We’ve Never Had This Many Multi-Homer Games
I think there are too many home runs. That’s an aesthetic preference, of course, and one you don’t necessarily need to share to continue with this article. I mention it only to help you understand why I became interested in how many multi-homer games the 2019 season has brought us so far, and whether that number was unusual. The reason is simple: I got sick of hearing about them. One of the first things I do each morning, at least with respect to baseball, is fire up At Bat and watch the first 10-15 highlights of the previous day’s games. I find it’s a good way of keeping up to date, if not with the broad trends shaping the game, then at least with the moments driving that day’s news. And almost every day, I’ll see something like this at or near the top of the highlights list:

Or, at least, I thought it was almost every day. It certainly seemed that way to me. But maybe I’d just developed a severe case of early-onset grumpy-old-man-itis. Maybe my aesthetic preference for fewer home runs was bleeding into my perception of the quantity of multi-home run games. When you hate something, everything about it annoys you, including how much it’s around. So I asked my colleague Sean Dolinar to run some numbers for me (all 2019 stats in this piece are through August 23) and set me straight. And it turns out that even though I absolutely do suffer from grumpy-old-man-itis, I’m not wrong about the number of multi-home run games this year. They’re up — by a lot:
| Year | Multi-HR Games |
|---|---|
| 2017 | 396 |
| 1999 | 362 |
| 2019 | 355 |
| 2001 | 341 |
| 2000 | 338 |
| 2016 | 337 |
| 2004 | 321 |
| 2006 | 318 |
| 1996 | 317 |
| 1998 | 313 |
Even without adjusting for the fact that we have yet to play the last six weeks of the season, 2019 already ranks among the top three seasons of the last 45 years for the number of multi-home runs games produced by the league’s players (1974 is as far back as our daily log goes). Give it a week or so, and I’m fairly confident we’ll fly by 1999 for second place. Taking the top spot — or even clearing 400, which has never been done before — will be a bit more difficult, of course, but I’d bet in favor of it happening. The record mark is just 41 games ahead of the current total, and most teams have about 30 games left to go. Multiply that figure by the number of games played on each fully-scheduled day (15) and then by the rate of multi-homer games per games played so far (about 0.17) and you have the potential for upwards of 70 more multi-homer games this year, and a final total of 430 or more. At this point, I’d be surprised if the league didn’t break the record.
There’s more. If the season ended today, 2019 would set the record for the year in which the highest share of all home runs hit (5,408 through games played on Friday) came in multi-home run games (13.5%). This in a year where players seem quite likely to obliterate the record for the number of home runs hit in total! It’s not a surprise, I suppose, that more multi-homer games are appearing in tandem with more home runs overall. Home runs are the highest form of victory a batter can achieve against a pitcher. As the playing field on which those battles are fought has tilted over the last few years in favor of batters hitting more home runs, it was inevitable that more batters would go deep more than once a game than ever before. But the specific way that increase has played out has been interesting. Let’s start by ranking all the seasons since 1974 by the average season-long ISO of the players who produced those multi-home run games:
| Year | Multi-HR ISO |
|---|---|
| 2019 | .226 |
| 2000 | .218 |
| 1999 | .212 |
| 2017 | .211 |
| 2001 | .210 |
2019 is number one, as you might expect. But, as many of you will be shouting into your screens at this very moment, that doesn’t tell us much. League-wide ISO is also high this year — in fact, at .183, it’s higher than it’s been in any year of our 45-year sample. So a more interesting table, probably, would show the ratio of multi-HR hitters’ ISO to league-wide ISO. We’d expect that hitters who end up hitting multiple home runs in a game would have a higher ISO than the league as a whole, and that’s true. But how much higher? Turns out that there’s been quite a bit of variation in that mark over the years. Here’s the top and bottom five by that measure:
| Year | League ISO | Multi-Homer Hitters’ ISO | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1976 | .106 | .166 | 1.56 |
| 1981 | .113 | .172 | 1.52 |
| 1975 | .116 | .172 | 1.49 |
| 1978 | .121 | .179 | 1.48 |
| 1984 | .125 | .182 | 1.45 |
| 2004 | .162 | .206 | 1.27 |
| 2016 | .162 | .204 | 1.26 |
| 2017 | .171 | .211 | 1.24 |
| 2018 | .161 | .199 | 1.23 |
| 2019 | .183 | .226 | 1.23 |
Here’s what I think is happening: There is a certain threshold of power, as measured by ISO, above which hitting more than one home run in a single game becomes likely enough that it does, in fact, happen at least once over the course of a season. In years in which the overall power environment is favorable to pitchers, only truly elite power hitters, by raw talent, are able to exceed that threshold and therefore hit more than one home run in a game. That’s what was happening in 1976, when the league ISO was an astonishingly low .106 but the average ISO of multi-home run hitters was .166 — five points higher than league-average ISO in even homer-rich 2018. Hitting multiple home runs in a game is hard enough in the best of times, and so in the worst of times only the best can do it.
