What Jackie Bradley Jr. Figured Out

Jackie Bradley Jr. has been doing amazing things. To be absolutely clear, they’ve all been doing amazing things. Every last one of them. That 91 mile-per-hour sinker outside? Amazing. That opposite-field roller past the shortstop? Amazing. The reason we bother to pay attention in the first place is because everything that happens out there is amazing, performed by amazing players. Yet Bradley has been particularly amazing. Here’s an amazing thing from yesterday:

Bradley is riding a long hitting streak, and while we don’t really care too much about hitting streaks, on their own, they’re tightly correlated to good offense. That’s what we do care about. This year, Bradley ranks eighth in baseball in wRC+, between Manny Machado and Nick Castellanos. Of course, some things still look a little weird — Aledmys Diaz, for example, ranks second. So looking over the past calendar year, Bradley ranks 15th. That covers 401 trips to the plate, and he’s sandwiched between Machado and Nelson Cruz. Regardless of whether this is for real, Bradley is now definitely a hitter. And in this season, he seems to have taken one more step.

The Jackie Bradley Jr. who debuted in the majors was terrible. He was even worse as a sophomore, and it appeared as if he was out of a role in Boston. They didn’t end up moving him, but they and everyone knew he was flawed. Great glove and everything, but the bat wasn’t there. The swing was long, and it made Bradley vulnerable. It caused him to over-commit, and it opened up an area inside. Bradley needed to figure out how to hit fastballs, so he put work toward tightening up. In 2015, he showed a quicker swing. It was, obviously, a more productive swing. Fastballs were getting hit, and pitchers responded by directing fewer fastballs toward the plate. That’s how it usually goes.

One weakness did sustain into last season. You probably won’t get anywhere if you can’t hit fastballs, but Bradley kept struggling against softer stuff. Before last year, Bradley made contact with 65% of his swings against non-fastballs. Last year, that dropped a little bit, to 61%. So while Bradley was crushing heaters, his contact rate against other stuff ranked him in the 21st percentile among big-leaguers. As a force, Bradley remained incomplete.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Now it’s a new season, and that contact rate is up to 73%. Put differently — Bradley now ranks in the 71st percentile. Between years, that’s a leap of 50 slots, and it suggests that Bradley has become markedly better at identification and execution. There’s a lot that could go into that — it’s not just like flipping a switch — but for more evidence, we can look beyond rates of contact. I decided to play with our pitch-type run values. I combined performance against fastballs and cutters into one, then I put everything else into another bucket. I turned those numbers into rates, so I could compare players in the majors over a common denominator. The graph should tell you everything — here are Bradley’s percentile ranks, league-wide, for each of the last three years:

jackie-bradley-jr

I know the math might seem sort of complicated. That image should make it easily consumable. Take 2014 — in 2014, Bradley was a mess. He was a complete disaster against non-fastballs, but he was a similar sort of disaster against hard stuff, so pitchers just stuck with that. The following season, Bradley improved dramatically against those hard pitches. Pitchers noticed, and they also noticed that he still wasn’t having a great time with other pitches. Against non-fastballs, Bradley didn’t get a whole lot better. Now look at what’s happened this year. Bradley has stayed good against hard pitches, if slightly worse. But against the other pitches? Almost nobody has been better. Bradley’s been even more productive against them than he’s been against fastballs, and that’s incredible. He went from the 20th percentile to the 94th. These numbers are sort of noisy, but the take-home message is clear: now Bradley can hit just about anything. That home-run highlight at the top came against a 1-and-0 changeup.

Bradley erased his weakness against heaters, and now he might be erasing his weakness against non-heaters. Which makes him difficult to pitch to, because, what do you throw? Every hitter on the planet has a weak spot, but Bradley’s hasn’t been easy to identify. Now, this doesn’t really have to be a mechanical thing. I don’t know if Bradley made a physical tweak; he’s kind of cagey about that stuff. We know that his timing must be good, so he’s been getting his foot down. I’d guess this is probably more about a refined mental approach. Having a plan that isn’t just “see a heater and hit it.” Throw in some swing consistency and you have the ingredients. What Bradley showed last year was that he could hit. What he’s showing this year is that he can adapt.

