What Christian Yelich Has Changed
You couldn’t blame Eric Hosmer or Christian Yelich if they got sick of hearing about Statcast. Anyone who’s ever played with the basic tools has been able to discover two things: (1) historically, Hosmer and Yelich have hit the ball hard, and (2) historically, Hosmer and Yelich have hit the ball on the ground. It became easy to wonder what might happen if Hosmer and Yelich set their sights on the skies. It just so happened that, last offseason, both of those players changed teams. Might they have also been willing to change their swings? It’s not that it wasn’t interesting. It just started to grow a little tired.
Hosmer hasn’t changed. That much I can tell you. Through five months of baseball, he’s got a below-average batting line and a below-replacement WAR. He has the highest ground-ball rate he’s ever posted. But then, Yelich is currently sitting on a career-high wRC+. He’s sitting on a career-high slugging percentage. He’s also technically sitting on a career-low ground-ball rate.
Don’t get the wrong idea, though. Yelich’s average launch angle hasn’t budged from last season to this one. He remains a ground-ball and line-drive hitter. In part, he’s just benefiting from playing in Milwaukee instead of playing in Miami. And in part, he’s benefiting from another change. It’s not one that has to do with his swing. Rather, it’s one that has to do with his approach.
Yelich has been particularly good over the past two months. It all led up to Wednesday, when he finished 6-for-6 while hitting for the cycle. Granted, through June, Yelich had a terrific 123 wRC+. But since the start of July, he’s up at 184. Out of everyone with at least 150 plate appearances over the same time span, Yelich has ranked as the third-best hitter, and he’s been doing his best to keep the Brewers’ offense afloat. Barring a disastrous final stretch, Yelich is going to drum up some measure of support for the NL MVP.
I’m not here to argue whether Yelich is or isn’t the most valuable player. The most important games are still ahead of us. Instead, I want to show you what Yelich has been up to. Yelich batted six times against the Reds on Wednesday. The first three times up, he swung at the first pitch. The last three times up, he took the first pitch for a ball. The third time he swung at the first pitch, incidentally:
And here we can see how Christian Yelich has changed. He’s been in the majors for a while, having batted more than 3,300 times. With the help of Baseball Savant, here’s a plot of Yelich’s career first-pitch-swing rates, expressed as 100-plate-appearance rolling averages:
The recent Christian Yelich has reached a new height, and you can see how this is a newer development. In the past, Yelich went after the first pitch roughly a fifth of the time. That was more patient than the overall average. Here are his 2018 monthly splits:
- April: 20% first-pitch-swing rate
- May: 22%
- June: 24%
- July: 30%
- August: 41%
Yelich turned it up in July, and it’s only grown more extreme in August. Now, maybe for something like this, you’d appreciate the additional benefit of context. So here’s the same idea, except this time I’ll show you Yelich’s percentile ranks among his peers:
- April: 22nd percentile first-pitch-swing rate
- May: 24th
- June: 31st
- July: 55th
- August: 91st
Yelich has gone from being particularly patient to particularly aggressive. He’s done this essentially on the fly. Through June, Yelich had 10 hits on the first pitch, which tied him for 99th place in the majors. Since the start of July, Yelich has 18 hits on the first pitch, tying him for first place in the majors. Looking at it again, through June, Yelich had six extra-base hits on the first pitch. Since the start of July, he has a league-leading 10. For the sake of reference, all of last season, Yelich had five extra-base hits on the first pitch. The year before that, eight. The year before that, seven. The year before that, five. Yelich has done in two months what he hadn’t previously done over six.
And while this might be a minor thing, Yelich seems to be swinging early with intent. I mentioned that Yelich’s overall launch angle hasn’t really changed. That much is true. But look at four years of his launch angles on first-pitch batted balls:
- 2015: +1.7 degrees
- 2016: +3.2
- 2017: +4.5
- 2018: +11.2
Yelich has always kind of had two swings — there’s the swing that sprays a ball the other way, and there’s the pull-power swing, the one that can hit a ball 440 feet. Yelich has been hitting the first pitch better, and he’s been going after the first pitch more. He’s been taking the more aggressive hack while he has some pitches to play with. Many hitters wouldn’t want to take the same chance when they already have one or two strikes.
Truth be told, this is sort of a proxy. What I’ve been focusing on are first-pitch swings. But lately, Yelich has been more aggressive in general, in zero- and one-strike counts. And while I can’t crawl into Christian Yelich’s head, what this suggests to me is that he’s simply made an effort of late to go into the box ready to swing. He’s more ready to punish the first pitch, which then leaves him more ready to punish the second or third. In that way, it’s psychological, but it also might be increasingly wise in this era of putaway pitches. This is the age of strikeouts, where everyone throws 95 with a breaking ball. The Red Sox have worked to be aggressive early in the count. The Braves have worked to be aggressive early in the count. Yelich is there, as well, trying to get to the pitcher before the pitcher can get to him. These things are always cyclical, but this has been driving Yelich’s success.
