Why I’m Excited for Dansby Swanson’s 2020

Last week, with baseball’s attention firmly fixed on the fall out from the Astros’ sign-stealing scandal, the Twins signed Josh Donaldson to a long-term deal. You’d be forgiven if the signing slipped your mind; there was a lot going on. The Braves, however, are certainly aware that Donaldson is no longer a member of their organization; I’m sure the Nationals (and really, the rest of the NL East) are at least happy to have him out of their division. There’s no denying Donaldson’s impact in 2019 — a 132 wRC+ over 659 PA and 4.9 WAR in 155 games made him one of the best free agent signings of last offseason. And while the Nationals ultimately won the World Series, there’s a more-than-reasonable argument to be made that Donaldson represented the difference in the Braves winning the division crown.

Without Donaldson in the fold, the Braves’ lineup is due to take a step back. Of course, this is still a team flooded with talent; among the six position players to amass at least 400 PA for Atlanta last year, five had a wRC+ above 100. Their offensive output was led by Freddie Freeman (138 wRC+) and certainly more than aided by Ronald Acuña Jr. (126) and Ozzie Albies (117). That trio will be back this year and supplemented by outfielder Marcell Ozuna (110), signed last night, and catcher Travis d’Arnaud, who represents something of a wild card offensively, though he did post a 107 wRC+ during his time in Tampa Bay. But perhaps the Braves’ solution to soften the offensive blow of Donaldson’s departure is the player who spent all of last season next to him in the field: Dansby Swanson.

To date, Swanson has pretty much spent his entire major league career operating under the light-hitting, good-defense profile that is more indicative of shortstops in the earlier portion of the previous decade:

Shortstops posted a 98 wRC+ last season, the best they’ve hit in 115 years, since they posted a 101 mark in 1904. Simply put, at no other point in the league’s last 100 years were shortstops expected to be as good at hitting as they are now, so Swanson’s numbers generally pale in comparison despite being solid overall. He posted a career-high 92 wRC+ last year on the back of a .251/.325/.422 line. But what you don’t see in those numbers is the potential for much better offensive production in 2020. Swanson was actually one of the league’s most improved hitters over the last calendar year, and I’d argue there’s a good chance that 2020 could be Swanson’s first full season during which he’s above-average with the bat.

A lot went right for Swanson last season, but much of that success remained below the surface. One measure of Swanson’s improvements is his xwOBA. From 2018 to 2019, Swanson’s xwOBA jumped by 69 points, the sixth-highest year-over-year increase among hitters with at least 200 batted ball events. His .347 xwOBA put him in the 69th percentile overall. As you’d expect, Swanson behaved like a breakout hitter — he hit the ball harder and with more loft. But while he did improve, his offensive numbers were far from eye-popping.

First, let’s dive a bit deeper into Swanson’s development in 2019. He posted a career-high line drive rate, a career-low groundball rate, and continued to spray the ball all over the field. For a player whose game is centered around contact and speed — Swanson has 88th-percentile sprint speed — these appear to be the ingredients necessary to making steady progress.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-members

Swanson was a menace to fastballs last year, posting a .368 wOBA (think Matt Olson-esque) and .386 xwOBA (think J.D. Martinez-esque) against them. He also made steady improvements against non-fastballs, though none of his stats — expected or otherwise — would suggest he’ll be an above-average hitter against the soft stuff next year.

Much of these breakthroughs start with discipline. Swanson’s strikeout and walk numbers didn’t shift much from year to year — he added a point to his walk rate and lost a tenth of a point of strikeout rate — but where he really improved was getting himself in fastball counts. Of the 2,223 pitches Swanson saw last year, 29.1% of them came while he was ahead in the count, a career-high, landing him in the 72nd percentile league-wide. Of course, getting ahead in the count doesn’t guarantee success, though there is a moderate correlation (r = 0.41) between the percent of pitches a hitter sees ahead in the count and their seasonal wRC+.