Well, 2019 is pretty close to the best of times when it comes to hitting home runs. The best players in the league are carrying ISOs above .350 into August, and even those who are otherwise close to league-average offensive players — Hunter Renfroe and Kyle Schwarber, both of whom have wRC+s between 100 and 110 — are posting ISOs north of .250. As consequence, 2019 has seen the likes of Pedro Severino (with a .166 ISO ) hit three home runs in a game, and the likes of Andrelton Simmons and Travis Shaw (.106 and .117, respectively) hit two. Yes, the truly elite power hitters have also had their share of big games — Mike Trout has hit two home runs in a game four times so far, and Nelson Cruz has done the same in addition to having two three-homer games — but 2019’s boom in multi-home run games has been the consequence of the little guys getting invited to the party, too.
To some extent, this is what’s behind my growing disinterest in this particular kind of highlight. Nineteen different players have hit three home runs in a game so far this year; collectively, those games have accounted for 5.6% of the multi-home run games recorded this season. Nineteen is a lot of players. When Nelson Cruz hits three home runs in a game, I’m reminded of how great a baseball player he is, and how amazing it is that he’s able to do what he does day in and day out. When Pedro Severino hits three home runs, with all due respect to him, I’m reminded that the game’s offensive environment has changed enough in the last five to 10 years that someone like Severino hitting that many home runs in a game this year isn’t just likely, it’s probable. And, at least to me, that’s dispiriting. Hitting three home runs in a game shouldn’t be something that this many big-leaguers can do. It should be special. It should be something worth rewatching. It should be hard to do, even for the very best of the very best. And right now, at least, it’s not.
Thank you to Sean Dolinar for research assistance on this article.
Rian Watt is a contributor to FanGraphs based in Seattle. His work has appeared at Vice, Baseball Prospectus, The Athletic, FiveThirtyEight, and some other places too. By day, he works with communities around the world to end homelessness.
The game is getting too exciting now with all these home runs. Something needs to be done to give some more advantage to the pitchers and increase the strikeouts.
Eh. But I’d take a few more doubles and triples in the gap.
This is why I want to see stadiums forced to adopt Kauffman Stadium’s dimensions as the new minimum.
I’d like to see more variety in stadia. Force new parks to deviate from the standard in some way. I like the old fence distances in Detroit and Seattle, but I also like Fenway, and the Polo Grounds.
Fenway already suppresses homers pretty well, and IIRC Lansdowne creates a problem with expanding that side anyway. For the ones that wouldn’t involve demolishing an entire street, I’d just say that the total outfield area has to be the same or greater than Kauffman and let them figure out the exact dimensions.
You misspelled “walks”.
I Think a lot of homers are good but this is a bit too much. Imo mlb should design the ball in a way that stabilizes HR/9 around 1.1 which is like 2015 level. Imo this is a pretty good compromise, we don’t want to go back to 70s slap baseball but also not this peak steroid era perversion.
Your point about mlb designing the baseball reinforces the fact that Mann is just a paid shill by the owners when he claims the design flaw that led to these massive homeruns and the number of them was just a freak of nature or some such nonsense.
Joe Posnanski has been tracking the streak of consecutive days with at least 1 player hitting 2 HR and it just recently ended at 37 which is by far the record according to his articles. He also wrote a lengthy column about all the HR records that are being set this year, for example: 12 teams are on pace to break the franchise record for HR (with the Twins having done it already and maybe San Diego since the piece was a few days ago & they were only 2 short) with another 5 or 6 teams within range and having a shot.
I didn’t know this! But I’m glad he’s on the beat.