As Yelich has been more aggressive, he’s been more able to pull the ball toward right and right-center. And as he’s been more able to pull the ball toward right and right-center, his power numbers have skyrocketed. This version of Christian Yelich still hits plenty of balls on the ground. This version of Christian Yelich might take a hack or two too many out of the zone. But this speaks to how good Yelich really is: A switch flipped for him a couple months ago, and he’s tweaked his approach on the fly. Yelich goes up there ready to swing these days, which means the opponent can’t take a single pitch off.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

I’ve been bamboozled. This was a post (somewhat) about launch angle.
re: home run GIF
does anyone know if pitchers care when their catchers hang their heads after they give up bombs? could see it going either way
To be fair to the catcher that particular head hang was probably less related to the pitcher’s pitch (which was pretty good) and more to ‘geez, how the heck did he hit that ball out?’
whatever the reason, no matter how many times you watch the catcher hang his head, it isn’t not funny
Attn: Eric Hosmer
All this time, at least since Moneyball and Scott Hatteberg, I have been led to believe that BB% is the best thing for a hitter to strive for, certainly if wants to pad his WAR. It seems pretty obvious that going after the first pitch is not the best approach in achieving that since, heaven forbid, the hitter might actually put the ball in play. I might be wrong but think it is far more advantageous to let the hitter knock the snot out of the first pitch.
Then you’ve learned the wrong lesson.
What do you disagree with?
He disagrees with the framing of the thought. The point of Moneyball is NOT that BBs are the best thing. It’s that you need to find skills that are undervalued by other teams.
At the time, for the A’s it was BBs, but these characteristics change over time. Catcher’s pitch framing, defensive range, and now launch angle have all popped up as areas where teams can temporarily gain an advantage (at least until the rest of the league catches up).
You are correct and your comment is very well presented. I was separating BB’s from the more recent developments in the game but the walk % is still mentioned in the scouting report of every player, prospect or established major leaguer. My point is that I still believe that the value of a BB is overrated. It is never the value of a hit. Taking a walk with Ivan Nova coming up next is akin to striking out. If I was managing and the number 8 hitter came up with men on 1st and 2nd I would walk him intentionally. It is a measure of the approach at the plate and a passive one, leading to more K’s, has always struck me as very inefficient. Everybody on this site knows that the batter is at a distinct disadvantage if the pitcher jumps ahead in the count. That was the point of my comment. Hit the first pitch if it is a strike. So much goes into successful hitting but pitch selection is near the top. Waiting for a better pitch, that never comes, may not be the best approach.
Walks are important but don’t make the mistake of saying walks equals obp. Walks help obp but the most important thing Is still hitting. A guy walking 15 percent (super elite walk rate) but never hitting would have a 150/000/150 obp/slg/ops line which would be one of the worst nl pitcher batting lines.
Don’t get me wrong, you do want to have an above average or at least not super low walk rate but certainly not sacrifice hitting.
The math for this is pretty easy. Using ops here to show it more clearly take a hitter with a 900 ops, 15% walks and .250 iso.
-Walks are 17% of the production (150/900)
-power is 28% (250/900)
-hit is 55% (the rest)
That doesn’t mean walks aren’t important. With no walks the formerly all star quality hitter would only have a 750 ops which is like league average. But you don’t want to sacrifice hit or power for walks which are important but clearly third.
Also while putting the ball in play early does decrease walk rate it also means pitchers are more careful. If you have a good eye your walks will maybe only go down a little because the pitcher nibbles more and throws less first pitch strikes. Now if you have a bad eye and Chase 0 0 breaking balls it is not good but then you wouldn’t walk much anyway.
Walks only have a big influence if they are very high (say more than 12%) or super low (under 5). I believe as long walks are somewhere between 7 and 12 batters shouldn’t think much about them and just let them happen when hitting. Now you don’t want to be that 4% guy but yelich is nowhere near there.
What are you saying? Walks count exactly as much as hits when figuring OBP. The equation is (H+BB+HBP/AB+BB+HBP+SF). For this reason they carry much too much weight when measuring offensive value Let us compare Javy Baez to Lorenzo Cain, two top candidates for MVP in the NL. Baez line is .327/.568 for an OPS of .895. Cain ‘s line is .402/.439 for an OPS of .841. Baez has 98 RBI’s and Cain has 34 yet Cain has a higher bWAR. Baez is a great defender so it can’t be that, or is it, and base running can’t make up that much difference. It almost looks like the program is penalizing Baez for driving in all those hated runs with his worthless RBI’s.