Over the past calendar year, Bradley owns a higher isolated slugging than guys like Nelson Cruz, Miguel Sano, and Anthony Rizzo. I think that’s misleading, because one of the things Statcast has demonstrated is that Bradley doesn’t have upper-level raw strength. The numbers should come down somewhat, and some swing-and-miss remains in his game. I don’t think that Bradley is one of the very best hitters on the planet, but I definitely do think he’s turned himself into a threat. A year ago, Jackie Bradley Jr. fixed his swing. This year, it seems he’s improved his approach. There was a time this would’ve been unimaginable, but that’s probably more the fault of our collective imagination.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

41 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Les Vegetables
10 years ago

I don’t necessarily disagree with you, but what about Statcast indicates he doesn’t have upper-level raw strength?

AA1989
10 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Sullivan

But his exit velocity on breaking pitches is up this year, which coincides nicely with the above narrative.

SoxScout
10 years ago
Reply to  Les Vegetables

His avg exit velocity is 60th of 184. Only 9 balls over 105 mph with a top of only 109. Good power, not great or elite.

Darren_Dreadfort
10 years ago
Reply to  SoxScout

This is interesting because if you look at his home run types, they look like the profile of a legit power hitter. Of of 17 home runs in the last year, I count 5 to center or opposite field, and top distances of 448, 429, 425, 419, 416, 416… mostly 400+. Not sure if it means anything but hes showed some very legit power.

Josh-
10 years ago

JBJ: I wish I was a good hitter! Look at Mookie! Look at Xander! That’s what I want!
The Devil: You know, Jackie, anything is possible?
JBJ: Anything?! I want to hit!
The Devil: Let’s make a deal…

*JBJ posts -15 UZR, hits .300 w/ 20 bombs*

kbn
10 years ago
Reply to  Josh-

By the eye test, his defense still seems terrific. Not as eye-popping as it was last summer, but still upper echelon. So I’m not sure if his currently negative UZR is just small sample size, or a case of the eye test not telling the whole story.

Or maybe it’s what you say… ^_^

minisidd
10 years ago
Reply to  kbn

Some of that decrease also comes from a vastly improved LF and Mookie’s range taking Opps away, I’d guess.

Paul22
10 years ago
Reply to  minisidd

Mookies in RF, but I guess that still could apply. It looks to me he has lost a step due to his increased weight

JediHoyer
10 years ago
Reply to  Paul22

Holt+young> hanley is what he meant in lf.

nerf
10 years ago
Reply to  Paul22

I think minisidd is saying that a vastly improved LF [in the form of Brock Holt > Hanley] AND Mookie’s range taking Opps away.

TKDCMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  minisidd

I believe the whole thing about good fielders around you making your defense appear worse has been proven to be a myth.

mgoetze
10 years ago
Reply to  kbn

By my eye test, he’s still capable of hitting the highlight reel, but he has been screwing up a lot of routine plays via lapses in concentration. His UZR to date seems well-deserved.

kbn
10 years ago
Reply to  mgoetze

Well, he had that incredibly derp pop-up which was clearly a lapse in concentration. And I’ve seen him screw up a few quite difficult plays, especially early on (e.g. jumping for and missing nearly impossible catches instead of playing properly on a bounce; trying to throw someone out and missing badly). I think all of that probably comes together to generate his current UZR. It’s inconsistent though, because he does still, as you say, hit the highlight reel. So I guess it depends on which side of the pendulum he decides to fall down on over the next year or two.

Johnston
10 years ago
Reply to  Josh-

I can believe it.

kbn
10 years ago

JBJ randomly becoming a fantastic hitter is probably the most exciting development for the Red Sox recently (topping Shaw randomly turning into Donaldson Lite). What I think is almost more interesting though is the fact that the defensive metrics seem to really hate him this year, and I’m not sure why. He’s made a couple of mistakes, certainly (one on a routine play, three or four on very remote plays), but it’s hard to say exactly why DRS is so unhappy.

SoxScout
10 years ago
Reply to  kbn

Probably normal fluctuation, I wish FG would just use a rolling 2000 inning game average or something in their defensive WAR numbers.

JediHoyer
10 years ago
Reply to  SoxScout

Seems maybe a little more than fluctuation. I would still peg him,above average but I don’t think he is plus plus or elite anymore.

kbn
10 years ago
Reply to  SoxScout

Well, remember that even up-the-middle defensive positions only have one or two attempts per game that can be called anything more than routine, and even then fairly few of them will even have the potential for a highlight reel. So it takes a ton of games for there to even be enough data to gauge someone’s true talent, regardless of what means you use to measure it.

JediHoyer
10 years ago
Reply to  kbn

I mean from the eye test as well. Obviously I don’t think he is negative, I just don’t think he is as good as he was.