From the aesthetic preference, I agree there are too many homers. Though multi-homer games don’t bother me as it is a symptom of the problem. In the high strikeout environment, I don’t want to go completely un-juiced ball either without another change. Personally, I want mound to be moved back with using either an unjuiced ball or a ball similar to 2016 and 2018 balls (some juice but not 2017 or 2019). My guess is 4 inches back would push contact rates back 20-30 years, but definitely don’t want that with this ball.
Pushing the mound back seems like one of those “unintended consequences” things – there are many who theorize it would create even more Ks since it would give breaking balls even more time to break. I also think it would be tough to ask guys who have been throwing from 60’6″ for anywhere from 10 to 30 years to suddenly switch to throwing from a different distance.
The walk rate would probably spike enormously. I would hate that from an aesthetic perspective.
4 inches isn’t that much. If it would cause breaking balls with incredible movement, MLB would select pitchers that are shorter to get benefit of release point a couple inches further from plate. Taller pitchers are favored because releasing ball closer to plate increases effective velocity. 4 inches is just enough to knock a couple of ticks off of effective velocity.
I mentioned this up there too, but I think the solution is to move the fences out. If Kauffman Stadium was one of the smallest outfields instead of the largest you’d have a lot more doubles and triples and fewer homers, and it would be fun. Also, teams would be less likely to put an immobile masher in an outfield corner, since they’d need someone to cover more ground.
I have to agree with sadtrombone that moving the fences out will create much more exciting offense. For some perspective on offensive seasons, the 1930 season is an extreme example and a significant outlier even for that era of surging offenses. This is probably not a season to statistically strive for, but I think it does (exaggeratedly) illustrate the point that scoring does not require a TTO offense and makes for much livelier entertainment.
Some stats for the season (per team):
Runs/G: 5.55 – highest ever not including several seasons in the 1800s
RBIs/G: 5.16 – highest ever not including several seasons in the 1800s
BA/G: .296 – highest ever not including two seasons in the 1800s
Doubles/G: 1.96 – highest ever
Triples/G: 0.52 – 6th highest ever not including several seasons in the 1800s
* HRs/G: 0.63 – 71st highest on the list (all seasons in the 1800s were below it)
OB/G: .356 – highest ever not including two seasons in the 1800s
OPS: .790 – highest ever not including the 1894 season
ERA: 4.81 – highest ever not including the 1894 season
WHIP: 1.52 – highest ever not including several seasons in the 1800s
I found a great article about the 1930 season called “The Big Blastcast of 1930”: http://www.thisgreatgame.com/1930-baseball-history.html
It appears that outlawing the spitball was the biggest factor contributing to the offensive onslaught. Also, balls were replaced much more frequently and batters were focusing much more on hitting for power.
Apparently, so many pitchers were “shell-shocked” that the following season they deadened the ball and moved the mound two feet closer to home plate. The 1931 season and beyond saw much more balance between pitching and hitting.
Sorry, but the mound has been 60 6″ since 1893. There were some minor rule changes in 1931 but it was the change in the composition of the baseball that was responsible for bringing runs back down.
Okay, you’re right. I was going off the article. Looking at it again, it said it was a recommendation, but apparently it was never changed. Thanks.
Ask one man named Bob Gibson who will turn 84 on November 9th how you can change the game without moving the mound back. He was so dominant in 1968 they lowered the mound. So if they do anything just raise the mound and see what happens.
I totally agree with “I think there are too many home runs.” I’m watching pitchers throwing what used to be quality or even what used to be unhittable pitches and these guys are reaching out and hitting home runs the opposite way and often with one hand. And then anti-union attorney turned baseball commissioner claims it’s just a freak accident that this is happening and says it’s “material” change in manufacturing of baseballs. I guess it’s just one of those “coincidences” that all investigators hate because this freak altering of the baseball just happens when attendance has become a real issue. And if you want more “coincidence” then coming into this season the big push by Mann and the league was “speeding” up the game. What a convenient time to make up for all that coming offense which makes games longer by stressing speeding the game up.
Sorry it took me so long to make my point that I think the office of mlb commissioner is just a public relations tool for 30 or so millionaires and billionaires running a tax exempt business which used to be a great sport.