If you actually look at the breakdown, you’d see that Cain has been credited with +16 runs vs. average this season against Baez’ +7. Their batting numbers are almost identical (Cain is +1 run on Baez, simply due to the large number of outs of Baez has chewed up to get his production.) So yes, the difference in bWAR is almost exactly the fielding difference.
It’s also interesting, because WAR offensive calculations are usually based on linear weights, which is literally weighing the different values of hitting events. The exact coefficients float with league averages and such, but the 1B/uBB ratio is pretty consistently 9/7. So a walk is about 78% as valuable as a simple single (the inverse ratio — 7/9 — is 0.7777…..) in WAR. How much lower do you think the value should be?
A high walk rate is less about the walks as it is about not making outs. When you draw a walk, you’re avoiding swinging at 4 poor pitches that in all likelihood would have been outs if you had swung
Cc: Phillies
Being aggressive early sounds like a good idea… especially with good pitch recognition. Great article.
Pitchers will adjust and if he has an answer we might see a freeman in Wisconsin.
Just imagine how good he will be when he goes through puberty.
I see this as a case of pitchers not yet having adjusted to his adjustment. He will be back to himself after they do
Not all the first pitches have been ‘get it over’ fastballs so that has also been interesting. And agree that pitchers will adjust. Then again Paul Molitor spent his career looking to swing at the first pitch so who knows how this will play out and hit more than 10 percent of his career homers on the first pitch Right now just enjoy.ing the ride
Did you change the title? I thought you had a reference to launch angle or something sabery in there last i checked.
no
Interesting that he’s on the same team as the guy who leads the league in 2-strike homers
Re: “the Red Sox have worked to be aggressive early in the count” — How are you measuring this? I’d hate to think you’re just repeating anecdotal statements and popular narrative.
Boston ranks:
— 24th in first-pitch swing rate
— 21st in overall swing rate
— 14th in most pitches per PA
— 4th in highest rate of 2-0 counts
— 8th in highest rate of 3-0 counts
I know these data omit zone considerations, but still — the story of J.D. Martinez is not necessarily the story of the Red Sox.
I do think that “being aggressive early in the count” is good for some batters. But it’s definitely not a one-size-fits-all solution for this high-K era.
A basic statement of the trouble inherent in early aggression (pardon me if this is obvious):
— Every STRIKE added to the ball/strike count dramatically HURTS expected future results, whereas
— Every BALL added to the count dramatically HELPS future results.
So the issue, of course, is what we mean by “aggressive.” Getting a result before reaching 2 strikes is generally a good idea — but not if it means swinging at many more pitches that you’re likely to miss or foul.
Consider the first pitch. (The following numbers are a modified OPS whose overall number is .725, which I’ll explain below.*)
— Overall results ON the first pitch are an excellent .873, with the best SLG and 2nd-best ISO of all situations.
— Results on all other pitches are .706.
— But if you miss or foul the first pitch, results drop to .605 after an 0-1 count. That’s .120 below the overall number, and .101 below all not-first-pitch.
— If you take a ball on the first pitch, results are .836 after a 1-0 count. That’s .111 above the overall number, and .130 above all not-first-pitch.
The difference in future results for “after 1-0” vs. “after 0-1” is huge. And a similar relationship exists for all such comparisons before 2 strikes: Results ON a given non-2-strike count are mostly better than those AFTER — but if you swing and miss or foul, subsequent results are much worse than if you take a ball.
* My methods:
— I modify OPS by (1) multiplying OBP by 1.8 to reflect the appropriate weight of OBP vs. SLG (as stated in FG’s explanation of wOBA), (2) adding SLG, and then (3) scaling that figure down to the same scale as plain OPS.
— Also, I used 2018 numbers for AL only, to filter out most pitchers, and omitted all IBB and HBP. (IBB because the vast majority now occur on 0-0 count, and HBP because they have no direct correlation to the count.)
Yelich is also crushing left-handers this year, for the first time. In the past, he had a typical platoon split, especially lacking power vs. LHP (.101 ISO). This year’s ISO vs. LHP is .234, and his overall line up to .340/.574/.958.
To this article’s theme, it is against LHP that he’s most raised his early aggressiveness this year. For example, his rate of first pitches in play this year vs. RHP is the same as ever, but that rate vs. LHP is up from 8% to 18%. The *outcomes* in both sets are up dramatically.
My favorite Christian Yelich numbers: 47.9% hard hits while pulling the ball only 36% of the time.