Swanson became choosier at the plate, swinging at just 45.8% of pitches overall, while also opting to only swing at pitches he can drive. He’s always done the most damage against fastballs, but prior to last year, his eyes appeared to light up at all fastballs, not just the ones in his wheelhouse. He swung at 18.4% of fastballs in the chase and waste zones in 2018, but he dropped that number all the way to 12.0% in 2019.

Here’s a 2-0 fastball Swanson had no business offering at from 2018:

If Swanson takes that pitch, he would have gotten to 3-0, a count that saw hitters post a .551 wOBA and a 256 wRC+ in 2018. Instead, he found himself 2-1, a count that offered much less favorable (though still good) split in comparison (a .358 wOBA and a 126 wRC+). Of these poor swings in 2018, 63% came while Swanson was either ahead or even in the count. There were 34 different occasions in 2018 where he could have run completely different splits just by laying off a bad fastball. And, as Ben Clemens chronicled earlier this month, the count is always king. So Swanson really did two things here: he reduced his swing percentage on bad fastballs overall, and he was seemingly more cognizant of the count when doing so. His O-Swing% on fastballs when behind in the count was just 27% last year, compared to 35% in 2018.

We know Swanson likes to swing at fastballs, given that he does the most damage there, but if we expand this analysis to all pitches, we see the theory hold up. Swanson swung at 32% of all pitches outside the zone while behind in the count in 2018, and he reduced that figure to a career-best 29% in 2019. He’s far from elite at this skill — Mike Trout, for example, only swung at 20% of pitches outside the zone while ahead in the count — but being in the 70th percentile isn’t bad at all.

Thus, the development becomes coherent. Swanson improved his underlying discipline, put himself in more favorable counts, and made pitchers throw fastballs. Then, upon receiving those fastballs, Swanson crushed them, putting up elite xwOBA figures against them. That, combined with making his performance against other pitches less bad, led to a breakout year.

Except it didn’t. The definition of a breakout is up to interpretation, but Swanson was still a below-average hitter last season. He experienced something of a rare case — he did nearly everything right, but was bitten by the bad luck bug, which masked those underlying areas of growth. On 43 different occasions last season, Swanson had a batted ball with a .500-plus xwOBA turn into an out — among the 142 hitters with at least 100 batted balls with an xwOBA of at least .500, Swanson’s 33.3% “crushed-but-out” rate ranked as the 12th-highest in baseball.

Swanson was robbed of both contact and power last year. He hit .337 on contact (effectively BABIP while including homers) last year, 28 points below his .365 expected batting average on contact. Meanwhile, his xISO (xSLG-xBA) was .209, 37 points above his actual ISO of .172. By no means would Swanson have been one of baseball’s best hitters last year, but a .271/.343/.480 line using his expected statistics looks a whole lot better than his actual .251/.325/.422 line.

Will Swanson become the next Josh Donaldson? Probably not. But there is the potential for much more from the former No. 1 overall pick. While xwOBA is park-neutral, and is therefore absolved of park factors, I estimated what Swanson’s rough wRC+ should have been had he produced at the level that his xwOBA suggested. It comes out to 112, which would not only have made him one of the better hitters on the Braves, but also in the top third of shortstops league-wide.

We’re already well aware of Swanson’s defensive capabilities. If he hits like I expect him to in 2020, the Braves might just have another 3-4 WAR player on the roster. In 2019, that potential was simply disguised by some unfortunate luck.





Devan Fink is a Contributor at FanGraphs. You can follow him on Twitter @DevanFink.

35 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
nickfox45
6 years ago

As a Swanson owner in a dynasty league, I couldn’t click on this article fast enough.

metscity
6 years ago
Reply to  nickfox45

Same

hipsterdoofus
6 years ago
Reply to  metscity

same

hombremomento
6 years ago

I mean he runs fast and plays good defense, but he needs to work on his bat-to-ball so he can take advantage of his line-drive profile. I think he can improve but it’s gotta happen soon

dukewinslowMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  hombremomento

He’s not so bad that he’s going to get dropped if he doesn’t improve a ton, is he? I mean, shortstops are a lot better offensively than they used to be, but they’re not expected to produce offensively like anyone else. I do wonder if Ozuna provides less “protection” than Donaldson and they’ll just feed Swanson breaking balls at wherever he slots in the lineup.

hombremomento
6 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

Yeah I get what you mean, and he’s not the worst but Braves could always get a vet bat for SS. Probably unlikely they do, but it’d be best for Dansby to improve before the season gets into full swing.

dl80Member since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  hombremomento

I don’t think there will be many veteran shortstops available for cheap that are going to project to be a 2-win or better player. That doesn’t mean the Braves won’t pick up someone that they think might be, though.

