What Do You Do with Jacoby Ellsbury?

After this past offseason’s lack of oomph, the winter between the 2013 and 2014 seasons feels like a different time. In the span of two months, Robinson Cano, Jacoby Ellsbury, Clayton Kershaw, and Masahiro Tanaka signed $150 million-plus contracts. It’s not the last time that’s happened: the 2015-16 offseason featured the same number of deals — to Chris Davis, Zack Greinke, Jason Heyward, and David Price — above the $150 million threshold. But there’s enough distance between that earlier offseason and now that it’s possible to review the performances of the relevant players and reconsider the years ahead for them. And as a competitive Yankees club prepares for the second half of the season, it’s worth wondering what will become of former star center fielder Jacoby Ellsbury.

When Ellsbury first signed his deal, Dave Cameron examined (not for the first time) how well fast outfielders with good defense tend to age and noted that it would be dangerous to lump Ellsbury in with Carl Crawford. This was a fair and calm assessment of Ellsbury’s value. He noted that Ellsbury was projected to be a four-win player in 2014, and that over the life of his seven-year deal, Ellsbury was projected to be worth 17.5 WAR. The first part absolutely came true — Ellsbury tallied 4.1 WAR in 2014, his first with the Yankees. The latter projection, however, isn’t working out quite so well.

Ellsbury is now in his fourth season with New York, and he has been worth 7.5 WAR to date. Our depth charts peg him for another 0.5 WAR for the remainder of the season, which would bring him to 8 WAR in four years. As a straight average, obviously that’s two wins per season, but the drop-off following the 2014 campaign has been significant. From 2015 to now, he’s been worth 3.4 WAR. Whether you think he’s a 1 WAR or 2 WAR player going forward, it seems that he’ll be hard-pressed to reach that initial 17.5 WAR figure. Ellsbury has become an albatross far earlier than expected.

Or has he? Judging Ellsbury’s performance is far from simple. Let’s take a look at his defense, for example, as measured both by Defensive Runs Saved (DFS) and Ultimate Zone Rating (UZR).

Jacoby Ellsbury, CF Defense Splits
Season Team rARM DRS ARM RngR ErrR UZR
2007-2009 Red Sox -6 -13 -5.3 2.7 1.3 -1.4
2010-2013 Red Sox -6 25 -10.3 39.3 1.1 30.3
2014-2017 Yankees -6 9 -10.6 4.9 2.1 -3.6
Career -18 21 -26.2 46.9 4.5 25.2

If you just look at his career DRS and UZR, you’d think they’re basically in agreement. But if you break it down by his last four years in Boston vs. his first four years in New York (with some early career Boston years left over at the front), you see that the agreements are not universal. Both systems agree he has a terrible arm, but UZR hasn’t given him nearly as much credit for range in New York as it did his last four seasons in Boston. As such, that negative UZR with New York has knocked down his WAR. But perhaps there’s more to the story.

For one thing, we know that he hasn’t slowed down. When we head over to the new Statcast tool, Sprint Speed, we can see that he is not only firmly above average, but faster this year than in the past two years.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
Jacoby Ellsbury, Sprint Speed, 2015-2017
Year Sprint Speed (ft/sec) Rank
2015 27.9 119
2016 28.0 108
2017 28.2 63
SOURCE: Statcast
Average sprint speed is 27 ft/sec

Visually, we can see that he is holding his own both league-wide and among his position group. (Ellsbury’s circle is to the left of his name.)

All of that is positive and good news. His speed metrics here on FanGraphs are in agreement as well. His BsR, Spd, UBR, wGDP, and wSB stats all show that, while not at his peak, Ellsbury is still plenty useful with his legs. The 1.1 runs he’s produced on the bases ranks fourth on the Yankees this season.

And in stretches, Ellsbury has shown that he is still capable of hitting well. Dave wrote about this last year, and he broke out a 30-game rolling wOBA graph that documented Ellsbury’s improvement. As both he and Owen Watson had before him documented, Ellsbury is still a pretty good hitter when he’s completely healthy.

Therein lies the rub, though: Ellsbury is rarely completely healthy. Let’s update that graph.

Ellsbury, as you can see, was doing well this season, until he ran into the Yankee Stadium wall on May 24th and suffered a concussion. The injury kept him sidelined for a month, and he hasn’t been the same since returning.

