Which Playoff Teams Will Miss Out Next Year?

We run a lot of chats and live-blogs around here, and I find that there’s one particular question that consistently comes up every September and October. By that late in the season, either the entire playoff field has been determined, or it’s been almost determined, and there are always people wondering which playoff teams we think are due to struggle in the following summer. People seem to love teams in transition — those transitioning from bad to good, and those transitioning from good to bad. Maybe especially those transitioning from good to bad.

I’m going to tell you right here: This post isn’t about my opinions. I haven’t thought this question all the way through, and I probably won’t until we’re at least a part of the way through the winter. As far as my work responsibilities are concerned, the 2016 season is still alive, and I need to mostly focus on that. But I wanted to run this post for you, because I’d love to see what the audience thinks. At the end of this post is a poll, a poll that allows for multiple answers. I want to see which playoff teams the community thinks *won’t* make the playoffs in a year. I love to crowdsource, and it feels like it’s been a while since I’ve done it.

Before we get to the poll, of course, I’ll list the 10 playoff teams from 2016, along with a few sentences about what could lie ahead. I want to remind you again that the poll will allow multiple answers. I’m repeating this because our polls almost never do that, and I don’t want people to vote with the wrong idea about what they’re doing. Onward! To the playoff teams!

Blue Jays

The Blue Jays have so much star power. An incredible amount of star power, scattered throughout the lineup. And not enough people have caught on to the fact that Aaron Sanchez is also a star, now, and Marcus Stroman is getting there. Most of the important parts of the pitching staff are in position to come back. There’s just, you know, the matter of the impending free agents: Edwin Encarnacion, Jose Bautista, and, less importantly, Michael Saunders. (And I’ll count Brett Cecil, I guess.) The Blue Jays are going to have some difficult decisions to make very soon, and even though I know you could say that same thing about literally every organization in professional sports, that doesn’t make it wrong! It just makes it unfulfilling and pointless.

Cubs

Sure, they might seem almost invulnerable as the near-term future goes. And also as the medium-term future goes. It might seem like they have the ideal blend of youth, talent, intellect, and resources. But you know what many of the Cubs are? Friends. You know what friends sometimes engage in? Moderately dangerous behavior. Last December I went with some friends to a trampoline gym. Totally innocent. Three of the four of us came away injured within quite literally 11 minutes, and the worst injury of the lot was a torn ACL. There can be downsides to excellent chemistry. People without friends stay home and do nothing.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Dodgers

The Dodgers have a lot of similarities to the Cubs. Highly-touted front office, absurd amounts of money, high levels of talent in the majors and below. As such, the Dodgers are another organization that would appear to be almost bulletproof. But they’re not short on relatively important free agents, like Kenley Jansen, Joe Blanton, Rich Hill, and Justin Turner. They probably can’t bring all of them back, even if they wanted to, and 29 other teams are going to be searching for help in the months ahead. The Dodgers can’t do everything they want.

Giants

The Giants just barely hung on, and then they were ultimately destroyed by the very thing that tried to blow up their entire second half. Because of the way the last few months happened, it’s being taken as a virtual guarantee that the front office will bring in one of the available high-profile closers. That is far easier said than done. Midseason trades depleted the prospect depth. The important players are poised to return, and they’ll get a full year of Matt Moore, which is something. The infield looks strong and complete with a regular Eduardo Nunez. The 2016 Giants weren’t *just* the second-half 2016 Giants.

Indians

It’s anyone’s guess how much is left of Michael Brantley’s bothersome shoulder. For all I know now it’s just a scarred, empty skin sack. But, I mean, look at what the Indians just accomplished without Michael Brantley. They got a tremendous second-half boost from Andrew Miller, and Miller remains under contract as arguably the best reliever in the game. There are impending free agents, yet not among the most critical pieces. Francisco Lindor is going nowhere. Corey Kluber, Carlos Carrasco, Jason Kipnis, Jose Ramirez, Cody Allen — they’re going nowhere. Though the Indians might be limited by their budget, right now they don’t seem like they’re in position to have to spend huge.

