy as long as it can.
Chris is a data journalist and FanGraphs contributor. Prior to his career in journalism, he worked in baseball media relations for the Chicago Cubs and Boston Red Sox.
This is something I noticed the other day when I was looking to see who was truly “out of it” and likely to sell at the deadline. There are only four teams that are more than 9 games out of both the division league and the wild card: The Royals, A’s, Rockies, and Nationals. The Cardinals and White Sox are less than 9 games back in their respective divisions, the Mets and Padres are less than 9 games back from the wild card, and the Cubs, Tigers, and Pirates are less than 9 games back on both. None of these teams have great chances, and the playoff odds for some of them are abysmal. But none of them are definitely, irretrievably out of it.
Of course what this means is that the ratios of buyers to sellers is going to be really lopsided at the deadline this year. I think it’s fair to assume that none of the 11 teams I just mentioned are going to be buyers. And maybe the Red Sox, Brewers, Mariners, Guardians, and Reds are going to be reluctant to buy. That would mean that there are going to be at least fourteen buyers and maybe as few as four sellers. And some of those “sellers”, like the Royals, have largely traded almost everyone except players under team control forever / would actually be upgrades for other teams.
For this reason, some of the Tigers and White Sox and Cardinals and Mets might think that it makes more sense to sell at least a little bit, even though nominally they are still in it. If there were more sellers, I would think maybe they would just hold onto players and see what they could do. But there are probably only 10 players on the A’s / Royals / Rockies / Nationals who would be upgrades for any single contender and also available. Blackburn, Greinke, Chapman, Scott Barlow, Jeimer Candelario, Victor Robles, Lane Thomas, Matt Duffy, and maybe Lane Thomas, Hunter Harvey, or Brad Hand; that’s it. So you might be able to get far better prospects for good rental players like E-Rod or Jordan Montgomery than you normally would.
I think it will be hard for Jerry Reinsdorf to sell. Even someone like Giolito who probably isn’t coming back in 2024. He’s 87, doesn’t know how many more seasons he will see, and probably feels like he just finished a rebuild and might not survive another one. Since it is almost impossible to be out of the AL Central race, they will talk themselves into not selling.
Of course, they don’t have much ammunition to be buyers either and the team hasn’t done what is necessary to keep them competitive after 2020 and 2021. I think they are headed back to “mired in mediocrity” for the rest of Reinsdorf’s life. They throw Rick Hahn (and maybe Kenny Williams) to the wolves, but as long as Jerry is in charge I don’t see anything more than the name plates on the offices changing.
No, they’ll sell. Seems like at least once per week there’s an article on MLBTR saying the White Sox are only considering trading their expiring contracts (Giolito, Grandal, and Reynaldo Lopez if anyone wants him) right now, but they’ll definitely do that. I hope they go further and trade Cease, Lynn, Kelly, Graveman, and Middleton.
2.5 years of Cease would return a bit less than the FV60 (Eloy) and FV50 (Cease, ironically) that 3.5 years of Quintana did in 2017, but this team isn’t going to be playoff-ready by 2025 anyway. We can’t trade Robert (control through 2027 so we won’t receive fair value), nor Hendriks (injured) and most of the rest of the team are having down years (like Tim Anderson and Yoan Moncada, again), so there’s no point in trading them at their nadir.
Any contenders need either starting or relief pitching for the rest of the season or longer? The White Sox shop is open!
The way TA is playing it doesn’t make sense for the White Sox to pick up his option… So he could walk at the end of the year. (Almost wonder if that’s his goal)
The last I heard was that they would be open to trading players on expiring contracts but only them.
I haven’t heard or seen anything since then but I don’t think it would be difficult for them to consider trading Grandal or Clevinger, so if that is what they were referring to it’s almost a non-story. Trading Giolito is another matter. I guess we will see.
Greinke?
Hm, I think I must have looked at his season last at the tail end of May or before he made his first start in June. In the month of June, his ERA has been 9.00 and his FIP has been 5.68. That has taken his solid 4th-starter numbers into 5th-starter territory.
But if you knock him off, that only means there are even fewer guys to trade!
Some of midpack might think of being both sellers and buyers. Instead of a selloff, they might trade from strength to fortify a weakness.
It’s not a common tactic but it happens from time to time and with few sellers it might be the only open path, betting on each other’s underachiers.
There are a couple cheap bats on the A’s that could help a few teams. Of course they are also cheap, so they will likely stay with the A’s.