Jacoby Ellsbury, 2017 Splits
Dates PA AVG OBP SLG ISO wOBA
4/2-5/24 153 0.281 0.349 0.422 0.141 0.335
6/26-7/9 48 0.214 0.298 0.262 0.048 0.256

Now, it doesn’t take much of a leap to say that Ellsbury probably still isn’t back to 100%. But since he was activated from the disabled list, he has played in 11 of 13 games. Will that change? Let’s go back to June 10 for a second. In the New York Daily News that day, Daniel Popper quoted Joe Girardi as saying the following, about Ellsbury and Aaron Hicks:

“He’s going to play a lot. That’s the bottom line, when (Ellsbury) comes back,” Girardi said of Hicks. “I know that at some point I’m going to have to give Gardy a day off. I’m going to have to give Judge a day off. I’m going to have to give Hicks a day off. But he’s going to continue to get a ton of at-bats.”

In case that wasn’t succinct enough for you, the title of the article was, “Aaron Hicks will keep getting consistent playing time even when Jacoby Ellsbury returns from DL.” Now, this isn’t an issue with which the Yankees have had to deal just yet. Ellsbury came back from the DL as Hicks was entering it. There’s a chance Hicks may miss a good portion of the second half. He’s not scheduled to partake in any baseball activities until “at least July 25.” Nevertheless, the Yankees will face the crunch eventually. Ellsbury is under contract through 2020. Brett Gardner and Hicks are under contract through 2019, and Aaron Judge and Clint Frazier (and Dustin Fowler and Tyler Wade) will be under contract well past 2020. Not counting Fowler and Wade — who may be good players — the Yankees are going to have five starting-caliber outfielders for the foreseeable future.

Maybe this won’t be a problem long term. Maybe this winter, the Yankees will finally make the long-discussed Brett Gardner trade, and one of the outfielders will rotate through as a DH every day. But for this season, it seems like an issue, especially when Matt Holliday comes back, and that should be any day now. When Holliday was healthy, he was the starting DH most every day.

Given the Yankees’ embarrassment of riches, one would think that this might be Ellsbury’s tough luck. It stinks to be a $150 million bench player, but those are the breaks, right? Except, he’s not the sort of player the Yankees generally bench. Yeah, the Yankees cut bait on Alex Rodriguez a year early, but everything about Rodriguez’s situation was unique. I think a better parallel for Ellsbury would be Mark Teixeira. Last season, Teixeira had a hard time hitting. He posted a 12 wRC+ last May. But the Yankees stuck with him. It wasn’t until he announced his retirement toward the end of the season that they put him in a job share. The same is true of Derek Jeter or Jorge Posada. The Yankees generally stand by their man.

Now, you may not think of Ellsbury in the same light as Teixeira or Posada (and especially Jeter), and you wouldn’t necessarily be wrong in that. But he’s been worth 30 WAR for his career. He finished second in the 2011 AL MVP voting. His contract is the 29th richest in MLB history. He’s one of just 50 players all time to rack up 100 homers and 300 stolen bases. He’s not a player to be cast aside. And yet, given his contract, he probably isn’t tradeable. So the Yankees have some hard decisions to make.

Jacoby Ellsbury was probably overpaid. He’s been worth only 7.5 WAR since coming to New York. But his WAR figure may be lower than it could be thanks to a disagreement between DRS and UZR, and it’s definitely tamped down by the various injuries he has incurred. When completely healthy, he’s still capable of producing at a league-average rate or better, but he isn’t always completely healthy, even when he’s playing. What do you with a player like that? This is a tough question that is exacerbated by the fact that the Yankees have a plethora of outfielders who are qualified to play every day. It’s certainly something you file under the “good problems” header, but it’s going to be a problem for the Yankees nonetheless.





Paul Swydan used to be the managing editor of The Hardball Times, a writer and editor for FanGraphs and a writer for Boston.com and The Boston Globe. Now, he owns The Silver Unicorn Bookstore, an independent bookstore in Acton, Mass. Follow him on Twitter @Swydan. Follow the store @SilUnicornActon.