Mets

I mean, who knows, right? This season threatened to destroy all their pitching. Next season might promise to bring it all back. Steven Matz could be good to go. Jacob deGrom? Good to go. Noah Syndergaard, good to go. Totally unbiased sources say Matt Harvey should be good to go. Even Zack Wheeler is still out there, indicating that if he has his druthers, he’ll be good to go. There’s so much here to dream on, even if 2016 did just show how much can go wrong. The big challenge has to do with Yoenis Cespedes, the anchor of the lineup, and a guy who is a total lock to opt out of his deal. The Mets don’t have an internal replacement for that. And they could also be losing Neil Walker. I don’t think there are many more volatile teams, at this point in time.

Nationals

People tried to paint last offseason as a disaster, and, certainly, it didn’t go the way the Nationals hoped, but it sure as hell worked out, in large part thanks to Daniel Murphy. Now the team might be losing Wilson Ramos and Mark Melancon. Those losses would hurt, but it helps to have, say, Lucas Giolito and Reynaldo Lopez ready to pitch in for cheap. It gives the front office flexibility, and there remains an outstanding core here, especially if Bryce Harper improves on what’s been a disappointing five months.

Orioles

I’m still not entirely sure how the Orioles survived the whole season with the starting rotation they had, but it’s officially now a part of major-league history. And as the Orioles move forward, they know they have Chris Tillman, and both Kevin Gausman and Dylan Bundy showed a good amount of growth. Even Wade Miley is a fine No. 4, results in Baltimore be damned. Almost every other team in baseball would love to have Manny Machado as the best player on its roster. Annoyingly for the team, Matt Wieters is again an impending free agent. Mark Trumbo, too. The higher parts of the farm system objectively suck. And given the Orioles’ divisional context, you have to think about their competition. They’re likely to have a tough schedule, once more, and that works to their disadvantage.

Rangers

Do we need to go over this again? There’s a core in place, and pick-ups Jonathan Lucroy and Jeremy Jeffress remain under control. Jurickson Profar and Joey Gallo might be poised to get extended opportunities, and it stands to reason there’s plenty of growth potential there. The front office has already indicated it intends to strengthen the rotation behind the terrific top two. Yet you also can’t just count on the Rangers being able to bring back Ian Desmond or Carlos Gomez. It doesn’t look like the team is going to have that much in the way of financial flexibility, and based on some early projections, the Rangers look a good deal worse than the rival Astros. Those numbers didn’t matter in 2016, but then, 2016 is effectively over, as the AL West goes.

Red Sox

So many good players. The most recent of them, of course, being Andrew Benintendi. Between him, Mookie Betts, and Jackie Bradley Jr., next year’s Red Sox outfield might cost a combined $3 million. They should generate at least 10-12 WAR. Yoan Moncada is getting closer and closer, which could provide some relief from the almost unavoidable return of Pablo Sandoval. The big issue here really is just the effect of David Ortiz’s retirement. He was probably the best hitter in the game this past season, which made him the biggest part of the Red Sox’ league-leading offensive attack. They’ll need a number of players to pick up the slack, and they’re likely to need health from Drew Pomeranz and Eduardo Rodriguez in the rotation. The foundation is awesome, but any structure can be ruined by a big enough earthquake.


And so, you’re left to vote. Which of these teams do you think will miss out on the playoffs a year from now? The poll allows for multiple answers. Do you want to select multiple answers? Good news! The poll allows for that.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

43 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Art VandelayMember since 2016
9 years ago

I definitely expected the Orioles to be on top, but I didn’t expect the Rangers and Giants to be getting so many votes. Especially the Giants; I don’t really get that one.

BubbaMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  Art Vandelay

I voted Giants. You can get to the post-season with the division win or 2 WC spots, and I think they’ll still be behind the Dodgers, so 1/3 of their paths are gone.

Fernando
9 years ago
Reply to  Bubba

My thinking is that if Giants miss out on the division (which is probably the most likely outcome) then they’ll be in a tough spot with several other Wild Card contenders (Cardinals, Pirates, NL East runner-up, etc.). It’ll be a case of too many solid teams and not enough spots.

minisidd
9 years ago
Reply to  Fernando

This was may thinking too. That, and the Giants have a had a really strong run health-wise from the front end of their rotation for a long while. If that changes (Cueto’s elbow concerns this last off-season come to fruition, or the innings catch up to Bum/ he gets punched at some point) the season could spiral in a hurry. Posey’s power should bounce back though, and the offense should see better production in general, so it’s a tough call.

victorvran
9 years ago
Reply to  minisidd

catch up to Bum/ he gets punched at some point

Where is Odor?