I would think they would have been in on Jose Iglesias if they thought getting a high floor/low ceiling shortstop was worth replacing Swanson.

hombremomento
6 years ago
Reply to  dl80

I see what you mean.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 years ago

So there’s two things happening with Dansby Swanson. First is that he is working the count better. The second is that he’s hitting the ball harder. Both are reflected in his xwOBA. I think it’s not that big of a leap to think that those will eventually be reflected in actual hitting production. But both of them have to stay in order for that to translate into actual offensive production.

Also, FWIW, I just checked Outs Above Average and it gives a pretty consistent picture of his defensive performance from year to year, which is approximately average for shortstops. So I wouldn’t put too much stock in either his great defensive UZR in 2018 or bad defensive numbers in 2019.

All of this makes me feel like the ZiPs projection, which takes into effect batted ball data and had him at 1.9 wins, seems like it’s probably about right. We keep waiting for him to break out because he looks and feels like he should be a star, but he’s probably not going to be one.

TKDCMember since 2016🏆 MVP
6 years ago

I’m enjoying this new Bravesgraphs website you have here.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Note how it all hits the second college football ends. The region’s got nothing else to do. Hail barvesgraphs. (I am curious about what teams drive traffic but have no intuition except prejudice against mets and rockies fans)

FrancoeursteinMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

Grow up, DW

dukewinslowMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

seriously though- the broader sports landscape in the southeast is basically empty right now. The shit talking from the LSU professor in my dynasty league has ended, Duke (where we all went to grad school) is… bad(ish) at basketball, and I got my first braves related email from the league chain this week. Dansby will be a keeper, apparently.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  Devan Fink

there’s always Dartmouth baseball, until half the team gets kicked out like apparently happened when I was in school (the buzzer cheating thing- never found out what the actual end result of that was). One of my summer RA’s was a Penn player, great kid. Ivy baseball is great.

FrancoeursteinMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

Apologies for the snark. You’re right about the sports landscape at the moment. Good thing there’s not too many LSU fans in the Atlanta area. Right now, the Hawks are historically bad and UGA basketball is meh – but I’m going to check out Anthony Edwards vs Auburn in a few weeks. Dude is an animal.

v2miccaMember since 2016
6 years ago

So, I’m a Braves fan, and generally have been a Swanson fan. But even I can’t manage this level of enthusiasm for his 2020 campaign. But, if Mr. Fink is correct, I will gladly name my first child after him in concession.

dl80Member since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  v2micca

Fink Micca has a nice ring to it.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  v2micca

I’d bet money Dansby is the result of the old “name the second child after the mother’s maiden name” tradition. All this to say Fink Micca would be interesting

CindyJNCMember since 2021
6 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

Yep, mother’s maiden name.

striderremixMember since 2023
6 years ago

Just a tiny note: “actual ISO of .422” should instead be .172. Imagine if anyone had an actual ISO of .422!

Part of the challenge with Swanson is how much he raked (xwOBA underperformance notwithstanding) before all the injury woes, and how not-raking-ish he was after he came back. While the injury doesn’t necessarily play into this, he’s struggled with diminished effectiveness levels around trying to play through injury before, so there’s a potential open question of whether the “real, healthy Swanson” was the guy with the gaudy xwOBA pre-injury, or whether he felt totally fine in the latter part of the year but was just worse and gave back some of his adjustment gains.