30 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
EasyenoughMember since 2016
9 years ago

And Cano is at an even 15 fWAR over the same period, 2014 – today. That 15 fWAR has cost $5.6M per WAR. Ellsbury (with $76.5m in pay so far) is around $10.2M per WAR. I’m excited to come back to this one every year until 2024.

redsoxu571
9 years ago
Reply to  Easyenough

Health is a fickle mistress. At the time of signing, Ellsbury’s was a mixed bag – he had missed time, but it was due to injuries of the fluke variety (he seemed to have trouble recovering from injuries, but didn’t actually look to be prone to injuries). Since then, he appears to have actually become injury prone, or else his recovery issues now prevent him from keeping up day-to-day maintenance. It’s a shame…

Paul22
9 years ago
Reply to  redsoxu571

Concussion from crashing the wall this year and in 2015 he had a knee injury when his spikes got caught swinging. Pretty healthy in 2014 and 2016. He was never known to recover quickly in Boston.

p00gs
9 years ago
Reply to  redsoxu571

If ‘injury prone’ is a thing, Jacoby is certainly it. He built up quite the reputation in Boston for being a “club med” guy. IE he loved being on the DL.

Rex Manning DayMember since 2022
9 years ago
Reply to  Easyenough

Some day I hope we get an Oral History of the Yankees’ Ellsbury/Cano Decision.

LightenUpFGMember since 2018
9 years ago

Though most of the old Sox/Yanks rivalry was played out in the early to mid-2000s, massive money thrown about and all, it’s amusing to see another Sox/Yanks contract become a financial burden due to outlandish expectations. If Cashman knew what was going to happen with the recent youth movement, I wonder if Ellsbury would have been wearing a different uniform in 2014.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago

Excuse me while I play a sad, sad tune for the New York Yankees…

roysuniverse
9 years ago

Gardner’s 2019 contract year is a club option, which no doubt will not be exercised. Basically he is a Yankee until next year, unless traded.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  roysuniverse

There is literally zero chance that the Yankees decline a $12.5m option for a guy who’s been a consistent 3 WAR OF over the past 5 seasons.

Joey Butts
9 years ago

If they pick it up, it will probably be to sell him off or to stick him deep on the OF depth chart. Either way, it’s probably not what they want to be seen doing to such a good soldier. Plus, he’ll have 10-5 rights by that point. I think there’s real benefits to doing right by him by letting him choose his team on the open market. Sort of like what the Cubs did with that pitcher (whose name I don’t remember but I don’t want to risk changing tabs and potentially losing my whole comment to find out).

roysuniverse
9 years ago

Ok…Gardner will turn 36 halfway through the 2019 season…The Yankees have Judge, Hicks, Frazier, Fowler, Rutherford and Florial either in the majors or on the way and all in their 20s. Ellsbury contract is nearly immovable so he will be on the team. Their is also a chance that the Yankees sign Harper…you’re telling me that the Yankees will pick up that option…Lol

carterMember since 2020
9 years ago

I tend not to believe in injury prone, but this guy has always gotten hurt. In high school he broke his arm freshman year, and broke his collar bone sophomore year. He had other injuries I cannot seem to recall also. The one thing he has always had going for him was freakish athletic ability. He could dunk from the freethrow line. Just let that sink in for a second.

redsoxu571
9 years ago

A word on Ellsbury’s fielding:
I’m not sure we can say that Ellsbury hasn’t “slowed down” in the field given just the above evidence. Yes, he still has above average speed in the field according to the listed evaluation, and yes, he is still reasonably-well positioned within his positional group. But that fails to show whether he has CHANGED since the prior period.

The best I can offer is anecdotal evidence, but throughout his time in Boston Ellsbury had a fielding reputation as a guy who used high-end speed to track down balls. In fact, I recall fairly clear strides being made that indicated that he was NOT good in terms of routes and/or jumps on the ball (it might have been just one or both, I don’t remember for sure), and so it was his pure “recovery speed” that gave him strong range in center. If he now has just “average” CF speed, and hasn’t substantially improved his range flaws, it stands to reason that he no longer has the same overall range that he once did.

Can anyone verify what I am presenting here, or add to it?

p00gs
9 years ago
Reply to  redsoxu571

I cannot verify but I do remember the reputation he had for bad jumps and first steps, made up for with speed. No idea if it was actually true though

London Yank
9 years ago

The Yankees should probably trade Gardner now if they can and keep a starting outfield of Frazier, Hicks, and Judge. I like Gardner because he is a decent player and club leader, but he is unlikely to be a part of the next great Yankee team in any case. Due to the contract Ellsbury will unfortunately have to be kept as a fourth outfielder. …I wouldn’t mind trading Ellsbury for a bag of balls after Fowler returns next year.