Doorknob11
9 years ago
Reply to  Art Vandelay

Probably for the same reason they were the favorites this year. Next year is an odd year and they don’t make the payoffs in odd years. As for the Rangers it’s probably because if you watch them you don’t say “oh there’s a playoff team” part of that may be because it’s the Rangers and much like the football team they share a parking lot with, what can go wrong will go wrong with them. And yes I am a life long Rangers fan so I know exactly how that goes.

piddy
9 years ago
Reply to  Art Vandelay

The Giants have been in the 80’s in wins 4 straight years and it’s not clear why they should be better next year

booj11
9 years ago

ban trampolines!

ZonkMember since 2016
9 years ago

I guess that trampoline response means you can’t really come up with a reason the Cubs won’t be back, other than “baseball”. Fowler and Chapman are main FA, but Cubs have depth to replace them, or the cash to re-sign them.

Post 2017 will be tougher, when Arrieta and Strop hit FA

Oliver
9 years ago
Reply to  Zonk

God forbid Pedro Strop leaves. Taking his talents to south beach would crush the cubs

victorvran
9 years ago
Reply to  Oliver

who would run down the third baseline along with the runner? WHO!?! I would be crushed

bunslow
9 years ago
Reply to  Zonk

Frankly even if they do resign Fowler no one has any idea how they’d find the playing time for all of Fowler, Schwarber, Heyward, Soler, Zobrist, and Baez… 6 people and 4 positions for em.

victorvran
9 years ago
Reply to  bunslow

Almora is also gonna probably need some ABs

OtterMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  Zonk

The case for the Cubs to miss the playoffs would be something like the 2015 Nationals season. Bunch of guys get hurt and under preform and, say, the Pirates figure out their pitching issues and boost the offense with Bell and a bounce back from McCutchen.

But a 15 game swing is asking for a lot to go wrong. (This is an oddly interesting exercise) constructing how it could go wrong for the Cubs in 2017: Lester spends most of the year on the DL, regression from Hendricks, Arrieta can’t find the plate, then Zobrist production falls off a cliff at 36, Baez strikes out at a 30% rate, Bryant moves to left where his skills aren’t as valuable, Heyward’s bat doesn’t really come back and his D regresses as does Russell’s ever so slightly, and the deal built around Almora and Schwarber for Sonny Gray blows up in their faces.

Doorknob11
9 years ago
Reply to  Otter

You got the first part right, in order for the cubs to miss the payoffs their pitching staff would have to get hurt. They can deal with injuries to position players.

JediHoyer
9 years ago
Reply to  Doorknob11

Even then, Mike montgomery is probably 6th starter and I liked what I saw. Travis wood is a free agent btw, Trevor cahill as well. One will probably be back though.

victorvran
9 years ago
Reply to  Otter

Cubs team + Joe Maddon decide to form a folk + rock hybrid band with Theo on lead vocals and forgo the 2017 MLB season in order to take their popular show on a world tour. And boom, no playoffs for them

kbn
9 years ago

In a lot of cases, this poll is really more about what the UNMENTIONED teams are going to do.

In the AL East… The Rays are far better than they showed this year. Even with amazingly bad down-years from several of their stars (Archer anyone?), they still managed to put up a nearly wildcard-contending BaseRuns. I expect them to get better next year while the Orioles and Blue Jays get worse and the Yankees shamble along in their bridge year. They will set the pace for the AL wildcard, assuming the Red Sox don’t get hit by an earthquake.

In the AL Central… The Indians are a lock due in a large part to all the ways in which the White Sox and Royals are *not*. The Twins are a hot mess.

In the AL West… As the Astros go, so the Rangers do not go. But both teams are aided considerably by the below-the-basement Angels and the rapidly-declining-with-no-farm Mariners. If the As are good, the Rangers will probably miss the wildcard. If the As are bad (or just middling), then the Rangers wildcard hopes are pinned on the performance of the AL East: how good are the Rays exactly, and how far will the Blue Jays fall?

