White Sox Beef Up at Catcher
(Photo: Keith Allison)
It’s been a veritable desert for baseball transactions this offseason, and there may not be an oasis on the horizon, as teams dance on the line between spending efficiency and collusion. But we’re starting to get metaphorical trickles of water here and there. One came over the weekend, as catcher Welington Castillo agreed to sign with the White Sox.
When Dave wrote up his top-50 free-agents piece, he ranked Castillo 48th, which was actually good for third best among catchers. (Jonathan Lucroy ranked 23rd,
Alex Avila ranked 43rd.) Nevertheless, Cameron was also a bit mystified as to who would actually sign Castillo:
I just can’t figure out who is going to be interested in a decent-bat/bad-glove catcher who turns 31 next year. I have him getting $20 million because catchers who can hit are still somewhat scarce, but if you asked me who was going to give it to him, I wouldn’t have an answer for you.
Enter the perpetually unpredictable White Sox. The White Sox aren’t expected to be contenders this season — and maybe not next season, either — though there’s certainly precedent for teams jumping the line if their young prospects mature quicker than anticipated. And if there’s one thing the White Sox have in abundance, it’s young prospects.
Some of those prospects/phenoms — like Eloy Jimenez and Yoan Moncada — are viewed as sure things, or at least players with very high floors. That’s not necessarily the case with their pitching prospects. Dylan Cease, Lucas Giolito, Alec Hansen, Michael Kopech, and Reynaldo Lopez all come with big talent but also some big questions. White Sox general manager Rick Hahn thinks Castillo will help them. “We think he’ll make an impact on both our young pitchers and our young catchers,” Hahn told MLB.com. Later in that piece by Rhett Bollinger, we find this excerpt:
Hahn also said he believes Castillo has improved defensively as a catcher, as the knock on Castillo early in his career was he struggled with pitch framing. But Castillo said it remains a point of emphasis for him to improve, and he’s asked backstops such as Cardinals catcher Yadier Molina for advice.
“This last year with Baltimore he continued to make progress in that area,” Hahn said. “It says a lot about his work ethic and character.”
Hahn, as you might suspect, is on to something here. Let’s look at Castillo’s framing numbers, courtesy of Baseball Prospectus (FRAA denotes fielding run above average):
| Year | Framing Chances | CSAA | Framing Runs | Throwing Runs | FRAA Adj. | FRAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 398 | -0.017 | -0.9 | 0.0 | -1.5 | -1.4 |
| 2011 | 259 | -0.036 | -1.2 | 0.0 | -1.3 | -1.4 |
| 2012 | 3,262 | -0.009 | -3.7 | -0.3 | -3.1 | -4.5 |
| 2013 | 7,026 | -0.020 | -19.4 | 0.9 | -16.5 | -16.1 |
| 2014 | 6,661 | -0.016 | -14.2 | 1.0 | -11.7 | -11.1 |
| 2015 | 5,486 | -0.014 | -10.1 | 0.0 | -8.3 | -8.3 |
| 2016 | 6,886 | -0.010 | -9.4 | 3.1 | -7.8 | -10.3 |
| 2017 | 5,977 | 0.004 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 7.9 | 7.4 |
After seven seasons (four of which were full seasons) of being pretty bad at framing, Castillo suddenly got better at it in 2017. Is that a lasting change? Only time will tell. But pair the quote with the data and it becomes pretty clear that Hahn thinks it will. The throwing runs had actually taken a turn for the better in 2016. After recording caught-stealing percentages of 25%, 29%, 33% and 25% from 2012 to 15, Castillo upped it to 38% in 2016 and then 49% last season. That 49% mark led the majors by a decent margin, as Tucker Barnhart came in second at 43.8%.
Whether this defensive improvement sticks, certainly no one can have a beef with Castillo’s offensive prowess. Over the past three seasons, he’s one of nine catchers who have posted a .190-plus ISO (minimum 500 plate appearances). In that time, he’s posted a 100 wRC+. Since he became a regular catcher in 2013, he’s posted a 101 wRC+. Since that 2013 season, he’s been the sixth-best catcher in the game by WAR:
| Name | PA | WAR |
|---|---|---|
| Buster Posey | 3,005 | 24.0 |
| Jonathan Lucroy | 2,675 | 16.5 |
| Russell Martin | 2,373 | 16.2 |
| Yadier Molina | 2,640 | 14.3 |
| Salvador Perez | 2,730 | 12.6 |
| Welington Castillo | 2,045 | 11.2 |
| Brian McCann | 2,366 | 11.1 |
| Jason Castro | 2,161 | 10.2 |
| Yan Gomes | 1,876 | 9.6 |
| Yasmani Grandal | 1,916 | 9.2 |
As you can see here, Castillo certainly hasn’t been a star, but once you get past the very small first class, Castillo is right there in that second tier. Now, as Dave mentioned, he’s about to turn 31, so maybe you wouldn’t expect him to keep this production up, but Steamer is reasonably confident. Over 90 games, he’s forecast to be a two-win player. This ranks in the middle of the pack, but 0.1 WAR separates 11th and 15th place, so it’s all relative.
From the White Sox’ end, it’s almost a negligible investment. In the macro sense, even with Castillo, their Opening Day payroll may be $30 million south of what it was last year, and roughly $50 million shy of where it had been the two seasons prior. MLB may not have a hard payroll floor, but the Players Association has been known to raise a stink in the past when teams failed to reach a certain payroll level. The White Sox probably needed to spend some money on someone.