CousinNicky
6 years ago
Reply to  striderremix

Imagine, I don’t have to as Barry Bonds exists. From 01-04 had an average ISO of .456!! with a peak in 01 at .536!

dl80Member since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  striderremix

I was curious, so I checked and Babe Ruth had a .473 ISO in 1920 and Barry Bonds had a .536 (!) in 2001.

There are four other qualified seasons of a .422 ISO or above:

Ruth 1921 .469
McGwire 1998 .454
Bonds 2004 .450
Bonds 2002 . 429

So those are the only ones.

From 2001-2004, Bonds averaged a .460 ISO, which was 132 points better than Jim Thome in second place.

Squid_MantleMember since 2020
6 years ago

Hey Devan! I have nothing to contribute to the conversation about Swanson, but I just wanted to chime in and let you know how much I liked your article. I loved all the context you provided, like the different percentiles for Swanson’s stats and also player comparisons, like the “J.D. Martinez-esque” part. I’m definitely going to be looking for your articles from now on.

rolledupkings
6 years ago

I don’t get the projections. He almost reached the Zeile Consensus projections in the first half of last season: 380-58-17-57-7-.822 . That’s 200 fewer plate appearances than his projected 586-71-17-67-9-.720. Then he got hurt and obviously wasn’t the same when he came back (0 HRs, .569 OPS in 165 PAs in the second half). In his age 26 season, in a great lineup and possibly hitting 2nd against LH, I was thinking he could have a legit break out. Now that you’ve put some meat to those bones with your statistical analysis, I’m buying all day long.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  rolledupkings

He’s really batting second though? I figure it will be Acuna, Albies, Freeman, Ozuna on opening day. But I’m happy to be wrong!

shakeappealMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

He batted at second a bunch last year.

Slappytheclown
6 years ago

A good comp would be Brandon Crawford. Swanson goes w/rc from 64/80/92/? and Crawford went 68/81/93/101/113. I expect some improvement and the Braves have a fine player and contributor but a 101 w/rc would be good for about 14-16th in the league based on last years stats so…not a real breakout candidate. I’m much more excited about Willy Adames.

Robbie314Member since 2018
6 years ago

I couldn’t help but look up the list of 1904 shortstops to see how they hit so well. So, ranked by wRC+:

1. Nap Lajoie (196, 8.8 WAR)
2. Honus Wagner (178, 9.0 WAR)

…

3. Freddy Parent (122, 6.0 WAR)

Note that Lajoie, who spent most of his career at 2B, only played a career-high 44 games at shortstop in 1904. That’s probably what caused average offense at SS to spike.

dl80Member since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  Robbie314

Lajoie is a criminally underrated hitter. I mean, I know it was over a hundred years ago, but casual and semi-casual fans have no problem remembering the names of Honus Wagner and Tris Speaker (who were both better than Lajoie) and Cap Anson (who wasn’t as good). One of only 20 guys with over 100 career WAR, and his 144 career wRC+ (as a second basemen!) is dragged down a little by 3 awful final years when he was 39, 40, and 41 but still playing a full season.

He’s my favorite “obscure” superstar from the deadball era.

From 1900-1913, he put up 88 WAR and was the clear third best hitter in the top tier of players, behind only Cobb and Wagner.

And he still has the third best wRC+ of any second basemen in history, behind only Rogers Hornsby (also criminally underrated by most fans) and Eddie Collins.

DannyMember since 2016
6 years ago
Reply to  dl80

And was so good in Cleveland that they NAMED THE TEAM AFTER HIM.

fullertonHalo
6 years ago

thanks for the article Devan, really well written. i did notice towards the end of the season he looked more comfortable at the plate. and while the slash line, as you pointed out isn’t eye popping, sometimes just plain bad luck can mask improvements in plate discipline. this is the type of article that can really help when your picking at the bottom of your draft. looking forward to the next write up!

Male Durphy
6 years ago

“among the 142 hitters with at least 100 batted balls with an xwOBA of at least .500, Swanson’s 33.3% “crushed-but-out” rate ranked as the 12th-highest in baseball”….. can we get a list of the rest? crushed-but-out rate