Clutch Narrative
10 years ago
Reply to  kbn

random doesn’t mean what you think it means

rounders
10 years ago

#1 was shorten swing.
#2 is swing at ball, not pitch, which goes back to #1
#3 is identify which side of plate ball is and go oppo on outside pitch
#4 is to not let bat head drop on high fastball
Bradley may also be the type of hitter who needs daily work in the cage to keep his game together.

Joshua Miller
10 years ago

And Alex Chamberlain makes an almost a mirror image of a post on rotographs.

wily moMember since 2020
10 years ago
Reply to  Joshua Miller

JBJ Fest 2016

Paul22
10 years ago

It looks to me as if JBJ gained about 20 lbs of muscle over last year. He just looks bigger and stronger, although not taller of course. Has a bit more pop, especially opposite field. Looks like he lost a step though, and he has not thrown as well (yanking more than a couple), although he still has a good arm and can still run well

Johnston
10 years ago
Reply to  Paul22

Seems like a fair trade to me.

Brock244
10 years ago
Reply to  Paul22

Yup noticed this too, Bradley looks like he put on a ton of muscle and looks stronger. I would guess this has to do with his uptick in power and down tick in defense.

I think his defense is still solid, but probably not at the level it was, but the increase in power should more than makeup for it.

Johnston
10 years ago

I always love to see a prospect figure it out and become a star.

diamondhoggers
10 years ago

I still think hitting streaks are cool. But then again, I still like RBI’s too. And saves.

EM_24
10 years ago

Yes but have you accounted for his sweet beard?

MatMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  EM_24

In terms of Sox beards though he is still learning. I mean, Mike Napoli in 2013? Let’s not get too out of hand here!

Damaso
10 years ago

J.Bradley

AUG ’15: .461babip, 207wrc+
SEP ’15: .269babip, 97wrc+
APR ’16: .350babip, 114wrc+
MAY ’16: .457babip, 237wrc+

Les Vegetables
10 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

You realize you could probably do that with any hitter who has been playing well right? Unless you are a prodigious power hitter, I would be really surprised if anyone could have a great offensive month without a high BABIP. Not saying he isn’t due for some regression, but you are conflating correlation and causation a bit I think.

nerf
10 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

What, exactly, is your point? Hot hitters have low babips when they’re hitting well? A hitter on a hot streak is going to have a higher babip. It doesn’t mean the success is fluky, it means more balls are dropping in for hits.

Damaso
10 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

well, .350 is a “high” babip.

.460 is somewhat more than just “high”.

Mahoney
10 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

JBJ’s BABIP over that stretch is .371, which is obviously high. But there’s another doubles-hitting lefty who can run (Christian Yelich) who has a .373 BABIP this year and .366 for his career. Trout has a .374 BABIP this year and .358 for his career. There are different “true-talent” levels for hitters’ BABIP

So if your point is that we should regress JBJ’s recent hot spell, I’d agree. But maybe not as much as you might think.

Damaso
10 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

yeah, there’s a chance that bradley is one of the elite hitters in mlb like those guys.

and bogaerts. and shaw. and hanley.

or maybe it’s just a shortterm babip fluke.

JediHoyer
10 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

Christian yelich was elite before this year?

sgnthlr85
10 years ago

The interesting follow up to this is where should he be valued now? Is he a top 20 outfielder the rest of the year? Do you want him over Lorenzo Cain, Yelich or Polanco? What about in a keeper league? Is he as valuable as someone like Mazara?

redsoxmaniac
10 years ago

As great as the JBJ story is, the efficiency of the entire lineup is jaw-dropping.

They have three players posting a .900 OPS, and it isn’t Bogaerts, Ramirez, Pedroia, or Mookie Betts. Christian Vazquez has the lowest wRC+ in the lineup; the second-lowest belongs to Mookie Betts (108).

Literally, every flaw that we’ve seen with different players (Bradley’s long stroke, Shaw’s ISO, Pedroia’s decline/power decline, Ortiz April/May inconsistencies, Bogaerts over-patience, Hanley (insert whatever here) through the years, seems like they were all figured out at the exact same time.

Except for Betts and Sandoval. Betts is the only player (other than Panda) playing worse (by a teeny bit) than his 2015 campaign. Shocking to watch them kill even the best pitchers in the league.

0bsessions
10 years ago
Reply to  redsoxmaniac

What’s more, Betts has actually gotten hot since this post, but not really at the expense of anyone else regressing. Pedroia’s wRC+ is “only” 111 on the last 14 days, but past him? Hanley’s bringing up the rear of the pack with a 175.

They’re getting absolutely nothing from C or LF (Except when facing lefties, Young is killing lefties), but when 7 of 9 hitters are killing it, you’re sitting pretty.