If I were the A’s I would seriously consider selling high on Rooker and Noda. Especially Rooker. But they are under team control forever and cheap so maybe they stay.
The main trade piece they have is Blackburn.
I don’t know if there is any selling high on Rooker at this point. He was hot for about a month and now he’s down to a .457 slugging percentage. He slashed .172/.254/.313 over the last month.
19 percent to make the playoffs?
You’re telling me we have a….Joey Votto (#19) chance at making the playoffs?
It’s destiny. Calling it now: the Reds will make the playoffs.*
*Assuming they can find a way to roster more than one good, healthy SP at a time.
Who needs healthy SPs when God is in the lineup? Expect miraculous things
Scoring 11 runs the day Luke Weaver is starting feels like a miracle, not gonna lie. I believe!
I’ll take that bet.
How much $?
I will take the bet. You give me 5 to 1 Reds make the playoffs? I’ll take Reds do, you tell me how much.
Is this the FBI? Rob Manfred? You know that I can’t bet on Reds games.
It would be really funny if you actually were Joey Votto. I wonder how many active mlb players comment on fangraphs. I’m sure some do. Sometimes at my gym some high A guys I can see are scrolling fangraphs on their phone, and I have actively seen people commenting. So I’m sure some mlb guys do, too.
I mean, former MLB guy, but Ronnie Dobbs for sure.
Detroit getting back Rodriguez,Skubal,Faedo,Greene,
Good luck facing that
I mean, I want the Tigers to make things interesting, too. But Skubal hasn’t pitched in a year, Faedo hasn’t shown anything to make me think “part of a playoff pitching rotation”, and it’s not like other teams aren’t also getting guys back.
I hope they take the Central by storm, winning the division by ten games with an 83-79 record. They’re a fun team in a bad division. But I suspect many teams will have good luck facing them, just as they have for most of the season thus far.
Replace Faedo with Matt Manning & maybe it’s a little more interesting.
Now seeing your other post about Colt Keith being a future HOFer makes more sense …
I know FG has had a couple posts on them, but outside of Arraez I feel like the Marlins have gone completely unnoticed while the media focuses on the Braves, Phillies, and Mets – all for very different reasons – in the East. There was a lot of hand washing over their off-season, but it seems to be going precisely according to plan and they just got Jazz back. Here’s to hoping Kim & Co continue staying relevant and getting their deserved props as the season goes on
The Marlins are a weird team. They’re 11-1 in one-run games at home, and 8-4 in one run games on the road. Most of their blowout wins (win by 5+ runs) were against losing teams, most of their blowout losses (loss by 5+ runs) were against teams with good offenses. Is winning so many one-run games sustainable? Probably not, but those wins are already banked. So long as they play .500 the rest of the way, they have a good shot at a playoff birth.
If their starters stay healthy, and the run producers in the lineup can keep from getting injured (playing on turf is hard on the body), they could make a run. Arraez is the guy they traded for, and Soler is back to hitting bombs. Teams have won before with average offense, great starting pitching, and a decent bullpen.
They’re like the inverse of last year’s first half, where they had a pretty good run differential but terrible record
The path to competitiveness is to beat up on the bad teams and hold on against the good ones.
They look more like a ’24 team in the making than a ’23 winner but stranger things have happened. Getting Alcantara close to last year’s level would help a lot.
Don’t they have a negative run differential?
-2 right now. it was -40 a month or so ago. they are very good right now!
I have to say that some of the Playoff/WS odds make no sense to me.
For example, among the Orioles, Yankees, and Blue Jays, the Orioles have the best odds to make the playoffs (68.7%), followed by the Yankees (60.3%), then the Blue Jays (59.0%). But the WS odds are in the reverse order with the Blue Jays having the best chance (4.1%), followed by the Yankees (3.7%), then the Orioles (2.4%).
Meanwhile, over in the AL Central, the Twins and the Guardians are in a virtual tie for the division lead right now. And the projections see little difference between the two teams, with the Twins winning 81.9 games and the Guardians 79.7. But despite those small differences, the Twins are given a far better chance of winning the division (59.1% vs 35.8%).
I didn’t bother looking at the other divisions cause just looking at those two confused the heck out of me. I’m sure I’m missing something obvious but I have no idea what it is.
The odds rely on names, players with a history of adequacy.
Twins hopes lie with injured players coming back, Cleveland’s on rookies and sophomores.