In the NL East… The Mets have the pitching of the gods, but not much else and not enough money or prospects to get the “else”, especially not in a down year for free agency. They benefit from being in a broadly rebuilding division, but the Nationals will be dominant and I don’t see the Mets making the wildcard pace because of the NL West (see below).

In the NL Central… The Cubs are the best team in baseball. Still. It’ll be more interesting in 2018 when the Brewers and Reds start getting real value out of their prospect horde. I expect the Cardinals will continue their decline. The Pirates might be interesting, or they might not. It’s really hard to say. I don’t see either of them keeping up with the pace in the West though.

In the NL West… The Dodgers are losing some big pieces, some other pieces are just plain older, and it’s a terrible market for fixing either of those problems. They will decline, but still be the dominant contender. The Giants are mostly in the same boat, but with a worse farm system. The real story I think is the Rockies, who have always had an excellent lineup (even though it’s not quite as elite outside Coors) and solid (at times elite) defense. Now they have elite pitching for the first time basically in franchise history. They have a boatload of outstanding position prospects too, which is kind of unfair. If they make the right moves this off-season (ideally DFAing Parra and signing/trading for some bullpen help), they could set the pace for the NL Wildcard, and maybe even win the division outright. Or, more likely, their perenially inept front office and meddling ownership will make the WRONG moves and they’ll just be mediocre. Again. We’ll see! But if the Rockies miss the wildcard, then it’s likely that the Mets will make it on the back of their failure.

victorvran
9 years ago
Reply to  kbn

I thought this was a pretty decent synopsis, what’s with the 15 downvotes?

piddy
9 years ago
Reply to  victorvran

Well I didn’t downvote, but as far as the dodgers

> The Dodgers are losing some big pieces, some other pieces are just plain older, and it’s a terrible market for fixing either of those problems

The expiring contract are Jansen, Turner, Hill, Reddick, Utley and Blanton. There’s not necessarily much stopping the Dodgers from resigning some of these guys.

The most important hitters (not named Turner) were Seager, Pederson and Grandal – all are still pretty young. Gonzalez and Kendrick are the main “aging” players, but they weren’t really counted on that much this year.

On the starting pitching side, Kershaw could potentially get a full season in, and the team has a large batch of young pitchers. It’s hard to see aging being an issue here either.

JediHoyer
9 years ago
Reply to  piddy

Love seagerr but grandal has been on the dl every year of his career and pederson is pretty strongly platooned. So 2 out of your 3 most important aren’t everyday players. I love their pitching as well but that’s just the starters. Bullpen on paper is bad next year, we will see who they sign. To me Thompson and toles are going to get 400 pa each next year so they will be important. They are the best team in the West but plenty of ways to go wrong.

Weston Taylor
9 years ago
Reply to  kbn

Completely agree with this. The Rockies won’t win the division, but let’s say they sign a good first baseman somehow (Trumbo) and don’t deal Car Go. Their lineup could consist of Blackmon, LeMahieu, CarGo, Arenado, Trumbo, Dahl, Story, and Hundley. That’s a pretty fucking good lineup, even if they don’t get Trumbo and instead end up with a league average or slightly above league average veteran over there. Definitely feel like there’s a decent amount to be excited about if you’re a Rockies fan

Spartacus
9 years ago

Odd year, clearly the Giants…

output gap
9 years ago

Odds are against Texas going 15-4 against Houston again. So there’s your most obvious one.

Doorknob11
9 years ago
Reply to  output gap

They’ve done it two years in a row though…

dmgutie
9 years ago
Reply to  Doorknob11

And the Giants won (note: not have won) the World Series three straight even years.

phoenix2042Member since 2016
9 years ago

It might just come down to which of these teams share a division with rebuilding teams. All these teams should be good next year, but the Indians (and Tigers) will get 19 games against KC and Twins, while Houston and Texas get 19 against Angels and Athletics. AL East teams, though have no real bad teams to beat up on. Yankees and Rays won’t make the playoffs but shouldn’t be much worse than .500. I know that two AL East teams just claimed the WC spots but maybe I can hide behind “that’s just baseball”?

Runaway ToasterMember since 2016🏆 MVP
9 years ago

“He [David Ortiz] was probably the best hitter in the game this past season”

I feel like Mike Trout just doesn’t get any respect on this website…

JediHoyer
9 years ago

Trout had 18 infield hits, Ortiz had 1. I don’t know if that’s about “hitting” or speed.