Paul22
9 years ago

Gardner in LF cuts down some of his UZR I am sure and there are a lot more HR in YS 3 than Fenway whic reduces BIP. Could be an intern thing as well or a diffetence in organizational positioning philosophy Too bad we never got the H-A splits for UZR and DRS to screen some of these park effects. Conspiracy?

LHPSU
9 years ago

You can’t sit the all-time leader in catcher interference.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago

I’d eat a ton of money to dump Ellsbury.

YKnotDisco
9 years ago

I was surprised this wasn’t a “Shirtless Bartolo Colon” comment.

Shirtless Bartolo Colon
9 years ago
Reply to  YKnotDisco

I’d eat Ellsbury for money, then take a dump.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
9 years ago

Enter Clint Frazier, exit Jacoby Ellsbury, at least as a full time regular in the Yankees outfield. The log jam that already existed just got hit by another bigger, better log. I can only think of one outfielder with a weaker arm than Ellsbury, Johnny Damon and, any way you look at it, his other skills are eroding rapidly. This is a case in which the eye test is even less kind than the numbers. His ability to go and get’em does not appear to compare to the young gazelles roaming CF for many other teams. He is the fifth outfielder in an era when teams only carry four. His contract looks as bad as Albert Pujols’ who, at least, can still do a low end impersonation of Big Papi as a DH.

YKnotDisco
9 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

“Throw” Khris Davis into that mix too. His arm has been worth -21.6 runs in only 3,656 innings.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

Ellsbury’s contract is pretty bad, but considering that Ellsbury is going to be paid 60% of Pujols’ salary and he is still playable, he’s got two big things on Pujols. Really, if you’re making a list of the worst MLB contracts he might not even make the top 5 (Pujols, Crawford, Howard, Zito, Mo Vaughn, Mike Hampton, A-Rod’s 2nd contract, and maybe Cabrera when all is said and done).

Paul G.Member since 2016
9 years ago

I thought the Ellsbury signing was a mistake from the beginning. He was an above-average-to-good player who was hyped because of a spectacular 2011 season (and very good 2013 season) and because he played for the Red Sox who had just won the World Series. Whenever I see a player with a spikes and valleys type career like Jacoby, I get nervous. It’s not that I wouldn’t sign him, but getting into a bidding war for an elite contract is not something I would do unless I felt he was the only thing I needed to win a championship in the first year.

Craig TyleMember since 2016
9 years ago

Ellsbury and Teixeira are completely different – the Yankees did not have the equivalent of Hicks and/or Frazier to slot in at first base last year. Ditto Jeter and Posada. It’s only now, since the Yankees actually have young talent, that they have the option to replace an expensive, but underperforming player.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Craig Tyle

I’ll also note that Texeira had some nostalgia associated with him. Do Yankees fans have fond memories of anything Ellsbury did? Probably not. If the Yankees have any sense at all, they’ll put him on waivers and hope someone bites. And when no one bites, they’ll let him spell the starters in center and left.

Matt1685
9 years ago

I think the Yankees are going to play their best players. What they did in the past is not so relevant. Besides, Ellsbury is neither a lifelong Yankee nor a legend like Jeter. The Texeira comparison is flawed because they didn’t have someone to replace him who was ready and proven. If Ellsbury dislikes the amount of playing time he receives, he will request a trade and the Yankees will eat a good chunk of salary. Fowler and Hicks getting hurt make this scenerio a bit less likely this year or this winter. But it will probably eventually be in play, assuming Ellsbury doesn’t pick his offensive output up.

Average Fastball VelociraptorMember since 2016
9 years ago

How much of the future is foreseeable?

d ross
9 years ago

Ellsbury and Cueto have similar contracts/term/WAR overall and WAR this year at 0.6 with Ellsbury missing time with injury. This would seem to be a good trade for both clubs. The Yanks could sweeten the pot with a prospect like Clarkin. I know, Cueto has an opt out this year, but that might not mean anything to both teams.

d ross
9 years ago

I also like a trade of Gardner to the Dodgers for a pitcher. Gardner is an upgrade and gives the Dodgers flexibilty for the playoffs. He could be their lead off man, and play left field. I’m not sure what Gonzo status is, but if he is healthy they might want to use him as a DH in the series. This is their year in my book. These 2 moves would clear money for the Yanks to get more pitching in another trade.