Me, I see Cleveland having a lower chance for a big second half but a bigger half if they get “lucky”, while the twins have a better chance of just muddling through.
If the division goes to a .500 team, experience favors the twinkie veterans because of their established floors.
I think the idea is Fangraphs views the Blue Jays and Yankees as a good bit better than the Orioles but the Orioles have banked the most wins. So the Orioles are most likely to make the playoffs because of those banked wins, but it doesn’t give them as good a shot at winning the four playoff series they’d need to win to take the WS as the two teams perceived as better.
To be clear, I don’t necessarily agree with projected win percentages, but to explain it:
ROS win% from the Playoff Odds right now:
TOR .536
NYY .531
BAL .478
The difference in wins between a .531 and a .478 over 81 games is about 4.3 wins, which is significantly smaller than the +6 advantage the O’s currently have.
Now, you make the playoffs, and the advantage disappears and it reverts to the projected winning percentage and, over a bunch of simulations, this could be one of a few different teams.
Since Baltimore wouldn’t get a bye in many simulations, they need to win 4 simulated series based on a sub .500 estimated win%, which wouldn’t happen frequently.
I don’t understand why Twins expected to win 81.9 wins vs. Guardians 79.7 wins resulting in 59.1% vs. 35.8% makes no sense.
First of all, two wins is not a small difference.
Essentially Fangraphs expects Twins to win 52.4% of their remaining 80 games and Guardians to win 50.9% of their remaining 82 games.
A simple simulation using binomial distribution tells me that
probability a random number from B(80, 0.524) being larger/smaller than a random number from B(82, 0.509)+2 (since Guardians have two fewer wins than Twins) is 58.1%/35.9%.
Now, this is not a proper calculation since the win/losses of Guardians/Twins are not completely independent, but the ballpark figure totally makes sense to me.
Reds are the most exciting team in baseball at the moment. I hope they squeeze every drop outta that 19% and make it to the dance
Braves just calmed them down in their own building, so I don’t know about that. How are we defining “the most exciting” here?
“Most interesting team to residents of southern ohio.” 😀
More seriously: currently hot team with interesting young players.
Well I find them exciting and I live in Boston. They are exciting because of how unpredictable they are. Brilliant winning streak followed by getting humbled by the Braves. Elly De La Cruz bringing back quite a few fans to that Cincy bandbox. A refreshed Joey Votto. They are indeed an exciting team. Elly De La Cruz! He’s fun to watch.
If the Reds were ‘calmed down’ by Atlanta, what did they do to Baltimore?
It seems nuts to me to watch this Reds team and say they have less than a 1/5 chance of making the playoffs, but I accept it because you don’t want to overreact to a small sample. But losing 2 out of 3 one run games being ‘calmed down’ is the most wild small sample I can think of.
Watching teams can be misleading, which is why we have stats.
The Reds are exciting but they also have one of, if not the, worst pitching staff in baseball.
I always find a lot of the comments funny. Obviously the Braves are better than the Reds. Braves slowed their roll a lil bit. But I would assume that most readers if fangraphs would understand baseball is just largely variance over any sample size of games. Iirc wouldn’t it take 72 games to equal an NBA best of 7? There are better teams and there are worse teams. But any series means nothing, ever.
I think if the pirates can find one more above average starting pitcher and O. Cruz comes back soon and plays like a superstar, then they could get back to being a winning team. They could have another 20-9 in them before the season ends.
All the bad players on the pirates (Marcano, Bae, and R Castro all have negative fwar and more than 150 ABs) are playing mostly because Cruz got hurt. Henry Davis and Nick Gonzales both look very good so far replacing the above. If Cruz comes back very strong then the offense has a chance to be formidable.
disclaimer: I bet before spring training $100 each on the Orioles, Diamondbacks, Marlins, and Pirates to make the playoffs. I’ll earn $3500 if they all make it. So I’m watching the Pirates super close this year and might be biased.
“…some of the particulars of this competitive landscape are due more to the quirks of division alignment – the same quirks that have brought us an AL East with five teams better than any AL Central team.“
I don’t believe the Red Sox are actually better than the Twins, especially given the Red Sox current injury situation with their starting pitchers. I’d easily prefer the Twins’ roster over the Red Sox if I had to pick one or the other. The BSR roster is just a mish-mash of has-beens and too-young-for-prime-time dudes, with the only exceptions being Devers and Verdugo (who’s probably having his career year).