Jeff
9 years ago

Lol!!

LHPSU
9 years ago

Actually, Ortiz edges Trout narrowly in .wOBA and has a 30 point advantage in OPS. He leads the league in slugging by a wide margin.

Trout’s home park doesn’t do him any favors, but it’s certainly not unreasonable to call Ortiz the best hitter this year.

carterMember since 2020
9 years ago

I like the Red Sox a lot next year, however I feel like their individual statistics this year scream regression. Mookie Betts led the major leagues in both lucky and just enough home runs. He could of hit 10-15 just as easily. Pedroia ran a career best babip, Jackie Bradley was so much better than one would expect, as was Ortiz, Hanley, and Xander. And Porcello might win the Cy Young.

Hopefully David Price is better in the future, and they can also expect to see a full season from Benintendi, and contributions from Moncada. Betts could also go the other route and continue to improve, which would not shock me. But when you account for losing one of the best hitters in the game in Ortiz, and having nearly the entire team overperform offensively one could see a drop next year.

JediHoyer
9 years ago
Reply to  carter

I expected this from Hanley… Its basically his career Wrc+.

redsoxman6594
9 years ago
Reply to  carter

Xander was actually really awful the second half of the season. Hopefully he can bounce back

clance
9 years ago
Reply to  carter

Not to say I disagree because you’re right this is a volatile team. But what if mookie continues to develop and replicates or even improves on this season? What if Bradley continues to improve his dislike at the plate as another young player? What if Xander’s power further develops? This goes for a lot of this team and the only area that will clearly go downhill is dh. But I’d argue a full season of benintendi and the potential additions/prospects at catcher and third base might completely outweigh this. Again they’re a volatile team but I don’t know if there floors is actually all that low unless everyone collapses which I’d argue is less likely than everything coming together

JediHoyer
9 years ago

Mets and o’s for sure. So much unknown for the Mets health and if they don’t get cespedes back yikes. O’s division is so tough and that starting staff is still miserable.

francis_soyer
9 years ago

Cleveland
Mets

Dominikk85Member since 2020
9 years ago

blue Jays decision is tough. they are really good and could compete for one or two more years but the hitting core is also old. if Bautista and Ed would sign a 3 year contract that would be nice but they likely will want a longer one.

that could mean the Jays end up like the Phillies after 2012 needing a half decade long rebuild because you have a depleted farm and an expensive declining roster that is untradeable.

so what are they doing? hoping for one more year of health by ee and jb going for the ws? the current core is likely their best bet to win a ws in the next decade but more often than not “one more try” does not work and then you are stuck with overpaid declining players like the Phillies and Yankees. very tough decision.

ideally their contracts would have gone a year longer but hindsight is always smarter. if the Jays would not bring back the two they are most likely not going to win a ws in the next half decade but they also don’t end up like the Phillies sucking half a decade.

They could either try to fill the holes or trade some of their young assets (stroman, sanchez, pillar) and immediately get a top 5 farm system at least meaning it would likely only take 2-3 years and not 6-7 years like the Phillies to be good again.

jmomccMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

I chose Rangers and Orioles. However, as a Jay fan I still think it is quite likely they miss next year also. They are getting old in spots and they had some great health in starting pitching this year.

I think they could split the difference this offseason and re-sign bautista on a 3 year deal with possible options while letting edwin walk. Or sign both of them but with bautista on a more team friendly deal. This year could have been a slight aberration for him.

However, next year is the probable last year in the window so you never know.

rosen380
9 years ago

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseball/mets/cespedes-honor-deal-mets-plan-opt-out-article-1.2764245

“The Cuban slugger said that at this time, he sees nothing that would make him use the opt-out he has in his contract after this season.”

That was on August 23th. If he was onboard then and from that point forward the Mets had the best record in baseball, then there would seem to be no baseball reasons for him to opt-out.

Or he was asked a particular question and answered in a way that would not get him booed out of CitiField…

cgoods94
9 years ago

“Friends. You know what friends sometimes engage in? Moderately dangerous behavior.”

Don’t you put that evil on me, Ricky Bobby.

RadermecherMember since 2018
9 years ago

Os are thin in starting pitching,combined with a very tough AL East,magic 8ball says,pass on Bucks crew.