“1974 is as far back as our daily log goes” — FWIW- here it is from Play Index back to 1908; the first extra one is at #31
1 2017 396
2 1999 362
3 2019 359
4 2001 341
5 2000 338
6 2016 337
7 2004 321
8 2006 318
9 1996 317
10 1998 313
11 2018 306
12 2002 305
13 2005 296
14 2003 291
15 2008 285
16 1997 278
17 2010 276
18 2009 276
19 2015 266
20 1987 266
21 2007 263
22 2012 248
23 2011 232
24 2013 227
25 1995 221
26 1993 215
27 1986 209
28 1977 206
29 1994 200
30 2014 186
31 1970 181
32 1961 179
33 1979 175
34 1985 171
35 1969 171
36 1973 169
37 1962 165
38 1990 163
39 1991 160
40 1983 159
41 1982 156
42 1964 153
43 1980 150
44 1955 143
45 1971 142
46 1956 142
47 1984 141
48 1966 141
49 1988 140
50 1963 134
51 1958 134
52 1974 130
53 1989 129
54 1965 121
55 1978 120
56 1975 119
57 1959 117
58 1950 116
59 1960 114
60 1957 113
61 1992 110
62 1968 106
63 1967 105
64 1953 102
65 1954 99
66 1951 98
67 1930 98
68 1949 96
69 1940 96
70 1972 92
71 1976 91
72 1947 91
73 1981 87
74 1938 85
75 1934 81
76 1952 78
77 1937 78
78 1936 78
79 1932 75
80 1935 73
81 1939 72
82 1929 66
83 1948 63
84 1925 62
85 1946 60
86 1922 59
87 1941 58
88 1928 58
89 1933 48
90 1931 47
91 1944 46
92 1924 44
93 1945 42
94 1943 41
95 1927 40
96 1921 40
97 1923 37
98 1942 35
99 1926 32
100 1920 19
101 1914 17
102 1913 15
103 1919 14
104 1911 14
105 1912 12
106 1916 9
107 1915 8
108 1910 5
109 1918 2
110 1917 2
111 1909 2
112 1908 2
Well, in all fairness, it does seem like Gleyber Torres only hits homeruns in pairs.
Verlander is the poster child for what is wrong about the new ball. In 179 IP, he’s allowed only 110 hits; 33 of those hits have left the yard! He has walked only 34, versus 239 Ks, so he’s utterly dominating batters, until they somehow get a piece of one, and then the ball flies over the fence. I can understand why he is so outspoken against the current baseball.
Having at least as many HR allowed as walks is a moderately rare club to join; min 140 IP:
2019 Mike Leake (34 HR and 22 BB thus far)
2018 Bartolo Colon
2017 Josh Tomlin
2016 Josh Tomlin
2015 Michael Pineda
2015 Bartolo Colon
2015 Phil Hughes
2014 Phil Hughes
2011 Bronson Arroyo
Verlander is presently at 55% of his hits allowed being XBH; add in ISO>AVG and Verlander is all alone. Get rid of the inning limit and he makes a friend or too:
Tommy Milone is at 83 IP this year, with more HR than BB and ISO>AVG. I guess he has the “advantage” of not needing to work his way to more HR than BB RoS. Also this year, David Hess at 75 IP, Jerad Eickhoff, 58IP and Ymi Garcia, 52 IP.
Bronson Arroyo, 2017 71 IP, 23 HR, 19 BB, .320 AVG, .333 ISO
Josh Tomlin, 2018 70 IP, 25 HR, 12 BB, .304 AVG, .307 ISO
Josh Tomlin, 2015, 66 IP, 13 HR, 8 BB, .195 AVG, .220 ISO
I’m just going to nominate Josh Timlin as the face of it, and call it a “Timlin”.
Tomlin is the absolute best example of how overrated K/BB is as a stat. Because he walks basically nobody and squishes that denominator down so low, he has been one of the very best in the league in that stat for years. But because he doesn’t strike many guys out and gives up a ton of HR, he’s been a crap pitcher.
“Tomlin is the absolute best example of how overrated K/BB is as a stat. ”
2015-2019 there are 142 pitchers with 400+ IP and if you just use K/BB, Tomlin is 98th percentile, with neighbors like Kershaw, Sale, Scherzer and Kluber.
Are there loads of articles about Tomlin being just as good as these folks? If not,then I suspect K/BB is merely being used as an ‘in addition to’ sort of stat and then it still works fine.
I don’t know of anyone who uses a straight K/BB ratio to determine value. Usually they do it in FIP, where Tomlin has been a league-average starter twice in his career, and never more than that. I suspect he’s rated where he belongs by most people.