In a micro sense, the Castillo contract carries very little downside. Contract crowdsourcing data produced a $24 million average and $18 million mediate estimate for Castillo. Cameron himself predicted $20 million. At two years and $15 million, the White Sox got Castillo for less than all three. If he’s a 1 WAR player — a bar he’s cleared in six consecutive seasons — then the White Sox can’t go wrong. And if he turns out to be really good, that $8 million club option for 2020 will be a pittance.
Welington Castillo is certainly not a star, but he’s a solid catcher, and paired with Omar Narvaez, the White Sox suddenly have the 11th-best projected catching corps in the majors. Castillo has sneakily been one of the steadiest and most productive catchers since he started receiving regular playing time, and if his catching improvement from last season is real, he could be an asset helping handle the team’s young pitchers. For his part, he seems excited about that role. Swimming in the free-agent waters can be dangerous, but this isn’t the kind of deal a team ends up regretting. Either way, it’s nice to finally a trickle of real player acquisitions.
Paul Swydan used to be the managing editor of The Hardball Times, a writer and editor for FanGraphs and a writer for Boston.com and The Boston Globe. Now, he owns The Silver Unicorn Bookstore, an independent bookstore in Acton, Mass. Follow him on Twitter @Swydan. Follow the store @SilUnicornActon.

Best titled post ever.
Please don’t encourage puns
So you’re saying you want to PUNish Paul for the title?
You realize “Beef” was his nickname with the Cubs, so don’t give Paul too much credit.
castillo is bottom of the barrell catcher. His body of work says so, you are making him out to be all star, that he is not. The story of the CWS signing him is that they are finally coming to the realization that everyone else already has with zach collins catching. He will probably be moved over to 1B soon. Very few can catch and hit at same time and hes struggled since draft day.
“As you can see here, Castillo certainly hasn’t been a star, but once you get past the very small first class, Castillo is right there in that second tier.”
I rate this comment two (2) stars. Poorly researched, no evidence provided, no attempt to actually refute the evidence in the article — really no value added to the conversation whatsoever. However, the commenter did bother to write four complete sentences, and used a different player for context, so it escapes a one-star rating.
Additionally, The Guru, everyone at FanGraphs is now dumber for having read your post. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
Zavala has been one of the better catchers in the MiLB if Collins doesn’t work out. The White Sox wanted to give Zavala and Collins the right time to develop and not feel rushed while signing a veteran catcher to work with the young starters. Win Win.
FYI, comments section seems to be acting buggy again for some articles with some not showing.
If you buy the framing data, he’s given away a half of his value (BP 5.9 WARP vs 11.2 fWAR), but given the state of the White Sox catching core and how minimal this investment is, it would be hard for this to be anything other than a fine fit for immaterial price.
Holy crap if Castillo was actually a good framer last year how much worse would have the pitching staff been if they had brought Wieters back?
Nats could have used him and many other teams who suck at catcher surprised there wasn’t more of a market.
The Sox needed some depth at catcher. Castillo replaces Kevan Smith who spent last season as the right handed platoon option with Narvaez. Smith will be at AAA in 2018.
Swydan and Sadtrombone’s comments regarding Castillo being a second tier catcher seem accurate.
To be fair, that was Swydan’s comment that I copied and pasted and put in quotation marks.
Another reason to sign Castillo is that if he performs well the first half of 2018, the White Sox could move him at the trading deadline to a contender that needs a catching upgrade. A team like Washington could use him right now.
Baseball Prospectus thinks he was a positive framer last year, but DRS had him negative yet again at -6 framing runs, and DRS’ metric is much more believable. And while StatCorner is a bit of a joke, it also had him well negative. I think there’s a problem with Prospectus, not an improvement on Castillo’s part.
Do you have a link to DRS’ framing metric? My understanding was that DRS didn’t include framing, but maybe that is out of date.
DRS has included framing for several years now. You have to look on baseball-reference though, because for whatever reason fangraphs still lists the old DRS for catchers (this is why a catcher’s DRS is different between the sites, ie. Castillo is -3 DRS here on Fangraphs but -9 on b-ref, making him -6 runs runs from framing).
Not sure what Dave hates about Castillo; especially at the price. He showed improvement following chatter; meaning he said he worked in the off-season with Molina (I believe it was Jose though, not Yadier as the article cites) and then went out and proved it. Could it be a fluke? Sure, but there’s no risk for the White Sox.
One gripe I do have with this piece is that Kopech is the #1 SP prospect in baseball; he has risk, sure, but it’s hard to get much higher than #1 in terms of safety from a pitching prospect. They’re all risky though.
Who has Kopech as “the #1 SP prospect in baseball“?
http://m.mlb.com/prospects/2017
other’s haven’t updated their rankings for 2018 yet, but there’s one list with him as #1. You act as if my comment was absurdly inaccurate.
I made this point about Beef’s framing improvement several times here in the last few years. The last time being in Jeff Sullivan’s post about framing randomness. Jeff implied 2017 was a freak year for Beef when in reality he has been improving steadily.
I’m surprised the A’s didn’t make a larger play at Castillo just to get out from under Maxwell’s issues.